FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Interference Complaints:
from
The ARRL Letter, Vol 25, No 24
on
June 16, 2006
Website:
http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!
FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Amateur's Interference Complaints:
In two strongly worded letters, the FCC's Enforcement Bureau has directed
the Manassas, Virginia, BPL system to take appropriate steps to eliminate
harmful interference to Amateur Radio operators. Several hams in the
Manassas area have complained, some repeatedly, about severe interference
from the BPL system, operated by COMTek on the city-owned power grid. The
FCC minced no words in detailing what it wants the city and BPL operator
COMTek to do to ensure its system complies with Part 15 rules governing BPL
systems and even hinted that it may shut down all or part of the system. One
of the FCC letters followed up on a complaint from Dwight Agnew, AI4II, of
BPL interference to his mobile operations.
FCC Spectrum Enforcement Division Chief Joseph Casey told the city and
COMTek June 16 that within 20 days he wants a "detailed report on the
actions you have taken and the progress you have made in resolving the
interference complaint or reducing the emissions in the area referenced in
Mr Agnew's complaint to 20 dB below the Part 15 limit," a level the FCC
maintains generally is sufficient to eliminate BPL interference to mobile
operations. Additionally, Casey said the Commission wants to know "the
specific steps you will take to inform customers of a cessation of service
in the event you are directed to cease operations, either in part or
system-wide."
ARRL CEO David Sumner, K1ZZ, said the League is "especially gratified" that
the Enforcement Bureau's Spectrum Enforcement Division has ordered the City
of Manassas to take steps to prepare for a cessation of BPL services.
"Clearly, the FCC has lost patience with COMTek's reliance on misleading
news releases as a substitute for meaningful solutions to the ongoing
interference," he said.
In an April 7 news release COMTek Vice President Walt Adams called the
Manassas BPL system "a real success story" and said its testing showed "an
almost identical" level of interference whether or not the system was in
operation. It made a similar claim to the FCC in Agnew's case.
COMTek has indicated it expects emissions can be reduced to 20 dB below the
Part 15 limit once second-generation BPL equipment is in place along the
Virginia Business Route 234 corridor by the end of July. Casey said that's
not good enough. "We note that a failure to respond until the end of July to
any complaint alleging harmful interference in an effort to determine if the
new equipment resolves the matter is not sufficient," he pointed out in a
footnote.
Casey said Manassas and COMTek must address and "reach a resolution" with
regard to Agnew's interference complaint "as soon as practicable."
Based on the engineering reports the FCC received from the city and COMTek
in response to the Agnew complaint, Casey said, "it appears that the BPL
system is not in compliance with the Commission's emission requirements at
several frequencies," although none were in the amateur bands.
Manassas and COMTek must detail within 30 days steps taken to clean up the
system as well as any additional actions necessary for the system to remain
in compliance with Commission rules.
In a second letter, Casey requested Manassas and COMTek to examine and
address specific longstanding interference complaints from George Tarnovsky,
K4GVT; Donald Blasdell, W4HJL; Bill South, N3OH; Jack Cochran, WC4J, and
Arthur Whittum, W1CRO. Manassas and COMTek must "take appropriate remedial
steps to eliminate any instances of harmful interference" or reduce
emissions in the areas cited in the complaints to 20 dB below the Part 15
limit, he instructed. He also reiterated his call for system compliance.
Casey said the FCC wants a report within 30 days on steps taken to address
the five radio amateurs' specific interference complaints and eliminate
excessive emissions.
Tarnovsky said the complainants are encouraged by the FCC's response to
COMTek's reports and are looking forward to the results of the
Commission-directed testing.
"I think I can speak for all parties in saying that we're looking forward to
a BPL interference-free Manassas," he said.
Source:
The ARRL Letter
Vol. 25, No. 24
June 16, 2006
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Amateur
|
|
|
by W2LO on June 16, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Finally! Is the FCC sincere about them cleaning up that mess? Time will tell. Keep tuned to this one, everybody.
W2LO
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Ama
|
|
|
by K1OU on June 17, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Where's W9WHE to shoot off his piehole now?
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Ama
|
|
|
by N7UQA on June 17, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
K1OU wrote...
Where's W9WHE to shoot off his piehole now?
:) I needed a good laugh Jerry...
Oh don't worry, I'm sure he's (W9WHE) is lurking in the back ground somewhere. I'm sure Johnathan will still insist that it was ALL market forces and pressure from the FCC; and that the ARRL had a negligible to nill impact.
Now that it's becoming more apparent that Mr. Powells still born BPL project is NOT the be all end all broadband delivery method; maybe now the abysmal interference problems with BPL will finally kill it.
Craig - N7UQA
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Ama
|
|
|
by K1OU on June 17, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Hey Craig,
I'm sure that our bad attorney from Illinois will somehow try to turn it around and try to claim that I am resorting to a personal attack because that's what liberals do!
|
|   |
|
FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Interfe
|
|
|
by K2JVI on June 17, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Perhaps we are seeing an attitude change caused by Powell's and Abernathy's departure, as many of you know they were the biggest BPL cheerleaders.
Lets hope this gets resolved. I'm not against Com-tek bieng the ISP for this,just this technology. Who knows, maybe they will migrate to a fiber-backbone wireless combination as part of the solution. That equipment is available off the shelf, does'nt pollute the radio spectrum , and can perform rings around BPL.
|
|   |
|
FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Interfe
|
|
|
by N4QX on June 18, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Achieved via the administrative process without recourse to a lawsuit. Frustratingly slow, but the way Congress has decreed it shall work, despite what armchair and actual lawyers on this forum say.
|
|   |
|
FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Interfe
|
|
|
by WA3KYY on June 19, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I particularly liked the requirement to present a plan on how they will inform their customers in the event they are ordered to shut part or all of the system down. That is a very large clue-bat the FCC is wielding and the operators of the system in Manassas had better keep that in mind.
73,
Mike WA3KYY
|
|   |
|
FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Interfe
|
|
|
by NT4XT on June 19, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Fine Business.
I was beginning to loose faith.
Hey, looks like- I got a whole lot more than just an Antenna Book with mostly stuff I already had in prior editions when I renewed this year!
Thank you ARRL for twisting my arm to renew.
I'm glad I did.
ex W3DCG KG4PYM.
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Ama
|
|
|
by W9WHE-II on June 21, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
"In two strongly worded letters, the FCC's Enforcement Bureau has directed the Manassas, Virginia, BPL system to take appropriate steps to eliminate harmful interference to Amateur Radio operators"
This is good news. Let's hope that this is not limited to Manassas, although it presently appears to be.
NOTE: In this arrl press release, arrl chose (and wisely so) NOT to take credit. Afterall, FCC has IGNORED arrl's multiple "demands". arrl has shown its impotence and has wisely chosen NOT to take credit for something that it could not acomplish.
What would be very interesting to know, is WHY FCC took this PARTICULAR action? If the REASONS for FCC's actions could be ascertained, then possibly the same recipie could be repeated in other places by other hams suffering legitimate interference.
In the long run, ONLY market forces can kill BPL as a technology. Either it is comeptitive or it is not. Let's hope that it is not competitive and BPL will die on its own. One thing is for certain, arrl can't kill BPL.
W9WHE
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Ama
|
|
|
by W6EM on June 21, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Well put, Jonathan, except the part about only market forces. ARRL doesn't want to kill all BPL, only that which it feels is harmful to amateur radio. They've even gone on the record as not wishing to help defend BPL's infringement on other services such as international shortwave broadcasting. If something legitimately isn't operating lawfully, it should not be ignored.
Market forces already have killed it. When BPL roll outs in urban and some suburban areas became the focus instead of sparesly populated rural areas (which was its original buy-line) it lost. Why? Extensive fiber optic systems already exist to very near individual subscribers making a superior/much faster broadband service a fierce competitor. DSL at 3.5GB/s beats the pants off of BPL, so bye-bye any hope for competitive advantage even in the suburbs.
All that are left are a few manufacturers trying to hype their 'special' BPL rollouts as being unique and interference free. Maybe to ham radio, but shifting the noise to public safety allocations from 30 to 50 MHZ is no solution either.
High powered WIFI and Corridor System's microwave approach will cover rural territories much more cost effectively and not burden the power system operators with a bunch of extra junk hung on the overhead lines to cause more power system faults and impediments to prompt power restoration following other outages.
73,
Lee
W6EM/4
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Directs Manassas BPL System to Resolve Int
|
|
|
by W9WHE-II on June 21, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
NT4XT writes:
"Hey, looks like- I got a whole lot more than just an Antenna Book with mostly stuff I already had in prior editions when I renewed this year"
Giving arrl credit for FCC's newly agressive stance is like giving the rooster credit for making the sun come up!
Did you know that last night, arrl broadcast code practice, and today the sun came up! WOW, arrl made the sun come up today!
Also, did you know, whenerver I do my snake dance, no snakes show up. How do I know my snake dance works? Well, you don't see any snakes do you?
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Related News & Articles
What is FCC Docket 03-104 Asking?
ARRL Asks FCC to Shut Down New York BPL Field Trial:
BPL Orders Exceed FCC's Jurisdiction and Authority, Court Filing Says:
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
No 136 kHz for the USA
Other News Articles
The New Frontier for School Radio:
New Vice Directors in Central, Roanoke Divisions:
New Amateur Radio Web Site Launches:
Announcing Railroad Depots on the Air:
Rowley Shears, G8KW (SK):
|