eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

VHF Fun

from Steve Katz, WB2WIK on June 8, 2008
View comments about this article!

"Editor's Note: Due to the popularity of some of eHam's older articles, many of which you may not have read, the eHam.net team has decided to rerun some of the best articles that we have received since eHam's inception. These articles will be reprinted to add to the quality of eHam's content and in a show of appreciation to the authors of these articles."

VHF FUN

...invest in the antennas, not the gear, and you'll double your fun for less $$

Steve Katz, WB2WIK/6

Background

I've been operating the VHF bands since the mid-1960's. I was first “hooked” by using a Gonset Communicator-II on two meter AM, and have been hooked ever since.

In the early days, I was so gung-ho about VHF that I thought it would be very nice to just have a Technician class license and stay with that forever, since I was making 30-40-50 contacts a day on two meter AM, and then later six meter AM, running low power and either very old or very homebrewed equipment. I was 13 years old, and there was no end to the number of local hams active on VHF in the New York metropolitan area where I lived.

Early into my ham career I found it frustrating that the two meter band was evidently capable of all sorts of DX that I couldn't hear or work. I had a neighbor, Neal, W2KME, who lived about two miles from me in a location no better than my own, and he sat there rag chewing with hams 300 miles away on two meter AM (!), and most of the time I thought he was talking to himself, since I couldn't hear who he was working. I chatted him up on the air, told him I was a neighbor and a kid and I'd love to see his station (to see for myself what he was up to). He invited me over, and I rode my bike to get there.

Bike ride

Two blocks from Neal's house I saw his “secret.” It was a 45 foot tall tower, with a 15 element Telrex two meter beam up another fifteen feet atop it. That beam cast a giant shadow, since it was 28 feet long. Looking more closely, I could also see it was connected to a fat water hose. Maybe he water cooled the beam because it got so hot? Remember, I was 13 or 14 years old, here...

Neal invited me inside to see his station, which, other than a National HRO-60 receiver, was entirely homebrewed. Oh, the HRO-60 and a D-104 microphone. Other than those, his entire station was homebrewed. And I mean everything. Every transmitter, VFO, modulator, amplifier, and VHF receiving converter was homebrewed - dozens of items, all neatly arranged on desktops or in rack cabinets. His two meter rig was a plate-modulated pair of Eimac 4CX300As using push-pull 4-250 modulators, and ran about 600 Watts output power, on two meter AM. His receiving converter was a “W2AZL” converter using a low-noise planar triode tube preamplifier, and he downconverted to 28-30 MHz, using the HRO-60 as a tuner. Incredible stuff.

With this amazing accumulation of stuff, Neal could chit-chat with stations in Maine and Virginia on two meter AM, like they were next door - stuff I couldn't even hear. So, I asked the big question: “What's the most important thing, here, that makes it so you can contact stations so far away?”

He gave me the honest and correct answer, which I'll never forget: “It's the antenna, son. Nothing else is very important, and I just had fun building all this stuff. But if you brought your little Gonset over here and connected it to my antenna, you could work everything I can.”

So, a few weeks later, I did.

We plugged the top-mounted SO-239 connector on the Gooney Box (familiar term of endearance for Gonset Communicators of the 1950's) into his water hose - I mean, feedline. It turns out what I thought was a fat water hose was actually Neal's coax, and it was military RG17/U, which looks like very fat water hose, even close up. It has about one-fourth the loss of conventional RG213/U type coax, and is, of course, about four times fatter and heavier.

I tuned across the band, that Monday night. Sure enough, there were stations in Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine - and one in Montreal, a VE2 calling CQ on two meter AM. Montreal was not only another country, but was more than 350 miles away, almost due north, over several substantial sets of hills. But there he was. With my mighty 5W output from the Gonset, I answered the VE2. And got him!

Next step

“Dad,” I said, “I want to put up a really big beam antenna. I've saved up the money for it, but I think I need help.”

The 15 element Telrex was, at the time, $99.95 from Telrex of Asbury Park, NJ. It was the highest gain two meter antenna on the market, ever, and had this 28-foot boom which would overhang our house. I had the $99.95, and also the money for a rotator, coax, and rotor cable, since I'd been saving birthday money, Christmas money, paper route money and any kind of money for a long time. I was hoping to somehow strap this monster to our chimney, and get Dad to go along with it.

Dad was, if anything, a pretty good carpenter and backyard mechanic and had a tool collection that anyone would envy. He reviewed my plans and decided I was crazy. The chimney would never hold this thing. It would take something far stronger, like an antenna tower. I didn't have enough money for a tower, and the base, and the concrete, so we struck a compromise: A roof tower, which Dad would install to be sure it's done right - and I'd do everything else.

Not so many kids are so lucky to have parents who would let them install a tower on the roof of their new suburban home, but I was.

A few weeks later, I had a 15-element Telrex yagi for 2 meters towering over the neighborhood at about forty feet above ground. The little Gonset exploded to life with signals it had never heard before. Neal came by in his car, looked up, and said to me, “Good job. You've got it, now.”

VHFing

He didn't know how much I really got it. The big antenna opened not only doors, but windows and corridors, and I found myself working stuff that, other than Neal, almost nobody else locally could work. I got a part-time job after school and on Saturdays, working at - where else? - the local “candy store,” a large retail electronics store that happened to be the biggest ham radio equipment dealer in the tri-state area. I worked in the ham radio department. Minimum wage, but lots of hours, and I started accumulating equipment.

One thing led to another, but without doubt, I knew that by far the most important things were antennas. The gear almost didn't matter. I had a little 4 element six meter beam, not on the roof tower, but on a tripod over the garage (too low, and too small) and although it “worked great” -- as hams often say when they make lots of contacts -- in reality, it didn't work great - it worked. A co-worker named John, WA2PBN (who is still active today as W5JON in Texas), had a 6-element Telrex six meter beam up about fifty feet on a tower in his parents' yard, and could work circles around me on six. If I wanted to really “DX” on six, it was better to do it from John's house. Proving once again, antennas aren't the main thing, they're the only thing. Just as Neal said.

That, and Location

When I bought my first house at the ripe old age of 23, having just gotten married (don't even go there) and my first real job out of college, VHF Wisdom prevailed and I looked only at homes on hilltops with a clear horizon and long view. The house sat at 1230 feet above sea level, 300 feet directly above a 10 mile long lake, so it had an “over the water” shot in several directions. Although the house was more than 40 miles from New York City, I could see the Skyline out several windows. It was high, for New Jersey.

Up went the same roof tower, this time with antennas for 50-144-220-432 MHz all fed with hardline. When I first fired up on the air, almost every station contacted said something like, “Holy cow! You're in New Jersey?” And they said that because they rarely heard anyone from my state quite so strong, before. Especially a lot of guys up around Toronto, 350 miles to my northwest. Most of NJ is blocked in that direction, but I wasn't. It was “across the lake,” and I could see about halfway there, it seemed. Signals from Toronto were so strong on VHF that I could actually watch Toronto UHF-TV stations, using an indoor loop antenna on the back of the TV set. From 350 miles away.

So, antennas count, and location counts, too. I've since moved more than a dozen times, and owned fifteen more homes, and every single one of them has been hand picked as a ham radio location, at least to the extent that I made sure there were no antenna restrictions, and I also made sure I had a clear horizon in some key directions.

Simple math

Here's a common theme among hams who have dabbled in VHF but became disheartened or bored, and went on to other things:

“Where's all the SSB activity on two meters?”

Ya know, it's right there, but you're not hearing it. And that's the truth, almost always. The fact is, the VHF-UHF bands are nearly noise free and you really can enjoy a receiver with 0.1uV sensitivity. Because the bands are so relatively noiseless (compared with HF-MF), antenna reciprocity works very well up here. That is, antennas that work well for transmitting work equally well for receiving - which isn't always the case on HF.

Here's a factoid that many don't quite understand: No matter where you live, or what you use for a station, if you're working VHF-SSB, the vast majority of signals you work and hear will be weak. If you have a terrible location and poor antenna, you might only hear five weak signals all week long - and they'll be weak, for sure. If you move to a mountaintop with a huge antenna array, now you'll hear one thousand weak signals during that same week - and they'll be weak, too. The nature of VHF-UHF weak signal work is that the signals really are weak. With a good antenna and good location, you'll hear a lot more of them, and the closer ones will be stronger, for sure - but the majority of signals will still be weak. They'll just be coming in from farther away.

Another factoid: Every time you double your working radius, you quadruple your working area, and the quantity of stations you can work. If you increase your working radius (on two meters) from 50 miles to 250 miles by adding a new beam and tower, you've just increased your working area, and the number of stations you can work, by a factor of 25 to 1. Not five to one, but 25 to one, because the ratio is the square of the radius change. The average ham probably doesn't think about this, but VHFers should: It's a very important statistic.

So, when you work VHF using a little zero-gain loop on the chimney and have a nice, solid 50 mile radius coverage for day-to-day tropo work, you may think you're doing just fine. But change the loop to a 9 element beam, and increase its height to double what it was, and your radius will change from 50 miles to 250 miles, in most cases. That will immediately allow you to hear, and to work, 25 times more stations than you could before. Geometry is a powerful thing.

If you routinely hear five different stations on 2m SSB in an average week, now you'll be hearing 125 different stations in that same average week. Don't believe it? Hah! Try it. Then, you'll believe it.

Bottom line: On average, a small rotatable beam at fifty feet above ground will increase the number of stations you can hear and work by a factor of about 25 to 1, compared with a loop antenna at twenty-five feet. A large rotatable array will increase it by 50 to 1.

With a 50 mile working radius, you're covering 7,854 square miles. With a 350 mile working radius (large beam array on a tower), you're covering 384,845 square miles.

That's important stuff.

So, next time you wonder, “Where is everybody?” think about improving your antenna situation. A small change (in terms of actual cost) will make more of a difference than a monumental change in the station equipment.

And always remember, the nature of VHF weak signal work is that we're dealing mostly with weak signals. You can have the biggest station on Earth, and most of the stations you'll contact will still be weak - there will just be a great number of them.

Alternatives

Not everybody can put beams on towers. If you absolutely cannot, due to restrictive covenants, consider taking your whole VHF station portable for routine operations. This can involve making the station small but effective, and easy to get into and out of your vehicle - or maybe leaving it all in the vehicle!

Another childhood memory: As a kid, even with the big Telrex beam and having worked up to about 100 Watts of transmitter power on two meters, and a very good receiving converter ahead of my trusty NC-303 receiver, I still didn't have a good location. We lived in a lowland area only about 100 feet above sea level, very open to the east and south but blocked in some other directions. Even the huge 15 element beam on the roof tower couldn't see over a 450 foot hill just to the north of me, which restricted what could be worked in that direction.

So, even before I had a driver's license, I built a mobile setup and used to beg dear old Dad to take me “up the hill” to see what I could work from up there. The top of the hill was only about 3 miles away, and it was a short drive. We'd set up with a 20 Watt Clegg transceiver and a homebrewed, portable 8 element yagi that I could break down into three sections and stuff in the trunk in about 30 seconds. The yagi was supported by a 15' collapsible mast which was in turn supported by something similar to a Christmas tree stand. I could set it all up in a few minutes, next to the car so I could reach out the window to turn the antenna.

From the top of “the hill,” I could rag chew with guys 300 miles away, in the directions I was blocked from home. This teaches one a lot about “location,” which of course drove every single house purchase I ever made, as retold earlier.

So, you might consider something like this, too. It's great, especially if you have a fairly local hilltop you can access conveniently. It also great if you have a really great mountaintop you can access inconveniently, but use just now and then for a VHF contest or something.

Another alternative, of course, is to make friends with a local VHF “Big Gun” (a ham with a huge and effective home station) and make arrangements to use his station now and then. Like I started out doing with Neal, W2KME - and like hundreds of hams all over the world do, to enhance their operations on all bands, not just VHF.

End

There you have it.

I don't want to argue with anybody about whether they're “doing great” or “having fun,” because only the operator himself knows if he's having fun or not, and it's not up to us to judge. Some might have a whale of a good time fooling around on two meter SSB, making one contact a day (or night) out to 100 miles or so. Great.

But most people have a competitive spirit and want to do better. I'm surely one of those. The point here is to understand that unless you already have several large stacked beams up very high above ground, you can improve your VHF station a great deal - regardless of what's in the “shack.” And the improvements can come in quantum leaps, not little baby steps. As we detailed earlier, a loop at 25' will make contacts. From the same location, usually, a beam at 50' won't only make more contacts, but will make twenty-five times more contacts, simply because you've now exposed yourself to twenty-five times more area. Silly to argue the point, it's too easy to prove.

WB2WIK/6

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
VHF Fun  
by NV2A on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
To the editor, thanks for the "evergreen story". I am toying with the idea of getting into VHF a little deeper and I found his math very interesting. Always knew antennas were the heart of an operation but the math he mentions really drives home the point and makes it easier to understand.

Ray NV2A

PS. To my DX buddies in the club, sorry I made the crack that "lifes too short for QRP and VHF" !!
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by WA2JJH on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Sure is! I like 6M CW and SSB.

Around 1979, even the 2M repeaters got DX from a repeater on the same input.

I have a 12W 2.4gig TX/RX. I like making the "coffee can YAGI"
Take an empty coffee can. Use some micro-hardline. Cut a 1/4 wave section of sheild back. Bend up 1/4 wave of center conductor inside the can. The back of the can is your reflector.

Mount a 1/2 meter long screw on the plastic top. Add 10-20 metal discs(spacing between discs is about 3cm.
. You end up with a dirt cheap 2.4gig Yagi. Expect about 13dbi gain.

My dimensions may be a tad off. The coffee can antenna can be used with no director too. One should get 8dbi gain. A 30 degree lobe pattern.

Sorry thats more like UHF/microwave fun.

I had a great copy on you(WIK) a few times on 20M. Perhaps, I could get you on 6M. 3000 mile hops on 6M? 10M, I work your neck of the woods all the time.
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by K0BG on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
The same type of situation occurs when you operate HF mobile. You can have a lot of fun with just a simple ATAS 120; one of the lossiest HF antennas money can buy. But until you build a first-class mobile installation replete with a properly mounted, good-quality antenna, you will never know what you're missing. It is best to remember, it is not just an antenna, it is T H E antenna!

Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
 
VHF Fun  
by K4YRK on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
This is a great story and a very good description of VHF/UHF SSB and weak signal work. The antenna is the answer for this mode.
I, K4YRK, have been active on VHF since the early 60's but until the mid 70's never had a good 2m beam antenna. Like you, when I finally got a good 2m beam, KLM 16 element yagi, I was able to hear and work other 2m ssb stations several 100 miles out and all over the eastern US with band openings.
I am still active today and we have an "early bird 432.095 net" each morning,7 to 7:30AM, with several stations in E. TN, Atlanta area, Macon, GA; and Charlotte, NC checking in. Join us for the fun of VHF/UHF. See my website www.vhfhamradio.com for more information.
73
Dave
K4YRK
Farragut, TN
EM75wv
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by N2UGB on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
I would like to do VHF simplex QRP cw weak signal work. If only I had the ability to have a decent antenna. Those who can, should give it a shot.

I always thought there was more to amateur radio than HF. (Or 2 meter repeaters).
 
VHF Fun  
by K6YE on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Steve,

Great article. I never did more than hit local 2-meter repeaters (W6MEP and Catalina) with a "twoer' back in the day (1963).

In 1987, I do remember mobiling from Woodland Hills to Palm Springs for a job interview and a Los Angeles ham talked to me all the on 2-meter simplex. I was quite impressed with his high yagi.

I also had a Ringo Ranger stuck in a vent pipe on the roof that worked way better when moved to the top of my 50-foot tower. Not a DX situation but proved that higher is better.

Six meters is hot at times and I plan to purchase and put an M2 5-L 6-meter yagi above my Force-12 C4-XLD at about 60 feet.

A great antenna at an optimum height it indeed the answer.

The next time you come to Colorado and have lunch or dinner with Mike, K6AER, let me know so that I can join in.

Keep up the good work.

Semper Fi,

Tommy - K6YE
DX IS
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by KF4KQI on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Excellent article!
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by WA2JJH on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Using VHF, my friends and I proved something.

Circa 1988

We used to fly to DAYTON.

THE FLIGHT BACK WAS FUNNY AND SCARY.

You see, the 727 was filled with Hams returning to LGA NYC.
SHUCKS.....we all purchased the newist dual band H-T's we could buy.

Imagine 100+ hams using 2M SIMPLEX to talk a few rows down!
The poor flight folk asked us 10X not to transmit during any part of the flight!

We proved that avionics are NOT AFFECTED by 50 VHF HT's outputting 2W!!!!!!!

WELL, I am alive to tell about it. Guess these days an air marshal would have to have lotsa handcuffs.

At 30,000 feet, we were using 6 repeaters at a time!!!!!
Yes, a good antenna is always prudent. However, I will take a few thousand meters of elevation any time!!!!!!!!

I just chuckle every time I fly! PLEASE TURN OFF ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES!!!!! HA!!!!
 
VHF Fun  
by K4JC on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Great article! I was once told, and have found to be sage advice, that if you have $1.00 to spend on ham radio, invest one cent into the radio, and 99 cents into the antenna.
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by G8UBJ on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
A great article.. Takes me back... I ended up hoisting a 16 Element boomer in the end, but it did the trick, 59 into DL and busted some big pileups with a FT-221r and 80 Watts..
On reflection 2 shorter beams with a slightly wider beamwidth stacked would have been better..
Looking forward to VHF field day as its the only time I will really get to stretch my VHF legs, and inspire some of the foundation licence holders..


 
RE: VHF Fun  
by N7YA on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
For what its worth, i believe the Mythbusters did an episode where they tested avionics equipment against cellphones, radios, laptops, etc...no effect whatsoever. they do real world testing as well, they got on a plane, turned on the avionics, then turned on their various devices and it didnt even register. To this day, i hear on air conversations on various frequencies between licensed hams while in flight...i also never hear of pilots leaving the flight deck to look for what is messing up their gear. Im not here to break the rules or put anyone in danger for selfish means, but i have been questioning this rule for years.

There must be another reason why they want these things off, perhaps its during the critical moments of flight where full attention is needed in case of a contingency, Maybe the rules were imposed back when aircraft werent as up to date as they are now and a problem actually could arise, not really sure. But if its due to an outmoded belief that personal electronic devices can cause a modern planes radios and directional equipment to malfunction, resulting in the aircraft spinning out of control and augering into a farm field...well, that notion may need to be revised.

Like an example? go back a post or two...hams all over the plane using their HT's? correct me if im wrong, but i believe that gentleman had to be alive and well in order to write his post regarding the subject. Nobody crashed, a few flight attendants got miffed. And this was a 727...that means the avionics were at least 25 years old. The new stuff is definately more well designed, well built and with much better shielding. 25 years ago, i had a 2 meter qso with a ZL friend visiting Alaska who was giving me the play by play of him taxiing, accelerating and lifting off out of my local airport...as i recall, he reached his destination intact.

Hey, we all reserve the right to be wrong.


73...Adam, N7YA
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by N7YA on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
...or the WRIGHT to be wrong! (ba da crash)


>sigh< ....i cant believe i started a whole new post just for THAT. sorry.
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by N6AJR on June 8, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
I certainly enjoyed this article again Steve, nice story. Remeindsa me of my very first HF antenna , a Fan Dipole for 80, 40, 20, 15 and 10 m on the 1 story roof of the apartments I lived in, setting 2 inches off the wood shingle roof on some wood childrens alphabet blocks.

But man it got out and I even got to talk on it ( a ft101ee) on the local air force mars net,, wow, I was a big gun :)
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by K9RFZ on June 9, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Good article expressing the joys of VHF. To the naysayers who claim electronic devices do not affect avionic controls, I have to say you shouldn't bet your life on it. I might not have believed it either, but I have the experience to know better.

I once flew in the backseat of a single engine aircraft piloted by a friend so I could take some pictures of a remote observatory in the Hoosier State Forest. He is a very experienced cross country instrument rated flyer and he needed to get some hours in the plane so he offered to take me along. Another friend rode in the co-pilot front seat. We made the trip and were returning without incident. The friend in the front seat started to use his cell phone to call his wife to arrange to meet at the airport. When he turned on the phone, the aircraft autopilot turned off and the plane pitched up and then descended abruptly enough that it felt like going over the top on a roller coaster. The pilot regained control and we were never in real danger. However, the pilot wanted to verify the cause and effect, so he came to level flight with the autopilot and had the friend try his cell phone. Exact same result. Because we had plenty of altitude, the sudden drop wasn't a great concern. It was surprising, but not life threatening because the pilot had plenty of room to regain control. At lower altitude, the same cell phone interference with the autopilot could be fatal.

My friend recorded the specifics of the two incidents and filed a report about the equipment interference with the FAA. When I fly commercially, and some bonehead business traveler next to me has to get that last text message to his secretary after the electronic device warning has been given, I make a point of sharing my story about the small aircraft autopilot.

Joseph, K9RFZ
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by WB2WIK on June 9, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
>RE: VHF Fun Reply
by K9RFZ on June 9, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Good article expressing the joys of VHF. To the naysayers who claim electronic devices do not affect avionic controls, I have to say you shouldn't bet your life on it. I might not have believed it either, but I have the experience to know better.

I once flew in the backseat of a single engine aircraft piloted by a friend so I could take some pictures of a remote observatory in the Hoosier State Forest. He is a very experienced cross country instrument rated flyer and he needed to get some hours in the plane so he offered to take me along. Another friend rode in the co-pilot front seat. We made the trip and were returning without incident. The friend in the front seat started to use his cell phone to call his wife to arrange to meet at the airport. When he turned on the phone, the aircraft autopilot turned off and the plane pitched up and then descended abruptly enough that it felt like going over the top on a roller coaster. The pilot regained control and we were never in real danger. However, the pilot wanted to verify the cause and effect, so he came to level flight with the autopilot and had the friend try his cell phone. Exact same result. Because we had plenty of altitude, the sudden drop wasn't a great concern. It was surprising, but not life threatening because the pilot had plenty of room to regain control. At lower altitude, the same cell phone interference with the autopilot could be fatal.<

::Big difference between cheapie autopilots installed in light aircraft and what's in commercial jets. Huge. This is a bit like comparing a laptop to a supercomputer with networked failover clustering for fault tolerance. You can disable the first one with the power from a hand-held transmitter, if you know how; you can't take down the second one with a 100kW transmitter and antenna installed in the same room with it.

Interesting story, nonetheless.

I've worked on aircraft programs where a routine test was electromagnetic compatibility and immunity, where the imposed field strength was >300V/m (this is a very strong field) swept from 20 kHz through 12 GHz and aimed at the craft from tip to tail over a period of about 72 hours, with the antennas changing polarization from vertical to horizontal to angular, and continously rotating on axis during the sweep. The effort is to check electronics systems immunity to almost everything except lightning, which is a different test.

Nothing ever hiccups.

The test is the equivalent to everybody on board running a 100W+ transmitter on any frequency to antennas directly connected to the fuselage.

Nothing's failed this in years.

Biggest problem I see with cell phones used in airplanes is cell sites aren't really designed to support stuff coming in from overhead, especially 8 miles overhead. With some design changes, they could. "Range" of a typical cell site is less than 8 miles, L-O-S, for users at the same or lower elevation than the site.

Future generations of passenger planes could easily have cabin-wide WiFi service, specifically designed for compatibility and the number of users the cabin can carry. Technologically, not difficult. It's only money.

WB2WIK/6





 
RE: VHF Fun  
by K0BG on June 9, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Actually Steve, a couple of airlines are indeed supplying WiFi aboard their aircraft. Unfortunately, the FAA won't let them do it within their juristrisction (US and territories). It's another case of to many frigging lawyers in positions of authority.

Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
 
VHF Fun  
by K0RGR on June 9, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
On the opposite side of the country, about the same time, I caught the 2 meter bug.

California is a land of valleys and mountains. Generally, a modest 2 meter station would let you work everything in your own valley with ease. Getting beyond the mountains took real effort, though.

I used a variety of gear on 2 meter AM. My first rig was probably the most capable - a WWII surplus SCR-522 that I'd spent a summer rebuilding, and a Nuvistor receive converter ahead of a WWII surplus receiver. But this lashup took up a ton of space, and was very non-portable.

The next 2 meter rig was a Heathkit Twoer, featuring 1 watt of heavily over-modulated AM and a sensitive but non-selective superregen receiver. The Twoer stuck around for many years, until the proliferation of strong repeaters in the area made it useless.

In Silicon Valley in the late 60's, 2 meter AM was more a social function. It seemed everybody had a Twoer. Every night, we'd meet on 145.92 AM and we'd have a roundtable with 20-30 people participating. You'd make a transmission and an hour later, it would come around to you again!

But, my buddy Dan, now W6WLE, and I started hilltopping before we could drive. It was amazing what we could hear from the mountaintops. Of course, the Two'er was so non-selective, it was a real challenge to copy anybody through the QRM. But we could work stations all over Northern California with our one watt and a whip antenna from the mountains.

I wish we could find a way to rekindle those days. We could do it on FM. The biggest thing is to just get people to turn off the TV and turn on their FM rigs, or at least be willing to switch if somebody comes up on simplex and wants to chat.
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by WA2JJH on June 9, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
My nicest memory.

Got the new fangled DRAKE TR-33 2m portable. 1.5W, used xtals, but rptr offsets were programmed in.

With the 1.5W power with the supplied 19" whip, had lotsa fun on 52.

Yup, simplex at 146.52 was a hot ticket! The repeater explosion did not happen until synthesised radio's became affordable.
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by WA2JJH on June 9, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
BTW CESSNA GULF STREAM-NO PROBLEM with any RF Gizmos.
Depends on what you fly. If you have a dingbat piper cub and just slapped in a cheapo auto-pilot----hahahahahahahahahahahha!!!!!!!!!!
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by K1CJS on June 9, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Re: The autopilot switching off--I have to agree with the others, there is a big difference between a commercial jet and a Cessna. First thing--the guy with his cell phone was right next to the autopilot electronics. Secondly, there are backup systems in commercial aircraft that are there to take over in case of failure of the main system. Those systems are also shielded to the max compared to a private aircraft electronics installation.

Even if using RF electronics in a commercial aircraft is prohibited, you've got to remember that someone will do the prohibited even after being warned not to--and 99.99% of the time, nothing happens. If you're worried about that .01% of the time something may, you're carrying paranoia to the extreme.
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by N3OX on June 9, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
"Biggest problem I see with cell phones used in airplanes is cell sites aren't really designed to support stuff coming in from overhead"

Biggest problem I see with cell phones used in airplanes is the three !@)(*&$# who won't shut up ;-)

WiFi? Great, fantastic, as long as they make sure to let you know that your Skype connection is going to crash the plane; sending email is fine!

- - - - - - -

Aaaanyway... my VHF antennas aren't nearly big enough or high enough but I still have a lot of fun.

It's a little painful to find out what N3DB and K3TKJ are hearing that I'm not, but it's just good impetus to figure out how to go bigger ;-)

Dan
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by WB2WIK on June 10, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
>RE: VHF Fun Reply
by N3OX on June 9, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
"Biggest problem I see with cell phones used in airplanes is cell sites aren't really designed to support stuff coming in from overhead"

Biggest problem I see with cell phones used in airplanes is the three !@)(*&$# who won't shut up ;-)<

::Yeah, you're right. And the *other* biggest problem with cell phones is they mostly sound like crap. The big, old analog phones actually sounded pretty good and you could ride QSB with them (signal fade, without losing connection). The digital phones, which of course today is all that we have, offer a combination of terrible fidelity along with signal drop outs that are very digital -- there one moment, gone the next!

Great leap forward in technology!

Well, the batteries *DO* last a lot longer nowadays...

WB2WIK/6
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by KA4KOE on June 11, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
My idea....

TS600
TS700a
KMA50500

Lots of contacts, loads o' fun.

Philip
 
VHF Fun  
by VA3SAX on June 12, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Great article...almost motivated me to work on an upgrade to 4el on 2m and 11el on 432MHz...however from testing with the antennas handturned from a non permanent location I realized that no the really is nothing I'm not hearing that I might be able except for during the contests so I doubt the upgrade from my omnis is worth it
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by NU0R on June 13, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Steve, I was a little slow in reading this article, but I really enjoyed it. I have been a Ham for 30 years and have never operated any thing above HF. Some day I plan to go higher in freq. and do it right. I think your article will stick with me as to how to do it the right way! As always your writing is a joy to read. You simply amaze me at your vast knowledge of radio. You are simply the best! 73, Bruce/NU0R
 
VHF Fun  
by N9DG on June 13, 2008 Mail this to a friend!

Even before I got my Novice back in 1980 I knew that VHF weak signal was going to be my main thing. I just had too much fun with FM BCB DX'ing vs. AM BCB DX'ing to ever be all that interested in HF. And it was inspiring to read about the DX and contest efforts of people in the ARRL Central Division.

One thing for those who have flipped their DC-Daylight radios over to SSB on a 2M vertical and didn't work anybody need to understand. By trying that you were at a 20dB or more disadvantage out of the gate before you even started. Being 20dB down on both RX and TX is a *huge* performance hit. But also ponder that the first 30dB or so of improved antenna system performance over that vertical comes pretty cheaply. Chasing the next 15dB or so after that is when it starts to get expensive. A modest 15-20 ft boom horizontal polarized antenna on 2M will put you in the vicinity of being 30dB better (on both RX and TX) than any FM vertical you may try to use on 2M SSB.
 
VHF Fun  
by K4LFK on June 17, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
Talk about FUN. Six meters was UNBELIEVEABLE for the June contest, and I happened to work W5JON during the contest. 73 Len k4lfk
 
RE: VHF Fun  
by WA4UF on June 18, 2008 Mail this to a friend!
I'll second that. I had an absolute blast in the June sweepstakes, running my very own pileups for the first time ever! A hundred twenty contacts ain't much for the big guns, but it beats the snot out of the half dozen I got in January! I was getting contacts all over the northeast and upper midwest, and up into Ontario. The last bit of fun was the Mexican chap just before the contest ended; had to go outside in the rain and turn the mast west to get him to hear me. I even found time Saturday evening (when the thunderstorm sitting overhead was dropping lightning strikes two or more a minute for over an hour - it was like being straddled by battleship fire) to whip out a new 15el 70cm Yagi.

Gotta love Kent Britain's Cheap Yagi designs. An 8' length of 3/4x3/4 molding, a brass welding rod for the DE, and some aluminum electric-fence wire for the parasitic elements... cranked it out in just under 2 hours, including painting the boom to weather-protect it. If you're looking to get your feet wet in VHF, these Cheap Yagis are just the thing, and as an added bonus you get the warm fuzzies of "I built it myself!"

Unfortunately, I didn't have any connectorized coax, so I couldn't get the new antenna up on the mast before the storm abated and 6 opened back up. 's all right - I'll build a second one and get the pair of 'em stacked for September. Might even replace the 2m beam with a new stacked pair. I have to replace it anyhow, as I kind of forgot to varnish it and it's got a nice spiral warp in the boom. :-)

And I'll also agree with Steve's comments on location. I usually do Field Day solo from my inlaws' house in Largo, FL, and out on Indian Rocks Beach. Last year I was up at their cabin in Sevierville, TN. Having a couple thousand feet of elevation under the antennas made a HUGE difference (or it did up until the 6m feedline shorted out in the rain :-( ).
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
Magnetic Minds Think Alike
Apartment dwellers 7 in 1 'Hamstick' Tree!
In Search of 'The Perfect Mobile Antenna':
The NA4IT 'CHEAP' Dual Band Ground Plane
Varmint Proof Your Antenna


Other Operating Articles
It's Not Your Microphone, It's You!
Cold War QRP: A Case of 'Discone Fever?'
Do You Have a Little More Power?
Better Days Ahead for 40-Meter Phone
Boatanchor Launches My DX 44 Years Later