eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK

from Heinz Stucki, KB8VIP and Mary Stucki, KC8SXL on September 14, 2007
View comments about this article!


"Editor's Note: Due to the popularity of some of eHam's older articles, many of which you may not have read, the eHam.net team has decided to rerun some of the best articles that we have received since eHam's inception. These articles will be reprinted to add to the quality of eHam's content and in a show of appreciation to the authors of these articles."

A 171-meter loop skywire antenna for PSK-31

by

Heinz Stucki, KB8VIP and Mary Stucki, KC8SXL

First of all, why 171 meters? Has the FCC opened up the top of the AM broadcast band to amateur PSK-31 transmissions? No, but the HF PSK-31 sub-bands are at least partially related harmonically and a length of 171 meters (562 feet) makes a loop skywire antenna a good fit for most of them. Full-wave loops have won the accolades of amateurs ever since they were first described in 1985 by Dave Fischer, W0MHS (QST, November 1985; The ARRL Handbook). Our antenna, an irregular pentagon strung from trees, is fed directly with 50-ohm coax and covers most of the PSK-31 sub-bands from 80-10 meters with a maximum SWR of about 4:1 without using a tuner or a balun. Its high gain and low radiation angles facilitate working DX.

Designing and modeling the 171-meter loop skywire

Our current operating interest is low-power PSK-31 on a number of HF bands. Our objective at the outset of this project was an antenna that would:

Provide superb reception.

Cover multiple amateur bands.

Be relatively omni-directional.

Have the low radiation angles required for DX.

Be coax fed.

And, oh yeah, be cheap.

After some research, we decided that a horizontal loop seemed like our best bet. We are fortunate in having relatively few space limitations at our rural Coshocton County, OH QTH. Our major constraint was the position and height of appropriate trees from which to hang the antenna.

As a start, the resonant length in feet of a loop antenna can be approximated by dividing 1005 by the frequency in MHz. While it's certainly not necessary, we simulated the loop using the antenna modeling program MMANA. In addition to optimizing the length, models can predict the SWR, gain, angle of radiation and directional properties of an antenna. Adjustments can be made for antenna height and ground type. Antenna models are similar, differing mostly in input-output features. Most use the "method of moments"; which means the model calculates one antenna segment after the other. MMANA is freeware and can be downloaded from www.qsl.net/mmhamsoft/mmana/index.htm. A demo version of a commercial antenna-modeling program EZNEC can be downloaded from www.eznec.com.

For the geometry defined by the location of our trees, we arrived at an optimum total length of 562 feet consisting of five segments of 167, 95.5, 114, 112 and 73.5 feet. The gain, angle of maximum radiation, calculated SWR and actual SWR of the loop for the important PSK-31 frequencies are summarized in the table.

Frequency (MHz)

Gain (dBi)

Angle of

Maximum Radiation (deg)

Calculated SWR

Actual

SWR

3.58

7.0

53

20.0

5.0

7.07

10.6

35

9.1

3.1

10.14

5.0

73

33.0

3.1

14.07

12.4

14

10.5

3.0

18.10

11.2

11

24.5

4.0

21.07

9.2

30

32.3

3.1

28.12

7.8

37

7.3

3.0

It's important to remember that all antenna models are simulations; they are not the real thing. Simulators are a great way to learn to fly an airplane. But you can't actually fly from New York to Paris in a simulator. It's the same with antenna simulations. You'll learn a lot about the antenna's anticipated performance, but you can't actually have a QSO. They're the "next best thing to being there" and can be a lot of fun especially when the sunspots aren't cooperating. More about the antenna's actual performance later…

Hanging the 171 meter loop

The antenna is made of insulated number 14 stranded wire from the local home products outlet. Do not assume that these nominally 500-foot rolls of wire will contain 500 feet! Ours was 18 feet short. The wire is threaded through five "dogbone" insulators connected to the support ropes with 24-inch 125-lb test bungee cords. The support ropes are polypropylene agricultural hay baler twine. This rope is UV stabilized, has 240-lb knot strength and is available from farm stores for about twenty dollars per 6500-ft roll. The only limitation is its low abrasion resistance. Make certain the rope is not pulled back and forth over a tree limb in the wind.

Support ropes were put in place using a slingshot and spin casting rod and reel. A lead sinker, painted orange for visibility, was attached to regular nylon fishing line and launched over the appropriate tree limbs. The sinker was removed and the nylon line was used to pull mason's twine back to the launch point. Finally the mason's twine was used to pull up the baler twine. Don't attempt to skip the mason's twine step. Fishing line is not strong enough to pull up the heavier baler twine.

Manhandling almost 600 feet of wire is a tad more challenging than dealing with a 40-meter half-wave dipole. To measure it, we pounded two stakes in the ground exactly 100 feet apart and then walked sections of wire past the stakes marking the sections at the 100-foot intervals with masking tape. The completed loop with attached coax was laid out on the ground. The five insulators were threaded on and put into position. Bungee cords were attached between the insulators and the support ropes, which were raised incrementally into the trees. The entire procedure took the better part of a day.

Several accounts of full-wave loop antennas state roughly, " It was the greatest antenna I ever had until it fell down for the umpteenth time and I got tired of fixing it." After two initial breaks due to wear against the tree limbs, our antenna has successfully survived a rather brutal winter and spring here in eastern Ohio. Anticipating breaks, we first put in place permanent "lifting" loops of baler twine reaching from the ground to the support limbs. These loops are used only to raise the actual antenna support ropes. Not being under tension, the lifting loops never wear out and you never need to get out the slingshot again if the support ropes break. Having five support trees rather than four facilitates repairs since more of the antenna remains airborne when a support rope does break. In addition, the probability of all of the trees pulling against each other in a storm and tearing the ropes or wire decreases as their number goes up. Keeping the antenna completely free floating in the insulators also minimizes breaks. The wire can reestablish equilibrium when stressed in a storm. This can shift the point where the transmission line is attached, but with no detectable effect on performance.

The proof is in the PSK-ing

As shown in the table, actual SWRs, as measured by both our ICOM IC-718's internal meter and an auxiliary meter, are significantly lower than predicted by the model. At 20-30 watts output, the transceiver shows no sign of reducing power. Our expectation of needing to use a tuner with the antenna was pleasantly eliminated. On the other hand, the predicted high gain and low radiation angles are supported by our operating results.

Loops are known to be great for receiving and this one's no different. Compared with our other PSK-31 antenna, a 20-meter dipole sized for 14.07 MHz, reception with the loop is almost always at least one S unit better. Noise levels are very low. Short-wave broadcasters, Dominion Observatory Canada at 3.333 MHz and the 60 kHz time signals from WWV all come in well. Even CB transmissions from the truckers on the expressway five miles away come in loud and clear on the IC-718. Some day we'll have to buy a CB radio and see if we can talk back. Just kidding!

The antenna is great for receiving and "if you can hear `em you can work `em". PSK-31 stations in Europe, South America, Japan and Africa have been worked regularly. Contacts have been made 80, 40, 30, 20, 17, 15 and 10 meters. Not requiring a tuner makes band switching a breeze. In the MMANA screen prints, the calculated directional patterns have an egg-dropped-on-the-floor look, but are in reality omni-directional. It's noteworthy that the average height of the antenna is only 35 feet. An 80-meter dipole at this height would radiate most of its energy straight up, but this antenna's angle of maximum radiation is a DX-friendly 53 degrees at 80 meters.

The simulations suggest that a better impedance match could be achieved on some bands by feeding the antenna with 300-ohm twin-lead or by using a 4:1 balun with the 50-ohm coax, but at the power outputs we're interested in that's really not necessary. The lengths of the individual segments could be optimized to favor a specific band of interest. We certainly plan to do some tweaking, but for us this may just be the perfect PSK-31 antenna - for less than fifty bucks and with a lifetime supply of baler twine left over.

© 2003



Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W6TH on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
I will be the first to comment.

This is not my cup of tea, I don't agree with the gain measurements, the angle of radiation, which is not the greatest for working dx, the VSWR is higher than my radio will take for long periods of operation.

For an all band antenna, I am sure I can come up with one slightly better, not talking about a multiband antenna now called the Fan Dipole.

The gain of a single loop at its fundamental frequency is approximately 1.8 dB over a dipole and is directional perpendicular to the plane of the antenna.

I bet it was fun building this contraption. I will comment more later to answer the flamers.

73, W6TH

.:
 
A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by N3AIU on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!

I'm glad that your loop works well.

I love my 80m loop back in the US. I use it from 80m-6m, and I've worked some great DX with it. In the future, I intend to change the feed arrangement so that it will have a lower radiation angle on 80m.

I think that a big loop of any circumference will work well, whether it's 171m, 200m, 1000m, etc. I'm concerned, however, about the discrepancies between your calculated and measured SWRs. They can indicate a number of different things. Two possibilities are:
1) You've made a modeling error.
2) You have a long run of lossy coax and you are measuring the SWR at your rig. Not only will the SWR be lower than expected, you will also be losing a significant amount of power heating your coax. This effect should be smaller at longer wavelengths, which does not appear to be consistent with the data in your table, unless the coax is really, really lossy.

73, Nick N3AIU/DL1NE
 
RE: This is not my cup of tea  
by K4JSR on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Vito, are you saying that this antenna is really a hysteresis loop? ;-)
 
RE: This is not my cup of tea  
by K3AN on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Could you let us know how long the coax feedline is, and the type of coaxial cable you're using? Thanks.
 
RE: This is not my cup of tea  
by W6TH on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.

I often wonder why it is often mentioned that the dipole has a gain of 2.14 dB? It is not the dipole antenna that indicated the gain, but is the lobe radiated from the dipole.

Gain measurements are determined by the use of the aperture of the emitted wave, lobe, beam, etc. This measurement is a measurement of a sort of the -3 dB points of a lobe or the emitted wave.

I would like an answer from someone of the EZNEC and this is, is the math figured into the EZNEC or is the EZNEC figured into the math?

As an example, it is often mentioned that 0dB = 0.214 dBi, whereas to me 0dB = 0.214 dBi = 2.14 dBd. Can anyone explain to many that use the EZNEC for comparison?

Thank you, W6TH.

P.S. Hysteresis? Good grief K4JSR, I must run and get "The Radio Amateur Handbook" to check this antenna to really see if it is a transformer.

.:

 
A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by WA4PTZ on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
After reading several articles on the Horizontal Loop
antenna and getting the opinion of a few HAMs who were
using them I made myself one. Since it was just an
experimant I did not get it more than 20 feet off the
ground in a few spots. I was sceptical. I'm not any
more. I love it. It works all the bands, 160 - 6 with
a 4 to 1 balun and a simple tuner. I am impressed.
I'm so glad I had room enough to experiment, I might
have missed a great opportunity. Coax used is RG8X
, about 100 feet. The 450 ohm ladder line length was
not even measured, I'd say about 15 feet on mine.
Oh, by the way, the 4 to 1 balun is a homebrew made
from a torroid I salvaged from an old TV. and used
some #16 enameled copper , salvaged from a choke from
another junk TV. The only cost I incurred was for the
spool of #12 TRW I bought at Lowe's home supply.
About 25 dollars. I love experimenting.
73 ,
Tim WA4PTZ
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W4VR on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
In VA I once had a vertically-mounted full-wave (265 feet) Delta Loop on 80 meters. I fed it on one of the lower corners through a 75-ohm quarter-wave stub. Beneath it I had 40, 100-foot radials. I received over 200 SWL cards from Russia during a period of 2 years. I'm not sure if the radials helped, but it worked like gangbusters compared to a sloping dipole with one end at 90 feet.

BTW, the difference between an isotropic radiator in free space and a dipole in free space is 2.14 dB. But, depending on the horizontal dipole height above real earth NEC modeling will give gain figures for a dipole that are considerably higher than 2.14 dB due to ground reflection gain.
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W0IVJ on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Vito, W6TH:

EZNEC makes use of the math in that it calculates the current in a small segment of an antenna and uses that to make a far field calculation by summing all these finite currents. These small currents interact with each other and the ground to form a far field pattern. If you place parasitic conductors in the field of the antenna, currents are induced that reradiate. These reradiation currents are also summed and entered into the far field calculation. EZNEC is a model and a model is only as good as its assumptions. For example, EZNEC assumes a flat ground which is rarely the case.

As far as dBi and dBd are concerned the relationship is as follows. An isotropic radiator is a theoretical point source that radiates equally well in all directions in free space. If you build a dipole in free space the current distribution in the wire causes it to radiate more off the sides than the ends. This distortion of the spherical radiation pattern of the isotropic radiator translates to a 2.14 dB gain in two directions over the spherical pattern of the isotropic radiator. Thus a dipole has 2.14 dB gain over the isotropic radiator. If you place the dipole over a conducting surface such as ground, the pattern is distorted further such that more gain is achieved. In some cases this can be 5 dB. Thus the dipole over ground can be said to have 5 dBd or 5 dB gain over a dipole in free space. But this is a little confusing since the dipole has gain over a dipole, so we say that the dipole over ground has 7.14 dBi. Where dBd makes the most sense is comparing a Yagi to a dipole at the same height over the same ground. You may then say that a Yagi has say 6 dBd gain. The best comparison is when you compare the Yagi to an isotropic radiator, both being calculated in free space. The additional gain that comes from the ground reflections in the above case applies the same for the dipole and the Yagi. But advertisers sometimes pick the largest numbers, so you have to be careful that they aren't comparing the ground reflected gain of an antenna to the free space isotropic radiator.

I hope this rambling is contributing more to understanding and not more to confusion.

73, Tom W0IVJ
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W6TH on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
Tom W0IVJ,

Sorry to mention this Tom, but I have not learned anything new from your explanation, something in the past I have already read.

From what you say really rings the bell with the assumptions. For example, EZNEC assumes a flat ground which is rarely the case.

What you have written:

If you build a dipole in free space the current distribution in the wire causes it to radiate more off the sides than the ends.

What you mean is what I mentioned above in my post; The gain of a single loop at its fundamental frequency is approximately 1.8 dB over a dipole and is....... ((directional perpendicular to the plane of the antenna)).....

Sorry Tom, you were of no help, thanks anyway.

73, W6TH.

.:
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W6TH on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
This is a post I posted back a year or so ago. Lets do some math with gain, using math, the old fashioned way, which may be of interest to our new ham radio operators.

Let us now try and take the gain of a 3 element yagi.

The lobe that is leaving the antenna looks something like a Zeppelin, cigar or a bullet. The forward point is the maximum power. Lets assume it will be 100 watts. We now look for a section of this lobe that is at the half power, 50 watts which we will call the 3db point and this point will be the amount of degrees. We do this both vertically and horizontally for the half power points which is 3db down. We now call these points "E" plane for the vertical plane and the "H" plane for the horizontal plane.

The "E" plane is 30 degrees. The horizontal plane "H" is 60 degrees. Now that we have found two points of this "beam width", we can now calculate the gain of this 3 element yagi in "isotropic gain".

30*60 = 1800

41253/1800 = 22.9

Log 10 of 22.9 = 1.36dBi

Multiply by 10 = 13.60dBd gain above an isotropic.

I said gain above an isotropic

We now can take other antennas and find the half power points and compare the gain between each.

Let us say that I just calculated a 0.625 wl antenna (5/8 wl) and the calculated gain was 8.84dB above isotropic.

The difference in gain between both will be 4.76dB but in different main lobe directions, the lobe of the 5/8 wl vertical is lower than that from the yagi.

Gain is meaningful only when considered with reference to a particular communications path and set of propagation conditions.

W6TH
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W6TH on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
Now to prove my point, I will check the gain of a simple dipole of 2.14 db forward gain.

The 3 db point is 70 "E" degrees.

The 3 dB point is 360 "H" degrees.

Here we go:

30X360=25200

41253/25200=1.637 dBi

Log 1.637=0.214

.......10 X 0.214 = 2.14 db over an isotropic.


The "E" and the "H" refers to the aperture of the lobe or the beam width.

.:
 
A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by N0AH on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
I put my money on a Hustler 6 BTV loaded with 120 radials at 45 feet each-
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W6TH on September 14, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.

Give me your favorite band and I will give you the gain in both iso and dB.

.:
 
A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W5PVR on September 15, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
W6TH,


For information on EZNEC and how it handles it's math
contact Roy Lewellen W7EL.




Bob
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W6TH on September 15, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
Bob,

All of EZNEC functions are algebraic since they can be defined by algebraic formulas.

Also:
The exponential, logarithmic, and trigonometric function may be expressed.

Is a computer needed to decipher such?

.:
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by N4CQR on September 15, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Looks like this has turned into the Vito thread.
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W6TH on September 15, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
.
Well I think it is time to further my fun in life and put more time into my work load.

Think I'll pull the plug and check out the www.worst of evil.com and see how the gov't is treating the folks here in New Hampshire. Today the Feds blockaded a road so folks could not visit their friends that haven't paid their income taxes and refuse to do so. The Feds have arrested 9 in all for passing by the blockade. Many have been arrested for bringing food to these folks. As the saying goes here in NH; Live Free or Die, death isn't the worst of evil.

73, W6TH

.:
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by KQ6XA on September 15, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
There is no such thing as a "PSK31 Sub Band".
What makes an antenna any better for PSK31 that it is for any other mode?
 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by KC8VWM on September 16, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
What makes an antenna any better for PSK31 that it is for any other mode?

-------------

A spray application product in a 20 oz. can called liquid linear?

73 de Charles - KC8VWM


 
RE: A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by K4JSR on September 19, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Also, Charles, the wire for the antenna was sold by the "LINEAR" Foot!
 
A 171-Meter Loop Skywire Antenna for PSK  
by W6NRJ on September 27, 2007 Mail this to a friend!
Gentlemen: I have used a 540' loop skywire since 1988. I run 400 watts max. As W4RNL states (paraphrase) about this type of antenna in his papers..."the joy from this antenna is watching your country count increase over time as you use the antenna." I have over 200 countries confirmed with this antenna, an antenna that is neighbor friendly as it can not be seen from the street. From my Maryland location I have run many tests and participated successfully in many pile ups. My comparison antennas in the past have been two phased half grounded loops for 80 and 40. The loop skywire antenna is a pile up buster on 30 meters and above. It seems as good as a 3 element beam at 60 feet (except for F/B) in many test with Europeans on 20 and above, some using the same radio. Yes, I got "the Reef" on 20 with the loop! As a contesting antenna, running QSOs results in calls from all directions. When a DX station is operating " up 3" it is easy to spot the station currently being worked and jump on his frequency. My antenna has 5 supports but is nearly square at 45 feet. I use pulley systems on all tree supports counter weighted by bricks and have not had breakage problems. Now the downside...1. Hears well on 160 but is more a NA antenna than a DX one (have worked Africa and Europe however) 2. Has definite nulls at times either by direction or in coming angles. However, the next day with a change in the atmosphere I usually work the DX station who was weak the day before. 3. On 40 mtrs I found that a "4- tail" Curtain or two half squares in phase is at least 1 S unit better on the path to Australia, off the side of my loop. Off the corners, the loop is superior to any other wire antenna I have used.. I feed the loop at the corner via 450 Ohm ladder line to a Johnson Matchbox for all band operation (yes WARC also) 80 -10. 73, Jim W6NRJ
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
Don't Throw Away or Sell That TNC!
W3LPL on Beverages
Auto Antenna Tuner Notes
Re-Inventing the Tape Dipole
Mobile Ham Help for 5th Wheel RVers


Other Antennas Articles
Log Periodics for Rovers
Remote Tuned Slinky Dipole for Restricted Hams:
Mythical Antennas
Hide in Plain Sight!
Inverted V, Vertical Rhombic