eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

End in Sight for 'Third Battle of Bull Run'?

from The ARRL Letter on November 19, 2009
Website: http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!

End in Sight for 'Third Battle of Bull Run'?

ARRL Chief Executive Officer David Sumner, K1ZZ, once termed the battle of Broadband over Power Lines (BPL) in Manassas, Virginia as the "Third Battle of Bull Run." While the war against harmful interference to Amateur Radio via BPL is not yet over, the battle in Manassas might soon be coming to an end.

In a Special Meeting on Monday, November 16 of the Manassas City Council, the Council voted "To allow the [City of Manassas] Utility Commission to make a recommendation to the [Manassas] City Manager as part of the FY 2011 Budget regarding the decision to continue offering Internet service; additionally, staff was instructed to discontinue all marketing and advertising of Internet service." This motion passed 4-2.

At the meeting, Manassas Director of Utilities Michael Moon told the Council that "it is not cost-effective to continue the internet service on the Main.net BPL communication system as a stand-alone cost center" and that the City "need[s] to make the decision for internet service in the context of what communication system will be used for the City's AMI [Advanced Metering Infrastructure]." Read more here http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2009/11/19/11206/?nc=1.

Source:

The ARRL Letter

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
End in Sight for 'Third Battle of Bull Run'?  
by AA5JG on November 19, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
So what will the ARRL complain about now?
 
End in Sight for 'Third Battle of Bull Run'?  
by K3DRQ on November 19, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
Just curious, with this BPL stuff, everyone in the media is portraying it as specific to ham operators. Wouldn't it affect the shortwave broadcast bands too?
 
RE: End in Sight for 'Third Battle of Bull Run'?  
by K3AN on November 20, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
Yes, but it's kinda like the old "if a tree falls in the forest..." Who in the U.S. still listens to short wave broadcasts?
 
End in Sight for 'Third Battle of Bull Run'?  
by KG4IVT on November 20, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
This made me laugh. Hell hath no fury like a scorned HAM radio operator!

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/tech/Manassas-Killing-the-Internet-70462922.html
 
RE: End in Sight for 'Third Battle of Bull Run'?  
by K2JVI on November 20, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
Its about time, especially with all of the other internet options available to business and residential customers at much higher speeds and reliability for not much more per month that BPL was charging in Manassas. I still remember the hype even back in the late 90's when I worked in corporate IT. Most of my counterparts were enamored with this technology but I was quite skeptical. I now work for a major worldwide ISP with legacy tied to Bell Labs. When I started at my current position, I mentioned BPL to one of the senior network engineers and she replied with a very loud "oh please,give me a break!!" I am speaking with almost thirty years of IT,telecom, and a brief stint at AM-FM broadcast engineering. The ISP I work for offers everything from T1's to 10GIG Ethernet connections to customers, it seems the rather slow(2-3mbits/sec on a good day with no arcing insulators) is hardly worth all that work to "clean up" power lines to make BPL even remotely feasible. The mentality of folks that are thrilled with BPL are the same ones that when you tell them you had to use some resistors to tie some leads high they reply "what's a resistor?" that would speak volumes.
 
End in Sight for Battle of Bull  
by NN4RH on November 21, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
Clearly they're giving up the city-run BPL system for economic reasons, not because of any "Battle of Bull Whatever" with the ARRL.
 
End in Sight for 'Third Battle of Bull Run'?  
by DD5FZ on November 23, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
> Wouldn't it affect the shortwave broadcast bands too?

It does and the effect is horrible.

Just go to Mannheim (Germany) or Linz (Austria) and try listening to otherwise powerful European broadcasters on shortwave - a virtual impossibility.
 
RE: End in Sight for 'Third Battle of Bull Run'?  
by DD5FZ on November 23, 2009 Mail this to a friend!
I Forgot...

Here interesting links with information about PLC interference:

English:
<http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFullText/RTO/TR/RTO-TR-IST-050/$$TR-IST-050-ALL.pdf>

Protocols of measurements in Austria (German):
<http://www.oe5.oevsv.at/export/sites/oe5/PLC-Information/plc-downloads/plc_stoerpotential_linz2007.pdf>
<http://www.bmvit.gv.at/telekommunikation/funk/plt/messberichte.html>
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
What is FCC Docket 03-104 Asking?
ARRL Asks FCC to Shut Down New York BPL Field Trial:
ARRL Plans Federal Court Appeal of Certain BPL Rules:
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
No 136 kHz for the USA


Other News Articles
Amateur Radio Group Puts Focus On Emergency Communication:
Lester, Daniel C. 'Danny' KE9SE, (SK):
World War II-Era Navigation System Shut Down:
CU Space Project to Study How a Violent Sun Can Affect Earth:
ARNewsline #1695 -- February 5 2010: