New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
from
Jim Linton, VK3PC
on
January 24, 2005
View comments about this article!
New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
The Australian Communications Authority (ACA) now requires broadband over powerlines (BPL) operators to make publicly known their intentions to trial the technology as part of just issued restrictive guidelines.
The ACA has also reminded BPL operators that harmful interference to any radio service is a breach of the Australian Radiocommunications Act, and worst case situations may require the BPL equipment to be turned off.
Separate guidelines have been issued by the ACA for Access BPL, that is public access to broadband services via powerlines, and In-house BPL delivering services via the internal wiring of a building.
ACA acting chairman, Dr Bob Horton said the ACA is continuing to develop Australia's regulatory approach to BPL and is monitoring developments in Europe, America and elsewhere. It will issue a discussion paper in April to seek industry and public comment.
Dr Horton said the ACA acknowledges it faces a challenge to establish a regulatory regime that does not unnecessarily block
the use of BPL, while at the same time protecting radiocommunication services.
The ACA's new guidelines came after the Wireless Institute of Australia expressed its concern about harmful interference on amateur radio bands from a recent BPL trial. The WIA asked that the ACA take action to avoid a repeat of that occurring.
There have been four trials of Access BPL in Australia, all using HF frequencies, three in New South Wales and one in
Hobart, Tasmania where a further commercial trial is due soon.
The new guidelines require BPL operators to avoid specified frequencies and bands including 12 aeronautic service bands and 27 maritime distress frequencies.
They must also notify the licensees using those bands or frequencies who are within one kilometre of their proposed BPL trials of the possibility of interference, and provide them with a contact person to report interference suspected to be associated with BPL.
Particular care must be taken to avoid interference to safety-of-life services too. There is an overriding legal obligation on BPL operators to mitigate harmful interference to radiocommunications services.
Both the ACA and the WIA consider that a wide-scale roll out of Access BPL across Australia is uncertain, while it is more
likely to become a "niche" means of enabling public access to broadband services.
--Jim Linton, VK3PC Amateur Radio Victoria
http://www.amateurradio.com.au/
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
|
|
|
by KZ1X on January 24, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Hey, I know what to do: why don't we replace Mike Powell with the Australian guy who figured this out?
Bravo to our friends Down Under.
|
|   |
|
RE: New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
|
|
|
by N2NZJ on January 24, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
the down UNDER ADMINISTRATION USES SOMETHING CALLED COMMON SENSE REASONING something THE FCC LACKS in some cases as in BPL. BONKERS FOR AUS. 73
|
|   |
|
New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
|
|
|
by HAMDUDE on January 25, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Bravo Australia! This is a good example of how common sense prevails over greed. Since obviously Australia doesnt have the same big money interests backing this BPL garbage like here in the states, their government sees this mess for what it really is.... RFI generating trash! It goes to show you that here in the USA greed over rule$ common $en$e and the right$ of all radio $pectrum u$er$ in the intere$t of lining big bui$ne$$e$ pocket$. Its really a shame we cant use this same approach to limiting the damage this noise generating crap will cause, but heaven forbid it may cost some CEO money in some greed monger corporation somewhere. After all its so hard to get by on millions a year these days. I guess its so much easier for the FCC to hang all of us out to dry for some easy lobby cash from all the isp`s and utility companies who stand to rake in the $$$ from this BPL crapola.
|
|   |
|
New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
|
|
|
by K8XF on January 25, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Excellent article. Its too bad that Shoe-shine boy for the rich a.k.a. FCC Powell didnt have the same foresight and intelligence as the Australians.
Its a shame that we have to suffer such fools.
BPL is the biggest mistake after the FCC gave away 11 meters to the Childrens band.............
73
Mike, K8XF
|
|   |
|
RE: New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
|
|
|
by WI4CW on January 25, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Congratulations to Australia ... how'd they get this right when their firearms laws are so messed up....
On the BPL note -- good job!
FCC -- take note and shut this crap down.
|
|   |
|
New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
|
|
|
by N2UO on January 25, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I am australian, so I am biased (HI), but it really makes sense. I sincerely hope they continue this way, and figure out that BPL is a bad idea. HF is widely used in Oz, not only by hams, so I hope they don't screw it up.
Marc N2UO
|
|   |
|
RE: New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
|
|
|
by N2NZJ on January 25, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I HOPE AUSTRALIA'S HANDLING OF BPL SENDS a big MESSAGE TO OUTGOING CHAIRMAN POWELL. and other administrations AROUND THE WORLD. each day goes by and the MORE BPL WILL GET BURIED. 73
|
|   |
|
New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
|
|
|
by K1CJS on January 25, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
This will never happen in the US as the people in control of issueing the regs are motivated by politics and money. I see the person in charge down under has a Dr. appended to his name--I would venture to say his doctorate may be in electronics and RF theory. Bravo to Australia for getting this right, but just one thing--don't look to the US for guidance, you'll end up polluting the radio spectrum down under just like the big companies are doing up here......
|
|   |
|
RE: New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
|
|
|
by N2UO on January 26, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
For K1CJS,
Dr. Horton, the chairman of the communications authority in Australia, holds a PhD in microwaves, as you correctly guessed. He is not a lawyer.
For details, visit
http://www.atug.com.au/other/Bob_Horton_Bio.pdf#search='Dr%20Bob%20Horton'
Marc, N2UO
|
|   |
|
RE: New Restrictions on BPL in Australia:
|
|
|
by RADIO123US on January 28, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
BPL will FAIL in the U.S. because of the economics of it. It can NOT compete with other broadband options such as cable, DSL, and satellite in today's market....in a few years, BPL will be gone and forgotten....so why worry about it....
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Related News & Articles
What is FCC Docket 03-104 Asking?
BPL Is 'Spectrum Pollution,' ARRL President Says:
BPL -- Some Humor
HAM Radio Has No Chance Against BPL
FCC Commissioner's Office Clarifies 'Broadband Nirvana' Remarks:
Other News Articles
A Towering Achievement:
Ham Radio Operators Participate in Earthquake Exercise:
Over 400 Radio Experts to Chant 'Ham Sab Ustaad Hain' from Oct 11:
Keith Sproul, WU2Z Critically Injured at ABQ Balloon Festival:
This Weekend on the Radio:
|