eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 691

from Tom Coates, N3IJ on March 22, 2005
View comments about this article!

This is An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 691, the Spectrum Protection Act:

If you aren't familiar with the Spectrum Protection Act, you can read it here:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.00691

You can get some background on the problem from testimony by Jim Haynie, W3JBP, June 11, 2003 to the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet regarding an identical previous bill. That's available at:

http://energycommerce.house.gov/108/Hearings/06112003hearing951/Haynie1536.htm

From reading H.R. 691 carefully, I am convinced that if it had been in effect five years ago, BPL would have gained less traction. BPL reduces the utility of the HF bands, and the HF bands have no equivalent. Whether you agree with that speculation or not, this legislation will be good for us if we can get it passed. The bill needs at least 220 co-sponsors. You can help.

The bill has eight co-sponsors at this writing. There may be more by the time you see this post. In Maryland, we have found four steps; done together, work well to sign up co-sponsors with minimal effort. All four steps are essential.

1. Telephone messages and e-mails from individual constituents to the representative's office. Simply say "I am a constituent and I would appreciate your support for H.R. 691, the Amateur Radio Spectrum Protection Act." Or send a QSL card to the district office with a note on it saying "Please support H.R. 691." Find these addresses in the blue section of the phone book or on the representative's website. Remember to put your street address on all correspondence so they can confirm that you are a constituent. Staff members have told us that several dozen messages from constituents is enough to make an impression.

2. Have your club president send a letter on club stationery to the district office. We found the following to be effective:

_______________________________

"Dear Congressman [name]:

On behalf of our [number] members (see attached) who reside in the 1st District we urge you to co-sponsor H.R. 691, the Amateur Radio Spectrum Protection Act of 2005.

As a volunteer service, the U.S. Amateur Radio service is prohibited by Federal law and international agreement from accepting compensation. Therefore, we are unable to participate in the FCC's spectrum auctions. Our access to the frequency bands we depend on to conduct community-based emergency communications, international people-to-people diplomacy and technical training for young people is threatened. H.R. 691 will secure our access to the needed spectrum and enable us to continue our 90-year tradition of serving the nation.

Supporting information is enclosed and we will be pleased to answer any questions.

Sincerely,

____________________________________________

Attach a list of the names and addresses of the members who reside in the district. The addresses are needed to confirm that club members really are constituents. This is important. Part of the process is educating the Congressman and his staff about Amateur Radio so be sure to enclose a few pages describing your club's activities and training programs for the recent past. Be sure to emphasize emergency and public service communications. Include copies of any commendation letters the club has received from local, state or supported agency officials.

3. During a congressional recess organize a visit to the representative in their district office. Remember to call ahead and schedule the appointment. See the schedule for recesses at http://www.house.gov/house/2005_House_Calendar.shtml . Plan to be in and out in ten minutes. Don't waste words: just rephrase the letter to sound conversational. Do a little research and find out what your representative is interested in by reviewing the bills they support. A keyword search of http://thomas.loc.gov on the representative's name will reveal all the bills and resolutions they are supporting. In addition, look at the biography on their website. If you can't get an appointment for a face-to-face meeting with the representative in the office, during the recess, there are other possibilities.

Check with your representative's office for a list of "town meetings" and plan on attending one in your area. Prepare as described above. I discovered that one of our local representatives had been a schoolteacher, so I supplemented my "elevator speech" with a couple of sentences about the ham astronauts speaking to the schoolchildren from the ISS. I could see a strong positive response, so I concluded quickly with, "We sure would appreciate your help with this, Congressman," and handed him the package. He promised to take care of it, and two days after our five-minute conversation at the "town meeting" he signed on as a co-sponsor.

If you are unable to see your representative at all during this recess, retain your momentum. Arrange a meeting with the staff member in the local office and educate them on Amateur Radio and the need for H.R. 691. Close by asking them to recommend co-sponsorship to the representative. Staff members are not flunkeys; many have degrees in law or political science. Some of our representatives became co-sponsors solely on the basis of staff recommendations.

4. Send "Thank You" notes to the representative after they sign on as a co-sponsor. Make sure the club president sends a thank you letter. Separately thank any staff members who helped. It's a small world.

Keep track of the co-sponsors at this site:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR00691:@@@N

Allow two weeks for the representative's staff to review H.R. 691 and prepare a recommendation for the representative. If your representative does not show up as a co-sponsor after two weeks, then follow up by e-mail or phone and ask the legislative aide responsible for telecommunications issues if the Congressman needs any additional information to make his decision.

The entire process is surprisingly easy, and very satisfying.

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 691  
by N3IJ on March 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Looks like I over-edited.

The first link in the text, which leads you to the text of the bill, lacks the concluding colon, like so:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.691:

And there is a congressional recess (also known as a "district work period") in process, ending April 1. There's still time to get the whole thing wrapped up before the end of the recess.

After your representative signs on, a brief report here on what worked and what didn't would be helpful.

Tom, N3IJ

 
An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 691  
by WI8W on March 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Well let's see now...I believe this is the third year in a row that the SPA has been introduced. Many members of Congress signed on to co-sponsor the bill the past 2 years but it has never gone before a committee or even had a vote.

Looks like this year will be no different.

They are not interested in passing this...there is too much big money floating around from the likes of Nextel etc.

A few years back someone estimated the 20 meter band alone was worth about 10 billion a year to commercial interests. Imagine what it is worth now.

Maybe you should ask your congressman about that instead.
 
RE: An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 69  
by N3IJ on March 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
It's been around even longer than that. The bill was first introduced in the 105th congress, on April 17, 1998.

The co-sponsor history:
105 83
106 167
107 53
108 108

In the 108th Congress, your state was the largest one in which hams signed up a majority of their delegation as co-sponsors of the bill. Michigan hams signed up 9 of their 15 representatives. If hams in every state had done as well, the bill would have had 261 co-sponsors and a much better chance of passage.

It is difficult to generalize accurately about the motivations of individual members of Congress. Nonetheless, it is safe to say that any member is more likely to support bills in which constituents have demonstrated interest.

The 108 co-sponsors from the previous session are a good starting point. They signed on once, so they should be interested in doing so again. That's where our club's team started. Now we're approaching the ones who never supported the bill.

Why shouldn't this bill have three or four hundred co-sponsors in this session?

Tom, N3IJ
 
RE: An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 69  
by KC8VWM on March 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
I think you would gain a lot of immediate response and many "signatures" in support of the idea of the "Spectrum Protection Act" if it were introduced at a table at a place like the Dayton hamfest.

Just a thought.

73 Charles - KC8VWM

 
An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 691  
by KE4ZHN on March 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
This sounds like a great idea on paper. I believe the only way youd get any support from the fine upstanding politicians (said with tongue in cheek) up in Washington for this is to toss large quantities of lobby money at them though. This seems to be the only language they understand or care to listen to.
 
RE: An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 69  
by N3IJ on March 23, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
I'm glad the procedure I outlined looks plausible. It's based on experience.

The region in which our club is located is represented by five congressmen. In the previous session three of them were co-sponsors. In less than 90 days, four have signed on and our club's legislative affairs team has an appointment with the fifth one. If he has any town meetings planned, we may attend one and try the direct approach described in the original post.

Your congressman, Tom Feeney, like 3/4 of the Congress, did not support the previous bill, so an additional half hour will likely be needed to brief his staff and get them familiar with Amateur Radio and the issues. It may still be possible to arrange that for this week or next if you call soon.

As in our case, you can apply the experience gained with the first one to the others who represent your region of the state.

One of the things we discovered last year was that congressional staff have more time and flexibility early in the session.

There may be practical details missing from the procedure I described in the original post. If you encounter questions, please post them here and I will try to help.

Tom, N3IJ
 
RE: An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 69  
by WA1RNE on March 23, 2005 Mail this to a friend!

Maybe it's time for a name change.


Perhaps one of these bills would be taken more seriously if we didn't call ourselves "Amateurs".

Jim's letter speaks of a large group of people with a unique skill set - one that not everyone has. So why call it "amateur"?

I don't feel what we do is very "amateurish", do you?

(pardoning of course our occasional troll posts)


I realize the name goes back about 90 years, but 90 years is a heck of a long time and things usually evolve and change with the times.

The small group of legislators who read this bill might be unduly influenced by the name and what the general definition of the word implies.


Not to present a problem without a decent suggestion, how about the "General Radio Service."


73, WA!RNE


 
RE: An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 69  
by KC8VWM on March 24, 2005 Mail this to a friend!

What is the General Radio Service? (GRS)

A Radiocommunication Circular Published by Spectrum Management.

Industy Canada.


http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric18.pdf/$FILE/ric18.pdf


73 Charles - KC8VWM

 
RE: An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 69  
by WA1RNE on March 25, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Thanks, Charles.

I admit, I didn't do an advanced Google search to check for other services with this name.

Funny when I checked this site, the Canandian GRS is the equivalent of the U.S. Citizens Band.

Scratch that name, huh?

How about:

Applied Radio Service ?

Advanced Radio Experimenters Service ?

Wow, that would clash with ARES. Wonder which is more important? (ha ha)




 
RE: An Opportunity to Gain Co-Sponsors for H.R. 69  
by KC8VWM on March 25, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
lol, yes but I still think you are on the right track in terms of a name change. I am in complete agreement that term "amateur" doesn't exactly validate the cause in a serious light.

We dont want to send the message to politicians that we are about as important as a group of serious stamp collectors.

I dunno, we will come up with some sort of name eventually.

73 Charles - KC8VWM



 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
What is FCC Docket 03-104 Asking?
BPL -- Some Humor
HAM Radio Has No Chance Against BPL
FCC Commissioner's Office Clarifies 'Broadband Nirvana' Remarks:
Organizations' Comments Augment Alarm Over BPL:


Other Regulatory Articles
Bandwidth versus Keying Speed
Fact or Fallacy?
HFA Spotlights ARRL Board Meeting
Kiss 33cm (900 MHz) Goodbye?
Group Lists 'Antenna Allies' In Congress