eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode

Scott Schultz (N0IU) on July 20, 2005
View comments about this article!


John WA6BFH has inspired me. He has a passion for particular bands and is not shy at telling people about them and encouraging people to use them. One of my passions are the digital modes. In particular, I enjoy Hellschreiber. Like 220 MHz, there is precious little activity on this mode. But unlike 220 MHz where you will need to buy dedicated equipment, if you are already using other soundcard-based digital modes, it will cost you nothing to try this mode since there are two popular software packages available for FREE!

Hellschreiber is a German name, meaning "bright writing", or "clear writing". Hellschreiber is anything but a new mode. It was first patented in 1929 which makes it the oldest machine generated data transmission mode used in amateur radio. To put this in perspective, SSB was not introduced to the amateur radio community until 1948! Like it's younger cousin RTTY, Hellschreiber was originally a land based method of transmitting information and was later adapted for radio transmission. Also like RTTY, this mode is experiencing a resurgence in popularity due to the recent development of computer software used in conjunction with a soundcard which has taken the place of cumbersome mechanical devices which were originally required to use this mode.

If you are not interested in learning how this fascinating mode works, then this will be a very short article. If you are already using PSK31 or any of the other sound card based modes, all you need is the Hellschreiber software.

One program is from Nino Porcino IZ8BLY and can be found at:

This program only does the various flavors of Hellschreiber. The website also includes links that go into detailed theory of this mode.

Another popular choice is MultiPSK. Don't let the name fool you. Not only does it do PSK31, it also does just about every other soundcard-based mode known to man, including the various flavors of Hellschreiber including a faster version called Hell80. The latest version (v3.9) can be found at:

Now to the theory -

In order to transmit information from Point A to Point B, it has generally been thought it had to be done in either an analog or digital format. Modes such as phone, voice and even CW are analog while modes such as RTTY and PSK31 are digital. By definition, when something is put into a digital format, it is put into a binary or two-state format. Also, there must be some sort of interpreting mechanism on each end to convert the data into digital signals and vice versa. The mechanism (usually a personal computer with appropriate software and hardware, i.e. a sound card, multi-mode controller or TNC) takes the analog data (the words you type on the keyboard) and converts it into distinct audio tones which are fed into your radio. On the receiving end, this process is reversed. The software converts those tones into characters which are displayed on your screen. To be considered truly digital, data must also be coded. This means there are other bits of information wrapped around the text that synchronize the information and tell the receiving mechanism where each letter begins and ends. There are many schemes for coding data in order to (hopefully) assure it will be received properly.

But the transmission of information does not necessarily fall neatly into one of these two categories. In between there are “fuzzy” modes and Hellschreiber is one of those fuzzy modes. Why is it called fuzzy? Perhaps because the definition is unclear and it leaves many people scratching their head! The basic definition of fuzzy states that the data is machine generated (as with all other digital modes), but the output is intended to be readable only by a human. So how is this different from RTTY or PSK31 which also displays human readable characters on the screen? The main difference is that fuzzy transmissions must be uncoded; without any synchronization or error correcting data wrapped around the information. That is the subtle but crucial difference.

With PSK31 and RTTY, you are presented with the actual computer generated characters (ASCII characters or resident fonts) which are the result of complex de-coding algorithms which are specifically meant to be machine readable. You as the human do not have to decide what character was being sent; the software does its best to do that for you. Hellschreiber, however, just paints pictures that represent characters which are specifically not machine readable. In other words, the Hellschreiber program is merely drawing a picture on your screen and it is up to you, the human, to look at the pixelated image and decide what character it is. The bottom line is that it is the human that makes the final character recognition determination in the fuzzy mode, not the computer. Another example of a fuzzy mode is Slow Scan TV. While the image being sent is generated by a machine, the computer on the receiving end has no idea if it is drawing a picture of a sail boat or the operator's dog! As with Hellschreiber, only the human looking at the screen determine what is being drawn on the screen.

So is the fuzzy mode better than digital? When using a digital mode and there is a loss of signal quality through natural noise like lightning or static (QRN), interference from closeby stations (QRM) or fading (QSB), the end result is garbage on your screen. Why? If any piece of the complex digital puzzle is not received exactly as it was transmitted, the coding information can be lost along with the actual data and this confuses the computer. When this happens, the software makes its “best guess” at what character it thinks it should be and it is usually wrong! With Hellschreiber, it is impossible for the software to display an incorrect character on the screen since there is no interpretation of the incoming data as to what that data represents. So how does it handle interference or fading? One can tell the quality of the signal by the relative darkness of the pixelated characters on the screen. By using this grey scale method, a solid S9 signal would yield nearly solid black print and a weak signal would result in very light print. When the signal is too weak to copy, the characters just fade away to nothing.

Here is an example of what Hellschreiber looks like. This is a screen snapshot from the IZ8BLY program. You will see that the bottom half (where the other station is talking to me) is what “less than perfect” copy looks like. It may look fuzzy, but is still readable.

0x01 graphic

This article is just meant to be a teaser about this mode. For more detailed information about the fuzzy modes and how they relate to ham radio, check out Murray Greenman's site at http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/

73,

de Scott NØIU

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by NE0P on July 20, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Hellschreiber is a great mode! Wish more people were on it. The main calling frequency seems to be 14.080. Plan to be on it more as I will quit HF SSB once the code requirement is dropped. Figure Hellschreiber should be safe. After all, if you are unwilling to learn Morse Code, you probably won't want to go to the effort of reading something off of a screen either.
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N8NOE on July 20, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
WELL, as for Dedicated Equipment, How do I run Mac's and get HELL to run?.. Seems as a Mac user, there are VERY limited choices.. And for 220Mhz, I have the 224.700Rptr here, this is a bit easier.. I ran Hell some time ago, and just getting back to some of the HF and Digital Modes. But the Bottom Line is, on a Mac without spending some $90 for Software, your stuck!.. PSK/RTTY you have CocoaModem & Lin/DarwinPsk, but htats about it.. If some software were out there, There are a few Mac-Hams that would use it.. Just My 2� Worth!..
Jeff
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by WA6BFH on July 20, 2005 Mail this to a friend!

Very interesting! While I have heard of this mode, I really did not know any of the comparative details with other text based radio transmissions but, I guess that is already a misnomer to call it “text based”!

I have to play devils advocate, though I am really curious if you can give me a good explanation. Why do you have a passion for this mode? Is it a historical thing, or what? I probably have been less than clear explaining my Ham radio passions. It may be difficult to translate such interests to others. It is a somewhat selfish reason that I ask because, if I can see why and how you have a passion for this activity (one which I don’t share) it may help me to explain mine to others!

73, and thanks for the nice compliment! John
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by KC7JDS on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
I know that most of these digital modes are used only in HF, but is there anything that says you can't ust them (especially Hellschreiber) in VHF/2m?

B Woodman
kc7jds
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by W2LYS on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
N8NOE -

Have you seen the Mac Ham Radio Start page?

http://www.machamradio.com/index.html

Some good stuff there for free... not sure if there's anything for Hellschreiber. No expert on the mac, I just picked up a used powerbook...
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N4KZ on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Hellschreiber is an amazing mode. I was active on this mode from 2001 to 2003 and was impressed with its weak-signal capabilities. For example, I had two-way hell QSOs several times with the same Japanese station on 15 meters when the band was in very poor condition over the path from USA to JA. At times, our signals were so far down in the mud that I couldn't really hear him but his data continued scrolling across the screen without missing a beat.

Of course, there are other modes that are impressive in their weak-signal capabilities but none are as easy to operate as hell. Just tune until you see data scrolling on the screen. For example, I like MFSK16 too for its weak-signal abilities but it's hard to tune in stations.

I haven't done much hell for a couple of years. Activity is low on this mode. That's too bad. When tuning across the bands, you might have heard hell signals but not realized it because at first listen they sound quite a bit like CW -- only CW without the dashes.

Strictly speaking, hell is not a digital mode but using sound cards to operate it has been a revival, of sorts, for the mode. More should try it. Very easy to set up and learn to use and excellent results for keyboard-to-keyboard QSOs.

And yes, hell can be used on VHF bands too. In fact, WA5UFH and I made a two-way hell QSO on 6m meteor scatter. You can run hell at 5 times or 9 times normal speed for use on meteor scatter and it works very well. Maybe not as good as WSJT modes but easier to do, in my opinion.

I will try to fire up tonight on 20 and/or 40 meters hell and see who's around. Time to get this excellent mode revived.

73, Dave, N4KZ
Frankfort, KY

 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by WD8JMM on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
I know I'll get flamed for this, but CW is a digital mode. If by definition, digital is the transmission of data via a binary stream (one of many definitions, but the one that applies here) then CW qualifies as digital.

I'm not saying this to be argumentative, just to correct a misconception.

73

Alex WD8JMM
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N5UV on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Nice article, tnx. for the explanation on it's qualitative differences with other modes.

My biggest (and only) complaint with our infatuation with PSK31 is that PSK is inherently slow and not very well suited for contesting. RTTY, MFSK, and Hell have much faster transmission speeds, a fact I can definitely confirm after comparing Field Day logs to the RTTY QSO Party last weekend.

However, PSK31 is like the VHS of digital modes...there are better digital products on the market, and we have access to them, but we all just have a habit of doing "as the Romans do" and just playing along.

I'll try it on 14.080, what the Hell (hihi)!!!
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N3ZKP on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
NOE:

<< How do I run Mac's and get HELL to run?.. >>

MultiMode! It does virtually all the digital modes, including Hellscriber.

www.blackcatsystems.com/software/multimode.html

Lon
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by AB2RC on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
N8NOE --

I agree with you about the lack of Hellschreiber software for the Mac, and I don't really want to spend $90 on MultiMode either. Currently I am working on getting gmfsk (a linux program) compiled for OS X, I will let you know how it goes when I finally get it working.
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by W7AIT on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
And the point is? I saw absolutely no advantage to use this mode, no reason to get the software, so what was the point?

The fact that it copies a picture and drops no data is interetsing but has zero application to every day ham radio digital communications.

If a few characters are dropped in RTTY or PSK31 QSO, the operator just does fills.

So again what was the point?

 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by AA4PB on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
I'm not sure Hell has a faster transmission speed than PSK31. PSK31 has an average speed of 50WPM. FieldHell is specified at 2.5 characters per second which translates to only 30WPM if my calculations are correct.

Has anyone tried FieldHell using a CW transmitter? After reading the docs on the provided link I wonder if it might be suitable to use with some of the small QRP CW-only rigs.
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by KB9GPN on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Great Article on a Great Digital Fuzzy Mode!

I have found that Hellschreiber FM245 can work through poor band conditions that stop most other modes.

Recently had opportunity to work Hellschreiber from a moored Submarine - great fun!

Thanks for the article!

73

Steve
KB9GPN
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N1DL on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Just thought I add a comment regarding Hellschreiber - the name has nothing to do with "bright"
The name comes from its inventor Dr. Rudolf Hell who died last year in his high 90s.
Dr. Hell was an inventor and had many patents in the communications, graphics and printing technology.
(e.g. PressFax, Gravure Printing, Color scanning)
He was a very interesting character and although a Bavarian from the Alps was an avid High Seas Yachtsman.
73 Karl N1DL (for part of my life Pres & CEO of Hell Graphics Systems Inc.)
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N0IU on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
WD8JMM wrote, "...CW is a digital mode. If by definition, digital is the transmission of data via a binary stream (one of many definitions, but the one that applies here) then CW qualifies as digital.

I'm not saying this to be argumentative, just to correct a misconception."

To those who say that CW is a digital mode, I must respectfully disagree. Just because CW is communicated by turning a single tone on and off does not make it digital.

First of all, in the electronic world, digital communications are coded, i.e. there is other data (start and stop bits and check digits) wrapped around the each letter or series of letters that tell the software how to interpret the information. CW does not meet this criterion. If the other op sends a dah and then another dah, did he just send me the letter “M” or was it two “T”s? It depends on the length of time between them. As a human, I can also take those two dahs and put them in the context of what was being sent to help me determine what the sending station intended to say and a computer (at least none that I have seen) can’t do that. If he sent those two dahs when using my name (Scott), I know that he was sending two “T”s. If he is telling me that the temperature is very warm, I know that he sent the letter “M” since there is no such word as wartt. Depending on the duration of the on state, those two dahs could also have been two dits sent at a very slow speed! Did he send two "E"s or was it the letter "I"? Sometimes it is difficult to copy CW because the person sending it has a sloppy fist and their sense of timing of the length of the dits and dahs and the spacing between them is radically inconsistent. This whole notion of taking a string of variable length on and off states in context is the main reason it is so difficult to write a program to read CW that is better than the computer between your ears. While there are some very good programs for copying perfect CW, nothing I have seen so far can compensate for a sloppy fist. Digital communications do not have to be taken in context because the data is coded. While there are some digital encoding schemes that are more efficient than others, there is no such thing as sloppy digital communications.

As stated above, even if you remove the electronic definition, there is also the matter of the duration of the on and off times as well as the spacing between the different states that is not a factor with digital communications. If you had a switching device that could only make or break the contact for a fixed period of time, you could theoretically use it for digital communications, but you could not use it for CW since the on and off times must be variable in order to reproduce the alphabet, punctuation and ten numbers. Also, the off state time between the characters must also be variable in order to differentiate where one letter or word stops and the other begins.

Digital communications are inherently machine generated and can not be interpreted by ear until it is reassembled by the program. Humans just can’t do math as fast as a microprocessor.

NØIU
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N0IU on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
W7AIT wrote, “And the point is? I saw absolutely no advantage to use this mode, no reason to get the software, so what was the point?

The fact that it copies a picture and drops no data is interesting but has zero application to every day ham radio digital communications”

And my question to you is, “What is the purpose of every day ham radio digital communications?” I thought the whole idea of amateur radio in general was to communicate with other like-minded people by generating and receiving radio frequencies (let’s not get into the Echolink thing here, please!) and this one qualifies for that so I wouldn’t say it has “zero application”. Do you have a different definition of what ham radio is supposed to be? Please share it with us.

I will grant you that some modes are more efficient than others, but if you don’t want to use this mode, then don’t. Its just that simple. By your own admission, you have never used this mode and don’t intend to. All you’re doing is pointing your finger and finding fault with a mode of communication you know nothing about. How does that qualify you to make a judgment call on the application of this mode to every day ham radio digital communications? If you had tried it for a period of time and found that you didn’t like it, then I might have a little respect for your comments, but at this point, to say that it is totally useless, my question is, "What is your point?"

It is a mode I enjoy and my sole purpose was to share some basic information about it.

NØIU
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N3AIU on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!

An interesting article, worthy of consideration. I think that I'll go to Hell this weekend. 73, Nick N3AIU
 
No, actually it is.  
by KC7EKK on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
//To those who say that CW is a digital mode, I must respectfully disagree. Just because CW is communicated by turning a single tone on and off does not make it digital.
First of all, in the electronic world, digital communications are coded, i.e. there is other data (start and stop bits and check digits) wrapped around the each letter or series of letters that tell the software how to interpret the information. CW does not meet this criterion. //

Scott,
I think you are getting your definitions mixed up. Start and stop bits are for timing (like over an RS-232 serial link). They are used in some forms of digital communication but are not a requirement for digital communication.
Just like encryption, or error correction are not requirements.
It is quite possible to digitize a signal and send it along its way with no timing. Your bit-error ratio will go way up but it would still be a digital signal.

In the same way, CW is indeed a digital signal.
Dit = 1
Dah = 0
It just happens that the operator and listener do the decoding manually.

John
KC7EKK
 
Let me meet you half way on this one.  
by KC7EKK on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
I just realized something Scott, although it would be possible to send digital data without start and stop bits, once the receiver got off track, that would be the end of it; garbage from there on out.

I think you are correct. A digital mode (for it to be reliable) must have some sort of timing built in. Whether that timing be a clock signal (as in synchronous communication) or start and stop bits (as in asynchronous communication like your computer’s RS-232 port).
In the same way, CW is a digital mode because it has 2 information states (dit and dah) and timing (pauses between letters and words).

What do you think?

73,
John
KC7EKK
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N5UV on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
AA4PB "I'm not sure Hell has a faster transmission speed than PSK31. PSK31 has an average speed of 50WPM. FieldHell is specified at 2.5 characters per second which translates to only 30WPM if my calculations are correct. "

I knew I should have clarified that...I can't speak for the other versions of Hell, but for it's EXTREMELY narrow bandwidth (a couple of hz, maybe?), Feld Hell is pretty fast. In fact, it probably has the narrowest bandwidth of all digital modes, save CW (which is a separate issue being discussed by others).

Also, if I remember correctly, Feld Hell sends text lines twice, so it certainly may seem longer when it transmits...but if you are working rare DX, it saves you the extra effort of sending your call/RST/name/QTH multiple times if there's a lot of QSB or QRM.

Only problem now is...finding another DX station that operates Feld Hell. German hams, understandably, are pretty big proponents of this mode, and I think they have a mini-contest for it...back in the Spring, maybe (?).

Either way, I'll give it a try tonight, what the Hell!
 
RE: Let me meet you half way on this one.  
by N0IU on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
KC7EKK wrote, "In the same way, CW is a digital mode because it has 2 information states (dit and dah) and timing (pauses between letters and words)."

Well I don't know John. I always understood digital to be binary in that one state is on and the other state is off. In this example, both a dit and a dah are both on states, but for different lengths of time.

Let me think about it and get back to you!

NØIU
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by WB8WKA on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
What is CW? Judging by most of the ditribes here, it appears to be a religion to me.
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by WB8WKA on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Oh, and back on topic of obsure digital modes, don't forget my personal favorite MFSK16 which is a fantastic and easy to use weak signal digital mode along with MT63.
 
RE: Let me meet you half way on this one.  
by WB8WKA on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
N0IU:

Most of your RKE's (Remote Keyless Entry) transmitters use ASK with manchester encoding. Meaning, you have various RF pulses of varying widths, which is very digital. Back in the RAM/ROM limited dark days of the late 70's, a friend of mine wrote a CW decoding program for a 1802 microcontroller. It was very digital.

CW on HF is ASK, or amptitude shifted keying.
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by NE0P on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
It was written:

"The fact that it copies a picture and drops no data is interetsing but has zero application to every day ham radio digital communications. If a few characters are dropped in RTTY or PSK31 QSO, the operator just does fills. So again what was the point? "

And the point of PSK31 is what? It does exactly the same things that RTTY does, but at a lower speed. So why is it so popular?


 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by W0MT on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
I appreciate any article such as this that encourages Hams to try modes or bands that they otherwise might not. The argument that this is not the “best” mode is beside the point. If we knew what is the “best” mode, then that is the mode we would all use. And of course, all Hams would be using that mode on the “best” frequency using the “best” rig and the “best” antenna. I think part of the fun of Ham radio is trying new ideas. That being said, there are two technical errors in the piece.

First, CW is a digital mode. A digital mode is one where information is transmitted by using discrete physical states. In the case of CW the states are carrier on and carrier off.

Second, digital modes can and do exist that use more than two states—they are not all binary. Most digital modes only use two states as that is easier and less error prone. Some of the problems with trying to use more than two states are discrimination and storage. It is far easier to detect and store states such as on or off rather then on at 6 volts, on at 4 volts, on at 2 volts, and off.

Robert W0MT
 
RE: CW has 5 states  
by KC7EKK on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
//A digital mode is one where information is transmitted by using discrete physical states. In the case of CW the states are carrier on and carrier off. //

Actually, I can think of 5 discrete states in CW.
A computer would interpret them as such:
Carrier on short (dit) 1
Carrier on long (dah) 11
Carrier off short (between individual dits and dahs) 0
Carrier off long (between characters) 00
Carrier off longer (between words) 0000

CQ DE KC7EKK would read as such

_ . _ . _ _ . _ _ . . . _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ . . . . _ . _ _ . _

or translate that to 1’s and 0’s

11 0 1 0 11 0 1 00 11 0 11 0 1 0 11 0000 11 0 1 0 1 00 1 0000 11 0 1 0 11 00 11 0 1 0 11 0 1 00 11 0 11 0 1 0 1 0 1 00 1 00 11 0 1 0 11 00 11 0 1 0 11

Try and sound it out yourself. It really is Morse code.

As shown by this very geeky example, Morse code is asynchronous communication. The series of double zeros or quadruple zeros act as start or stop bits to indicate the end or beginning of a character or word.

73
KC7EKK
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by NE0P on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
"If we knew what is the “best” mode, then that is the mode we would all use. And of course, all Hams would be using that mode on the “best” frequency using the “best” rig and the “best” antenna. I think part of the fun of Ham radio is trying new ideas. That being said, there are two technical errors in the piece."

WE ALREADY KNOW THAT. IT IS CALLED CW!
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by NE0P on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Hellschreiber is probably one of the best digital modes in heavy QRM. I have had Hell QSOs in the past where another station just opened up on the same frequency with a MFSK16 transmission, since they use the same calling frequency. I was still able to copy and visually decode everything that was being sent to me in Hellschreiber, even if the MFSK station was louder. I doubt you could do that with RTTY, PSK, or SSB. Look how upset the PSK community gets if you use more than 25 watts. You might be able to discriminate between the 2 signals in CW if one was slightly offset from the other in frequency.

ALso, Hellschreiber is a 50% duty mode (equal times on and off during a transmission) rather than a 100% duty mode, so it is much easier on the radio also.

 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by NE0P on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
With the latest FCC proposal for dropping the code, I guess we really can say now that the bands are going to Hell! See everyone in Hell on 14.080.
 
RE: CW has 5 states  
by KC7EKK on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Come to think of it, Morse is both asynchronous and synchronous. It is asynchronous in that it has pauses between characters and words (timing) and synchronous in the sense that in order to receive Morse, the characters must be clocked in at a constant wpm. Is it possible for a digital mode to be both?

I suck at straight keying. My dits sound like dahs and dahs like dits. I miss my old Icom 706 because it had a dit and a dah button on the mic. They were always perfectly spaced out.

Back in my college days, I had a roommate that went to bed around 7:30 PM. I prefer working SSB but when he got mad at me for my squawky radio, I would put on my headphones and flip over to CW and quietly push out dits and dahs using my 706’s mic buttons. Ah those were the days.

KC7EKK
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by NE0P on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
John, KC7EKK,

I found the same thing-that the mic buttons on the 706 actually send very well. Saves having to drag along a key for short portable trips. The mic buttons on the newer Yaesu radios can also be used for paddles, but they are next to impossible to send with.

 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by KD5WZB on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
As someone mentioned, it's duty cycle is less than RTTY, etc. It is much easier on the radio. My radio has no cooling fan and relies on convection. You try a 100% duty cycle mode and just see how hot it gets. With hell, it got warm, but never hot. I've since added a fan to the radio so that is no longer an issue.

I had a couple of interesting QSOs with Hell, including a nice guy (K3LNT) who was on Jeopardy a few days after I talked to him. Of course the shows were prerecorded already, but it still was fun to root for someone I had a short chat with on amateur radio.

Sig levels can be bad and you can still pick out what they are saying. In some digi modes, you can easily miss and entire word. I noticed on Hell that I would only lose one or two letters in a word for the most part.
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by K5PAX on July 21, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Nice article.

I like using Hell in all its modes as a nice change of pace. It's worth pointing out that there are big differences in the performance of FM-Hell modes (both 105 and 245) and the more standard FeldHell modes. The FM-Hell modes are very good in bad band conditions and yield a very high signal to noise ratio. When these modes give out it is time to turn off the radio and pick up the telephone. I have also run them routinely down to QRP levels and they perform very well. It is also worth checking the unique PSK-Hell mode included with MultiPSK. It is a good all-around mode -- performing like FM-Hell with an improvement in tunability.

Hope to see you on the air using some alternate modes.
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by KB2HSH on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Hell is perhaps my favorite "unusual" mode. It is robust enough and "forgiving" enough for me to use my rather drifty Argonaut 505 with decent results. I have had many great QSOs on 40 with no more than 2 watts. And while there are other software suites that can handle Hell, the IZ8BLY freeware is THE best.

JM
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by KB1GMX on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
CW is not a digital mode because you key the tx on/off. It is not even a binary state transmission in many cases.

CW has time domain encoding as well as character encoding IE: dits and Dahs, the fact that it's broadcast (USUALLY) by interrupted carrier is irrelevent. I've heard MCW on VOR station signals and 2m FM, no carrier interruption there. Interpretation is by combination of four symbols, DIT, DAH, short space(between characters) and long space(between characters and words).

IS CW digital? It's in the fuzzy realm. It contains no
state information that makes it easy to decode. This is why morse decoders require a fair amount of software and CPU compared to greyware(orgainic computing) to operate in difficult conditions.

Allison
KB1GMX
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by K0RFD on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
While 14.080 may have been adopted by Hell enthusiasts as their calling frequency, it has been in common use for a long time as the RTTY "dx window" and more recently as an MFSK DX calling frequency.

While I have no intention of taking sides here (I use lots of digi modes so I have no dog in this fight) please be aware that if you hear activity on a frequency, even if you can't decode it, that means the frequency is in use at the moment. With some weak signal digi modes you might not even hear it, in which case I don't know what you do.

Someday we'll sort out the problem of incompatible digital modes occupying the same space. The ARRL's regulation by bandwidth proposal isn't even a good start. Here's a great example of the problem it DOESN'T solve.
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by WB8WKA on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
KB1GMX wrote:

>CW is not a digital mode because ...

"It is a religion"

>CW has time domain encoding as well as character
>encoding IE: dits and Dahs,

Hmmm.... sounds digital to me, or is this the Church of the Dits and Dahs?

>IS CW digital? It's in the fuzzy realm.
>It contains no state information that makes it
>easy to decode.

Hey hojo, VIC20 could decode CW if you feed it clean dits and dahs. Here is a 20 year old Atari 800 article on a CW decoder program:
http://www.atarimagazines.com/v4n7/morsecode.html
Here is another one on a little 16C84 PIC 18 pin microcontroller:
http://www.qsl.net/yo5ofh/pic/morse_decoder/mdecoder.htm

CW is just PWM/ASK modulation. There is a clock embedded in the signal as well as state information.

>This is why morse decoders require a fair amount of
>software and CPU compared to greyware(orgainic
>computing) to operate in difficult conditions.

OK, now, in the later, I agree with something. The actually translation of the over the air tones to a digital Dit and Dah signal, that is a bit tougher due to interference/noise. A simple microcontroller can easily decode "Dits and Dahs" it is getting a clear digital representation of those Dits and Dahs that is tough. A 567 doesn't do a good job on HF but some of the more modern sound card programs are getting better.

But, if your looking to pull stuff out of the ether, ASK CW is no longer king of the hill. Stack it up against MFSK8 and other weak signal digital modes and you'll see what I mean.

Which is no cut on CW as a special interest group, much like AM is, but lets at least be factual.

Anyways, back to the Church of the dit dah.

Jeff wb8wka
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by K0RGR on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
First, Hell is a fun toy - and a nice weak signal mode. I can really crank in the filters and dig the weak signals out of the noise with this mode. Some would say that there are already efforts to encourage too much Hell on the bands, but not me...

As for CW, I am hoping that over time, more people with limited or, perhaps, no CW skills on HF will find that there is CW option on their multimode soundcard program, and choose to try it out. I find that MIXW, the one I use, does a great job of copying machine-sent CW, and it sends code that I can copy solid at well over 25 WPM. I should be able to have QSOs with slow-coders, or maybe even no-coders equipped with this program, as long as they keep the speed under 25 WPM, and their programs can copy mine. Maybe if this catches on, we'll see a new generation of small, portable Morse keyboards so the CW-enabled can send machine-generated code while portable that the CW-impaired can copy with their computers?
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by KB9YGD on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Scott thanks for taking the time to write this very well written and complete informative post.Hellschreiber and mfsk16 are very good for weak signal work and i like them.It seems all the guys are just using psk31. i have called cq on 10.137,150 but not many takers even on 1.838.This mode beats psk31 any day.the best program is IZ8BLY.73,Norm.
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N0IU on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
NE0P wrote, "And the point of PSK31 is what? It does exactly the same things that RTTY does, but at a lower speed. So why is it so popular?"

I will tell you why --

First of all, PSK31 and RTTY do not do exactly the same thing. One reason it has taken such a strong foothold on the digital community is because of its greater flexibility. RTTY can only do capital letters and once a character is transmitted, there is no going back to correct typos. With PSK31, you have the complete alphabet in upper and lower case and you can backspace to correct typing errors. Also, a major difference is that RTTY does not do all that well at low power whereas PSK31 can be very effective with only a few watts.

I think the real reason is economics. When I started in RTTY back in the early 90's, it required some sort of multi-mode controller; either an outboard unit or in internal card. After spending a few hundred dollars on one of those, you still had to buy the software to drive it. For me, I started out on the cheap with a Commodore VIC-20 and an AEA CP-1. I bought this stuff used at a hamfest for about $75.00. There were no macros, no type ahead buffers or anything. You pressed a key to put the rig in transmit, typed your message then pressed a key to put the rig back in receive. Finally, I decided I really enjoyed this mode enough to let the moths out of my wallet and bought a Kantronics Kam Plus and their DOS based Host Master program. I believe this combination cost me somewhere around $400.00. This let me also use AMTOR, PACTOR and Kantronics’ proprietary mode called G-TOR. You needed to have some sort of commitment to the mode and know that it was something your wanted to do back then since most people would not be willing to spend several hundred bucks on a mode just to see if they liked it!

Fast forward to the end of the 20th century when Digipan came along which I believe was the first piece of software written for PSK31. The important factor was that it was FREE!! By this time, a soundcard was pretty much standard equipment on most PCs. You could explore this terrific mode with a simple interface built from a handful of junque box parts. Then all you had to do was download a free software package and hook up a couple of cables between your soundcard and radio and you were good to go! If it turns out that you didn’t like this mode for some reason, you were not out any serious cash. Even if you use a commercially made interface or build one like the one Bob AA4PB designed (like I did... thanks Bob!), the cost of one of those is nowhere near what a multimode controller costs brand new.

Whys is PSK31 so popular? I will borrow a phrase used by James Carville who was Bill Clinton’s campaign manager during his first run for the presidency who became famous for saying, “It’s the economy, stupid!”

NØIU
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by K0RFD on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Well, I think there are also other reasons for PSK's popularity. As you mentioned, simplicity and economy compared to the old "Classic" RTTY setups are, of course, important. But also, PSK takes far less bandwidth than RTTY, which means that you can often see 20 or 30 PSK QSOs in a single waterfall, and move between them with just a mouse click. That means that PSK operators have a natural tendency to clump together in the same part of the band, a little slice about one SSB-phone QSO wide. Makes it easy to find Qs. PSK also decodes well even when both stations are running very low power, when signals are weak. In contrast, many (most?) RTTY ops run 500 watts. A lot of the guys you work in the PSK area are antenna-challenged or antenna-restricted. The exception to this, of course, is multipath conditions, where PSK totally falls apart. But when conditions are good, PSK works great with signals you can barely hear.

Be aware that the "Clumped Together" PSK qsos will likely move down further into the CW subband if the ARRL's bandwidth proposal goes thru. The way that proposal is written, the "070" PSK windows will be in the medium (over 200 Hz) bandwidth subband, where PSK is fair game to being stepped on by Pactor, RTTY, and other modes. If the US ops move, will the DX ops move too? Who knows? At least right now RTTY ops tend to not venture down as low as 070 out of courtesy and it's only the "Lid-O-Matic" Pactor stations that routinely QRM the PSK areas. It would have been nice if the ARRL had started their medium bandwidth windows at 073 or 075, but they apparently don't know PSK exists. That's probably why PSK is not even mentioned in the "Considerate Operator's Frequency Guide".

My personal favorite sound card mode for DX is MFSK-16. It's nearly bulletproof, even under multipath or auroral flutter conditions. But that comes at a price--it's almost 10 times as wide as a PSK signal, and quite a bit slower.
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by WB4M on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
"And the point of PSK31 is what? It does exactly the same things that RTTY does, but at a lower speed. So why is it so popular?"

Because it is FREE! Your computer already has a sound card, and there are many FREE sound card programs available, including programs for PSK.
I personally do not like PSK all that much and find it quite boring. But you cannot argue with the price of operating PSK.
 
The "real" forgotten mode!  
by WB4M on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Hellscreiber isn't forgotten, at least yet. But the best ragchew mode of all, Clover, is all but forgotten. The is a lot of HAL equipment out there, but Clover just never caught on for some reason or another. Only a handful of us die-hard Clover ops still use this mode.
 
Don't like it?  
by KA4KOE on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Then throw the disk in a trash can. In others, the disk has gone Hell in a handbasket.
 
PSK vs. RTTY  
by NE0P on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
But RTTY is also free. Uses the same interface as PSK programs do, and you can download MMTTY for free and run RTTY at the same cost as PSK.

I am not saying that PSK shouldn't be used, I am responding to the comment that Hellschreiber is pointless because it does the same thing as other modes. In fact, every digital mode has its own special flavor, which makes each one the best mode in certain conditions. Hellschreiber is great for high QRM and QRN conditions, and easier on the rig than RTTY and PSK. It is also easier to tune than MFSK16, although I enjoy all of those modes.

Hellschreiber used to use a calling frequency of 14.063. Not sure why it moved to 14.080.
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by KA0GKT on July 22, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
"PSK takes far less bandwidth than RTTY"

Not necessarily.

Back when I was considerably younger...like during the Kennedy administration...One of my father's friendly competitors who had a store across the street from my dad's shop, got interested in RTTY. He was a SWL, so he picked up an old TTY and built his own FSK decoder. He used to tune in to the Reuters network stations and copy the NEWS. The receiver was a Hammarlund super pro, IIRC.

Any way, I was at my father's store one evening after closing when the phone rang. It was the guy across the street, he was receiving something odd.

We went over and the radio was tuned to WWL, New Orleans, the BFO was on and the teleprinter was typing away "...WAR TEST WAR TEST WAR TEST..." The guy across the street knew that my dad was an Electronics instructor for the Naval Reserves. Dad's answer was "Gee, isn't that interesting, never seen anything like it before".

That night, President Kennedy announced that the Soviets had placed nuclear tipped IRBMs in Cuba. Dad received a telegram telling him to stand by for possible deployment. The order never came.

Years later, I read an article about "Voice Plus Modulation" and asked dad about it.

It seems that back during the cold war, the government installed some equipment at clear channel stations around the country. This allowed the AM transmitters to be frequency shift keyed a few hertz and were menat for military and governmental communications in the event of a nuclear exchange.

So, it has been a long way around, however a couple cycles shift is all that is needed for RTTY, even with the less than rock steady receivers of the "Hollow State" age.

73 DE KA0GKT/7
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by KA0GKT on July 25, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Morse Code not digital?

I beg to differ. (The following quotes are all from N0IU’s post of 7-21-05)

"...coded, i.e. there is other data (start and stop bits and check digits)"

Not necessarily. There are numerous protocols used on RS-232 links which have neither parity nor stop bits.

While it is a common practice in some modes to include clock information in the transmission, it isn’t necessary if an agreed upon clock is used at both transmit and receive sides. The signal is digital, it just doesn’t have clock information, error correction or stop bits. Morse Code would fit into this definition.

In a digital transmission system with a clock, there is no need to drop a transmitted “one” before transmitting as second “one”. The clock tells the receiving device that indeed a second “one” is being sent even though the data remains high (or low, depending upon the particular flavor of digital you’re using).

International Morse Code is a string of ones or zeros with a generated clock at each end of the transmission path. Error correction is software defined and translation is done by a neural net processor with excellent DSP…the human brain, which, according to medical professionals, does operate in the digital realm as well as the analog.

"Digital communications do not have to be taken in context because the data is coded".

Neither does Morse code. Military and commercial operators regularly sent five-character code groups in Morse. The code groups often would be a string of non related letters and numbers. The operators rarely would be the person who decoded the message, in fact, often the message could be an enemy intercept and would be sent to the crypto team to be decoded.

"As stated above, even if you remove the electronic definition, there is also the matter of the duration of the on and off times as well as the spacing between the different states that is not a factor with digital communications. If you had a switching device that could only make or break the contact for a fixed period of time, you could theoretically use it for digital communications, but you could not use it for CW since the on and off times must be variable in order to reproduce the alphabet, punctuation and ten numbers. Also, the off state time between the characters must also be variable in order to differentiate where one letter or word stops and the other begins".

Properly sent Morse Code is a fixed set of element lengths. For instance, the letter “M” can be represented by 1110111 An inter-letter space is 000 an inter word space is 0000000.

The secret obviously is the regenerated clock at the receiving end of the link.

11101110 00111011 10111000 10111010 00101010 00100011 10111010 10111011 10000000 10111000 00001110 10100010 10001110 11101000 10100011 10001011 10001011 10101000 00001110 11100011 10111011 10001110 10100010 00000010 11101011 10100000 00111010 111

So, the signal isn’t digital simply because a machine cannot decode it all of the time? Your machine must not be a very good machine…however the one which regularly deals with the DIGITAL mode called Morse Code has had several millennia of upgrades. By comparison, your electronic device is just in beta testing, less than a century old.

73 DE KA0GKT/7
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by KR3DX on July 25, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Nice article, Scott. I became active on Hellschreiber shortly after the IZ8BLY software was released. Hell is my favorite "computer" mode (hardly anyone has a real Hellschreiber machine!) and I would like to see a resurgence of activity on this mode. If anyone would like a sked, please e-mail me and let's see if we can raise some.......OK, no cheap puns. Seriously, I would enjoy renewed activity on this mode, so let's give it a try.

73,
Denny
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N0IU on July 26, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
With this article rapidly approaching its sunset, I would like to thank everyone for their comments. It was not my inention to start a debate on whether or not CW could truly be called a "digital" mode or not. I suppose my actual terminology should have been something like human generated vs. machine generated instead of analog vs. digital. The problem is that all of us don't seem to be using the same definition of just what is digital.

Anyway, lets get on the air and use whatever mode floats your boat. Hopefully I have inspired a few of you out there to try this mode.

73,
de N0IU
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by WA6BFH on July 26, 2005 Mail this to a friend!

Isn’t it a bummer when people question your article, and make absurd comments?

Just kidding!

73! John
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by VE3HBB on July 27, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
I was of the impression that PSK 31 has a TOP speed (not average speed) of 50 WPM. Of course, to exploit that top speed, one has to have the ability to keyboard that fast. Otherwise, the top speed is as fast as you can type!

73

Charles VE3HBB

BTW PSK 31 has no start, stop or parity bits. It's WYSIWYG!
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by VE3HBB on July 27, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
I also find the "what's the point" sorts of comments to be a little shallow. The point is, as amateurs we "advance the art" in part by learning. Learning for its own sake is worthwhile and is most defititely to "the point." If you are not interested, just move on. Those who are interested will read and learn. Let's close the schools if we don't see the point? I don't think so.

73

Charles VE3HBB
 
Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by NU7I on July 28, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
It seems Hellschreiber would be inherently inaccessible to the blind. I would thus strongly urge that this mode never be used for anything important from which the exclusion of blind hams could result. 73
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by N3ZKP on July 28, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
<< It seems Hellschreiber would be inherently inaccessible to the blind. I would thus strongly urge that this mode never be used for anything important from which the exclusion of blind hams could result. 73 >>

I sincerely hope this is a tongue-in-cheek remark, because if it isn't, it's a REALLY stupid remark!

RTTY, AMTOR, PACTOR, Clover, PSk31, MT63 and every other mode except the voice modes and CW are inherently inaccessable to blind hams.

Lon
 
RE: Hellschreiber -- The Forgotten Mode  
by AA4PB on August 1, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
PSK31 is 31.25 baud. Due to the vericode coding technique the number of bits needed to represent a character depends on the particular character. The actual speed then depends on what characters you type and so the 50WPM is an average for a "typical" transmission.

Although there are no start, stop, or parity bits as such, each character is synchronized by a zero bit between characters. Each character is represented by a particular combination of bits and if one bit is incorrect then the wrong character will be presented. In this regard it is not WYSIWYG in the same sense as the fuzzy modes such as Hellschreiber. With fuzzy modes you can have a number of bit errors within a character and still tell what that character is. With PSK31 and other non-fuzzy modes one bit in error will cause a totally incorrect character to be displayed. With non-fuzzy modes it is possible to add additional Forware Error Correction (FEC) bits to compensate for several bit errors in a character but as soon as the number of errors exceeds the FEC capability then a totally wrong character is displayed.

Sometimes a human operator can identify and correct errors from the context. For example, "THA NAME IS" can easily be corrected to "THE NAME IS". However, if the error occurs in an address, or telephone number then the message becomes undeliverable and quite often you can't even tell there is an error until you attempt to deliver it. This is why ARQ modes like Packet and Pactor are so important in any type of message system. The imbedded CRC check flags the packet as having an error so that a re-transmission can be requested.
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
USA 5 MHz Emcomm, Not Ragchew DX Contests
Warnings from Icom


Other Recent Articles
VK5RJ Still Gracing the Airwaves at Age 101:
rec.radio.amateur.moderated -- 5 Yrs. Old:
Tune-In To The World -- Amateur Radio Gets People Talking:
Student Sends MIT Letter to Space:
Amateur Radio Club Talks to Hams Worldwide on Centennial: