eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

FCC Cites Florida Utility for Interference to Radio Amateur:

from The ARRL Letter, Vol 25, No 23 on June 9, 2006
Website: http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!

FCC Cites Florida Utility for Interference to Radio Amateur:

The FCC has issued a Citation to Lakeland Electric, a municipally owned utility in Lakeland, Florida, for violating Part 15 rules by interfering with a local radio amateur. §15.5(c) of the FCC rules requires that the operator of an "incidental radiator" must cease operating the device after an FCC representative notifies the operator that the device is causing harmful interference. The "incidental radiator" in this case is overhead power lines. Under an agreement, the ARRL and the FCC cooperate in resolving cases of line noise interference to Amateur Radio licensees.

"Power line noise continues to generate the bulk of interference complaints that ARRL receives," says ARRL Electromagnetic Compatibility Engineer Mike Gruber, W1MG, who says the League reviews hundreds of such complaints each year. About half of them are resolved promptly by the utilities, in some instances with assistance from the ARRL Laboratory. Gruber says he believes this is the first time the FCC has issued a Citation to a utility in a case involving power line interference to ham radio.

The radio amateur involved, J. C. Flynn, W4FGC, told ARRL that Lakeland Electric has been good about fixing routine problems, but he doesn't think the utility personnel know how to resolve cases of power line noise. "I have been 10 years trying to get something done," he said, adding that the noise affects all HF bands. "It is terrible!"

Flynn first noticed the power line noise around 1995. Subsequent complaints, assurances from the utility that it was addressing the problem--or that it couldn't find one--and even some FCC warnings followed before the FCC issued its Citation to Lakeland Electric on May 16. Flynn, who's now 84, told the League that as of June 7, nothing had been done to fix the severe line noise at his location, which he demonstrated over the telephone on several bands. He said he especially enjoys getting on 40 meter SSB with a large roundtable of friends.

Commented Gruber: "There has been no activity by the utility in resolving this problem in over a year, and Mr Flynn's noise case now appears to be at a standstill." The League's involvement in the case goes back to January 2001, when Flynn requested the League's assistance. Gruber says the League's role is to provide technical information and guidance to utilities "to keep a complaint from reaching the point of a Citation."

In late 2005, Gruber had a chance to check the line noise at Flynn's QTH firsthand. He had taken RFI gear to a Florida ham radio convention for a talk and demonstration. Afterward, on his own time, Gruber--with help from ARRL West Central Florida Section Manager Dee Turner, N4GD--took some noise measurements of his own.

Gruber submitted the results of his on-site inspection to the FCC. Personnel from the Commission's Tampa field office followed up with their own inspection before issuing the Citation, which lays the groundwork for a possible Notice of Apparent Liability proposing to fine the utility if the interference problem is not resolved.

"I hope this case serves as a precedent for FCC enforcement, where appropriate, in power line noise cases," said Gruber, who's compiled various reports and correspondence relating to the Lakeland Electric power line interference case into a booklet of approximately 60 pages. "While the League will work with amateurs in such cases for as long as it takes," he added, "we hope the FCC Citation will serve as a warning to electric utilities that it's not acceptable to take months or years to fix the problem causing the interference."

Source:

The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 23 June 9, 2006

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
FCC Cites Florida Utility for Interference to Radi  
by K0RFD on June 9, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
Shoot, the guy is 84. I am sure the utility is waiting him out. I just hope he gets rid of the QRM before he dies.
 
FCC Cites Florida Utility for Interference to Radi  
by KE4ZHN on June 10, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
I find it ironic that the FCC goes after this utility company, yet drags their feet and lets years pass without going after the BPL problem up in Virginia! I guess Part 15 is subject to selective enforcement by the FCC. Or should I call it "selective enfarcement"?
 
RE: FCC Cites Florida Utility for Interference to  
by W1RFI on June 10, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
Actually, some of the power line cases have also dragged on for years, although it is sometimes the complainant that wants to give a cooperating, but inept, utility time to continue to work on the problem.

ARRL probably has about 200-300 staff hours behind the Lakeland case, including a site visit by Mike Gruber, W1MG.

For information about process used to file this complaint, see:

http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/rfi-elec.html

The FCC has been getting more and more firm with Part 15 device operators, primarily under the procedures described above.

http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/FCC_enforcement/part-15/

You would think that most folks would rather resolve it than literally make a federal case out of what should be a local problem.

Ed Hare, W1RFI
 
RE: FCC Cites Florida Utility for Interference to  
by W9WHE-II on June 14, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
"Power line noise continues to generate the bulk of interference complaints that ARRL receives," ......... the League reviews hundreds of such complaints each year"


Complaining to arrl about power line noise is a TOTAL AND COMPLETE waste of time. You might as well complain to mommie about the wheather. arrl has ZERO power to order a power company to do anything. FCC and FCC ALONE has power to address RF issues.

So why does arrl receive complaints? Could it be that arrl has brainwashed 'dumbed down' hams into thinking that arrl has some power or influence over such issues? Scary. Very, very scary.

Fully 2/3 of hams recognize arrl's lack of meaningful influence with regulators:

http://www.eham.net/survey/720

W9WHE
 
RE: FCC Cites Florida Utility for Interference to  
by W1RFI on June 14, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
ARRL "receives power-line noise complaints" because the procedures it and the FCC have worked out have ARRL act as first point of contact in trying to get the problem resolved directly with the power company. About 40% of the cases are resolved at that first step.

http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/powerline-FAQ.html

If not, at this point, ARRL has all of the information needed for the FCC to take its next step - an advisory letter.

If I had my druthers, FCC would do its job from start to finish, but it won't, and unless ARRL were willing to step forward and offer its help, most of these cases would not have gone anywhere.

For the life of me, I can't see why you would want to undermine that work, WHE-II, but that is exactly what you are trying to do.

Your rant would be more effective it it were accurate, so you may want to take the time to read the URLs I posted and see if you can find an interpretation that fits your agenda.

In the meantime, I hope that you don't mind if ARRL staff continues to work on power-line cases.

Ed, W1RFI

 
RE: FCC Cites Florida Utility for Interference to  
by K1OU on June 16, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
Bad lawyer from Illinois:

"Fully 2/3 of hams recognize arrl's lack of meaningful influence with regulators:

http://www.eham.net/survey/720"

Funny how he relies on an unscientific poll for evidence. I would think that he would have learned at evening commuter college law school that facts should have some credibility before being entered into evidence.

 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Other News Articles
New Vice Directors in Central, Roanoke Divisions:
New Amateur Radio Web Site Launches:
Announcing Railroad Depots on the Air:
Rowley Shears, G8KW (SK):
Cuba Facilitates Equipment to Amateur Radio Operators: