eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

FCC to Seek Comments on Katrina Panel Recommendations:

from The ARRL Letter, Vol 25, No 25 on June 23, 2006
Website: http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!

FCC to Seek Comments on Katrina Panel Recommendations:

The FCC will invite public comments in response to recommendations presented this month by the Independent Panel Reviewing the Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Communications Networks. A Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-83A1.pdf in EB Docket 06-119, released this week, contains wide-ranging proposals and considerations that could involve FCC rule or administrative changes, a few of which deal with the Amateur Service.

"The devastation of Hurricane Katrina highlighted the importance of telecommunications and media to our daily lives, and our dependency on our national communications infrastructure," remarked FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin. "With this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, we are asking for comments and suggestions from the public on how to best address and implement the Independent Panel's recommendations."

The Independent Panel's report points out that Amateur Radio stations were among those segments of the communications infrastructure adversely affected by Hurricane Katrina.

"Equipment was damaged or lost due to the storm, and trained amateurs were difficult to find in the immediate aftermath," the report said. "However, once called into help, Amateur Radio operators volunteered to support many agencies, such as FEMA, the National Weather Service, Hurricane Watch [Net] and the American Red Cross."

The Independent Panel report said Amateur Radio volunteers provided communication in many locations where no other means of communicating existed. Hams also provided other technical aid to communities affected by Hurricane Katrina, the report added. The panel recommended adopting "a proactive (rather than reactive) program for network reliability and resiliency."

ARRL Alabama Section Manager Greg Sarratt, W4OZK, addressed the Independent Panel on March 7 to note that Amateur Radio volunteers "were part of the solution" in supplementing normal emergency communication systems taken out by the storm. For 37 days following Hurricane Katrina, Sarratt headed the volunteer effort to process Amateur Radio volunteers headed to the Gulf Coast to assist recovery operations.

In its NPRM, the FCC asked if should explore amending its rules to permit automatic grants of certain types of waivers or special temporary authority (STA) in declared disaster areas. "As a condition of the waiver or STA, the FCC could require verbal or written notification to the Commission staff contemporaneously with activation or promptly after the fact," the NPRM suggested. Following last year's devastating hurricanes, the FCC issued a handful of STAs to permit licensees lacking HF privileges to operate on HF for emergency purposes. The NPRM offered these specific areas for consideration.

* Waiver of Amateur Radio and license-exempt rules, permitting transmissions necessary to meet essential communications needs.

* Waiver of application filing deadlines, something the FCC did last fall for amateurs who lived in hurricane-stricken states.

* Streamlined STA process, so parties in the affected area may simply notify the FCC in writing or orally of a need to operate in order to restore service.

Comments will be due 30 days from the date the NPRM is published in the Federal Register and may be filed via the FCC's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/.

Source:

The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 25 June 23, 2006

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
FCC to Seek Comments on Katrina Panel Recommendati  
by MACGUFFIN on June 24, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
I found this part interesting.

"Following last year's devastating hurricanes, the FCC issued a handful of STAs to permit licensees lacking HF privileges to operate on HF for emergency purposes."

Had the FCC acted on its proposal to remove the Morse code testing requirement sooner there would have been little to no need to issue these STAs.
 
RE: FCC to Seek Comments on Katrina Panel Recommen  
by W6EM on June 24, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
Having read the entire FCC committee report, it strikes me that once more, bureaucratic shuffling at its best.

No real solutions proposed to fix the interoperability problem. And, the solution is sitting right in front of them.

The military and Coast Guard could talk directly to hams. How? Frequency-agile NB high-band VHF FM transceivers. They don't have to use FCC-restricted, type-accepted radios that cannot be moved quickly to mutually agreeable frequencies. There were examples of Coast Guard and amateurs communicating in Katrina's aftermath. But, not the cops. Not the paramedics, firemen, etc. Why not? For a number of reasons. Mostly, trunked-junk stuck on 800MHz. And, of course the big single-point trunked controller failure in New Orleans. And some of the units that came there were running digital protocols like EDACS and Smartnet. Maybe some APCO25, to boot. The military and Coast Guard don't use that stuff or those bands.

How simple it would have been for the FCC to have recommended taking 148-150MHz, that is now sparsely used by the military, NASA and CAP, to use as an emergency spectrum interoperability segment. And, with the plethora of export-only, non-type-accepted, keypad frequency programmable radios already made by Motorola, it would be all too simple. The Coast Guard could go there. The military and National Guard could go there, we could go there, and, even late-model public safety high band VHF radios could be programmed for a few channels, if keypad programmability remains a no-no for our trusted first responders.

But, the FCC probably wants no part of that. Why? They've been trying to push public safety users up to (or down to) 700MHz for some time. Even Motorola showed up with a few hundred HTs on 700MHz for them to use. (I guess the military didn't want to or they weren't on M's list of customers.) Plus, many agencies don't want to scrap big investments in their existing radio systems. Especially outfits like the California and Missouri Highway Patrols. Fringe area operations on 700MHz would be a whole different matter when compared to the penetrating power of 40MHz. Talk about dead spots and problems. They know better.

Anyway, nice try, FCC. Let's instead shoot for a simple solution to interoperability problems. One that is practical and works for almost everyone and not one that would cost hard-pressed agencies millions to replace all of their radio gear. And, in the process, skips over interooperability for the military, National Guard and the Coast Guard. Forgetting, as we know, that they need to be part of the interoperability solution as well. It could save lives the next time.

I've not been silent. They have my proposal or will have, as of Monday.

73,

Lee
W6EM
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Other News Articles
VK5RJ Still Gracing the Airwaves at Age 101:
rec.radio.amateur.moderated -- 5 Yrs. Old:
Tune-In To The World -- Amateur Radio Gets People Talking:
Student Sends MIT Letter to Space:
Amateur Radio Club Talks to Hams Worldwide on Centennial: