eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

FCC Reduces Fine to Ex-Ham

from The ARRL Letter / ARRL on July 25, 2000
Website: http://www.arrl.org
View comments about this article!

FCC REDUCES FINE FOR FORMER AMATEUR

The FCC has substantially reduced a $17,000 fine that it proposed to levy on a former Houston, Texas, amateur. On July 12, the Commission issued a Forfeiture Order telling Leonard D. Martin, formerly KC5WHN, that he should pay $4000 for repeated unlicensed operation and for failing to allow the FCC to inspect his radio equipment.

Martin first ran afoul of the FCC two years ago. In May 1998 the Commission received a written complaint alleging that a station identifying as KC5WHN was operating on frequencies not authorized by Martin's Technician class license. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth sent Martin a Warning Notice in November 1998. In a subsequent telephone conversation with Hollingsworth, the FCC says, Martin "generally denied the unauthorized operation."

In February and March of last year, an FCC agent using mobile automatic direction finding equipment tracked 27 MHz transmissions to an antenna at Martin's residence. Both times, Martin reportedly refused an FCC inspection.

The FCC's Houston Office issued Martin an Official Notice of Violation last April. In his reply, Martin said that he understood that operating on the frequencies in question was a violation and that the FCC has full inspection authority. He also promised to comply with FCC rules. In July, Martin turned in his Amateur Radio license for cancellation.

Last October, the FCC twice tracked 27 MHz transmissions to Martin's residence. Once again, Martin reportedly refused to let FCC personnel inspect his transmitting gear.

In March, the FCC's Houston Office sent a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture to Martin for "repeatedly and willfully" operating without an FCC license and refusing to allow an FCC inspection. Martin did not deny the violations but said he couldn't pay the $17,000 fine and submitted copies of his tax returns for 1996, 1997 and 1998 as proof. He also told the FCC that he would dismantle and sell all of his radio transmitting gear and antenna and forfeit proceeds to the FCC or to charity and would permit FCC personnel to inspect his residence to insure all equipment has been removed.

The FCC said that while it could not rely on Martin's "promises of remedial action," it could reduce the size of the proposed forfeiture given Martin's "limited ability to pay the full amount." The FCC said the $4000 fine was justified in light of the serious nature of the willful and repeated violations and gave Martin 30 days to pay.

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
fine reduced  
by AC5KD on July 28, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
On several occasions I crossed signals with this individual. Each time was a negative and unwanted event. The individual mentioned once tried to debate with me the fact that 2m can not in any way, shape, or form, be used in satellite communications. Even though I told him that I had actually done it before, he still insisted that 2 meters simply can not be used to break the atmosphere to space for use in satellite communications. I had monitored him numerous times on 27 Mhz boasting of how he could get away with "illegal operation" and that the best DX was actually between CB and 10 meters. But every encounter was a hard headed argument of some kind started by him.
Finally, it had come to the point where my hambuds and I decided to cease all contact with him in order to enjoy our hobby. Immediately he began to key up on top of our sideband transmissions making all kinds of noise just to irritate us and prevent our communication. Luckily, we each had a code key at hand. The individual mentioned in the article did not, and once said, "If God had meant for man to do morse code, he would have put "clickers" on our mouths." ok, whatever. The code definitely still has many good uses, and we were able to continue operations through his interference. Hey, and it built up good code speed and hand rhythm too! RJ
 
FCC Reduces Fine to Ex-Ham  
by AB5XZ on April 30, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
Sad indeed.
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
PG&E Responds to Amateur Noise Complaints
Former ARRL VE Receives 46 Month License Suspensio
Hams Subject of RF Exposure Study
How to put the FCC in check!
FCC Sends Ex-Ham to the Slammer


Other News Articles
Cuba Facilitates Equipment to Amateur Radio Operators:
ARNewsline # 1684 -- Nov. 20 2009:
Propagation Forecast Bulletin #47 de K7RA:
Technology Enthusiast Boosts Skills with Amateur Radio:
Solar Radio Flux: Slow Upward Trend Since Summer: