Mobile Antenna Notes
from
Alan Applegate, K0BG
on
September 4, 2006
View comments about this article!
"Editor's Note: Due to the popularity of some of eHam's older articles, many of which you may not have read, the eHam.net team has decided to rerun some of the best articles that we have received since eHam's inception. These articles will be reprinted to add to the quality of eHam's content and in a show of appreciation to the authors of these articles."
The majority of HF mobile antennas are electrically short. For example, an 80 M mobile antenna 8 feet long is electrically 11° in length as opposed to 90° of a full-sized 1/4 wave vertical. Thus, the input impedance is around 15 to 25 ohms depending upon loading coil position and Q factor, and ground and resistive losses. The formula is as follows:
Rt=Rr+Rc+Rg
Where Rt=total or input resistance (more correctly input impedance), Rr the Radiation resistance, Rc the coil resistance, and Rg the ground loss resistance.
We have some control over the radiation resistance, but for our example above, the Rr is under 1 ohm! Since it is a factor of the electrical length of the antenna (loading coil position is also a factor), we must lengthen the antenna to increase it. Obviously, there's a limit here. After all, who could drive around with a full 1/4 wave, 61 foot, 80 meter vertical on their vehicle?
The Rc is the resistive component of our loading coil, which cancels the high capacitive reactance of our short vertical. On 80 meters, the coil will have between 75 to 200 uh of inductance depending upon where in the antenna it is located. The higher up the mast it is located, the higher the radiation resistance, but the larger the coil (inductance) needs to be. There is a trade-off limit, however, because the larger the inductance, the greater the resistive losses of the coil. The reactive resistance versus the resistive losses determines the "Q". The higher Q, the less loss, and the more efficient the antenna will be. On 80 meters it is difficult to obtain Qs much over 200 and even this much requires good construction practices. The ratio between diameter and length to maximize Q is 2:1. Imagine running around with a spare tire-sized loading coil!
The Rg or ground loss resistance typically varies between 2 and 10 ohms, but can be much higher. It's mostly a factor of the size of the vehicle our antenna is mounted on, and how and where it is mounted. Remember our vehicle is not a ground plane for the lower frequencies, but rather a capacitor to ground. Rg can be minimized by proper grounding (bonding) all bolted-on parts including doors, hoods, trunks, tail and exhaust pipes, bumpers, etc. Mounting the antenna as high as possible on the vehicle also helps as this reduces the coupling to ground (we want the vehicle coupled to ground, not the antenna). Avoid using bumper mounts, magnet mounts, trunk lip mounts, and similar devices.
In just about every case, an HF mobile antenna will have an input impedance of less than 50 ohms, and typically between 12 and 35 ohms. Obviously if we wish to obtain a low VSWR, we need to match our 50 coax feed to the antenna. There are several ways to do this, but the easiest is to use a 4:1 unun.
Attached to this article is a schematic diagram of a 4:1 unun. Unun stands for Unbalanced to unbalanced, as opposed to Balun, which is Balanced to unbalanced. To the left is our 50 ohm input, and on the right a 12.5 ohm output. By tapping 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 of the way along the top winding, 1.5:1, 2:1, and 3:1 ratios can be obtained. Or, 33 ohms, 25 ohms, and 16 ohms. In all but the extreme cases, one of these taps will closely match just about any mobile antenna. Using the chart in the ARRL Antenna Book, or by using an antenna bridge like MFJ's 259B, we can guesstimate or measure the input impedance of our antenna and select the best tap.
Construction is easy even for a novice builder, and the ARRL Handbook gives a lot of good tips on how to wind one. In short, the untapped winding should be insulated from the tapped winding with Teflon or high-temperature plastic sleeving or tape. A T200-6 is the best bet, but a T200-2 can be used. The core should be wrapped with glass tape if high power is contemplated. AWG 14 wire is adequate for 1,000 watts of power, and will allow an 11 to 12 turn bifilar winding. The transformer should be mounted close to the base of the antenna, and protected from the weather. Cores, glass tape, and Teflon sleeving may be ordered from Amidon, Palomar Engineering, and many other sources.
Now let's digress for a few moments and take another look at the inherent losses of a short, mobile antenna. Referring to our original formula above, Rt=Rr+Rc+Rg, let's read between the lines. If Rt is say 40 ohms, and affords us a 1.25:1 VSWR, what and where do you think the other losses are? Most generally they are in the coil, and to a lesser degree the ground losses. You might ask then, what does a lossy coil looks like? Well, one thing's for sure, it isn't spare-tire sized!
Many commercial mono band and multi band short mobile antennas will match 50 ohms quite well due to their resistive losses. This author recently measured a 6 foot long, helically wound, bumper mounted antenna with an MFJ 259B, and got 64 ohms at resonance on 40 meters! Its approximate efficiency is under 2%. That is to say, fewer than 2 of those 100 watts inputted were being radiated, and the guy bragged about how well it matched! Well guess what? I have an antenna with a 1:1 VSWR from DC to 1.2 GHz. It's called a dummy load! If your antenna matches as well as this one did, you need a better antenna.
One last bit of information... A VSWR bridge cannot measure phase angle, and therefore cannot be used to determine the actual resonate point of any antenna other than a purely resistive one, and that just doesn't happen very often, especially with mobile antennas. What it does measure is the (lowest) voltage, and because an antenna has reactance, the voltage and current are not in-phase. Without a good noise bridge or antenna analyzer, it is mostly guesswork. In short, don't rely on a VSWR bridge to adjust your mobile antenna.
Alan Applegate, KØBG
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by SSB on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
What is the point to this? There isn't anything here that one could not find in a zillion books written over the last 80 years.
Alex....
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by BIPTL on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
>What is the point to this? There isn't anything here >that one could not find in a zillion books written >over the last 80 years.
So addressing the issue again is vorboten? FWIW, not everyone has seen all those zillions of books that you seem to have at your finger tips... or can claim to be all knowing as perhaps you might.
Perhaps instead of complaining --in a fashon so characteristic of many HAMs these days --- you could opt to either: 1) say thanks to the author for taking the time to contibute to eham or 2) keep your crankiness to yourself.
Cranky comments like yours are exactly the type stuff that make people who are willing to step up to the plate and contribute to this and other forums decide it is just not worth sticking their neck out again. Life is short. Consider saying thanks every now and then.
Have a great day!
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by PA3DUV on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Alan
Thanks for another great contribution on the ever interesting topic of mobile HF antennas.
It takes good elmership to explain us the complex conditions and engineering considerations of a mobile HF antenna system in a straight forward and easy to understand manner.
73, Dick
PA3DUV
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by KD8CPP on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Alan,
I want to thank you for this article. I am getting ready to upgrade and buy a HF radio, and this article helps me, as I do not have zillions of other books, nor time to go and look through half of eham.
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by KX8N on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
"Cranky comments like yours are exactly the type stuff that make people who are willing to step up to the plate and contribute to this and other forums decide it is just not worth sticking their neck out again."
Remember, this is coming from someone without a call, calling himself SSB. Don't fall for the trolling.
|
|   |
|
Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by G8UBJ on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
So just like in a fixed station the greatest gains are to be had through the antenna set up.
Of course its a slightly different set of rules for mobile (For a start I didn't appreciate the value of an unun balun).
I just bought an old FT-7 for mobile work (10 watts output). Sounds like $50 spent on the antenna is equivalent to $400 on an amp. I know where I will be spending my money. But after thats sorted a nice big THP amp ;o)
|
|   |
|
Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by W4KPA on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Well, personally I don't have a "zillion" books on mobile hf antennas. I only have a couple of references and they aren't nearly as clear and well written as what Alan posts. And, even if I've read it before, I always learn something new.
Thanks, Alan, for writing the article, and thanks to e-ham for posting it again.
Bruce
W4KPA
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by W6TH on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
.
XC means capacitive reactance.
XL means inductive reactance.
When XC equals XL, this means the system is resonant.
XC=XL=0. What is left is "R", is the resistance of the wire or antenna.
A real antenna won't radiate all the power it receives. Some will be dissipated in antenna losses.
A value of "R" greater than zero means that some power is wasted. Since we can't expect to completely avoid dissipation losses.
Thanks Alan.
W6TH
.:
|
|   |
|
Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by K3WVU on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Thanks Alan, for sharing your expertise. All of the real hams here appreciate your efforts.
73
Dwight
|
|   |
|
Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by G3VGR on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
"Without a good noise bridge or antenna analyzer, it is mostly guesswork. In short, don't rely on a VSWR bridge to adjust your mobile antenna"
Alan has never writen anything better. If you don't have an antenna analyzer, beg, borrow or steal one. I used a switched auto-transformer with my Hustlers.as described by Mike, G3TSO ( http://www.qsl.net/g3tso/images/Schematics/AntMatcher.pdf )
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by KE4MOB on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
"Attached to this article is a schematic diagram of a 4:1 unun."
Hey Editor, I think we're missing something here.
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by W2BLC on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
very useful post - wish there were more as good as this.
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by K8MHZ on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I doubt that MFJ's 259B or Teflon high-temperature plastic existed 80 years ago. Glad to see the reprint.
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by N4JBK on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Hey SSB get a life and try saying something useful and constructive for a change, instead of trying to cast a bad light on good work that others have done. If you work hard you too can be accepted
|
|   |
|
Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by WB8YFL on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Very good information, I think I may understand some of it even.
My motto is if my radio likes the match and I can hear and be heard, and even score a QSO now an then, the antenna must be doing something. Its hard for me to justify an antenna that cost 25 times what a Hamstick style goes for, at least right now, maybe someday.
Plug a monoband whip into your roof and properly ground it, and your on the air.
Heck, put an unshielded dummy load on your roof and someone will hear you I'm sure.
Ron
WB8YFL
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by W6TH on September 4, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
.
by SSB on September 4, 2006.
What is the point to this? There isn't anything here that one could not find in a zillion books written over the last 80 years.
Alex....
......................................................
Yes Alex, this is a true statement, but this post is not like Cebik, W4RNL, where he takes a zillion books, EZNEC, re-phases and puts in his own words and then copywrites it.
This is a wonderful post and beneficial to all, especially to new comers that now have entered the ham fraternity. This information is all in one package.
W6TH
.:
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by M0ESW on September 5, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Dear Allen,
Ignore this person....!!!!! Callsign or NOT one should have the common decency to post ones name, why's and wherefore's in the register if one wishes to COMMENT, leave alone critisize!!! Your contributions is and has always been helpfull to me and your meticulious website a source of inspiration and knowledge. Thank you for your effords.
73
Etienne Swanepoel M0ESW
Bude
Cornwall
UK
|
|   |
|
Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by KI4PEQ on September 5, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
1. I think that when SSB has a call sign, he would have more credibility on this forum. Hiding behind a nom de plume is trollish behavior IMHO.
2. To all of the hams that have submitted articles, DON'T be afraid of stating what might be obvious. Unlike our "learned" friend, not everyone is blessed with encyclopaedic knowedge of all things amateur radio. Those of us with call signs so new the ink is wet appreciate ANY information that can be stuffed into our heads. Articles like this are what "Elmering" is all about. I truly appreciate it.
3. It seems that the ham internet forums have more than their share of cranks, curmudgeons, and all around anti-social people. I'm happy to say that this is not indicative of the ham poplation at large.
4. To the eHam editors: keep those articles coming!
73,
Richard
|
|   |
|
Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by N0AH on September 5, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Wyoming recently passed a law against any and all communication devices being used while vehicles are in motion. This was a result of the large number of fatalities on I-80, a main highway connecting the west and east coast. Most were related to cell phone use, CB radio's, and other modes of communications including laptops. Makes you think about all this mobile stuff posted................
|
|   |
|
Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by AH6OK on September 6, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I think it's great to see these formulas/concepts again. It'll help with the newbies as well as seasoned hams. great Job and Mahalo!
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by W7QHH on September 6, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Did you ever find the diagram for the un un? Thank You and 73s, Clyde ,W7QHH
|
|   |
|
RE: Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by W7SMJ on September 6, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
"Did you ever find the diagram for the un un?"
It looks like the diagram didn't make the original article either. Alan describes the construction though in a follow-up post.
Reference the original article...
http://www.eham.net/articles/4425
73,
Scott
|
|   |
|
Mobile Antenna Notes
|
|
|
by N1GXC on September 7, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Why should Alex (aka SSB) care? Mobile ham radio antennas are of no use to him anyway. I always get a kick out of the e-ham users with little CB handles and no personal info. They seem to be the first ones to complain about everything.
73, Dan WZ1P
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Related News & Articles
No One Cares Unless It's Them
Was it Help Mail or Hate Mail?
2M Square Dipole by KØFF
Verticals Work!
Portable QRP Antennas
Other Antennas Articles
Running Radials the Easy Way -- Sew What?
The Worry and Apprehension of VHF Antenna Polarization
'No Show' HF Antenna that WORKS!
The Eagle Has Landed
My Quest for a New Antenna
|