eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

Rediscovering CW

Gene Brewer (KI6LO) on June 24, 2007
View comments about this article!


REDISCOVERING CW

While the debate of “Code vs No-Code” seems to never die, many hams still use code daily and even the new hams are still learning and using it. This article is not a stance on either side of the Code issue nor is it a Coder vs No-Coder bashing, but rather a reflection on recent events that spurred old memories and relit my desire for CW operating.

I was first licensed as a Novice in August 1976. Back then you had to take your Novice test from an Extra Class and the test was mailed in to be graded. The interim time seemed forever to a young kid bitten with the Ham Radio bug, but soon my newly issued Novice license `WN5UZU' appeared in the RFD mail delivery. I was now an official ham! I called my Elmer (a year and a half older than I at 17) and we decided that I should get on the air that afternoon right after work. We sat at my newly installed bedroom shack and tuned up on 80M. I called CQ a couple of times and got a bite. I heard the station sending clearly in the speaker but for the life of me, could not remember the code. My Elmer was copying along and told me that the station was calling me. It took a moment or two to gather my composure and then I started copying my call being sent. I had done it. I had actually contacted another ham radio operator using code. Many CW QSO's would follow while preparing for the 13wpm General test.

Fast forward about a year and half, around late 1978, and now I had a new call `WB5UZU' and General Class privileges. Since I was never the best Morse operator and really like the new ability to actual `talk' voice to voice, my use of the Code waned with the inclusion of SSB and HF use. Soon I found myself struggling to remember the 13 wpm that I had achieved to pass the required General Class code proficiency test. As the years went along farther I found I could barely copy code at all.

Within the last few months, my desire to rekindle my code speed has flourished, driven by a bit of friendly ribbing by my old Elmer and other CW ops that I know. I have been copying on the air and using computer based tutoring. My speed is slowly coming back. I can now copy a decent 10-12 wpm now. Soon I hope to raise that even further.

You may ask “Why do you say all this?” Well first to say that I, for one, like all facets of amateur radio. I am also very disappointed in myself for having let my code skills deteriorate to the condition they are in today. I have come to realize that code is just another mode but at the same time, there is something magical about being able to convey a message around the world without actually speaking a human language.

This last weekend I decided I want to do something I had never done before. That was to participate in a CW contest, namely the WPX CW. I had recently built and configured a digital interface for my rig and could now operate PSK, RTTY, etc, as well as CW using my PC. I know there are those that are purists that think that using a PC for CW is `cheating' or such ilk. I would rather like to think that it is an equalizer that helped me copy the 30-45 wpm average speeds that many use in these contests. Without the PC helping, I would not have been able to really join in the fun. I did do my best to copy the code sent and to do fills where noise and static covered up the PC's ability to discern the actual code being sent but at such high speeds, for now, I was overwhelmed. By the time the contest was over (I only worked about 8 hour's total) I found that my speed seems to be up a word or two. I found that I could actually copy most of the code sent from slower participants by ear without the PC's decoding because of the static on 40M during that time made the PC go nuts. All in all, I made 104 QSO's (appx 17000+ points), worked a couple of new DX entities and had a blast doing it. It brought back memories of my early years in amateur radio.

If you are like me and a bit rusty, set up your PC and enjoy digital and CW operating while rebuilding your speed. Or just get back on with a straight key and have at it. It's kind of like riding a bike - once you know how, you never forget. You just need to practice some more. If you are a newcomer to amateur radio, don't feel like you're not welcomed on CW. We all had to learn it somehow. Get a key, get on the bands and send some code.

If you despise code and want nothing to do with it, that's great too. There are far too many modes and facets of operating to get upset over just one mode. Pass it by for now and who knows; maybe later you'll get bit by the code bug, like I have again.

73 es gud DX,

Gene KI6LO

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
Rediscovering CW  
by K7LRB on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Great article Gene!

(However.... brace yourself, you're not gonna believe what follows!)

73,
de Larry
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N6KYS on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
>>>by K7LRB on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Great article Gene!

(However.... brace yourself, you're not gonna believe what follows!)

73,
de Larry<<<


Too funny, Larry, but true!!
73,
Brad
N6KYS
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by VK2GWK on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
After 4 yours of CW, then 35 years of phone I "relearned" the code and enjoy it. I am not a very fast operator, 18 - 20 wpm is my limit. But this enabled me to enjoy many good contacts, locally and DX.

The pity is that there seems to be an increasing number of operators that just dont bother to listen to what you are sending.... They manage to get the RST and sometimes the name. But when you ask a question - or in my case - try to correct my call sign (I am VK2GWK and ot VK2GW - without the K....) the just come back with 73, tu ....

Most likely they are using poorly performing decoding software or just dont bother....

I could blame myself when sending with something like 25 wpm or more. But 16 - 18 wpm (what I am using whenever I think there is a problem) or even slower when the other party is slow should enable everyone to get it right.

Most likely there are too many stations that try to send CW at a far faster pace then they can copy just to "look good". Do not be ashamed to be slow... the "real" CW operator will always accomodate you. Those "fast" jerks can get stuffed...
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by W4LGH on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I personally have never cared for Code, but certainly respect those who do. Just like all the many facits of the hobby, there are things some love and things some hate. Personally I love vintage gear, both operating and restoring them. Some think thats a waste of time, but thats the great thing about this hobby, there is something for everyone.

Makes no difference to me what modes you like to operate, the important thing is that you are operating! So, break out that mic,key, or computers operated digital modes and get on the air!

73 de W4LGH - Alan
http://www.w4lgh.com
 
Rediscovering CW  
by N0IU on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I can really appreciate your first CW contact because it sounded almost exactly like mine except that I did not have an Elmer sitting next to me. After the station responded to my painfully slow CQ, I also proceeded to forget everything I knew about Morse code, but since there wasn't anyone there to copy it for me, my only choice was to reach over and hit the power switch on the rig!

A few deep breaths later, I did manage to actually "fly solo" and complete the first of many thousands of QSOs I would have the pleasure of putting in my log.

I also had a bit of a reality check a few days ago. I was tuning around 30 meters and heard someone calling CQ at about 12 WPM so I answered at his speed. As it turns out, the guy has been licensed over 50 years and he was just trying to see if there were any "newbies" on the bands who wanted to work on their CW skills. We ended up finishing our QSO at about 35+ WPM.

And for those of you who think that us "speed demons" do that to be bragging or to scare off the new guys, once you reach that speed (and it does take a lot of practice and a long time to get there), it really is a lot more comfortable to carry on a conversation at that speed.

Once in a while we all need a wake up call like the one I go and throttle back the speed control on the keyer. I know I sure appreciated it when the other ops did that for me as I was learning it.

Scott N0IU
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by M0AOA on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Can anyone recommend a program and a suitable interface to decode CW via a laptop PC using the USB port. I have come back into the hobby after a few years away and although with practice have been able to get up to 10-12wpm while using G4FON on a PC I really struggle and panic when someone calls me on the air.
As the original article says it all helps so a bit of help from modern technology would be the difference between me giving CW up altogether and just using SSB or carrying on with it and hopefully being able to get some exotic DX.
The transceiver is a Kenwood TS870.
 
Rediscovering CW  
by W8VZM on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Right on target Gene!

I had a lousy contact last night (my end not his!)with Tim K8TJ on 30m. My code skills are terrible but with Tims help I made it through. My driving force is going QRP. While it can be done on ssb I chose cw because of the rig and I really wanted to get my CW skills back. 2.5 watts from the Ohio River to Flint MI is not exactly DX but it's not too shabby for poor cw and an inefficient G5RV. More fun to come! dit dit

72 Ron W8VZM
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N6NKN on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Licensed in 1986, I also learned the code well enough to pass the test, and make one CW contact. I gave the key and keyer to a friend who loved CW.

Well its now 2007, and I'm re-learning the code using the G4FON program.

This time I'm doing it because I want to, not because I have too!! And I'm enjoying it.

I have recently met several "new" hams that are learning the code after obtaining their license. They have realized, as I have, that by not learning the code they are missing a significant aspect of the hobby.

When asked why I'm learning the code again when its not required, I am happy to say I'm doing it "For the Fun"!!!
 
Rediscovering CW  
by K1CJS on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
A nice article--and point of view. It seems that the 'magic' of morse is calling out to hams even though it isn't a required part of the tests anymore. And, another thing I have thought would happen is happening, hams are picking up on the code anyway, just for the sheer enjoyment of being able to copy it.

Thanks, Gene, for a nicely writtten reminder of how 'the magic' still can hook a ham's interest.
 
Rediscovering CW  
by VE5OA on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
It is surprising to read of the similarities that others have with one’s own experience. I was licensed in 1968 and built my first rigs, Heathkit SB-300 and SB-401. I had to use CW for a minimum of six months and was then eligible to get 10 meter phone privileges. I did not operate CW again. In the past couple of years my interest too has been rekindled, owing in part to two things: I built an Elecraft K2 (totally enjoyable), and in our club Field Day we had only one member who could operate CW. I determined to address this imbalance and in the process rekindle my overall interest in amateur radio. Your article was what I needed to read at this time. The followup comments let me know that I am not alone. See you on the bands, when I get the hang of that Bencher iambic key.

73
Slater VE5OA
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by KX8N on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
"There are far too many modes and facets of operating to get upset over just one mode. "


That right there is one of the most meaningful statements I've ever read on this site. Enjoy what you enjoy, dabble in what you are uncomfortable with, and you may end up enjoying that, too. There's more than one flavor of ice cream, and you're free to enjoy any or all of them. Regardless of the flavor, you're still enjoying ice cream in the end.
 
Rediscovering CW  
by WW3QB on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I few weeks ago I posted in the CW forum about my first CW QSO in 25 years. My story is similar. When I got phone privileges in 1973 I kissed CW bye-bye. Now I miss it. I’m still working on getting my code better for QSO #2.

I do not believe CW will ever die. It is one of many popular modes. You cannot regulate popularity.

The Washington Post newspaper has a nice article on hams radio and CW today. You can also see it at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/23/AR2007062301209.html. You may need to register.

73,
Bob WW3QB
 
Rediscovering CW  
by KF4HR on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Even when learning the Code was a licensing requirement, there were those people who learned it, passed their test, and never used CW again; regardless of their license class; Tech, General, Advanced, or Extra. Then there are those who enjoy the challenge CW presents; again, regardless of license class.

As far as those who learn and actually enjoy CW, there's nothing new going on. Even though CW isn't a testing requirement some people will continue to learn CW, especially if they enjoy chasing DX or Contesting activities. A lot of DX still resides in the CW sub-bands! And perhaps others will learn CW to get a break from the CB-ish & rude activities, that we sometimes hear on the Phone sub-bands.

For whatever reason, I think we'll continue to hear acitivity on the CW sub-bands for many, many years to come, and I think that's great. I'm no CW speed demon, and CW is not my favorite mode, but I do see it as a challenge and maintain my skill level in the 15-22wpm range.

I think learning CW is similiar to learning a foreign language:

* Most people envy those who can speak more than one language, although the majority of people can't.

* Learning a 2nd language takes extra effort and most people prefer not to expend that extra effort.

* For those that do put out the extra effort, there are nice benefits.

* For those that don't feel the extra effort is worth it, their communications range is somewhat limited in certain circles; just as no-code operators limit their communications bandwidth within our bands.

My suggestion is, if you've never tried CW, give it a shot. Who knows, you may end up enjoying it. But either way, there's a place for everyone.

KF4HR
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by W4VR on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
The last time I was on CW was in 1964...using a bug at 30-35 wpm. Before the FCC takes away the CW bands...and they're doing a pretty good job of it as it is...I would like to try it again using a keyboard.
 
Rediscovering CW  
by KB2HSH on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
M0AOA:

Hamscope. I only use it because my HTX-10 didn't include a real CW mode. (It has AM/FM/SSB, but no CW) It works pretty well. The rest of the time I use a J-38 and copy by ear.

HSH
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by W6TH on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
My first cw contact was great, not nervous and still knew my code, felt like I have been doing it for years like a pro.

First cw contact was W2MXK (SK). Rye, NY. "Cap"
Second cw contact was W2LSD (SK). Yonkers, NY. "Nils"
Third cw contact was W2DXB (SK). Rochester, NY. "Bill"

W2MXK and W2LSD were close friends, being this, I felt right at home.

My first "AM" contacts were W2KFA and W1ERX, both (SK).

W2KFA at Port Chester, NY. "Gene".
W1ERX at Darian, CT. "Frank".

Of course knowing 13 words per minute back in the 30's made cw copy very easy and built up our confidence.

A feeling of assurance, or self-assurance is the backbone of learning cw.

73, W6TH

.:
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N6HPX on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I too enjoyed learning the code and never had the chance to get on the airwaves with it,mostly due to travels, but when I did get home this last October I tried to hook up my Icom 706mk2 to the keyer and it started transmitting without even keying the unit.

I would like to try both the keyer and the laptop if possible. I find morse qas quite easy to learn and fun to try when it came to the exams. It was easier than my trying to learn my wife tagalog. But anyways it was and is a good story and comment. Morse is fun I feel.

 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by WB2WIK on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Nice story.

Reflecting over old logbooks, which I've had since I was a kid and my "contact #1," I see my first 3500 QSOs or so were all CW.

Now 42 years later, I still make 15-20 CW QSOs a week, amongst other activities. "Phone" is okay, lets me hear another voice; RTTY and PSK are okay, but they're "keyboard to keyboard" and very impersonal. CW is the most personal of all to me, lets me hear another op's heartbeat.

Hams who haven't operated CW don't know what they're missing.

WB2WIK/6
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N6VL on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Gene,

What a great little article!

I am quite similar to do you. I was licensed in 1975, but as a Technician and not a Novice. I had to pass a 5 wpm code test before a volunteer examiner. In those days, a Technician, which required a code test, conferred no HF privileges whatsoever. Sometime in 1976, the FCC gave Techs all HF Novice privileges. I was on 2 meters then and didn't want to mess with the code. By 1977, I bit the bullet with some ARRL code practice tapes and passed the 13 wpm exam before the FCC. That was just after the FCC allowed answering 10 questions about text, rather than one minute of solid copy. I am managed to get my General and Advanced that year.

I spent the next 30 years operating HF, mostly all voice. I never was good at CW and wondered why it was ever a requirement. More recently, I started operating PSK31 and similar sound card modes on HF. I spent very little time on SSB. After about 5 years of HF digital work, I soon realized I liked PSK31 because of the narrow bandwidth operation and efficient operation on lower power. It made me think seriously about CW operation.

Then last fall, I decided to really give CW a try. I broke down and started working on my code speed. It had been around 9 wpm without any practice. Now several months, later I am up to 15 wpm on a good day. There is a lot for me to learn, especially on sending. But it is a lot of fun. The testing barrier is no longer there, and CW can be pursued for its own ends.

I am not fast enough to enjoy a lot of the DX. I want to reach that level, but mainly for the enjoyment of conversing in a simple yet efficient mode. Yesterday and this morning, I did my first CW Field Day. I was at home operating 1D. Not only was it my first CW operation for FD, but it was a 100% CW FD. In spite of the difficultly keeping up with the fast operators, it was fun to jump into to the fray and give some points away.

I think every ham should give CW a try. I know that is bold statement, because there are those have a very difficult time learning the code. That said, I don't expect every ham to like CW and stay with it. But if more would give it a try, then many more hams will be operating CW.

73,

Steve N6VL
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by KD5HLG on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
My story is simular to several on this form. Except that my first lisenes was in the 1950'S with out the aid of any one as I was an orphan native american with a love for All things Electronics and ham Radio. But being very poor with out any resorces was not able to persue ham radio. So it was off to the US Navy at 17 to get an education and get into Avation electronics, Then it was a family two wars and becoming tone deaf.
By the time I servied agent orange canser and was able to get back into ham radio as a tech I could no longer understand the difference between a dot and a dash. So could not upgrade. So I stuck with what i had and waited patintly for the gloris day when the testing was gone. I tested on the first test avalible and am now a general. I also got prepared to use my computer and have interface from MFJ with a Kennwood 450S but have the first CW contact to make, But not because I havent been trying.

I wont give up:::::

73'S KD5HLG
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by W6TH on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
..................Remember...........................
Quote:

Before you could walk, you had to crawl. Should you only be able to talk like in ssb, then you are still crawling.

Unquote.

W6TH
.:
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by KG4TKC on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Nice article. I too am trying to build my cw speed,now trying to get past 13 wpm.I plan to try my best to get at least to the 20 to 25 wpm level. I just wanted to ask Larry(K7LRB)how his friend Dale(K7ZY) was doing. I sure hope he was able to get back home and get back on the air. Thanks for the nice cw article. 73 KG4TKC
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by KC6ZZT on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Not much different here than what I've read so far.

First licensed as a 5wpm novice in 1968, in college. Early in 1969, went down to the FCC office on Greenwich St in downtown NYC to take the General; passed written, failed the 13wpm code so I became a Tech. Next month (rules then said you had to wait a month to take it again) went down and passed the 13wpm and got my General.

During Novice year, did only CW on 40m. Terrifying, but plunged headlong. Soon as I got my General, forgot about cw.

By the time out of college, not active. Although not active, I had renewed my license through the years. Moved to California, got my current call. Fast forward till two years ago, decided to get active again after approx. 33 years.

Joined a local club, got a radio, and became active on the air and in the club. Been practicing cw using the G4FON program, and copying off the air. Burned an audio CD of cw qsos and listen to it in the car for practice. Did one cw qso with a fellow club member to see if we could do it.

I still have the J-38 I was given when I got my novice, it's the only key I have.

This weekend, Field Day, I am with the club and operating phone. This morning in the last few hours of FD, I sitting next to KG6HM, our cw operator, and find I can copy many of the callsigns and exchanges. So I ask... can I try? He says sure, and I take the key. Haltingly, I make many mistakes, need to repeat and repeat, and he prods me and elmers me, but hot damn!, I made a some contacts. It's great.

Thanks to the club, the elmers, the operators who slowed down so I could copy the exchange.

More cw is in my future, I can say for sure.

Tnx & 73,
Joe kc6zzt
 
Test requirement for a mode has ended.  
by AI2IA on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
While you are enjoying the article and sharing your experiences about this particular mode of operation, keep in mind the following fact:

"While the debate of “Code vs No-Code” seems to never die ..."

The meaningful debate ended with the official ending of the Morse Code testing requirement.

If you love Morse Code, let it go. It will thrive. If you try to ram it down people's throats, you do Morse Code a disservice. Preserve it, but know that the future of amateur radio is digital.

 
Rediscovering CW  
by N4MJG on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
i love cw the only problem is i have hearing problem !i can only go very slowly 4 word per min,i'm deaf on both ears making me harder to understand now starting to catch up some but very slowly,i have to ask each every one of you guys to slow down !!!!!!plus other problem is not fast writer. more like slowpoke,so guys easy on me !


73
Jackie
KG4ORX
SOUTH CARS MEMBER ID 5956
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by W6TH on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
Do you have a problem to copy ssb on your many nets?

.:
 
RE: Test requirement for a mode has ended.  
by N6VL on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Yes the morse testing requirement has ended.

If someone posts an article on using Heil microphones or building a PSK31 interface, it doesn't stir up controversy. But if someone posts an article on morse code, somehow it is polarizing. I don't see that intent in this article.

I for one am open to improving my code skills. I covet those who operate at high speeds and do it effortlessly. Some of the commenters on this thread are lamenting the fact that they let their skills get rusty, myself included. Besides, taking a code test never made anyone a CW operator. It takes a lot of practice beyond passing a test. I met someone yesterday, whose code skills surpass mine, and he never took the test.

I don't see any heavy handed promotion of CW here. Since the testing ended, there is a resurgence of interest in the code. That is what you see in this article.

73,

Steve N6VL
 
RE: Test requirement for a mode has ended.  
by N6HPX on June 24, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
AI2IA; No offense but Many don't want the debate to die its no offense towards the anyone in particular but they are just that way. I got my own but keep getting spammed when I talk about it.

Am still looking to hook up my laptop and keyers but havent had the time since I am gone for 6 to 8 months.

 
RE: Test requirement for a mode has ended.  
by K0BG on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Geez, digital is the future of amateur radio? I guess I'm mistaken, but I thought CW was a form of digital, pulse-width modulation.

Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
 
RE: Test requirement for a mode has ended.  
by W6TH on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
Was the real reason to eliminate the code testing to open the door to many more ham operators, or was it in the future to make bigger profits for the selling of digital communications? I am sure those that have a problem to copy Morse code will give many relief to get on the air if not interested in phone operation and a problem of some sort to copy code.

I am sure that the ARRL will profit by advertising digital products and the FCC to profit the manufacturers and the states with another form of collecting taxes.

Not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country; does this make sense to you?

.:
 
CW - Balance not Hostility  
by AI2IA on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I would not purchase or use HF rigs without Morse Code capability. In fact, I would prefer to see VHF-UHF transceivers with both CW and SSB abilities, not simply FM. You can't beat Morse Code in a high noise environment. It is more than just fun for remote hiking and camping.

I think that it is most appropriate to continue to share comments on Morse Code experience. Let all just be firm on one matter: The Debate is over. Let the resistance to this fact fade out completely, and the enthusiasm to use this mode continue. Leave the barbs for the fish hooks.
 
Rediscovering CW  
by N2RRA on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Gene,

Great article! I operate CW as much as possible even while mobile. I worked Peter - DK6KT while mobile going home. Condition's were bad for me in the city SSB. We had a nice QSO on 20m despite the fact I was in and out of bridge's and over pass's. This would not have been the case on SSB that day. Thanks to CW!

The more I use it the better I get. The better I get the esier it is. The esier it is the more fun it become's, and prove's more efficient when SSB is not possible.

Learning CW take's time, and there's ton's of 3 - 5 word minute operator's out there which leave's no excuse for someone not able to get started easy. When you have it under your belt you will say "why the hell didn't I do this sooner".

QTH I use a Kent.
Mobile I use a Vibroplex paddle.

Have fun and 73!

 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N7RAC on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
First licensed back in 1981....got as far as General, back slid for a while....got back into it in 1999, back to General now..... This past weekend, at our Clubs Field Day Station, I was in AWE watching a NEW Ham, (5 months) who was keeping up with the big dogs. We had programed the laptop that we were using for logging with some CW macros, but when Ray and I were in the Comm Van, I let him do the fisting. He was awesome!!! (He is a retired military CW ops guy, and as a matter of fact, was our clubs LAST Code Test, and ACED IT!!!!) While we were in the Comm Van, I was surprized how much I remembered as well...I cant help but think of some of the Star Trek shows where they would be strapped, and had their communicators taken from them, and were using Morse Code in a pinch.....LONG LIVE CODE!

73

Rex/N7RAC
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by K8MHZ on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Here is a message for some of you die hard CW ops.

I got my license to get involved with Civil Defense. For my first ten years as a ham I was totally focused on doing emergency communications. I was a no-code Tech for all those times. I really had no use for the code and (at that time) hoped the testing requirement would be eliminated.

I now think that Morse Code is the greatest! I passed my Element 1 a couple years ago and now hold the Extra Class license and am very proud to be a licensed Morse Code operator.

So what was the source of this seemingly enigmatic catharsis?

First and foremost is the attitude of our local hams. In the early '90s I was playing with CB radios. I got my hands on a 300 watt amplifier that I did not know how to tune and when I did I quickly realized that I was working all telephones, TVs, speakers and probably modulated a few well grounded AC lighting systems when I transmitted. A trip to the local ham shop provided the 'cure'. Dan, N8PPQ, told me about using an RF choke at the base of my antenna to clean up my signal. Dan's shop, HR Electronics of Muskegon, was always populated by the local OFs sitting around drinking coffee and guarding the inventory with their lives. Not once did any one of them berate me for being a CBer. Instead they taunted me by showing me the cool ham stuff there and easily yakking around the world with far fewer watts than I was using to talk to the next county.

That same period of time is when I decided to get into Civil Defense. A requirement in our county is to have a ham license. When I was told that I thought to myself that not only could I get into Civil Defense by getting my ticket, but I could join the gang that was so nice to me at the electronics store, a gang that I really felt consisted of some very gentle and intelligent folks. I rememeber the day I went to HR with my first CSCE to proudly show Dan and Crew.

As I spent the next decade doing countless hours of volunteer work in our community I always felt that the code requirement was holding me back from my HF ticket, but there was so much to do with a Tech license that it was not a huge issue to just to stay a Tech. For 10 years or so the OFs would dazzle me with their fists and their ability to make sense of the cacophony of chrips and cheeps coming from the ether. It took a while, but slowly but surely I was getting more and more respect for Morse Code and it's ability to bust through just about anything and deliver a message. Finally, a couple years ago I decided that Morse Code was so cool that I just had to learn it, which I did and passed my Element 1 the first try in a very noisy pole barn sitting next to my 11 year old daughter who also passed her test the first try with me.

I maintained sparse contact with Dan, N8PPQ over the years and never really got a chance to tell him how influential he was with me, not only getting my ticket but pressing on to get my Element 1, my General and later my Extra class license. I got that chance at FD this year where I had the opportunity to spend some time with him. He was operating the 40 meter CW shack and sending and copying Morse like he was on fire! Now I want to get my speed up and be a CW hot shot just like Dan.

There you have it. If you want to promote Morse Code, dazzle people with your skills. Making fun of folks, talking down on them and berating them will do nothing to futher the mode. Trust me, I know that from a life experience.

I now teach ham class and part of my class is the promotion of Morse. Not one of my students has objected to learning it which they will as time goes by.

To me there is no code/no-code debate. There is only a my way/your way debate that is fueled by a bunch insecure egomaniacs on both sides.

I know for sure that demonstration along with gentle persuasion is the way to advance the art of Morse Code.

Morse Code is not about to go away any time soon. How soon depends letting our egos take the short bus and becoming real Elmers to the folks that have not yet mastered the Code.

73

Mark K8MHZ
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N3EF on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
"Hams who haven't operated CW don't know what they're missing. WB2WIK/6 "

That's for sure! I took up cw two years ago, three years after becoming a ham, and now it's the only mode I operate. I look forward to my cw "fix" every day!

Eric N3EF
 
RE: Test requirement for a mode has ended.  
by KI6LO on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
AI2IA writes "The meaningful debate ended with the official ending of the Morse Code testing requirement......... If you try to ram it down people's throats, you do Morse Code a disservice."

Your are absolutely correct that the OFFICIAL debate ended with the new ruling yet hardly a day goes by that that very topic is not seen hammered out on eHam forums and articles. I for one am not involved in that constant barrage of 'good' vs 'evil' concerning code nor was the intent of the article to 'RAM' anything anywhere. Actually the reverse was the intent of the article. It was to show how PERSONALLY I had garnered a new love for Morse and was sorry to myself for having left my meager abilities wane even further.

Also I am both glad and sorry to hear that I am not alone in this issue. Seems that many ops followed a similar path in their ham radio lives and neglected their CW abilities, only now to see the error in their chosen path.

From my observations, it appears that since the ruling on code testing, the 'want' to learn CW has seen a resurrgence. I guess it follows along similarly to 'if you tell a kid they have to do something, they fight it - tell them they can't do it (or in this case don't have to ) and they want to do it.' Go figure.

Anyway everyone have fun in whatever mode you choose and maybe I'll catch you on the bands sometime.

Gene KI6LO
 
RE: Test requirement for a mode has ended.  
by W6TH on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
Wow, it sure makes me happy to find that many that wanted to rid of code testing is now all for it.

Look at the many previous posts and check out the ones that opposed the testing of cw, low and behold their minds have been changed and bragging how great cw is.

What a bunch of phonies.

.:
 
Rediscovering CW  
by M0RNA on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Nice article, and I am glad you are rediscovering CW. I am discovering it for the first time and have only been licensed since 2004. I, like most of my contemporaries, started with phone which I used for a year or so, then I discovered PSK31 and got heavily into that for a while, but it didn't hold my interest despite the fact that its a great narrow bandwidth mode. I then started thinking about CW. When I became a SWL in 1981, my then elmer, G2AOF, was a Morse man, and would demonstrate the mode to me, and even though I couldn't understand it, it obviously had a magic about it....a real skill and universal language of hams. So, with that in mind, I set about learning the code and practised daily for about 2 years. The hard work has begun to pay off now, and I am starting to feel comfortable at 25 wpm head copy. From the advice I have been given about learning Morse, the best way is to simply get on the bands and have a go. There have been times when I have fallen off the horse, so to speak, but I just dust myself down and get straight back on.

A recent highlight of my Morse career was operating a special event station here in my home QTH of Portsmouth in the UK. My club, The Horndean and District ARC, was operating GB0RMM from the Royal Marines Museum here in Portsmouth, and I wired up my key and had a _lot_ of QSOs. My fellow club members were very enthusiastic about my Morse ability, so much so that it was suggested that I give regular Morse tuition to those in my club who want to learn the code...and there are many of them apparently. So much for Morse being a dying skill...far from it!

Morse keeps me happy. When I put on my headphones, and fire away with our language, the cares and worries I may have really do go away. I think its the concentration involved...but either way, its much more fun and safer than other chemical based ways of making worries go away.

Finally, during the weekend of GB0RMM operation, a young lady and her little girl came into our shack and wanted to observe a contact on 'shortwave'. So, to give them the most understandable demonstration, I picked up the microphone instead of the key, and got into a QSO with a station in Europe. I smile now, but at the time, I was really nervous and sounded like a complete beginner making his first HF SSB QSO. I very quickly realised that I am now far far more comfortable on the key than I am with the microphone....and I don't feel the need to change that state of affairs anytime soon.

Long live Morse!

73 de Steve M0RNA
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N6HPX on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Well the debate is over as AI2IA stated but you still have alot of Hams who are still dedicated to that debate. Thats called Determination and they feel they earned that right. I can say its there right and no FCC law will ever change there feelings.

Many of us worked hard for it and its not one they will forget.

In the meantime I will again meantioned its a great story and I agree those who never tried to do it don't know what there missing. Learning it was fun and I do it again no matter what.
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by 2ARADIO on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I think we'll continue to hear CW for many, many years to come. It seems to be a part of human nature that many of us are fascinated with the appeal of "retro" things, whether it be old cars, old guns, old radio's or older, simpler forms of communication. Others see no romance whatsoever and collecting or using the things, and that's fine too.
 
Rediscovering CW  
by AI2IA on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
To Gene, KI6LO, and others who may not quite understand what I am getting at. Let no one think that I have any criticism for Morse Code operation. I simply do not.

Where emotions run high on the subject, I have looked forword for many years to CW being accepted as a mode among modes. All modes being considered equal. As many observed, CW is the only mode that used to be a license testing requirement. It was my belief that once this was dropped as a test requirement, CW would enjoy a popularity similar to the other modes of operation. I believe that time and the responses to this article are proving this correct. Taking the requirement down has taken the rigidity out of the activity of using Morse Code and is also taking away a lot of the bad attitudes of the past along with it. Forgetting about the code/no code debate will go a long way in promoting good will in the ham community. BPL is similar in this regard in that it has stirred up a lot of mud. Fighting over this kind of stuff is silly.
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by KD6WKY on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I'm using DXlabs software. The Winwarbler part of the software should help you. It's a good program but lots to learn.
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by KI6LO on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
KD6WKY writes "I'm using DXlabs software. The Winwarbler part of the software should help you. It's a good program but lots to learn."

I use DX Labs Suite also and have tried the Winwarbler but found that I actually prefer the interface in Hamscope to WW. I have setup the DX Lab startup program to start Hamscope in place of WW. Since I don't use the rig interface for freq control right now, I don't loose anything. For some reason (still working on it), my TS-940S will not work with the Piexx interface I bought. It goes beserk whenever the Piexx is installed. Works fine without it. Sent the interface back to Piexx for a checkout and they said it is working properly so possible a bad Digital A board in the TS-940S? Can't find a Kenwood stock interface board for the 940. Don't exist anymore and no one is selling theirs.

Gene KI6LO
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N6AJR on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I am supprized at how many "retreads" like me there are out there. I was originaly licensed as a Tech in 1978 at the FCC office in San Francisco. and went inactive in 81 or 82 due to work , family etc, I got interested again in 2001 and bought a vx5r and then found out I could be grandfatnered ,.

So on a friday I became a general and a week and a day latr I passed my extra. It was always the code holding me back.

I still use it, but not very well. I always try to gewt foljks to try it ( I was probably the first to put an article here and on qrz.com about Ray's G4FON program) and I try to do a little cw when I can.

bottom line is code is a good mode, and probably more efficient as a "get through the bad stuff" conditions, than SSB, but some folks say it's interupted analog continous wave and not digital. either way, it is a lot of fun, so give it a shot.

I say a tuna can radio, and a fan dipole and you are in business..

it's just another mode, but lots of folks like it, so from one retread to another. Gud Luck and Gud DX my friend...
 
Rediscovering CW  
by K0RGR on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Outstanding! I'm glad to hear that using the computer has helped you get over some hurdles and enjoy CW again.

I've been advocating that for some time now.

I do want to encourage people to upgrade to General, but at the same time, I want Technicians to realize that they really have some useful and powerful privileges on those CW-only bands.

There is nothing to prevent two Techs from working each other on 40 meter CW in the middle of the night using computers.

OK, so computers don't always get perfect copy. If the CW is being sent by a computer and the conditions are reasonable, the computer will do a fair job. I've watched the MixW program and CWGet both copy W1AW perfectly under less than perfect conditions. I've also seen both of them fail to copy under other circumstances.

I'd like to suggest 18 WPM as the standard for computer-based CW. That is the speed W1AW uses. Everyone can experiment with W1AW to find settings that work well with their program. Also, at 18 WPM, most of us who work CW by ear can easily copy your sending - all we need is a keyboard and some typing skills to be able to have a QSO with you. 18 is fast enough for computers to copy it well, but still slow enough for humans.

 
Rediscovering CW  
by N0AH on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Dear E-Ham Editor..................
 
Rediscovering CW  
by N0AH on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
My first CW contact was with:

GGG5NP83ZZL-/rdu+++WQAAAL
OP:(Nateeelllmmlllmnbboyu)....

I have since practiced to whereas my last CW QSO was with AB0BX, Paul in Brighton, Colorado.

Either my copying has improved over the years or I worked a pirate on my first QSO! After all, I was on CB channel 37 LSB when I tried my MFJ CW code ring device-I was only a tech back then and didn't my head from my rear-
 
Full Capability  
by AI2IA on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I haven't seen anyone post a comment looking at it this way, but the thought is very logical.

All hams should use Morse Code at times. The majority of HF rigs all have CW mode. Why leave part of your rig unused? If you look at the Frequency Chart you will see spectrum devoted to CW activity. To be a well rounded ham you ought to use it. Why leave it unused? There is no pressure anymore to force you to use Morse Code to upgrade. Now you can put your time on Morse Code just because you feel like it, not because you must do it get above the grade you're in. So, you have nothing to lose and more spectrum to use, if you use it. Why not put some time on it?
 
Rediscovering CW  
by KG6R on June 25, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
All --

I am rediscovering the code myself. I was first licensed in 1971 as a novice. For years I did not use CW, now I am back practicing to get my code speed up.

I am have spoken to many people who can copy cw at amazing speeds 50+ words a minute. They tell me to limit code practice to 15-20 minutes a day BUT do it everyday.

I think many people do not realize that when you first start, it can take 40-60 hours to get to 5 wpm. They may practice 20 hours and give up or say that they don't have an ear for it. For me it takes a time commitment. After two weeks of practicing everyday I can now copy at 10 wpm (no speed demon) but I am going to keep at it and eventually I will reach my goal of 20 wpm.

There are good morse code practice programs available as freeware. The one I use is from g4fon.

Thanks for the nice article.

73 de kg6r formerly kg6qhp

Jim
 
Rediscovering CW  
by WK9H on June 26, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Thanks for the story. I, too earned my novice ticket in the mid '70s. Like you, I managed to forget everything I knew when I heard my old call, WN9UVS, come out of the speaker. Unlike you, I had only that one QSO (wish I'd kept the QSL card) and then went through a 30 year "sunspot cycle." In 2005, I dusted off enough CW to pass element 1 and the rest of the elements to once again become a ham.

Last weekend at Field Day, I decided to sit down in the club's CW tent and stay there until I had made at least one contact. It took a few hours to screw up the nerve (sitting next to a seasoned CW contester,) and find someone calling slowly enough to copy over the QRM of the conversations, generators, and the SSB station a short distance away. I made two contacts that night and another two from home the following morning. They were easier than the two before it. I'm hooked. Except for the public service stuff and some local nets, I'm going to focus on CW until I'm good enough to think of myself as a CW operator.

If you hear me on the bands, give me a call. Just be prepared for a lot of ........'s and .. -- ..'s.

--... ...--

P.S. If anyone takes a a trip down memory lane in their log books and runs across a QSO with WN9UVS (mid to late '70s during the school year), I'd love to hear from you (and sorry about never returning the QSL.)
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N6HPX on June 26, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
For myself the Code portion of the exam was the best part as it made it more fun and challenging,unfortunately there seems to be a change in our midst. I wish they left it in place myself as its a great challenge and was worth the effort.

Great story and will be listening to it when I get home. In 2 months.
 
RE: Test requirement for a mode has ended.  
by N7RAC on June 26, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
To W6TH...

I cant speak for all of the others, but I dont think there are a bunch of phonies out there...as you say. I was not in favor of the elimination of CW testing. (Note I said TESTING...They did not eliminate code...just the requirement to take the test). Nor did I agree with the elimination of some of the block diagrams or formulas from the test. I havent seen the new test pool coming out, but hopefully, some of it will come back. I dont want this hobby to turn out like a certain radio parts store that "has the answers", but dont know what the markings on a resistor denote. I still code, and I know Ohm's Law... But if you feel the people need some help; E-L-M-E-R!!!!!!!!

73

Rex/N7RAC
 
Rediscovering CW  
by KI4LAZ on June 26, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Sounds like deja vu!! I was licensed like many other hams more than 3 decades ago and have recently been upgrading my miserable CW skills. Interestingly, it was only when I began to explore digital communication modes that my older children expressed some interest in becoming hams. They found the act of communicating by SSB or CW to be primitive compared to a high tech internet connection or a cell phone. However, once I showed them how a ham radio could be interfaced with a computer, they seemed spellbound. CW will be with us for sometime, but if my kids are representative of the next generation of hams, then digital communications are where the new growth in ham radio will be headed.
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by K0MU on June 26, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
How many of you other old timers (I'm 40 and have been a ham since 1978 at the age of 12) remember something like this from your Novice days...

I though the other operators were calling me a LID by saying "so LID cpy"

Of course they were saying "solid cpy." Scared the heck out of a 12 y/o boy.

I spend 3 years as a Novice (CW only), boy was it fun.

No matter how much time has passed between CW contacts, (sometimes several months) I can alway copy at least 25-30 wpm.

 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by WA4KCN on June 26, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
K8MHZ "To me there is no code/no-code debate. There is only a my way/your way debate that is fueled by a bunch insecure egomaniacs on both sides."

Mark congratulations on teaching the class and encouraging others to learn Morse Code. The position you hold on what has fueled the debate over Morse testing however reflects a degree of both shallow thinking and misconception. How an individual feels about themselves may indeed being the motivating force behind positions held for some regarding the matter of Morse qualifications. However, more important in developing one's position to be in favor of Morse testing is a value system which takes into account such matters as history, culture, and achievement levels. For example, many who have been in support of Morse testing disapprove of the test elimination yet would have supported some sort of testing quid pro quo. For many the dissatisfaction stims as much from the immediate change in the essence of the amateur radio licensing process as it does from the Morse test elimination. A testing plan centered on substitution rather than complete elimination would have been the wiser choice and would have moved the service more in the direction of unity.

73 de Russ
WA4KCN
 
Rediscovering CW  
by KC6ZSY on June 27, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I am in the same situation like Gene KI6LO. I have been license since dirt (1970) and started with CW on 15m. I learned the code again back in Dec. 1999 to upgrade to my General ticket. Passed the test with flying colors, but droped CW again. Now learning the code again, but this time, two sons are working on their Tech. ticket, and will go for their General one as well. We listen to CW over dinner time since my shack is near the dinner table consealed in a cabinet behind doors. Talking to Guam on voice and CW caught the ears of both my sons. I will soon be teacking the Radio Merit Badage to a group of Boy Scouts who have become interested in HAM Radio. This is what HAM Radio is all about; "Teaching younger men and women what we know".

-Manny, KC6ZSY
Temple City, Ca.
 
Rediscovering CW  
by KC6ZSY on June 27, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I am in the same situation like Gene KI6LO. I have been license since dirt (1970) and started with CW on 15m. I learned the code again back in Dec. 1999 to upgrade to my General ticket. Passed the test with flying colors, but droped CW again. Now learning the code again, but this time, two sons are working on their Tech. ticket, and will go for their General one as well. We listen to CW over dinner time since my shack is near the dinner table consealed in a cabinet behind doors. Talking to Guam on voice and CW caught the ears of both my sons. I will soon be teacking the Radio Merit Badage to a group of Boy Scouts who have become interested in HAM Radio. This is what HAM Radio is all about; "Teaching younger men and women what we know".

-Manny, KC6ZSY
Temple City, Ca.
 
Rediscovering CW  
by KX0R on June 27, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I want to add a comment relevant to this great topic:

We actually are at the peak of CW technology, right now. We have the most incredible digital keyer chips, interfaces, precision paddles, synthesized rigs, with fantastic receivers - all just fantasy when I started in CW as a novice. For a few dollars you can buy a prgrammable keyer chip that you can use to make your own keyer, and you can just rip along at whatever speed you like. Never before have we had such a choice of fine paddles, many reasonably priced, and some of them really art objects designed and built for the expert operators. Today's rigs will run rings around most older equipment when we operate in QRM, rough conditions, and when we really need narrow bandwidth. QRP CW is more practical now than years ago, partly because receivers have improved. Likewise, QRO gear today will send beautiful CW as well as anyone could desire.

There has never been a better time to enjoy CW. The gear is great, and the only problems are choosing and paying! There are plenty of fine CW operators, and we all have a lot in common in our enjoyment of what we do.

You do have to work at CW. It may take a long time. It isn't like fast food or the Internet - this is something you have to grow, and it takes a lot longer than vegetables in a summer garden.

If you concentrate on operating - particularly ragchewing where you have to use and understand code more so than in a quick QSO - and throw in some contesting and DXing so you get challenged and pushed along - you'll get better. Confidence will come with practice. At some point you may find yourself listening to parts of your QSO's in your head, because it's so much easier than try to write stuff down.

I just ran a solo 1B-battery FD station from a remote forest area in Wyoming, and I know I gave many ops their only WY section contact. Most of these contacts were CW. It was fun!

One of the greatest things that ever happened to me was when I was a teenager, maybe 15 years old, some hams at a FD club station in Lawrence, Kansas, invited me to see their FD station set up in a semi trailer - well, after a while one of the OT's asked me if I'd like to try the rig for a few contacts - big Johnson Viking rig with lots of knobs and a bug - I said I'd never used a bug - they said "go ahead and try it" - then I made some contacts after some adrenaline started flowing as I learned how to send the characters with the bug - then they said I could come back later that evening if I wanted, since they were short a CW operator - and I did, and it was so cool to put those contacts into their log for a couple of hours, even though I was totally green and not quick at all. Those guys opened the door, and I remember it every Field Day.

Well, CW is so efficient with modern gear that you can go out in the middle of nowhere with a 5 watt radio, a battery, and a half-decent wire antenna up in the trees, and you can make hundreds on contacts if you want to. Today's technology makes CW a real dream - you don't need much power, drift is no longer an issue, receiver bandwidth is so narrow that QRM can be managed, and in a quiet site, you can hear the whole country easily.

There has never been a better time to enjoy CW, and it will become very clear as you get into it deeper. Don't wait - there may never be as good a time to make the commitment as right now.

73,
KX0R
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by WD9I on June 29, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Funny how things work out. I was licensed in 73 after a neighborhood class. I did well in the class but I dropped ham radio due to lack of equipment and an interest in girls. I got back into ham radio in 84 having tested up to general in one sitting. Advanced and Extra came soon thereafter. After passing the 20 wpm test I swore I would never use code again. Here it is more than twenty years later and I'm copying W1AW and on air QSO's every day trying to get my speed back up. I'm somewhere between 15 and 20 wpm now and about to dip my toes back into the pool. It was all due to the low power of the FT-817. I decided that qrp operation cries out for cw! Look for me on the air! Please not too fast though!

73 de WD9I (Eb)
 
Rediscovering CW  
by WD0BCX on June 29, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Never lost interest at all. I work CW only except for local FM repeaters and SKYWARN.

Do have a comment on the computers and electronic assistance.

Went to a new local clubs field day last week. Sat down and their was a computer, I expected to log with it. NOT. All was done with a few function keys and the computer. All I did was read the calls and punch in the computer. The answering was all single key.

What a letdown. I went home disgusted. That is NOT CW!

If you can't use the keyer or key and do it by hand why bother?

Really torques me off when the repeater ID goes off and the new EXTRA in the croud says "WHAT'S THAT NOISE?"

JMHO
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by WR8D on June 29, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
The rediscovering of cw actually started to take place a few years back from my view point. I started getting into several qsos with folks that got tired of all the crap on the phone bands and dug out their old straight keys or an iambic paddle they had not touched for years.

This has been my experiance too, i just got tired of the new echo boxes and more and more amateurs trying their best to sound like a chickenbander on channel 19...in a 18 wheeler going about 80 down the interstate with the windows rolled down.

I rediscovered the old amateur spirit alive and well on the cw bands as well as in the digital portions too. I found gentlemen and ladies both old and young with that thrill of just communicating.

I've been restoring old rigs with them turned on their side and send out a test de WR8D and find myself then having a wonderful qso with wires and probes going in every direction "lol".

If you're slow don't give it a thought, speed comes with use and getting into your comfort zone.

I honestly admire the newbie working cw. I've ran into several that honestly can burn the hair on some of us so called old timers too and that in its self has turned my attitude completely around toward the new hams.

Yeah some sat around for a decade waiting on a handout license. Some of those are trying their best to turn the phone bands into their version of glorified chickenband.

There's a ton of new hams out there though on digital and cw and ssb... that have the so called right stuff. You have my total respect.

Have a great up coming weekend and when you hear one of us old farts...one of us who were once called elite snobs...especially me..."lol" give me a little chance before you go to "smok'n" me .

73 John WR8D
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by K0VJ on June 29, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Really torques me off when the repeater ID goes off and the new EXTRA in the croud says "WHAT'S THAT NOISE?"

=======

Ah, they're just pulling your leg.

Either that or they REALLY have tin ears. I'm not very musically inclined, but a good op purring along at 30WPM has always sounded like a symphony to me.

73,
Rick KØVJ
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N2EY on June 29, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
"Went to a new local clubs field day last week. Sat down and their was a computer, I expected to log with it. NOT. All was done with a few function keys and the computer. All I did was read the calls and punch in the computer. The answering was all single key.

What a letdown. I went home disgusted. That is NOT CW!"

Sure it is. They just let the computer do the sending. The op had to do the receiving, tuning, and most of all the judgement of who to call and when to call.

"If you can't use the keyer or key and do it by hand why bother?"

Because the computer saves time and effort. Same reason we went to bugs and keyers.

That sort of thing isn't new, btw. The use of memory keyers goes back decades. Heck, in the *spark* days, they had CQ wheels.

At our FD setup, they had a computer too. I brought along a Y adapter and plugged my 1974 vintage Vibroplex Original Standard bug in parallel. The computer logged - I did the sending. bwaahaahaaa.

btw, the group I went with ran 3A + VHF/UHF. There was one HF CW station, two HF 'phone stations, and a VHF/UHF station. All the HF stations had 100 watt transceivers and dipoles of various types (G5RVs and OCFs).

Our single CW setup made 470 CW QSOs. The rest of the operation - all three rigs - made 342 'phone QSOs. The CW station also sent the SM message, made the natural power bonus, and the special W1AW bulletin was copied on CW.

"Really torques me off when the repeater ID goes off and the new EXTRA in the croud says "WHAT'S THAT NOISE?"

They're just trying to torque you off. Jealous people do that sometimes.

Same thing happened on FD, some wiseacre asked 'what the noise was'. We responded by turning it up louder and working more stations. Brought chuckles all around.

But as another poster noted - I can't "rediscover", because I never went away from Morse Code.

73 de Jim, N2EY
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by KB6NU on June 30, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I'm glad to see so many guy re-discovering CW. When the test requirement was dropped, we discussed this on the Koch-Morse Yahoo Group, and Ray, G4FON, noted that in Great Britain, CW activity actually increased after the requirement was dropped there. Perhaps that's what's happening here as well.

N2EY: The computer setup you saw at FD wasn't CW, it was a contest setup! We had something similar at our FD, and working it was a blast. It makes racking up the points a lot quicker, and that's what contests are all about. I wouldn't use a laptop to operate like that during day to day ragchewing, but for contest operations, it's beautiful, imho.

I also want to reiterate what KX0R said about the state of the CW art. He's absolutely right about this being the best of times for CW operators. Even entry-level rigs have built-in keyers, and when you get past the entry-level radio, the rigs have DSP filtering. As he says, these were all just dreams when we were Novices.

I think it's easier nowadays to learn CW, too. I think using the aforementioned G4FON CW Trainer and other computer programs make it easier to learn the code than the tapes and records we had back in the day.

At any rate, I hope to hear and work you all down at the bottom of the bands. 73!
 
Rediscovering CW  
by KD8EZU on July 2, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I'm a new ham, and was able to beat the FEB 24th deadline and get my ticket WITH code. I would never have been able to look my elmer in the face if I became a ham without code. He's been SK for a while but somewhere he smiles at me. CW is a challenge and s-o-o-o-o rewarding when you can decipher a persons thoughts out of dits and dahs. I've ALWAYS be treated courteously by those who , I'm sure stuggle with my QRS CW QSO's .

It's a challenge for sure and at times I get discouraged but it's what I remember as a youth about ham radio. The man with headphones on, a key in one hand , a notepad and pen in the other, and a Collins, Heathkit, Drake, Yeasu, Icom, Kenwood transciever glowing in the semi-darkness.

I'm glad it's being rediscoved by many older hams.
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N6HPX on July 4, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Welcome aboard sir
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N6HPX on July 4, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Welcome aboard sir
 
Rediscovering CW  
by KC9LCS on July 5, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I am a new HAM having recieved my TECH in March of 2007 and my General in April of 2007. I am working on learning code since my HF rig is a FT 817ND, and I see CW as the main stay of QRP. Also , being a history buff I really like the idea of communicating with the original form of digital.

I find the code a challenge, but I will learn it and be proficient in time.

Marc Findlay, KC9LCS
 
Rediscovering CW  
by K4YDN on July 6, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Enjoyed your article Gene. I have been licensed almost 50 years and was always lousy on CW. About 15 years ago I decided to give CW another try. To this day I am still lousy on CW but love working what some call slow speed CW, HI. There are plenty of CW ops like my self that 10-13 wpm is there comfort zone. Give it a try, just send CQ at what spped you are comfortable with or if someone comes back to fast ask them to QRS (slow down). As the FISTS club says "Accuracy Transcends Speed". I hope you closet CW wantabes will join me in slow speed CW.

73's, Mike K4YDN
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by W4SK on July 7, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
KC9LCS - that's good news. Jump on in there with us. I am betting you'll be welcomed with open arms. Enjoy the achievement.

-73-

W4SK
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by KF5KWO on July 8, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Perhaps soon we'll be having a "No SSB/Know SSB" debate ;-)

I've been doing CW for about a month now, every QSO has been QRS, but I'm getting better. Haven't plugged the microphone back in yet, probably will for the next big contest. Still working on getting a decent chunk of time off for it.

Thanks to all for QRSing in the future!

73 de Jeff, KF5KWO
Helotes, TX
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N7YA on July 9, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Just a quick note about what "real" CW is...if you are ever in Washington DC, and at the Smithsonian, the Information Age exhibit has Alfred Vail's original Correspondant key...the daddy of them all, but also there is the machine that was there too, the wooden structure that had interchangeable letters, it was hand cranked and it fed the letters through on a board, they were then run under a type of mallet/pin that read them and keyed it out, thats what i gathered anyway.

From the look of the machine i was seeing, the VERY FIRST telegraphic message was automated!

I use CW almost exclusively, i dont care what you use to send with...if its standard morse, ill be able to copy it, in turn...ill be able to make a new ham friend. the device doesnt matter nearly as much as the act of making the actual contact. hams reaching out to other hams.

73...Adam, N7YA
 
Rediscovering CW  
by W9IND on July 10, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
If any of you would like to get a taste of living Morse code history, check out the eighth annual "Night of Nights," in which several now-retired commercial CW stations fire up their vintage equipment again and transmit for about seven hours.

This year's event will begin at 0001 UTC July 13, which of course is Thursday (late afternoon/early evening), July 12 to most of us in the United States. It will continue until at least 0700 UTC July 13.

The last commercial CW signal went silent in 1999, so this is a rare chance to copy Morse code signals and obtain QSLs from stations that are essentially returning from the dead.

And this year it won't strictly be an SWL event -- you'll also be able to work an amateur station, K6KPH, representing the Maritime Radio Historical Society. K6KPH will field reports on some of the stations, and the preferred format is QSA/QRK or SINPO (SINFO), not RST.

But even if you're shaky or rusty at CW, give the code a whirl: As the Society notes, K6KPH "will give amateur stations the experience of what it was like to work a real coast station. Professional operators will be at the key and commercial procedures will be used. But please don't hesitate to call, no matter what your code speed or experience level may be."

Here's the link: http://www.radiomarine.org/non8.html

Hopefully this can also be posted as its own article, but in any case I wanted to get the word out. I have a nostalgic spot for this event ... when I was a teenage SWL, these commercial CW stations helped me learn Morse code because of their constant repetition of short messages and perfectly spaced characters. Then, when I took my first Novice code test, it was a breeze for me because I'd been copying these commercial transmissions for more than a year.

Incidentally, I'm for the preservation of Morse code in any form ... whether today's hams use a straight key or a software program. Just keep those dits and dahs rollin'.

Hope you can all tune in to "Night of Nights."

73,
Brian, W9IND (ex-WO9I, KA9OIH, WN9ICB)
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by N7YA on July 10, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Thanks for the reminder Brian. Indeed, if anyone wants to snag a little bit of history this would be the one! I worked K6KPH a number of years ago...nice qso, the op was none other than Denice Stoops(DA), the first woman op in the maritime offices. My card was verified by Dick Dillman, who i think still does the qsl duties if im not mistaken.

I fully agree, i am all for preserving the use of telegraphy so its nice to hear these on the air, even if its only for a night. Back in the early 80's, there were still tons of these stations on the air, i learned to copy by listening to them talk back and forth. I also got a lot of new SWL countries as a kid by tuning the utes and shore stations...this event should bring back some fun memories.

I second Brians suggestion...jump on and grab K6KPH and log the others too. they dont come along very often.

73...Adam, N7YA
 
Rediscovering CW  
by N3AIU on July 11, 2007 Mail this to a friend!

I am gratified to see no major know-code/no-code flame wars in this thread. I am also pleased to read the excellent stories of everyone's first CW experiences.

I spend 90+ percent of my ham time on CW. If you hear me, give me a call. I'll be happy to QRS for anyone who needs it.

Keep practicing!

73, Nick N3AIU/DL1NE
 
RE: Rediscovering CW  
by W1RFI on July 13, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
> Have a great up coming weekend and when you hear
> one of us old farts...one of us who were once
> called elite snobs...especially me..."lol" give me
> a little chance before you go to "smok'n" me.

Way to go, John. This is the way to get people interested in CW operation. Those that have berated folks about CW have not helped Amateur Radio. Those that have berated old timers for hanging on to an old mode have not helped Amateur Radio. To me, this sends the message that no matter in what direction it is pointed, berating doesn't accomplish the goal.

Maybe the change in the rules will give us a way past that, on both ends. There is no good reason for anyone to put down us old timers for our interest in Morse-code operating. It's a good and useful mode, and those who may not be interested in it are not harmed by those who are. And with no code test, those who want to promote the mode will do that much better by discussing why it is a good and useful mode, and gaining new interest the same way that every other mode does.

And we all have to remember that there are a thousand ways to contribute to the value of Amateur Radio and I am happy with any ham who does so by *any* combination of those ways. Those that contribute in a different way than mine are bringing something to Amateur Radio that I may not be able to do. I WANT Amateur Radio to be more than what I can give.

Ed Hare, W1RFI
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
USA 5 MHz Emcomm, Not Ragchew DX Contests
Warnings from Icom


Other Recent Articles
VK5RJ Still Gracing the Airwaves at Age 101:
rec.radio.amateur.moderated -- 5 Yrs. Old:
Tune-In To The World -- Amateur Radio Gets People Talking:
Student Sends MIT Letter to Space:
Amateur Radio Club Talks to Hams Worldwide on Centennial: