Safety First
from
Alan Applegate, K0BG
on
October 26, 2009
View comments about this article!
"Editor's Note: Due to the popularity of some of eHam's older articles, many of which you may not have read, the eHam.net team has decided to rerun some of the best articles that we have received since eHam's inception. These articles will be reprinted to add to the quality of eHam's content and in a show of appreciation to the authors of these articles."
Safety should be the highest priority item an amateur radio operator instills to his hobby. Most of us know better than to stick our hands inside a live HF power amplifier or climb a tower without a safety belt. However when it comes to mobile operation we seemingly forget the dangers involved. In a recent OpEd article (April 2004 issue of QST) I wrote the following words: It is distracting enough to talk on amateur radio and drive without adding further distraction caused by poor installation practices. It is up to us amateurs to set a safe operating environment level, as free of distraction as possible. This is the essence of this article.
I've been operating mobile for over 30 years with a great deal of that time traveling the highways and byways of the mountain west. I averaged over 40 hours each week behind the wheel and mitigated these hours operating the HF bands. I DXed, county hunted, rag chewed, and mostly listened. I wore out about a dozen cars, and not once did I temporarily mount a rig or antenna. Company cars and personal cars alike, I drilled holes and installed ballmounts, screwed down mounting brackets, and hid the wiring all in the name of safety.
I like the readers of this article to recall the part of their high school physics class which dealt with energy. More specifically, the formula for kinetic energy which is 1/2(m*v2), where m equals the mass and v equals the velocity. For example, a 2-pound object traveling 8.8 feet per second (10 mph) will have a kinetic energy of 77+ foot-pounds. Then there is the law of Conservation of Energy, which deals with the change of kinetic energy to potential energy and back again. Using the above 10 mph example, a 2 pound object laying on the top of your car has a potential energy of 77+ foot-pounds. If your car stopped instantly and we ignore any friction losses, all of the potential energy turns into kinetic energy. In any case, I wouldn't want to be hit on the head with the object!
I used the 2 pound example above for two reasons; this is about the weight of the average remote head (face plate), or that of a VHF mag mounted antenna. Let's assume we're merrily traveling down the highway at 60 mph. At this speed the potential energy of our example becomes 7,744 foot-pounds. All of this potential energy would not become kinetic energy in the event of crash because other factors must be considered. For example, the mag mount does have some adherence to the car body, there is friction, and there are deceleration components as well. But don't kid yourself! If you have a crash while driving 60 mph, that mag mount will dislodge itself and most likely will snap its coax cable allowing the antenna to become a missile with enough kinetic energy to maim and kill! This is true of a remote head as well when we trade magnetic lines of force for the tensile strength of Velcro.
As I inferred above, it is difficult if not impossible to determine the actual kinetic energy of any object without knowing all of the factors involved. In some crashes nearly all of the potential energy will become kinetic, and others just a fraction. The point here is, even 77 foot-pounds can kill.
There is another aspect of safety which most amateurs miss, and that is the distraction factor. Improperly positioned and/or mounted devices can cause an inordinate amount of distraction. Distraction can be described as the length of time your eyes are off the road and/or controls of the vehicle. At 60 mph (88 feet per second) the average vehicle needs 144 feet to come to a stop (102 feet for some sports cars to 208 feet for some loaded 8 passenger vans) and you have used over half of it due to distraction. You may not be paying attention, but our lawmakers are!
Early this year, the NHTSA (National Highway traffic Safety Administration) amended its rules to require reporting of the use of telematics in any vehicle involved in a crash (the word crash is now used in place of accident as crashes are seldom accidents). Telematics is their term for radios, FAX machines, computers, cell phones, etc. installed or in use in a vehicle. The most prevalent of these is of course is cell phones. This fact has spawned a rash of new laws against telematic use.
Go to this site
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/ncsl/Index.cfm and select 'Distracted Driving' from the right-hand popup, and push the button. While most of the listings cover cell phone use, a closer look at the individual laws just might make your blood boil. And the real spotlight is yet to come. The first annual telematic use report is about 9 to 12 months away, but preliminary data indicate an extraordinary high incidence of telematic use in crashes. Incidentally, amateur radio is one of the sub headings.
One of the easiest ways to avoid distraction is to properly mount your equipment in your vehicle. This means Velcro, bungie cords, rubber bands, and other temporary means are not only verboten, they're hazardous to driver and passengers alike. You can add mag mounts and many other temporary schemes to this list.
It is difficult to address every mobile mounting scenario as each piece of equipment and each type of vehicle is different. However, one can list a set of guide lines which should be considered regardless of the telematic or the vehicle in question. Just for brevity I'll use the words rig and car.
1). The rig should be located so it is clear of all the controls yet is easy to operate and view from the driver's seat. This is not always easy to accomplish. In my own car, I mounted the rig face plate along side of the center console just to the right of my right leg using a home brewed bracket made from DIY aluminum purchased from Home Depot. I can get to the rig controls easily and the mic can be stored in the lower dash cubby hole and out of the way when not in use.
Contrary to popular belief mounting a rig on top of the dash in plain sight is not such a good idea from a distraction standpoint or injury one to say nothing of the theft issues.
2). All brackets should be securely affixed to the various surfaces inside of the car. With proper planning the requisite mounting screws can either use existing attachment points or placed where they're not easily seen. On my previous car, I used two screws, which secured the AM/FM radio frame and center console together to secure a home brew bracket. In turn my IC-706 faceplate was bolted to that bracket.
3). Depending on the year, make, and model of car you own, one or more SRS units (supplemental restraint system commonly called air bags which they're not) will be installed. All rig controls, mounting brackets, mic and power cables should be clear of the SRS. In my OpEd article, I sited an instance where the rig faceplate was mounted atop the drivers SRS, smack dab in the center of the steering wheel. Imagine what sort of smack he'd get if the SRS went off?
4). All wiring should be properly sized, fused, and affixed to eliminate interference with in-car wiring and controls, and out of the way to avoid abrasion, shorts and tripping hazards. Avoid using splices and electrical tape. Never use existing circuits for power even though they appear adequate. In other words, always wire directly to the battery with proper fusing in both leads at the battery end.
The accessory sockets which are replacing cigarette lighter sockets these days are never wired adequately for use by rigs? -- No matter how they are fused! And don't do what was recently suggested in QST; modify a mini-fuse to tap power from the electrical system. If you want to have a real rude awakening, induce enough RF into the SRS circuitry to set it off while you're doing 65 mph down the interstate!
5). How many of you have used one of these phrases or ones like it. My wife won't let me drill a hole in our new car. It's a lease car. I'll get docked thousands when I trade it in. I can't speak for you, but I bought and paid for my car and the one my wife drives. If I decide to drill a hole, even in hers, I will.
I don't lease cars and unless you can write off the expense of a lease car to business, you shouldn't either especially if you drive over 20,000 miles a year.
I just recently traded my old (1998) car for a new one. I covered the holes in the trunk and quarter panel with rubber plugs I purchased from Radio Shack. Not one word was said about them. Car dealers are much more concerned with overall appearance and mileage. A neat and clean installation is of less concern than a trunk lid all scratched up from using a mag mount. Drill the hole and do it correctly.
6). Clean up your operating practices. Just about every modern rig out there has multiple memories and typically more than you'll ever use or at least remember. If you're like me, and the majority of hams out there, your favorite frequencies can easily be stored with room to spare. The Icom IC-706 is no exception. Whether it be a repeater or HF frequencies, modes, tones, filters, power out, and a variety of other parameters, they're as easy to change as pushing a button on the mic once they're stored in memory. For those parameters you can't store, familiarize yourself sufficiently with the various menus so you can change any of them while in motion without having to take your eyes off of the road.
7). Stick to your best operating mode. Operating CW while driving requires a good memory, good coordination, and above average dexterity. If you can't copy 20 wpm solid in your head, or remember the call and name of the guy you're tapping code with, don't try it! Using FM is much easier as everyone is "59", you usually know the guy you're talking to, and all of the controls are set and forget for the most part.
If you're a logging freak, buy a small voice recorder. The newer solid state ones will record several hours worth of data and they're cheap. I saw one recently at Wal-Mart for $29 which boasted 4 hours of recording in the low fidelity mode which is more than adequate for any mobile logging function.
8). If it is legal in your area, use a headset with just one earphone so you can still hear traffic noise, sirens, and the like. Make sure it's comfortable for long-term use, and that the mic is compatible with your rig. The Heil I used originally was too hot for the rig it was designed for, so I modified a Pacific Plantronics unit, which I like much better. Make sure the cords do not interfere with your driving.
If possible use VOX rather than PTT. The use of VOX requires a good noise canceling mic and few mobile mics fit this parameter. For several years I used a visor-mounted mic from a Motorola M500 cell phone with good success until it died. I'd like to find another some day. Perhaps this is one item Mr. Bob Heil can address.
9). Traffic conditions should dictate whether you operate, listen, or turn off the rig. No contact you've ever made or will make is worth risking a crash for and the consequences, which follow. If you decide that contact is more important, pull off the road on to a side street to finish your contact.
10). If you're one of those folks who wish to refute or rebuke what I've suggested because crashes caused by distraction only happen to the other guy, remember this; to the other guy, YOU'RE the other guy!
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
Safety First
|
|
|
by K0BG on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
This is more poignant than ever. This is from John Pavelich VE3XKD
New rules on Ontario roadways
By Peter West
Ontario’s Ministry of Transportation announced today that Bill 118 – the distracted driving legislation – is coming into effect as of Oct. 26. The new law will make it illegal for drivers to talk, text, type, dial or email using hand-held cell phones and other hand-held communications and entertainment devices. Following a three-month period that begins October 26, where the focus will be on educating drivers, police will start issuing tickets on February 1, 2010.
All two-way radios in all vehicles with the exception of emergency responding vehicles must be hands-free in three years time. This news comes from the official government staffer who has been in communications with Radio Amateurs of Canada over the last year. At the end of the three-year exemption, all commercial, CB and amateur radio equipment used in moving vehicles by the vehicle operator must be hands-free in operation.
Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by K6AER on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
The Canadian law is a classic example of a draconian solution in search of a problem. How many people have accidents from using a radio or cell phone. 20, 100, 500. I’ll bet any time there is an accident and the person has a cell phone in the car the accident report has a box to check off that indicated a cell phone was in the vehicle.
Traffic accidents have been going down on average every year. Any data on how many accidents have been prevented by calling law enforcement on drunk drivers?
People who are distracted from talking on a communication device will be distracted wither they are using Blue Tooth or a hand mic. The mind is distracted not the hand.
What this will do is impact general safety. I did not see if you have a non Bluetooth radio in the vehicle is that is a safety violation of is it a violation to be using a hand held radio. I can see the next level…tinted windows are illegal for the officer can’t see in the vehicle.
There will not be enough officers to enforce this ill conceived nanny law so the Canadian government will need to have blue tooth cops. To pay for the Blue Tooth Cops their will be a $300 per year cell phone tax. Being US visiting tourist, we will have to pay the tax at the boarder crossing after a strip search for cell phones. Their tiny you know.
Next level of distraction is no food, coffee, and doughnuts…no doughnuts!...what about the cops?
Just wait for the both hands-on-the-wheel legislation. How about having three traffic observers in each vehicle to warn the driver about hazards he can’t see. I’m thinking of mother in laws in action. But wait, with all that information the driver will be distracted. Better get two drivers with dual wheels like commercial aircraft.
Idiots behind the wheel will still be idiots behind the wheel no mater what the legislation or good intentions are. You can’t legislate stupid.
By the way, nice article Alan sorry for the rant.
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by K6AER on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I forgot to add the real problem is not talking on wireless devices but controlling them. So the next level of wireless devices including ham radio, CB and land mobile communication will be total voice recognition command and control. Text messaging is not a hand free problem but an eyes off the road problem. Blue tooth does not solve this problem.
It is obvious nobody has thought this through. The land mobile business will vanish overnight. Cities will be forced to pay enormous amounts for communication upgrades for every vehicle will need a full time communicator on board.
AND THIS IS THE COUNTRY WE WANT TO MODEL OUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM AFTER??????? NOT ME.
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by K0BG on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
No problem, Mike. It is an issue with no clear answers or solutions. Yet, the fact remains, anything you do within the confines of a vehicle can be distracting. It is the level that is in question.
In answer to the question, law makers have adopted draconian measures, just like your observation of the health reform. It seems, after all, the pendulum doesn't rest in the center, but tends to stick on one side or the other.
Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by K6AER on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Alan,
I agree. The pendulum in this case looks a lot like a wrecking ball.
73, Mike
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by W7WV on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I quit operating HF mobile as I found myself too distracted while driving.
I only wish that others on the road would have as much common sense and quit playing with all the gadgets that the makers of cars and trucks keep installing in them that take your attention away from the road.
I know, it's OK as it came with the car as factory equipment.
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by K5END on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Drivers using cell phones for voice or text messaging cause a hazard. No one (intelligent) will argue with that. The studies are there, the crash analysis is there, and so on. One study reportedly says that distraction from cell phone use has the equivalent result of a 0.8% blood alcohol level.
My new pickup was rear ended last year by an 18 y/o driver when I was stopped at a stop light. She admitted she was on the cell phone and having been distracted was the reason for the crash. That is not stupid. That is beyond stupid. We'd have to create a new word to describe that level of hyper-stupidity.
It was not a severe crash, my vehicle was hardly scratched, and my rear bumper ensured that all that kinetic energy was transformed into bending the metal on the front end of her car, so I felt fortunate--this time.
She also told me this was her third accident in a month. And damage to other parts of her car body supported that claim. Drivers like this should be removed from the road.
New Law in Texas
Texas passed a law recently banning drivers from use of "wireless" devices (wireless defined as a paid subscription service) in school zones.
The exemptions are hands-free devices and licensed radio use (which includes Amateur radio.)
However, having an Amateur license does not allow the licensee to use a "wireless" device such as a cell phone in a school zone.
My opinion is the term "wireless" was chosen poorly, but in this context it is defined as a paid subscription device, such as a cell phone.
So, I guess that means you'd better not touch the volume dial if you have XM radio?
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by WA8MEA on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Good article, Alan.
However, this should have been a two part safety course.
This part (part one) should have been entitled:
Mobile Safety First
Part Two: Home Safety First
The old ARRL Handbooks (and other ARRL publications) really emphasized shack safety.
Rubber sole shoes saved my life one day when my fingers slipped and touched a screw driver while trying to find an intermittent. I found out the plastic handle wasn't sufficient enough. But....I was a dumba** teenager back then.
Back to the mobile article: Did you know that many mobile whips emit a wind-whipped, high-pitch, whistle-like tone that will keep deer(s) from jumping in front of your vehicle?
73, Bill - WA8MEA
http://HamRadioFun.com
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by G6NJR on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
>>All two-way radios in all vehicles with the exception of emergency responding vehicles<<
Yet another example of trying to say they are better drivers than anyone else and that is the biggest load of codswallop in existance "Whats good for the Goose is good for the Gander" no exceptions wake up people force the issue
Pete G6NJR
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by KC0RBX on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
The best solution I ever heard to make drivers more alert and conscience while driving was made by a transportation safety "expert" on a television documentary. His solution? Require all vehicles to have 10 inch steel spike sticking out of the center of the steering wheel such that it is pointing right at the driver's chest. He said we would immediately see a dramatic drop in vehicle crashes! His reason is because we become too complacent when we try to implement every possible safety device to save lives when what we really need is to be constantly reminded that "If I crash, I get a spike in my chest! I better pay attention!"
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by KE4DRN on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
hi,
I'm more concerned with all the guys that
tow trailers without any safety chains,
or the chains are NOT crossed.
73 james
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by KB9JXZ on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
There have been laws on the books to address and fine texting,cellphones,radios,computers,eating, reading the paper, and putting on makeup for many many years....it's called distracted driver. No need for another law. There are laws already in place. Less government please!
73,
KB9JXZ
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by WA8MEA on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I'm more concerned with all the guys that
tow trailers without any safety chains,
or the chains are NOT crossed.
**************************************************
Hey James, I've often wondered why chains are crossed. I've just done it because my father taught me many years ago to do it that way. But I'll be dammed if I can remember why he told me to cross 'em....
Bill
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by AD5TD on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
You cross the chains so that if the ball comes off, the crossed chains catch the tongue and it doesn't dig into the pavement and send the trailer off into the next lane or worse, the oncoming lane!
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by K4VVX on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Safety Chains- - In a jack knife situation, such as an inexperienced driver might encounter when backing a trailer, crossed chains actually get more slack in them as the turn angle increases. If they aren't crossed, you risk damage to the safety chain, the trailer and the towing vehicle when the chain gets tight. They are already short enough to keep them from dragging on the road. The "tounge catch" is an added benefit.
73,Carl.
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by K5END on October 26, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
"His solution? Require all vehicles to have 10 inch steel spike sticking out of the center of the steering wheel such that it is pointing right at the driver's chest."
Yeah, I saw that guy in a documentary.
He's got a point (sorry, that was lame.)
The safer we make the cars the more careless some drivers become.
Same goes for health care.
Healthy diet? <scoff> I can take a drug to fix my LDL!
Damn, the triple bypass! Full McLipids ahead!
|
|   |
|
Safety First
|
|
|
by N4MJG on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I had close call rear end people get behind yaking on cell while driving, too close call for me ! Nashville Tn ban use of cell texting while driving ! that were the most wreck.
There one more thing they sould not be texting while driving.or will happen to them !
73
Jackie
N4MJG
|
|   |
|
Safety First
|
|
|
by N5YPJ on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
"10). If you're one of those folks who wish to refute or rebuke what I've suggested because crashes caused by distraction only happen to the other guy, remember this; to the other guy, YOU'RE the other guy!"
Amen Allen.
I was the other guy a few short days ago, saw the vehicle coming at me at the last second - not a damned thing I could do about it except hold on for the ride. That was my first and it was really amazing what did move around in a 30 MPH collision! I can attest to the fact that I would not have wanted to have had an HT flying around the vehicle much less anything heavier. Plan for the worst case scenario bolt that transceiver down to some metal! Find out where your air bags are located and by all means avoid those areas. In the right, the worn or shared blame it doesn't matter the life you save will be your own.
|
|   |
|
Safety First
|
|
|
by AI2IA on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Good, better, and best - you choose.
For over thirty years before retirement I drove five days a week over the greater New York City metropolitan are, a radius of 75 miles. I saw it all, and some very ugly accidents I would like to forget.
It did not take me very long to decide that driving is really a full-time occupation. No radio operation, no cellphone operation, no long discussions - pull over if you want to do those things. Don't drive with medication, fever, sleepy or angry emotions. Don't daydream. Give the aggressive drivers a path and let them go. Take a short break when you need it.
There is one supreme rule to return home in one piece to your wife and children - STAY ALERT.
Mobile Morse Code? HF mobile? VHF-UHF? AM, FM radio? CD player? Sure you can! But be smart, pull over if you want to use those distractions. Is this extreme? Not if you want to live.
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by WA8MEA on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Thanks for the explanations on the crossed chains. I guess I'm from that ancient throwback era where you just did what your father told you....without asking why.
So today, 35 years later, I learn the why's. I can live with that....
73, Bill - WA8MEA
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by TANAKASAN on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
"It did not take me very long to decide that driving is really a full-time occupation. No radio operation, no cellphone operation, no long discussions - pull over if you want to do those things. Don't drive with medication, fever, sleepy or angry emotions. Don't daydream. Give the aggressive drivers a path and let them go. Take a short break when you need it. "
Thank you AI2IA, nice to see that someone gets it.
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by KB2FCV on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
A number of years ago I had my car totalled by a lady yacking on the cell phone. I was sitting waiting to make a left turn, stopped, blinker on. With no warning I was rammed at just about full speed. The back of my Caprice crumpled up like an accordion. The lady stepped out of the car.. she was STILL on her cell phone! After 10 or so seconds she finally hung up and asked if I was alright. Grr..
I whole heartedly agree with everything K0BG says. Install your gear properly and safely! Drill those holes!
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by KE4DRN on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Hi,
Sounds like the mother in law should do
the driving !
"His solution? Require all vehicles to have 10 inch steel spike sticking out of the center of the steering wheel such that it is pointing right at the driver's chest."
Yeah, I saw that guy in a documentary.
He's got a point (sorry, that was lame.)
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by KE4DRN on October 27, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
hi,
wonder if those guys on that Northwest A320
were working some DX instead of paying attention
to the flight computer ?
73 james
|
|   |
|
From the Opus :)
|
|
|
by KL7AJ on October 28, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
"......Let us now investigate Hazard Number Five: scalding your carcass with hot coffee.
Hams drink coffee. Lots of it. It is the potion of life that powers us through contest weekends and late night construction projects. If, as a new ham, you don’t drink coffee yet——you will.
Now, for those readers “across the pond” who still possess a modicum of common sense, the following may come as a shock to your system(s). We Americans need to be told that hot coffee is——well——hot. Our government tells us we should know this ahead of time. We have warnings on microwave ovens that inform us that materials emerging thence might be hot, as well.
In a dimly-lit workshop, it’s easy to mistake rosin soldering flux, (a pasty, dark brown, mildly toxic substance), from Ham Radio coffee (another pasty, dark-brown mildly toxic substance). The best indication that you’ve been dipping your soldering iron into your coffee rather than into the vat of soldering flux is that coffee usually works better for cleaning the slag off the soldering tip.
After several such inadvertent dousings, however, you may find the coffee takes on a curious, tangy character. Although this is likely to be a marked improvement over what you’ve normally been drinking, this can have deleterious health effects, and should be avoided whenever possible. (Note: This is not a suitable method for reheating your coffee, as convenient as it may be. Invest in a good “official” coffee warmer. You’ll be glad you did).
Now, for those of us who are indeed deemed incapable of safely handling hot liquids, there is a relatively newfangled alternative, i.e., cold, canned “energy drinks.” Most of these can be partaken with little chance of scalding yourself. They come with all kinds of Generation X, Y, or Z-sounding names. Rock Star, Kick My Butt, Cordless Bungee Jumper, and the like. Now despite the “balls-to-the-wall” (forgive my Romanian) sounding names of these drinks, the truth is, these are wimpy alternatives to good old fashioned ham radio coffee sludge. Ask any contester. In addition, these drinks lack the multi-tasking capabilities of genuine coffee. (For alternative uses for coffee, see CHAPTER FOURTEEN, “Setting Up Your Very Own Ham Radio Station in Your Bedroom, Garage, Attic, Basement, or Perambulator”). Our advice is to learn how to safely and properly handle coffee. (For our British friends, most of the references to coffee can be replaced with tea with little modification, except with regards to soldering flux. Tea does not generally thicken with age)....."
Eric
|
|   |
|
RE: From the Opus :)
|
|
|
by KG4DGF on October 28, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Thanks for a great article Alan. I also enjoyed your website which took a few days over the summer for me to fully appreciate. As soon as I can I plan on following your advise for a safe mobile set up. Once again thank you very much for all the effort you have put forth for the ham community.
|
|   |
|
Safety First
|
|
|
by K9CTB on October 29, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I can see why this is an eham classic. Great job, Alan.
73 de Neil
K9CTB
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by W0AEW on November 1, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I got one of those liquor flasks with the flexible neck so I don't have to take my eyes off the road while drinking. Just doing my part.
|
|   |
|
Safety First
|
|
|
by WA6BFH on November 3, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Is this really a Ham radio topic?
No denigration to Alan but, I have some cool Ham radio dinner plates. Is that something to chat about, or have great concerns?
Ham radio has more to worry about! Can I list the ways......?
73! John
|
|   |
|
RE: Safety First
|
|
|
by KL7AJ on November 3, 2009
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I think it should be fairly obvious that if there aren't any surviving hams around, it WILL be our biggest problem! If hams are talking about a topic, it's a ham radio topic.
Eric
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Related News & Articles
Warnings from Icom
USA 5 MHz Emcomm, Not Ragchew DX Contests
Other Recent Articles
VK5RJ Still Gracing the Airwaves at Age 101:
rec.radio.amateur.moderated -- 5 Yrs. Old:
Tune-In To The World -- Amateur Radio Gets People Talking:
Student Sends MIT Letter to Space:
Amateur Radio Club Talks to Hams Worldwide on Centennial:
|