The Doctor Is In: Antennas for Domestic Contests:
from
The ARRL Letter
on
October 29, 2009
Website:
http://www.arrl.org/
Add a comment about this article!
The Doctor Is In: Antennas for Domestic Contests:
By ARRL News Editor S. Khrystyne Keane, K1SFA
Just the other day, the Doctor and I got to talking about ARRL
Sweepstakes
http://www.arrl.org/contests/rules/2009/novss.html. I
showed him my crystal mug and whisk broom from last year's Sweepstakes
running (the W1AW team did quite well), and he showed me what kind of
antennas I should look into for domestic contests. Being more of a DX
RTTY contester, I really don't know much about the domestic side of
things. I dabbled in the February NAQP RTTY Contest
http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.php last year from K1TTT
http://www.k1ttt.net -- and will do so again in 2010 -- so I made
sure to listen attentively. Here is what the good Doctor had to say:
http://www.arrl.org/news/files/DoctorARRL_Letter102909Figure1.pdf
Each contest brings its own special requirements to the antenna
designer. While many popular contests focus on communications outside
North America and require the ability to send signals to all points of
the compass, Sweepstakes is different, with a need to cover just the US
and Canada. That means generally shorter range contacts and contacts in
a limited range of directions, depending on station location.
In addition, points are gathered based on individual contacts
multiplied by ARRL Sections. Thus, it is desirable to have the
capability to reach all 80 sections on at least one band that will have
propagation available. ARRL Contest Manager Sean Kutzko, KX9X, notes
that many a contest superstation's secret weapon for Sweepstakes is a
40 meter dipole up between 25-30 feet. He says 40 meters is the
Sweepstakes "money band" -- you can get close-in contacts during
daylight and rake in the distant Sections when the band goes long in
the evening hours. He said he had never put in a serious effort at
Sweepstakes without a low dipole for 40, no matter how much aluminum he
had up in the air.
http://www.arrl.org/news/files/DoctorARRL_Letter102909Figure2.pdf
Another great solution is a multiband Yagi that can be pointed towards
the areas with the best propagation. If possible, have it relatively
low -- perhaps at a half-wave length above ground -- to be able to
cover the close-in stations, as well as those at the continent's far
edge. Obviously, from the Central US or Canada, distances tend to be
shorter than they are from the coasts with stations near the edges
better able to make use of higher antennas. If you have the ability to
try different heights, by all means try lowering your antenna from the
optimum height for transcontinental contacts and see what works best
for you.
If you're like me and don't have rotatable HF arrays available, all is
not lost. First you need to figure out what azimuths you need to cover
and then try to match those to fit your location. From my Connecticut
location, I would want to cover from the direction toward old friend
Don, WT1I, in Ocala, Florida (bearing 214°) up to Mark, KL7TQ, my old
Army buddy in Eagle River, Alaska (322°).
There are many ways to compute the bearing to a station. The easy way
out is to just use www.qrz.com
http://www.qrz.com/. If your listing
includes your latitude and longitude, bringing up another station and
"looking at the details" will provide you with the bearing to their
station. If you don't know anyone at the edges of the desired coverage
area, just put a city name in the "Name Search" function and pick one
that comes up. It doesn't get much easier -- or, if you must, you can
use spherical trigonometry.
http://www.arrl.org/news/files/DoctorARRL_Letter102909Figure3A.pdf
Using my station as an example, the range of bearings I want to cover
requires a beamwidth of 322° minus 214°, or 108°. A half-wave dipole at
a height of half a wave length has a -3 dB beamwidth of 87° (see Figure
1). At a width of 108° it's only down to -4.6 dB from the peak. That's
pretty close, and might be good if I had a lot of distant stations
behind me, as in Central US or Canada, but I don't.
If I were to put a wire reflector, 5 percent longer than the original
dipole, 6 feet behind it (for 20 meters), I would have an easy to
deploy 2-element Yagi with the pattern shown in Figure 2. To make it
resonate in mid band, I need to trim about 4 inches from each end of
the now driven element and I'm good to go. Note what I have -- a bit
more gain in front, a lot less in the back, but still plenty of signal
toward northern New England. My signal at the edges of my coverage area
is now stronger than the dipole's -3 dB points.
If I don't have many stations to my rear, an additional 1 dB of forward
gain can be achieved at the expense of rearward signals (see Figure 3)
and a higher SWR by shortening the reflector a few inches -- about 2.5
percent over the driven element should do the trick. This may be
worthwhile if you are right at a corner of the country. For more bands,
just use parallel elements and multiple reflectors. See the article
http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/pdf/0111035.pdf by Marcus Hansen, VE7CA,
to get the idea. Azimuth plots represented in Figures 1, 2 and 3
represent the output from the EZNEC antenna modeling software
http://www.eznec.com/ by Roy Lewallen, W7EL.
Thanks Doctor! Do you have a question or a problem? Send your questions
via e-mail
doctor@arrl.org or to "The Doctor," ARRL, 225 Main St,
Newington, CT 06111 (no phone calls, please). Look for "The Doctor Is
IN" every month in QST
http://www.arrl.org/qst, the official journal
of the ARRL.
Source:
The ARRL Letter
There are no comments on this article:
Post One
|
Email Subscription
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Other News Articles
Antenna Rules on Dixon Agenda:
The New Frontier for School Radio:
New Vice Directors in Central, Roanoke Divisions:
New Amateur Radio Web Site Launches:
Announcing Railroad Depots on the Air:
|