CW & You
Philip Cala-Lazar (K9PL)
on
July 19, 2000
View comments about this article!
Now that the furor over restructuring has cooled a bit, I'd like to comment on the essential nature of CW in amateur radio. Putting aside all nostalgic notions of telegraphy in the history of ham radio, it's the practical nature of that mode that keeps it at the forefront of many hams' HF operation.
If one of the purposes of restructuring was to bolster the existing population of HF operators, then the physical nature of those frequency allocations must be met to successfully operate on them. Operation on the
short-wave bands requires, on the transmitting end, an efficient antenna and sufficient RF power to initiate and maintain a QSO. Though more Americans may be living in single family homes than ever before, many of these homes are located in communities where antennas are severely restricted or prohibited. Additionally, not all hams fortunate enough to live in unrestricted areas have the means, family circumstances or desire to erect sizable antenna arrays and towers. How then for the newly-minted HF operator to utilize the expanded privileges granted by his license?
Simple wire, stealth, or indoor antennas are the usual solutions to these situations. All these antennas work, and will net you as many contacts as you have the time to work them. However, for the stealth, and especially for the indoor antenna user, health and safety concerns dictate that minimal power be used. For the stealth antenna user, TVI will quickly reveal your clandestine operation, and for the indoor antenna user, only the foolhardy would operate near even moderate RF power levels.
There is a solution for the ham with less than ideal operating circumstances and who, by choice or necessity, uses low RF output power
and that is: CW!
The oldest amateur radio mode (ignoring spark!) provides benefits for even the newest operator. CW operation does not require the latest, nor the most feature-laden (read expensive) rigs available
and bare-bones equipment will do the job. Over the past 24 years, I've QSO'ed hams using everything from QRP kit rigs to decades' old boat anchors to brand-new,
multi-kilobuck, state-of-the-art transceivers, and you just can't tell the difference on the receiving end.
The majority of the hams I've worked on CW run their rigs at well below their rated maximum power output
and that means fewer RFI problems, a longer life for their rigs and smaller utility bills. CW's biggest advantage, as any experienced op will tell you, however, is enhanced operating ability. CW often gets through when SSB won't. For weak, or marginal signal work; on noisy, crowded bands; and for less than contest-quality stations, CW garners QSOs not possible using voice modes. Indeed, for many hams, the CW mode of operation provides them their only means of getting, and staying, on-the-air as active members of the amateur radio community.
Another advantage not often noted even by CW proponents, is the comfort and amicability level of the non-hams in your household. When using headphones, CW is a "silent" mode, no one can hear you operating/contesting in the wee hours of the morning when all else are sleeping. Try that when repetitively shouting your call and exchange into a microphone during your favorite DX contest!
All the modes available to us as licensed amateur radio operators deserve the spectrum allotted them, and all have their advocates and devotees. Give CW a
try. It doesn't require much cash outlay or an ornate installation, but the dividends it pays in operating pleasure will surprise and delight you.
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
good ol' cw
|
|
|
Anonymous post on July 19, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Most of your comments about the virtues of cw appear to compare only to phone, and only in limited cases. For example, compared to digital modes which can get through where cw can't even be heard, they is no contest (pun intended). However, there is always room for sigs within a hobby. CW is just one to enjoy. Life (and amateur radio) is like a shoe store: Take with you what fits.
Double Phooey to those that would bash the anon sig!
|
|   |
|
Not Just CW
|
|
|
by K3AN on July 19, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
First of all, my own experience supports the author's contention. Last fall, I was living in a rental townhouse and my antenna was an end-fed wire run out a basement window, up the back wall, and over the roof. Ground was a single ground rod. The antenna was matched with a homebrew L-network antenna tuner. I made over 400 contacts in the CW Sweepstakes running 5 watts, even snagging VY1 and KH7. A few weeks later, I jumped into the phone Sweepstakes (QRP again), and gave up in total frustration after about an hour. I made only 4 or 5 contacts, and most of the stations calling CQ never even responded to my calls with "QRZ?" or "Again?" I knew it was hopeless.
However, CW is no longer the only efficient low power/poor antenna mode. PSK31, especially using Digipan software, is a remarkable mode. I can have a QSO with a station I can't even hear because of other nearby (in frequency) PKS31 signals, while just running 5 or 10 watts myself. The other neat thing about PSK31 is that many of the ops actually chew the rag, just like the old days.
When it comes to simplicity, of course, CW still has no competition. When the aliens hit us with a massive EMP, and every internet router, phone switch and computer is fried, it will be homebrewed CW rigs that will allow the world to coordinate its counterattack ;~)
|
|   |
|
CW is here to stay
|
|
|
by KA9NZI on July 19, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
The old argument that "CW will get through when other modes fail" is
starting to weaken. As pointed out by others, PSK31 (a digital mode)
performs extremely well in weak signal/low power situations. So do
some of the spread spectrum modes.
However, using these new digital modes requires a computer and
a fairly complex radio setup. Operating PSK31 without committing
the sin of overmodulation and splatter seems to be beyond the
comprehension of some. CW, on the other hand, is so elegantly
simple that QRP operators can build complete portable rigs
inside "Altoids" tins, and carry them anywhere.
When you come right down to it, CW will survive because it is
fun. Sure, it may be useful and even valuable at times, but those
times are relatively rare. Those of us who use CW regularly simply
know that it is fun. The obstacle is acquiring fluency, just like
learning a language. This takes time and practice. Fortunately,
it isn't too hard to get that practice, and once you reach the
5 wpm level required for an HF license, you can start getting
your practice with live, on-the-air contacts.
For more about CW, including a "Code Buddy" program that
pairs learners with more experienced hams, I'd like to recommend
FISTS. This international society is dedicated to the preservation
and promotion of CW as a mode of communication. You can
learn more on their web site: http://www.fists.org/
|
|   |
|
CW
|
|
|
by K9JXW on July 19, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Does anyone know where I can obtain the T-Shirt with "HAM RADIO WITHOUT CW IS JUST CB" ? Thanks
|
|   |
|
The enduring appeal of CW
|
|
|
by W4JFR on July 19, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I heartily agree with the author's articulate and well-founded comments. I just have one additional bit of information that many might find of interest. I teach at the US Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School at Ft. Bragg, NC (I am a civilian professor). This is the home of most special forces (nee "Green Beret") training. The special ops people have to prepare for rather dangerous unconventional combat missions where communications are vital. One would think that they would have available to them the most sophisticated and up-to-date radio and communication equipment available. And certainly, none of this equipment would involve morse code, right? After all it is an outdated and obsolete form of communication (at least according to its critics). Nonetheless, each day I walk by a rather large classroom and guess what they are doing inside? You guessed it---learning morse code. It seems that the special ops community has concluded that when all else fails and in dangerous missions where resources are limited, then at least one member of every special forces "team" must be conversant in CW. This guarantees that some form of communication will be maintained virtually no matter what the circumstances.
It seems to me that this is a powerful testimony to the enduring appeal and functionality of morse code!
And, besides no mode is more fun.
W4JFR
|
|   |
|
CW
|
|
|
by W5UX on July 19, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
On comparing cw to psk-31, keep in mind that psk-31 is 100 percent duty-cycle. I don't think some of the smaller rigs can keep up at 100 percent key down.
|
|   |
|
CW compared to PSK31
|
|
|
by KA9NZI on July 19, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
W5UX: yes, PSK31 is a 100% duty cycle. But the power requirements are so low
that you can crank the drive way down. Almost any rig can handle RTTY or PSK31
duty cycles when you reduce the power output to 50% or less of the rated peak
value. It's just like AM (remember that?) which was OK in the old days but you
ran less than the maximum power output. Running PSK31 at high power courts
trouble anyway, as it defeats one of the advantages of the mode: extremely narrow
bandwidth.
To answer that question "Does CB + CW = Ham radio" I'd say absolutely not.
On the other hand, one only has to listen to the bands to realize that the code
requirement did little to keep out the lids and idiots. Most of the people cited
in the FCC enforcement logs (for operating violations, not exam cheating) were
licensed before the restructuring. Many are "old-style" Extra Class.
I *like* CW, and I expect it to be around for a long time. But I think it's time for
code to stand on its own merit, too.
|
|   |
|
Thanks, Phillip, for a good, positive article!
|
|
|
by N5LF on July 19, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Bravo, Phillip, for a positive, thoughtful article on CW. There is too much negativity these days, with too many folks bashing this mode or that. This should be FUN! And Phillip captured that spirit. We should welcome each other as we share our favorite aspects of hamming. That is how we learn and how we teach each other, after all.
Regarding PSK31. I have used it and I am very impressed. By the way, this mode was invented by a British ham who combined his knowledge of information theory, digital signal processing AND MORSE CODE to create a completely new idea in communications modes. As hams, our eclecticism is our strength!
I encourage the non-CW folks to try it with a good CW mentor. Or get on the air and you'll find hundreds of good CW mentors! And to the CW folks, try PSK31 and other modes too! We have a veritable feast of radio activities to experience. Try it all! Our health as a service is our ability to Elmer each other.
Alan N5LF (An author of the Petition for Reconsideration)
see - http://www.qsl.net/n5lf
Keep the Technical Questions on the Exams.
|
|   |
|
Do YOU know the Morse Code?
|
|
|
by K7FD on July 20, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
"Do YOU know the Morse Code?". This is one of the first questions I get asked when non-amateurs find out I'm a ham radio operator. This tells me right off the bat that CW, to the uninitiated, is that 'something special' about Amateur Radio. The assumption on their part, a very correct assumption, is that I must have worked mighty hard to learn the Morse Code. Working hard for something leaves a very postive image in the minds of most people. The pride I feel when I can answer 'YES, I DO!' makes me realize learning the code well worth the effort. Want to feel good about yourself? Tackle CW!
|
|   |
|
RE: CW is here to stay
|
|
|
by KL9A on July 20, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
PSK31 is great and all... but CW is still MUCH better at over the pole qso's. Here in Alaska, all of EU and Africa are practically due north Short Path. No matter how little aurora there is, almost always you hear flutter. I tried out PSK under decent condx, a little flutter, but not much. It completely failed. There was no copy what so ever on PSK. CW, however, was 100%. PSK is great for paths not affected by aurora, etc. But try working Europe on it from Alaska.. you can't do it unless under the very best of condx. To finish up this CW debate...
When I was studying for my license, I NEVER wanted to do CW. Until I started learning it. After a while I realized how fun it was, and stuck with it. Now 95% of my qso's are CW. As far as I'm concerned there is nothing better! But, to each his own. Whatever flips your burger! (Just don't take my freq in a cw conetst) :)
-Chris KL9A
|
|   |
|
CW
|
|
|
by N9PO on July 20, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I fully agree with the origianl article and also give merit to the other digital modes such as PSK31. No arguements on the smaller rigs ability to operate them. One strong point however. Cw is a mode that can be operated with very basic equipment, no computer, that allows entry class or low buget operators a means of communication that would not be open to them. Remember everyone does not have a computer( although most of the people you know do, birds of a feather as they say) Some people like operating portable and only have desktops. Kinda ackward to take one camping. Just my thoughts.
|
|   |
|
CW Now that the "ax" is gone....
|
|
|
Anonymous post on July 20, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I passed 5wpm to get my license long before restructuring but I never could seem to develop the practice discipline to get over the 13wpm hump. It became like an "ax hanging over my head" as far as ham radio was concerned, so I messed around VHF and 10 meters here and there but I was'nt really that active. Since restructuring I have upgraded and gotten into some serious operation. PSK has become my main love but I have found out something really strange. I want to operate CW!! I am working very hard to get my code speed up so I can keep pace on the air. I am using a computer practice program right now as I don't think I am ready to run with the "Big Dogs" HI HI. Anyway, the point is that it seems like once the CW requirement was eased and I no longer felt pressured to do it that's when I wanted to learn. Simple human nature if you ask me... Long live PSK and long live CW!!
P.S. I posted this anon because I am tired of being "flamed" by the restructuring "doomsayers",so if you are one, flame away but you never know, you may meet me on the air someday and have an enjoyable QSO HI HI.
|
|   |
|
Running CW with the 'Big Dogs'
|
|
|
by N5LF on July 20, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Hey, Anon!
There's a pack of 'Big Dogs' who'd love to have you run with them on the air.
Check out the Fists frequencies at 7.058, 14.058, 21.058. For the Novices & Tech Pluses try 7.008, 21.158.
You'll hear "CQ FISTS," but they'll answer everyone. FISTS is a non-political club (they stayed silent on restructuring) that promotes 'code buddies' - we help each other. No pressure! In fact, one of their mottos is "Accuracy Transcends Speed." A good fist at slow speed is better than a sloppy fist at higher speed. No speed snobs in FISTS.
See ya on the air!
PS: To the guy regarding PSK and auroral flutter. That's a good example of using the right tool for the right job, and as you point out, CW is the RIGHT TOOL!
73,
Alan N5LF
The web site is http://www.fists.org
|
|   |
|
CW&YOU, HOW ABOUT FOR SLOW LEARNERS??????
|
|
|
by K4TDB on July 22, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
HELLO ,MY NAME IS MARTIN E.LEE/K4TDB. I AM A SLOW LEARNER. I GRADUATED WALTER PANAS H.S. IN 1978.I HAVE HAD A PROBLEM LISTENING TO CW SINCE I KNEW ABOUT FROM MY FORMER NEIGHBOR,ELLIOT/W2DIE,IN PEEKSKILL,N.Y. I WENT THRU SPECIAL ED.(BOCES)IN SCHOOL I NEVER REALLY HAD TAKEN A LIKING TO CW.I WOULD LIKE TO GET MY GENERAL LICENSE BY THE TIME I TURN 41!11/30/00 THANKS FOR THIS FORUM
|
|   |
|
RE: CW&YOU, HOW ABOUT FOR SLOW LEARNERS??????
|
|
|
by K9PL on July 22, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Martin,
Please check for a slow-speed net in your area. Many radio clubs offer them. My club, Metro Amateur Club (MAC) in the Chicago area, offers such a net on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Wednesdays of the month at 00:00 UTC on 21.115 Mhz. If you can hear us, please check-in, or, if you don't have HF privileges, try copying the net traffic.
See if any clubs in your area offer CW practice on VHF/UHF, you can get some good practice that way and perhaps meet a local ham to elmer your code proficiency.
Don't forget the ARRL offers code practice runs. Check "QST" for their schedule.
Whatever you decide, including copying other hams' QSOs--practice, practice, practice.
73,
Philip, K9PL
|
|   |
|
RE: CW compared to PSK31
|
|
|
by KA0W on July 23, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
PSK and the other complicated modes have the annoying problem of needing a computer, keyboard and interface. I find the other digital modes more difficult to use and less reliable than CW. Just the need to be centered on a specific frequency for RTTY causes problems. CW is the only digital mode that can be used mobile and portable with no added externals. The FCC needs to add a typing exam in place of the Morse exam to the Amateur Radio exam elements, 60 wpm for General and 150 wpm for Extra.
73,
Ken, KA0W
|
|   |
|
RE: CW compared to PSK31
|
|
|
by W5EI on July 23, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I have to agree with Ken. RTTY, PACTOR, and PSK31 modes are interesting and a lot of fun, but the keyboarding skills I see are not too impressive. If the other person is a slow or inaccurate typist, the digital QSO is apt to go slower than most CW contacts. Couple this problem with the added gear one has to have for digital, and I often opt to just go back down to the CW subbands for ragchews. It's true that there are lots of sloppy fists out there, but you can weed out that problem by listening to the other person call CQ or in QSO with someone else. With digital, the computer calls CQ for the operator, runs the brag tape etc., and you don't know what you've gotten into until the other guy starts typing.
|
|   |
|
CW Now and forever....
|
|
|
by WA4CNG on July 23, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I first learned CW in 1961 for my novice class license, passed/earned a Conditional Class License (more than 100 miles from Atlanta) did 13-15 WPM. As the world goes around so do the various "Specifications For a Ham License". I now have a second General Class license in two centuries with the same call, only the second time the CW requirements were met in 1967 as a Technician Class Licensee. I have worked many CW stations in my time, (just bought a Bencher Iambic Paddle for my FT-100) because I can do 7-10 WPM with it easier than my 45 year old straight key.
CW has it's place and that it is part of one of the requirements for a current Ham Radio License in the USA period.
|
|   |
|
CW
|
|
|
by WB2AMU on July 24, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
All of the reasons cited by the author are extremely valid. I would like to add this bit of information. On Six Meters, CW is a very, very big key in working DX, particularly transatlantic DX into Europe from the East Coast. Signal strength are not always that great during time like these and CW is necessary. Also, CW is the best way to go during an aurora opening on Six or Two Meters. Ten Watt CW signals tend to get through the 100 Watt SSB signals on this band at times!
73
KEN WB2AMU
|
|   |
|
RE: good ol' cw
|
|
|
Anonymous post on July 24, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Whoever sead that Digital modes were Amateur Radio
|
|   |
|
CW - The most FUN mode
|
|
|
by AB2GG on July 24, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
At least for me it is. Ive been a ham for almost 2 years.
In that time. I've experimented with as many different modes as I could. SSB, packet, repeaters, birds, RTTY, SSTV, ...
I always come back to CW.
You can talk about the technical merits of the other mode. But for pure entertainment and excitement, nothing get my blood going like working a distant station using a key!
|
|   |
|
CW & YOU
|
|
|
by W2EH on July 25, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
If your computer is damaged, you lost your microphone, the band is noisy as all heck, you have a poor antenna, the odds are you can still make a contact using CW !. The mode has a narrow B.W. leading to a great signal to noise ratio, and if your keyer or straight key is lost, you can always touch two wires together. Try that on SSB or the Digital modes.
|
|   |
|
If it needs justification...
|
|
|
by W5ABQ on July 26, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
It seems to me that if you have to spend a lot of time justifying something it means you think it's of questionable value. People who spend a lot of time "defending" CW obviously think the detractors are correct and it will disappear. Personally, if the mode is all it's cracked up to be, then I can't help but think it will insure its own survival.
|
|   |
|
RE: If it needs justification...
|
|
|
by W5UX on July 26, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
W5ABQ. . . Advertising and brainwash do work. Look at how much big business spends on it. Big business was successful in reducing the code test speed by years of subtle brainwash. They would not allow the magazines to publish anything positive about cw. If all the negative stuff was here in my shack, I would not be able to pick it up. Thank goodness eham came along so that we can now hear both sides of the story. By the way, your call used to belong to a great radio operator.
Bob
|
|   |
|
RE: If it needs justification...
|
|
|
by N0MHS on July 26, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
It's great that CW has its uses and its aficionados, but how does that justify the old 13/20wpm requirements? The problem was that the requirements had grown to be out-of-line with the importance of the privileges in today's world. Restructuring was LONG overdue.
Good riddance!
|
|   |
|
RE: To K9JXW
|
|
|
by K4TIN on October 8, 2002
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Maybe not, but CB + CW sho ain't CB!!! (I have yet to meet the Good Buddy who knows it).
|
|   |
|
RE: To K9JXW
|
|
|
by WA4BWO on January 29, 2003
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I must comment on this article! I got my novice in 1964 and after 1 year, tried for the general. After taking the code test (13 wpm) I was told that I needed a little more time and would I like to take the written test to receiver my Tech. I did so and passed receiving WA4BWO. After many rule changes ect., I upgraded from Tech plus to Extra by taking the written test in April, 2000. I went home and started to operate on the HF bands on SSB. After a few agonizing QSO's with the guilt of 20wpm CW on my mind (the old requirement for Extra) I decided to learn the code. I struggled with 5 wpm for over a month, copying W1AW and anything else I could hear.(that was slow enough) I finally got a CW training course that would get me to 15 WPM. After 6 months, 13 wpm sounded slow!! (that meant that I had just received my psudo-general liscense) A year or so after that, I can copy the ARRL CW bulletins 95% and 25wpm from W1AW about 50%. To all those who say they can't learn the code, I offer this advice to you. Get off the flash cards and the written code, (if you have used them in the past) and start listening and hearing the letters at 18wpm (not the words, just the letters!) and that will take 1-3 months! Start slow 2-5 wpm and learn ALL the letters again. Copy W1AW 2 or 3 times a week, NO MORE. Practice no more than 30 minutes a night no matter how badly you want to copy code, and give yourself about 6 months to a year to get over the 7 to 12 wpm plateau. You can and will learn the code.(15 wpm sounds slow to me now!) Then the next step is to get over the "shakes" on your first CW qso. Thanks for your reading time and letting me ramble on about my favorite HF operating activity. See you on the bands. --... ...--'s Dave
|
|   |
|
RE: To K9JXW
|
|
|
by W1AWB on February 22, 2003
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I had my general class ticket when I was a kid in the early 60s and used an old J38 I bought at a hamfest.
Had a lot of fun until adolescence intervened and I got interested in girls. I let my license expire and traded my rig in for a stereo.
Although I always regretted losing my ticket, I didn't get it back until last May. I had to learn the code from scratch all over again but the 5 wpm test was pretty easy.
When I got on the air I had a blast working SSB and a very little CW. I tried to work a little cw every day but I wasn't terribly serious about it. Then a funny thing happened: I got BORED with SSB. It was really fun studying for the tests and learning all about the new developments in radio, but after I had passed all the exams and been on the air a month or so, I had a strange let down.
At that point I decided to get serious about my CW and...wow... what a blast its been...trying to up my copying speed by a million different methods...learning to use paddles and keyers...
trying to make QSOs at slightly uncomfortable speeds..
risking looking like a fool at times...I'd love to be able to do QRQ one day but I don't know if that will ever happen....CW is hard and takes a lot of "work"
but for me "work" translates as fun.
Plus it annoys my wife no end when she gets in her car and, instead of her new Dixie Chicks CD, she hears the CD I made the night before of live 30 wpm CW off the radio.
Give me the stink of a crowded 40 meter CW band at 8 P.M. with the key clicks and the new guys pokin' along and the QRQ guys blowing by at the speed of light...the old rigs with the chirpy signals...too much QRN and the RTTY op thats down WAY too low..the QRPers you can barely copy and the guy in Georgia thats calling CQ with a kw and a beam....Now thats what I call a good time!
Andy W1AWB
|
|   |
|
RE: To K9JXW
|
|
|
by WR8D on October 29, 2003
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
RE WA4BWO: Very nice and well said Dave but most of them just want a handout. Great to see someone that wanted something enough to actually work for it...and have the balls to face these flamers that want it give to them.
73
John WR8D
|
|   |
|
|
|
|
by SINDK8 on January 5, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
cw is great. mastering cw requires skill, concentration and devotion. im not yet licensed but i can listen and recieve cw below 5wpm. im also a slow learner. oh well. cw is much fun when its real. coz i just have my pc here generating some qso and im decoding it. i wish ill be on air soon. yes ill take exam to get ticket.
73
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Related News & Articles
VHF and Above is Calling!
A Thought About an Often Forgotten Band
Open Standard for VHF/UHF Needed
Will April 15 Make Any Difference?
Canada Announces HF Planning Committee
Other Operating Articles
Safety First
My First Date with Olivia
D-STAR/Analog Interference Experience
Using Twitter During Mobile Operation
First HF Contact and Other Stuff
|