Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
from
George Dowell, K0FF
on
March 18, 2007
View comments about this article!
"Editor's Note: Due to the popularity of some of eHam's older articles, many of which you may not have read, the eHam.net team has decided to rerun some of the best articles that we have received since eHam's inception. These articles will be reprinted to add to the quality of eHam's content and in a show of appreciation to the authors of these articles."
Suitcase Portable SLOOP (Shielded LOOP) Receive Antenna for 160 or 75 Meters
For MF and low HF (160, 80,75) fixed station use, the Beverage is probably the first choice among receive antennas. When space does not allow such a large antenna, the Shielded Loop or SLOOP made from inch CATV cable is another proven performer (see my article on the SLOOP on eHAm). When traveling to a remote DX location for an expedition though, it may not be practical to transport such large loop of coax, nor is its ruggedness necessarily needed for a limited operation. For these instances, I have developed the Suitcase SLOOP, which uses flexible RG-8U coax cable, and can easily be assembled and broken down again.
Shown here is an example from which you may draw ideas.
The subject of the shielded loop is covered in great detail by ON4UN in his excellent book : Low Band Dxing
So look to those original articles for the theory behind this type antenna. Briefly, it is a loop of coax cable, less than 1/10th of a wavelength, that has the shield split at the midpoint by a gap. Most designs simply resonate the loop with a capacitor, and run it directly to a coaxial feedline to the receive-only port on the station rig.
I have always figured that the operating impedance of such a high Q loop is being swamped by doing such a simple feed scheme, so a coupling transformer has been included. By using a transformer made from an Amidon BN 73-202 Binocular core, with a loop side winding of 12 turns, and a feedline winding of 2 turns, a very good match is achieved using an MFJ Antenna Analyzer, and also looking at it with an Autec RF-1. These figures were arrived at by the back door method, that is by winding a series of transformers that got closer and closer to a good match, until a set of figures could be determined, and then the final turns count was calculated. This ratio is 6 to one, and since the impedance transformation is the square of the turns ratio, that would indicate that the loop itself is about 36 x 50 or 1800 Ohms. This makes sense to me, as the antenna is very narrow, having a 2:1 SWR bandwidth of about 40 KHz on 160.
Any other interpretations will be welcome.
Now, on with the mechanical layout.
We start with 20 feet of RG8U coax cable for 160 (10' for 80) to which a quality PL259 if soldered to each end. Once that is done, fold the length in two, and mark the exact center. At that point, remove approximately of the outer black insulation, and also the braid below. By doing so we form the gap, which is the heart of this antennas' success as a noisebuster. To strengthen and weatherproof the gap, wrap a few turns of Scotch 33+ tape over the wound, and top that with some heat shrink tubing.
For the main housing a cast aluminum outdoor electrical box called a Three Hole. Single Gang- , Suitable for Wet Locations is utilized.
Into the top hole is screwed a threaded to PVC fitting which has been strengthened by a brass plug. The plug also serves to waterproof the fitting.
A plastic 5/8 button plug is inserted fully into the bottom hole, to seal it from weather, and then a galvanized close nipple is screwed all the way in that hole. When mounting your finished antenna, this piece of threaded pipe will adapt to the larger pipe needed to fit the rotator, or other mount.
On the back side of the box is the third hole, and a standard chassis mount SO-239 fits nicely over that hole, for eventual connection of the feedline. Two more SO-239's need to be mounted on the blank sides as well, and there is where the loop coax with attach. Holes will need to be drilled for these.
Inside the box, between the loop coax connectors is where the resonating capacitor (s) is mounted. In the example shown, it is pre-tuned for the CW segment of 160, and therefore a variable is not used. In some DXpedition activities, the operating frequencies are well known in advance, and a variable may change position during transit, so we used fixed Silvered Micas to eliminate on more source of problems. You will undoubtedly want to include at least some variable capacitance in your unit for tuneup experiments. Then if you wish, they may be measured, and replaced with a fixed unit.
With Polyfoam RG8U, which has a stranded center conductor, it will take 800 pF to resonate at 1825, and 400 +/- for 75 meters. Each specific type, brand and even lot number will change this figure a bit.
A frame is constructed using PVC schedule 40 waterpipe, and cross(4 way) fitting . The 4 pipes are cut to 40 inches in length, and inserted into the cross to form a big X and the bottom is seated into the adaptor on the top of the box housing. The other three ends are terminated in TEES through which the coax loop is fed, and which hold the loop's shape.
In the example shown, I used TEES instead of , because the PL259 will easily fit through the ends, and it makes the wind profile a bit smaller. Some extra work was needed, because no adaptor could be found to go between the sizes, so I simply took a piece of PVC schedule 40 pipe, and reduced an inch of it's length for a slip fit INSIDE of the frame members. Into to top of this adaptor is inserted a 9/16 Nylon Hole Plug, to further limit the ingress of water into the framework.
All that is left is to assemble and tune the unit. There will be a sharp decrease in the SWR at the exact resonance point, and the impedance should read 50 Ohms.
Of course an antenna like this is used to reduce the local man made noise and improve the signal to noise ratio of the desired incoming signal. There is a tradeoff of ultimate signal strength, so a preamp may be in order.
If there is enough interest, I may make a partial KIT available, which would consist of the finished boz and all machined parts. You would have to supply the coax cable and PVC pipe. Don't forget that this construction techniqe should be used for temporary activities only, for fixed station use, the regular SLOOP is highly recommended.
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
RE: Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
|
|
|
by K0BG on March 19, 2007
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I wish this article would have been posted higher in the list. This is a neat project for those vacationers who like to operate on the beach (as an example).
Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
|
|   |
|
RE: Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
|
|
|
by N1XBP on March 19, 2007
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I built a similar loop using this article as one of my points of reference, and I've been experimenting with different versions of it since. My loop is designed for 40 and 80 meters, with similar construction but I used F connectors on the coax antenna element because I had them on hand, and they were easy to crimp to the RG-6 I used. My original used a polyvaricon, but I've also made one remote tuned with varactors (MVAM109s). Using a trifilar balun wound on a T-120-6 with a similar 1:12 ratio (to bring the low impedance loop up to 50 ohms) seems to really help keep the nulls deep, much more so than when I connected straight to the feedline.
The S/N ratio on this antenna is great, but mostly because of the two deep nulls which lets me kill interference sources nearby. The signal amplitude is really rather weak, though, and a preamp seems to be the way to go. I did a quick experiment using the cheap Ten Tec T-Kit preamp and a 9 volt battery power source and the loop performance really picked up. There might actually be a bit too much gain, since I get slightly better performance if I kick in the attenuator on my rig, but that combination seems to be much improved over no preamp at all.
The next round of experimentation will be to try a balanced preamp, although I've been told that keeping the varactors and transistors matched might be a chore. I've got one ready to go but haven't tried it out yet.
At any rate, thanks for this article, I think loops are fascinating antennas. I've heard there are a few good books about them kicking around (Didn't Carr write one?) If you are in an urban situation with lots of noise sources, try one of these out. It can be built in an afternoon. I even transmit with one of mine on 20 meters, QRP, with no problems using a cheap-o polyvaricon pulled from a tossed AM radio.
|
|   |
|
Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
|
|
|
by K4UUG on March 20, 2007
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
A Dipole cut to the freq you want to work is the most efficient antenna.
|
|   |
|
RE: Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
|
|
|
by K0FF on March 21, 2007
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
N1XBP on March 19, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I built a similar loop using this article as one of my points of reference, and I've been experimenting with different versions of it since. My loop is designed for 40 and 80 meters, with similar construction but I used F connectors on the coax antenna element because I had them on hand, and they were easy to crimp to the RG-6 I used. My original used a polyvaricon, but I've also made one remote tuned with varactors (MVAM109s). Using a trifilar balun wound on a T-120-6 with a similar 1:12 ratio (to bring the low impedance loop up to 50 ohms) seems to really help keep the nulls deep, much more so than when I connected straight to the feedline. "
**Naturally this loop is for receive only and is a tool designed to reduce background noise on the lowest ham bands as well as nulling out local interference.
See my other articles for the remote tuned balance preamp which will work with regular loops or shielded loops. Varactors are getting hard to find especially in larger values, but I do have a pretty good stock on hand. Get them when/where you can. Like 40673's they don't make them any more. Small values are a dime a dozen.
Geo>K0FF
|
|   |
|
RE: Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
|
|
|
by K0FF on March 21, 2007
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
K4UUG on March 20, 2007
A Dipole cut to the freq you want to work is the most efficient antenna. "
**There are many instances where a dipole is not a desirable antenna for a particular task. Efficiency does not equal effectiveness.
Factors such as noise polarity, height above ground, angle of takeoff/arrival all have a big bearing on the selection of an antenna for a particular task or path.
My 5/8 wave 40 meter vertical with raised radials is an excellent long haul DX antenna. The angle of takeoff is optimized for the long haul.
I can easily prove that a vertical has gain over a dipole/ Just take the measurements off the ends of the dipole!
On MF, that is 160 meters, you will universally find DXer's use vertical transmit antennas and receive antennas of the loop or Beverage design. Naturally local rag chewers would select a dipole or other high angle antenna.
Geo>K0FF
|
|   |
|
RE: Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
|
|
|
by KC8VWM on March 22, 2007
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
K4UUG on March 20, 2007
A Dipole cut to the freq you want to work is the most efficient antenna.
-----
The most "efficient antenna" depends on many variables such as operating frequency, height above ground, angle of desired radiation and many other variables.
To suggest a dipole antenna is the most efficient is not correct. A Yagi antenna design has more gain and one could conclude it's more efficient because of that fact alone.
Another example is an NVIS antenna that is typically located closer to the ground. This is not particularly efficient for long haul DX but yet the same antenna is extremely efficient for NVIS propagation.
Antenna efficiency is a matter of perspective and depends on the desired outcome and it's not necessarily based on the particular antenna design itself.
73 de Charles - KC8VWM
|
|   |
|
RE: Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
|
|
|
by KC8VWM on March 22, 2007
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Oh yes, nice article.
I'm with what N4SL said.
I do quite a bit of portable SWL'ing with my FT 817 and it seems the SLOOP is a nice compact portable antenna design which would serve this purpose.
I don't see this antenna design being used in the great outdoors but rather in tighter apartment like operating locations where it may not be possible to string up a 66' dipole.
Too bad it doesn't TX. Then again, it just might with a little modification. Would probably work far better than any Miracle Whip. (It's a miracle they even work at all)
It's always good to read about other hams who home brew thier own interesting antenna designs like this one. Good work.
73 de Charles - KC8VWM
|
|   |
|
RE: Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
|
|
|
by K4UUG on March 24, 2007
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I have two plastic reels with #12 wire one reel has 5'.635" on it the second reel has 11'.25" I have a small 4:1 balun this makes a mini off center windham dipole. With tuner it will work 75 60 40 20 17 10 6 2 meters its small and it packs up into a shaving bag with 50' of mini 8 coax. Two other reels have 50' feet of trot line to hang this mini antenna this would work well with a mini qrp rig such as the Yaesu Ft 817.
|
|   |
|
RE: Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
|
|
|
by K4UUG on March 24, 2007
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
KC8VWM Thank You Charles I see your point.73 k4uug Rick
|
|   |
|
RE: Suitcase Portable SLOOP RX Antenna
|
|
|
by K0FF on March 24, 2007
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
KC8VWM on March 22, 2007
K4UUG on March 20, 2007
A Dipole cut to the freq you want to work is the most efficient antenna.
-----
The most "efficient antenna" depends on many variables such as operating frequency, height above ground, angle of desired radiation and many other variables.
To suggest a dipole antenna is the most efficient is not correct. A Yagi antenna design has more gain and one could conclude it's more efficient because of that fact alone.
Another example is an NVIS antenna that is typically located closer to the ground. This is not particularly efficient for long haul DX but yet the same antenna is extremely efficient for NVIS propagation.
Antenna efficiency is a matter of perspective and depends on the desired outcome and it's not necessarily based on the particular antenna design itself.
73 de Charles - KC8VWM
***EGGGGGzactly! I'm going to write an article on just that subject becasue it needs to be put into black and white. "Efficiency" and "Effectiveness" are two sides of the same coin. We have to keep an open mind to the fact that Ham radio offers a ton of different pursuits from Satellite to traffic nets to DXing.
Geo>K0FF
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Related News & Articles
6-Meter Square Copper Dipole
Wire Antenna in Trees with Crossbow
The 'Lazy 7'
Where Do I Go from Here?
Other Antennas Articles
Wire Antenna in Trees with Crossbow
The 'Lazy 7'
Where Do I Go from Here?
|