eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

JARL Administration Officers Again Affirm PLC Support:

Kenji Rikitake (JJ1BDX) on August 26, 2006
View comments about this article!

* JARL administration officers again affirmed their PLC support on the Radiowave Regulation Council of Japanese Telecom Ministry

Reported by Kenji Rikitake, JJ1BDX
August 26, 2006
(Unlimited distribution permitted among the amateur radio communities.)

JARL administration affirmed their PLC support in the opinion document they explained on the Radiowave Regulation Council of Japanese Telecom Ministry, on August 23, 2006.

The Radiowave Regulation Council of MIC (Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, aka the Telecom Ministry) of Japan held the meeting on August 23, 2006, to gather public opinions in Japan among those are for and against the PLC (Power-Line Communication) using spectrum of 2 to 30MHz.

The meeting is private and the minutes have not yet been publicized by the MIC. The following includes an unofficial meeting brief report of Mr. Toshikazu Kusano, JA1ELY, as of August 24, 2006.

Five participants explained their opinion statements. Mr. Kusano explained his opinion against the PLC, with a set of extracted copies from the petition statements sent by 2000 JARL members who are against the PLC. He also claimed JARL administration's opinion was on the contrary standpoint of many of the members.

The second participant was from Nikkei Radio, a commercial shortwave radio station in Japan, who claimed the position against the PLC with their own documents.

The third participant was from PLC-J (PLC Promoter's Alliance in Japan)_ and the position explained was for the PLC.

The fourth participant was from JARL administration with two delegates of Mr. Kaieda, the full-time Director of JARL, and Mr. Mori, Director of JARL Technology Laboratory. Their position explained was for the PLC.

The Fifth participant was Dr. Katsuhiro Kitagawa from Osaka University, claimed the position against the PLC with an academic report from Kyoto University [1], and other documents which showed the scientific fallacy of IEC CISPR 22, which is the evaluation basis of MIC on the PLC's electromagnetic environmental implication.

[1] Ishihara, M., Umehara, D., and Morihiro Y.: Measurement of radiated emissions on indoor power line communications, Technical Report of IEICE, EMCJ2005-145, pp.43-48, March 2006 (in Japanese).

Note/Errata: in the previous report on August 23, 2006, the author erroneously cited Dr. Kitagawa's position on this issue from an unconfirmed source. Dr. Kitagawa claimed to the author that his position on this issue did not represent his involvement to the PLC issue as an amateur radio licensee, and that he had never claimed an opinion such as reported in the previous report.

The author requests those who received the previous report titled "JARL administration said "YES" to PLC (Power-Line Communication); many JARL members protest against the announcement without the member consensus" to replace the document with this report ASAP. The author is solely responsible for the mistake.

The author regrets the mistake on the previous report, and shows his apologies on the erroneous citation and the inconvenience which might be caused on Dr. Kitagawa and others.

[End of report]

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
Domo arigato - I can see clearly now...  
by AA6E on August 26, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
What is going on at JARL? This article is unhelpful.
 
RE: Domo arigato - I can see clearly now...  
by DD3EO on August 26, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
I suggest reading the first Article as well:
http://www.eham.net/articles/14654
In that, you will find, that the decision to support PLC(BPL) was made by the three persons mentioned alone, without consulting the JARL members.
Legal consequences will follow.
I can only suspect Corruption inside the JARL-Administration, as anyone, who has a little bit of technical knowledge, knows, that PLC is the end to shortwave communication. We surely can expect that knowledge from a licensed ham, can we? Plus, PLC and its effects is a constant topic for years in any ham radio related media. They cannot claim, they didn't know.

That's my 0.02 Euro Cent about that.
DD3EO

 
Time will resolve the issue of BPL everywhere.  
by AI2IA on August 26, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
In each country the BPL issue will be confronted in different ways. It is encouraging to see our Japanese counterparts giving considerable attention to BPL. In addition, the nice part is the principle that you cannot fake it with technology. While harmful interference will result during attempts at implementation, this BPL thing is going to work, or it will not. The third possibility is that before it gets very far along, it may fall by the wayside because of newer or newly modified and superior techniques. One thing for sure, if the supporters invest heavily in it and push it, and if it continues to be a source of substantial QRM, they will lose all of their investments, and their reputations will be considerably harmed because of all the warnings previously given. May the best side win!
 
RE: Time will resolve the issue of BPL everywhere.  
by W9WHE-II on August 29, 2006 Mail this to a friend!
"....the decision to support PLC(BPL) was made by the three persons mentioned alone, without consulting the JARL members".

If true, then JARL is taking a page right out of the arrl playbook!
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Other News Articles
VK5RJ Still Gracing the Airwaves at Age 101:
rec.radio.amateur.moderated -- 5 Yrs. Old:
Tune-In To The World -- Amateur Radio Gets People Talking:
Student Sends MIT Letter to Space:
Amateur Radio Club Talks to Hams Worldwide on Centennial: