QSLing
from
Reg Beck, VE7IG
on
August 4, 2010
View comments about this article!
QSLing
by Reg Beck, VE7IG
The old adage, "The final courtesy of a QSO is a QSL", is as true today as it was when that phrase was coined many years ago. There are many reasons why a fellow amateur may want your QSL. He or she might be working on an award, wanting to post your card on an online QSL gallery or perhaps just collecting QSLs and putting them on the shack wall or taking them to the local club meeting to show to friends. Although eQSLs and LOTW confirmations are a form of QSLs, they are still limited in use so this article will concern itself with actual paper QSLs normally sent through the postal system.
If someone decides not to QSL at all, that is certainly his or her choice. However, I believe this fact should be published (perhaps on QRZ.com) so that
people don't waste time and money attempting to obtain a card when none will ever be forthcoming. Other than just chatting with a friend, DX or otherwise, or making
a casual QSO when there is nothing else happening, many operators only work a station with the idea of obtaining a QSL in mind. I know I do. When I tune across
a pileup and see what station is operating, already having a card or not will usually determine whether or not I call the station. Oh, I still get excited working that new one or a rare base in Antarctica but usually have getting that QSL in the back of my mind when working that station. So the main reason myself and a lot of other hams work some stations is to obtain their QSLs. Take note DX! We only work you to obtain your QSL!
When attempting to obtain a card, perseverance can win! Tracking down a source of a card after 30 or 40 years and obtaining the QSL is a DXing feat par excellence. But
often the original logs have been lost, as in the case of the logs of Gus Browning, W4BPD, and many others. W4BPD travelled around the world in the 1960s and 70s and operated from many countries, so if you lose your Gus Browning cards, you are out of luck. Some of those are "deleted" DXCC entities and those cards are certainly prized in any QSL collection or online gallery. Why would you want to go after QSLs for old contacts? Perhaps because a friend told you about an interesting award and you find yourself mining your old logs for QSOs. That happened to me not long ago when my friend Sasha, RW4NH, told me about the CQ DX Field award. After a week of mining my 2 tubs of QSLs I turned to the logbooks, back to 1980 when that award begins. Look into that award, I think it is one of the most interesting DX challenges available.
It is my personal opinion that an operator who enjoys the fun of operating from a rare or sought-after location and then does not send QSLs in a timely fashion is a pretty
low form of life in the amateur radio world. I could list a few of those. Some of them go on large DXpeditions where there is a designated QSL manager so they don't have to
issue their own cards but when it comes to some of their own DX operations, cards are not forthcoming. These guys have become DX big-shots, too big for their DX-britches and deserve to be taken down a notch or two. Imagine one of them responding to questions after giving a presentation at a DX dinner and having someone point out that this is all quite all right and quite interesting but where is my QSL from your own such and such operation? If you do not have the time, energy or interest in QSLing then PLEASE get yourself a QSL manager. There are a great many out there only too willing to serve. Then regularly send your logs to your manager if your DX operation is ongoing.
Another operating "sin" by my way of thinking is not keeping a log. Keeping a log used to be mandatory in Canada but is no longer required by the licensing authority. A radio log was a legal document at one time here in Canada. If you do not keep a log then I doubt that you can legitimately send QSLs as you won't remember sufficient details of the QSO. So don't be an ass and keep a log! If you go on an expedition and keep an electronic log on computer it is easy to submit it as an online log so operators can check to make sure they are actually in the log before sending a card. There are several websites that host online logs and a Google search may provide a suitable one for your operation. Many larger DXpeditions keep an online log active during the actual operation so you can make sure you have the contact in the log before the operation ends.
QSLing can be expensive if you need the card quickly. But if you are willing to wait up to a year or two the bureau is usually an inexpensive way to send or receive cards, especially here in Canada where belonging to the national amateur radio organization, RAC, entitles you to use the outgoing QSL bureau free of charge up to quite a large number of cards per year. The incoming bureaus are all free, except for providing postage from the bureau to your QTH. Some people do not respond to bureau cards because they consider cards sent via bureau to be an afterthought and not serious. But for many hams worldwide the bureau is the only way they can afford to obtain a card
and they are very serious about QSLing via bureau. It is unfair to these hams to deny their cards sent via bureau. So stop being lazy and be considerate of your fellow
ham and get those bureau cards and answer them! A lot of the problem is just about laziness. If you take time from your busy schedule to operate, save some
of it for QSLing.
As a point of interest, the DARC bureau in Germany will return your card with an appropriate rubber stamped note if your intended recipient has become a silent key. In the
case where he has sent you his card and you have responded, this means that in the time his card has been in the bureau system coming to you and yours has been in the bureau going back to him, he has become a silent key. Bureaus can take a long time. They are operated by volunteers and sometimes it is difficult to get enough volunteers.
If you need someone's card and want to QSL direct, then it is usual to look after return postage yourself. Enclose a self-addressed envelope and appropriate postage, a current
IRC or US dollar bills (green stamps). You can get correct postage from some sources including Plum DX in New York. When you're sending for cards let your cards accumulate for a month or so and then order the stamps. When using IRCs, ensure they are current, as most post offices will not accept old IRCs. Usually 1 IRC is sufficient but some countries may require 2 or 3. Also, some countries do not accept IRCs or have rigorous rules about accepting them. Some countries do not allow their amateurs to receive money through the mails so sending green stamps may be a no-no, otherwise one or two green stamps are usually enough, depending on the country, although some countries are now requiring 3.
A bit of research online using Google may be necessary to see what you can use to prepay postage. I have found that stamps are always good but remember they must be stamps of the country your card is going to and not stamps of your own country. Strange as it may seem I've often received cards with US stamps on the return envelope where the sender forgot this point. If you do not enclose return postage in some form be prepared to have your card returned via the bureau.
Always check QRZ.com first to see if there are any special QSLing requirements. Some QSL managers have a list of rules about QSLing. I've found some of these to be a bit outrageous but if you want a card you may have to comply.
Unfortunately, there are some countries where postal theft is rampant. Sending money in envelopes to these countries will often result in your envelope not getting delivered.
I used to send cards to most third-world countries using postage stamps instead of IRCs or green stamps and the envelope open with flap tucked in. These always got through because the thief was able to look in the envelope and see there was no money and then put it back in the postal system. If the flap is stuck down the thief usually has to rip the envelope open and then has to dispose of it. Then I found out that it is now against Canadian postal regulations to leave the envelope open, apparently due to privacy concerns. It may be legal in your country but if not use a stamp on your SASE, seal the envelope and keep your fingers crossed. Postal registration is always possible as a last resort but is very expensive.
Recently I waited 6 months for a QSL from a DX operation. The DX operation itself was an incredible feat of engineering and operating but the QSLing left something to be desired. The card, when it came, was a beautiful card in ultimate maxi-colour. Obviously they put a lot of time and effort into designing the card and then waiting for it to be printed. All the cards I receive eventually go into QSL binders or a plastic tub. Some are scanned for my online QSL gallery. These cards are nice but I'd much rather receive a plain and simple card within a few weeks than wait months for a fancy card. Sometimes time is a consideration when getting cards for awards-- meeting the DXCC honour roll deadline for listing in QST, for example, or being the first to qualify for a new award. We want our cards FAST and the older we get the faster we want them!
I have had cards printed by foreign printers and have been very happy with the high quality QSL and the low cost of cards and shipping, although time is always a factor. These cards were for special events. Cards for ordinary operations or my IOTA island operations have always been simple, inexpensive cards printed quickly and usually available for mailing by the time I get home from the operation and have to deal with the stack of incoming envelopes already waiting. Lately I have begun printing my own cards using WB8RCR's QSL Maker program, available free online. This program lets you design a simple card to your specifications, except for the QSO panel which is fixed, and print it in colour on your own printer. You can print a few cards easily on regular paper or light card stock but if you want to print a lot of cards you need to obtain A4 card stock for printing 4 cards per sheet. This paper is not easy to find but may be obtained from the UK on eBay. You also need a printer that prints A4. Many ordinary printers do but some do not. This program is also good for printing a QSL to send to someone in the hopes he or she will fill it out, sign it, and return it. Sometimes that works.
If you have a scanner an excellent practice is to scan your prized QSL cards. Then, if you lose one you still have a record of it. Somehow I recently lost a very rare card
from one of the deleted Yemen DXCC entities. It may have fallen into my waste basket and been disposed of. Anyway, I had scanned that card for someone's online QSL gallery, so at least I had a scan of the original card. The card was a W2CTN manager card from 1964. QSL manager W2CTN is no longer with us but the name and call sign of the original HB9 operator of that International Red Cross mission was printed on the card. I was very surprised to find him still listed in QRZ.com. I printed out a copy of the scan and sent it to him with a request to endorse the back if he no longer had any cards. I received it back very quickly endorsed on the back and also received a nice letter with the QSL! I have had credit for mixed DXCC for that particular entity since the 1960s and now if I ever decide to apply for phone DXCC, I still have a confirmation in hand.
Some people forget that a letter or a note on the back of a QSL card attesting to the authenticity of the contact is also a QSL and accepted by award managers and card checkers, perhaps with some stipulations as in the case of IOTA. They may not be as easy to deal with as a regular card but are often sufficient. So if you do not have cards or have run out of them, please remember that you can send a letter of confirmation or endorse the card appropriately and return it. Some managers had a rubber stamp to stamp the blank reverse side of a QSL card they received and then returned it to the sender as a confirmation. When I visited KV4AA in 1963 he had a bunch of these hanging on hooks on the wall for the Danny Weil expeditions. This was in the good old days of the blank reverse side of QSLs -- although I still get a lot of them with blank reverse sides.
Some awards, such as IOTA, are very careful about QSLs. The IOTA regulations stipulate that the correct call sign be printed on the QSL and not hand written. Also the name of the island operated from must be printed on the card and not hand written--not the group name but the name of the actual island where the operation took place. There is leeway for some old cards for contacts before 2001 but not much, if any, for cards for operations after 2000. This is because of past frauds, errors and ambiguities which cause a lot of trouble for the card checkers and the IOTA manager and the fact that there are so many IOTA groups and so many islands that count for IOTA as well as so many that do not. So if you go on an IOTA expedition please check the rules for QSLs before printing your cards.
If your own expedition card is missing the island name or correct call sign used you can always PRINT this information on a QSO label using your computer printer and put it on the card or letter. This applies to operators living on islands as well. You need your island name on the card. It is a good idea to sign across the corner of such a label or apply a rubber stamp. Also, anyone submitting QSLs for IOTA should ensure the cards submitted confirm to the regulations because if you have a card declined that is YOUR fault, not the card checker's fault, as you did not follow the rules. This applies to all other award applications as well.
A further point of interest is that the reciprocal license agreement between Canada and the USA stipulates that stations use their call sign first, followed by the location indicator. So the correct form for me operating in the US would be a call such as VE7IG/W7 not W7/VE7IG and for W1AW operating in Alberta the correct call would be W1AW/VE6
not VE6/W1AW, no matter what is used in most of the rest of the world. Of course the correct call should be printed on your QSL.
Always ensure that the correct information is included on your card. I once received a 6 metre QSL requesting my grid for VUCC but his own grid was not on his card!
So remember that many operators (including DXCCers, VUCCers, county hunters, etc.) enjoy real QSLs and get very excited when they receive a new one! Please co-operate and QSL. I'll be looking for your card.
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by WD8KNI on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Reg, thanks for the article. I myself have stopped sending cards, unless a specific request comes during the conversation. Most likely you have noticed the people like me, or you would not have written the article. While in the past it was a great thrill to work a DX station, receive cards, and have reminders of the hard work it took to find and work the station, and lets not forget the friends we created along the way. In today's world it is not difficult to work DX stations. With email and notification services that pop up any-time someone hears a DX station on the air, the thrill is gone. We even have DX stations getting on the services and announcing themselves as being heard. I for one refuse to use any of these services. My only hope is to be the first station to hear someone, if that is not the case within 2 minutes hundreds of stations are calling, not because of their skills, but because they received a notification. Many of them have not even heard the station, they just start calling over and over in hopes they will hear their call repeated back. For some reason I don't find any thrill in participating in the fish in a barrel mode. Do I get on the air, absolutely but almost 99% of my work is on CW where mostly we still find polite people not calling on top of each other.
I still remember the good old DXpedition days when you read about it happening in QST and then started looking for them, find them work them and receive a card. I didn't even mention the need to know what band and when it would be open to their area. In today's world you only need to have an internet connection so you can join the huge pileup. Thrill, I think not.. and don't even get me started about getting on pre-arranged lists to work the DX station.. Fred
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by K0BG on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I agree with you Fred. And, there's another aspect or two.
Over the last few years, I've been getting cards from all over the world for RTTY contacts; I've never been on RTTY in my life! I could understand if the contacts were SSB or even CW, but RTTY! Apparently folks can't read. Perhaps I should return them, but I haven't so far.
Making matters worse, some of the QSL cards I receive are flat bogus! Most of my operating is mobile, and I log DX contacts into a pocket voice recorder. When I get home, I enter them electronically, replete with the time of the contact. So when I receive a mobile QSL for a time I know I wasn't operating, what am I to think?
Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by N2UGB on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
As a QRPer, DX contacts are very special. There is no being blase about a DX QSO, especially with the propagation of the last years. I QSL direct those cards received via any bureau. If I ran an amp and DX was an everyday event, I would probably not QSL.
I think most non-USA amateurs also have enough W/K/N/A cards in their collections.
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by KB2DHG on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Nice article. I love to send and receive QSL cards. My collection is a wonderful rememberance of the places I have been (that is my air waves) all over the world. I love to sift through them and display the exotic ones in my shack. To me a QSL is a common courtesy and something that I would never want to loose. I QSL 100% direct. And I look forward to receiving QSL's from near and far!
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by WA4HBK on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
One other comment about the well written article on QSLing. Please, please QSL promptly if you need a card. Last year I received a request for a QSL for a contact made in 1978 while I was operating as KG4HC! Fortunately I have all my logs from my DX ops so it was no problem, but I just wonder how many logs have been lost, or otherwise unavailable. I would suggest that if you need a card certainly within 6 months get your card out to the DX station. I did have a policy from my DX ops that I would pay the return postage for all US stations, I looked at it as price to pay for my hobby. Usually ran about $100/month or so, but that was back in the 15/22 cent era for postage. Today at 44 cents a pop I might have to reconsider. So did out your old logs and if you need a card from
KG4HC 1978-1983
TU4EC 1992-1994
TU5BA 1992-1994
J5TUBA 1993
TU4EC/T5 Dec 1992-Jan 1993
XT2CH 1994-1995
R1/WA4HBK 1998-2002
EW0/WA4HBK 2002-2005
I have all the logs and will be more than happy to provide a confirmation card. Provided, of course, that it was a valid contact.
|
|   |
|
I love QSL's
|
|
|
by KE7WAV on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I get the usual assortment of bills and junk mail but nothing else makes the trip to the post office box as fun as finding a QSL card from a great QSO, or from a new state or country.
I just one back from France the other day and I had to call my dad to tell him how cool it was to get the card confirming a short but good CW chat with a great operator in France.
Anyway I hope someday to have a QSL from all of you too. CUL
|
|   |
|
RE: I love QSL's
|
|
|
by AF3Y on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Yes Sir! I could not agree more. Received FOUR cards today, T32CI, T32MI, T32SI and T32VI, all from the "2010 Southern Line Islands DXpedition to Eastern Kiribati"! This group of guys moved from island to island handing out QSOs if you were lucky. They sent 4 different cards, one for each island, and each is very pretty! Really nice! 73, de Gene AF3Y
|
|   |
|
RE: I love QSL's
|
|
|
by N4KC on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I'm with you guys. I still enjoy getting a distinctive card from someone with whom I've chatted. Or when one of the envelopes shows up from the bureau. I especially appreciate those that display some local color or have a personal note.
LOTW is good for easy confirmation, but it is not (nor was it intended to be) a replacement for the QSL card. I am not enamored with eQSL. Even printed out, the "cards" just don't have the same pizazz. And about 30% of all confirmations I receive on eQSL are for contacts that never happened.
I got a real thrill a while back when someone sent me a scan of one of my own cards he received for a QSO we had...in 1965!
A few things have changed since then--my call sign, my hairline, my waistline...
73,
Don Keith N4KC
www.n4kc.com
www.donkeith.com
www.n4kc.blogspot.com
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by K4YZ on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Great piece!
One of my disappointments is getting my cards returned with some note about "how annoying" QSLing is, or how the receipient "...doesn't require the egotistist acquiring of trophies", which I have received. I'd rather they just threw the card in the trash and let me think it had been lost in the mail rather than confirm to me how rude a growing sector of our avocation is.
By the way, I always SASE, unless the recipient has directed otherwise, so other than a couple minutes of one's time to fill out a reply card, nothing is lost to the other station.
I, for one, will return a domestic, VE or XE card on my own dime, no SASE required.
I agree with another correspondent here that encourages those who choose to not participate to please annotate thier QRZ.com listing with a note to that effect. I don't mind spending my time and money to exchange cards...I love sending and receiving them...but I hate wasting time and money to send a card to someone who finds it annoying or bothersome.
One aspect of QSLing that has waned is the use of PFC's, or pre-filled confirmations. These are QSL cards that the sending station has prepared, and all that is required of the recipient station is to sign the card and return it. They don't even need to have their own QSL cards. Perhaps we can convince some of the commercial printers to prepare a version of PFC for these folks?
In any case, hope to work you on the air...And looking forward to getting your QSL!
73
Steve, K4YZ
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by KB2FCV on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I enjoy QSL'ing. I've never really tried the online QSL thing because I just don't feel it's the same as getting a real paper QSL in the mail - something you can look back at decades later. Will eQSL or LoTW still be around in 20,30,40 years from now? I have no idea. Chances are.. If I still am around, my cards will be too.
On an interesting note, I found one of my old log books I thought I had lost 15 or 20 years ago. A few months ago I decided to look up and check out the cards I didn't have confirmed out of there for DXCC. Many hams had been deceased or simply no information, but there were quite a few that had email addresses or QSL managers that still had logs and cards. I was able to get some interesting cards back! Just the other day I got one back from the Pitcairn Islands from a contact I made 20 years ago. It's been fun and a bit challenging but certainly rewarding. Better late than never, I suppose!
73,
James KB2FCV
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by N4UFO on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
"One aspect of QSLing that has waned is the use of PFC's, or pre-filled confirmations. These are QSL cards that the sending station has prepared, and all that is required of the recipient station is to sign the card and return it. They don't even need to have their own QSL cards. Perhaps we can convince some of the commercial printers to prepare a version of PFC for these folks?"
I went to an office supply house and had a self inking stamp made... It had my callsign and the usual QSL info with appropriate blanks. I just stamped a 3x5 index cards (much cheaper than post cards and lighter) and tossed it in with the outgoing card and SASE. The stamper was much cheaper in the long run than buying preprinted cards.
Kevin, N4UFO
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by W6MQI on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
LOTW is good for easy confirmation, but it is not (nor was it intended to be) a replacement for the QSL card. I am not enamored with eQSL. Even printed out, the "cards" just don't have the same pizazz. And about 30% of all confirmations I receive on eQSL are for contacts that never happened.
I got a real thrill a while back when someone sent me a scan of one of my own cards he received for a QSO we had...in 1965!
A few things have changed since then--my call sign, my hairline, my waistline...
73,
Don Keith N4KC
www.n4kc.com
www.donkeith.com
www.n4kc.blogspot.com
Is that 3% or did you add an extra zero to exaggerate a little bit? With more then a 1000 eQSL's I have less then one percent that are bogus. You might want to find out what you're doing wrong that's kind of a high a percentage I think anyway.
73, Dave
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by K4JC on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I, for one, still love QSLing. As another poster noted, it's a particular thrill to go to the mailbox and find a QSL card waiting for you. Unfortunately there are some hams who just don't feel the same way and over the years it has changed the way I QSL.
I don't have any particular issues with either LOTW or eQSL, except that the return rate is rather dismal. On LOTW my returns run around 20%, and actually slightly better on eQSL, maybe 20-25%. But it doesn't cost me anything except the few minutes it takes to upload my logs to both services, which I try to do at least once a week. What bothers me most about electronic QSLing is the people who claim they achieved WAS or DXCC or other awards using exclusively electronic confirmations. One ham claims he managed WAS on 10 bands with only LOTW confirmations! Wow, that seems like quite a stretch considering the overall return rate on LOTW confirmations (according to the numbers shown on the LOTW website itself) is only 10.8%. So I tend to take such claims with a grain of salt. On eQSL I have logged thousands of contacts but their awards system says I still need 11 countries to get to the 100 mark, and 5 more states to achieve WAS! In actual practice I have worked over 200 countries and all 50 states many times over. As I stated earlier, the electronic QSLing services are free and involve little effort, but they are certainly not going to replace paper QSLs.
And speaking of hard copy QSLs, while I don't have any hard and fast numbers it seems like folks just aren't returning them the way they used to, even when I include greenstamps and/or an SASE (which I always do.) I estimate my overall return rate on cards sent direct is around 50%. I really don't need to state that QSLing this way can get mighty expensive, mighty fast! So these days my QSL policy has been that if I really need or want a DX card I will send my card direct with an SAE and an IRC or greenstamps (depending on the station's QSL policy, usually listed on QRZ.com.) Occasionally they will have a QSL manager, which makes a return card more likely. All other DX cards go via the Bureau. (By the way my return rate through the Bureau is less than 10%.) For U.S. hams I will always send an SASE along with my card. My thinking is that if I need the other station's card I want to make it as easy as possible for them to get their card back to me. And if I receive a card I always make it a point to reciprocate within a day or two.
QSLing is a terrific "hobby within a hobby", and I hope it always continues to be one of ham radio's finest traditions.
(On a side note, I wanted a card from a DXpedition contact I made not long after I was first licensed in 1978. All my QSL cards and logs from those early days were lost long ago, but for some reason I always remembered the call of that operation. Recently I Googled the call and discovered that the QSL manager is not only still active but still has the logs from that operation. He was kind enough to search all those old paper logs to find my QSO and send me a replacement QSL card. Now that's dedication to QSLing!)
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by NU4B on August 4, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Nice article Reg. And by the way, thanks for the QSL's from NA-154 and NA-010. Really great replies also.
Running 5 watts it has taken a while to buld up a QSL collection, but I finally have a decent one. One thing that is interesting is the information contained (whether geographical, or historical, or whatever) contained on many of the cards I receive. I, and I know many others do, really appreciate working new countries and islands and learning about these places that most of us will never get to visit.
Now that I've been a ham long enough (and I'm old enough) I have QSL's from deleted countries. Just from the historical prospective cards from places like the German Democratic Rep. or Czechoslovakia remind us of a politcal time in history that dominated our lives from World War 2 for the next 50 years. Or the QSL's from the old Soviet Union. (And thankfully those cards from the old "socialist republics" still count.)
I have a really cool card from Sudan that had a great pic of some Sudanese pyramids. Heck, I didn't know there were pyramids in Sudan before I got the card. Just one of many great cards. While some may "pooh-pooh" QSL cards they are, to me, a window to the world (as is amateur radio). I think it would be a rare ham that worked a new country or IOTA island and didn't at least find out where it was and maybe read a bit about it. Many cards (like the ones from UA4HWX) show a picture that gives you an insight into life the country you worked. You would have to be awfully opague not to get some geographical, historical, or social perspective from many of the cards that come in.
Another neat card came from Z2/UA4HWX showing a picture of (talk about insight into a society) a 50,000 and a 100,000 Zimbabwe dollar bills attached a fence with clothes pins apparently drying in the breeze in a reference to the sky high inflation.
One more (of the many noteable cards) came from Canada. It was from VE2008VQ commemorating the 400th anniversary of the founding of Quebec (city). Great card!
I could go on and on (and I'm sure many think I've already gone on for too long) but there's a lot of good stuff that come from QSLs - not just as one person's claim - an egotistic need to claim a prize for a QSO. Even a plain QSL represents a contact from a geographical point that most likely is interesting enough to learn something about.
And finally, remember the IARU website has a list of all the operating DX bureau addresses. You can send your cards directly to the DX bureau and cut down on the return time of your bureau cards (if your in a hurry). You can save on the cost of direct QSLs especially if there is a question of the reliability of the mail system.
But for many of us, there's nothing like opening up the mailbox and getting a card from a new country or rare island. It certainly can brighten up a rainy day.
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by WZ1P on August 5, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Thanks Reg, great article.
Recently the 'Carribean Buddies' 100 pound DXpedition team spent a week operating from St. Lucia (J6) and made thousands of QSO's. I have found that about 40% of the operators requested a QSL card. Only a very few did not provide an SASE or return postage. A small expense on my part. I received some really wonderful cards and enjoyed every minute of both the trip and the excitement of maling that trip to the mailbox every afternoon.
73' Dan J6/WZ1P
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by G3RZP on August 5, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
If you QSL 100% via the bureau, 50% of those cards are headed for the tras, becasue a lot of people don't pick their cards up from the bureau. This applies very much to special event stations, who often QSL 100%. They might as well throw the cards away to start with, rather than clutter the bureau. So it's a good idea to ask if the guy wants a QSL while in QSO! Of course, if you are a DXpedition, it is somewhat different.
Thie is the result of experience of 20 years as a sub- group manager for the bureau.
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by WB5MHA on August 5, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
QSLing is, to me, one of the best parts of the hobby. I'm talking about real QSL cards, direct or via bureau with that personal touch.
Electronic confirmations have the personal touch of junk mail calendars from insurance agents. In addition I found that on the single e-confirmation site I checked 30% or more were not in my log. My log is complete back to 1962.
I know mailed QSLs are quaint and old fashioned (Ebay has dozens listed) but they are part of our history and as said before a courtesy; something that seems lacking in today's world.
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by AD6KA on August 5, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Another good idea for an uninterecepted QSL
by a dodgy Postal System is to NEVER use pretty or
attractive postage stamps when sending Direct to
a poor country. The whole envelope will be nicked for the stamps. With the new machines in most US Post Offices, it will just print a plain, black and white stamp that just says "U.S.Postage .$98". (Or $.94 depending on the country).
As a kid and into my early teens I had dozens of Pen Pals all over the world, and the "Do not use fancy stamps on the envelope" came from my foreign Pen Pals.
If they collected stamps, I would put them inside.
As stated, do NOT put any callsigns on your foreign SASE. These are flags for many postal thieves. While logging programs that automatically fetch the direct QSL address and print the SASE are very handy, I much prefer to hand address my Direct overseas QSL requests. The aim is for it to look as much like personal correspondence as possible. Is it a pain in the butt? Sure, but it's worth it when you finally get that new one.
But sometimes you just never win. I've been waiting 9 years and have sent in 6 direct requests for a card for my only RTTY QSO with India. The last request was sent Registered International Mail Return Receipt. Very expensive....still no card....part of the game.
You win some, you lose some.
If you haven't got the card, you haven't got the country!
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by W6ONV on August 5, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I still feel this is one of the greatest aspects of the hobby. I know the feeling is not felt through out the hobby by others, but to each their own. Like others have already said, I QSL 100% or at least make an attempt to. I don't require an SASE for any card, domestic or DX. Like Reg said in the first line of the article, "The final courtesy of a QSO is a QSL." I believe this wholeheartedly.
I recently sent out a group of cards I had filled out about 2 years ago. While going through and addressing envelopes to those hams who would be receiving my card, I ran across an individual who said he didn't do paper QSLs. I decided to go the extra step and draw up all the pertinent information on an index card, included a SASE and ask the ham to sign the card. Thankfully he obliged my request and sent the index card back.
I started using the two major online services, eQSL and LOTW when I got on HF. I like the aspect of instant satisfaction of confirming a contact, but neither will replace receiving envelopes in the mailbox of QSL cards. Great piece on QSLing, thanks Reg!
73
Steve
W6ONV
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by K9CTB on August 6, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Excellent article, Reg! Thanks a million.
It's been almost a year since I received a QSL card, and the last one I received is still as coveted as the first.
As a casual op, I only send when I get, unless I'm asked during the QSO, which is rare. Still there is always a chance I'll get a new foreign ham looking for all 50 states. Actually, I've found that happens pretty frequently, particularly on PSK-31!
My casual attitude doesn't get me many cards, but I still get excited when one shows up, and I am very happy to send one out.
Reg, your article made me smile knowing that paper QSLing is still alive and well. I was one who thought e-mail and the "e-QSL" internet stuff had done away with it almost completely.
Hey, maybe I should get another batch printed, and jump back in the fray?
73,
K9CTB
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by VK2CA on August 7, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Hi All
I have to say that QSLing is one of my favourite parts of the hobby and thanks for such a great article and all the replying articles as well from like minded people. I use LoTW and like it for filling in the gaps on some bands etc but I will always QSL the new ones for me regardless of the LoTW status. I also upload to eQSL but really dont follow the stats on that side - more for others who do. My log makes it a couple of clicks to upload to both so no problem.
I do get somewhat annoyed by people who are supposedly seasoned DXers who send cards with no return postage etc. I fail to see how they get such large totals with that method of card chasing?
I love finding cards in the PO Box which probably explains my new found interest in managing. Only a couple at the moment but stiil good fun and my XYL collects the stamps as an aside.
I hope paper QSLing never dies out as the thrill is definitely still there.
cheers....Allan VK2CA
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by ZENKI on August 7, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Getting a QSL card must be a tough business. I hear so many stations screaming "QSL" after every part of their transmission. What does this mean? Is this Freudian conditioning of the other party to get a paper QSL? Do you have to scream QSL 10 times to get a QSL, who knows? QSL!
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by ZENKI on August 7, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Getting a QSL card must be a tough business. I hear so many stations screaming "QSL" after every part of their transmission. What does this mean? Is this Freudian conditioning of the other party to get a paper QSL? Do you have to scream QSL 10 times to get a QSL, who knows? QSL!
|
|   |
|
QSLing The Original Tradition
|
|
|
by K6RF on August 9, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Paper QSLs are one of the last remaining traditions we have in this hobby. I am pleased to see others who love paper QSLs as I do.
I am sure the future generations of Amateurs will appreciate that we kept this aspect of the hobby alive for them to enjoy.
If you decide you no longer want your collection of cards, do not make them part of the local landfill. Donate them to collectors.
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by W0AAA on August 10, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Hi Reg, Nice article. I have 50 years in the hobby and I have collected QSL cards every single one of them. Some years were sparser than others, but I have kept them all. My 10 x 10 foot shack shows the evidence of it. All four walls, the ceiling, the desktops, the cabinet fronts, the door and any other place I can find in there display my cards. I also have thousands of them filed alphabetically in drawers. Some of the best times in my ham career have been connecting with a long lost friend from the past, discovering their card in my collection, and sending it back to them as a surprise. I've had this done to me numerous times as well. The hobby is changing for sure. Many could care less about a piece of paper that is a memory confirming a QSO, but to each his own. For me, I intend to keep collecting them. 73 Zed, WØAAA (ex. WAØAAD)
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by KC2UML on August 10, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Alas, QSL is a causality of the more is better meantality ! Don't get me wrong, I enjoy making lots of contacts, but not at the cost of QSL's.
I enjoy recieving QSL's from any one anywhere I've QSO'ed. It could be a plain B&W or a fancy color job, it's more about reminding me of a contact with another operator somewhere in the past.
The electronic formats are ok, but for me and my house paper QSL is the way to go.
73 from the Garden State !
KC2UML Rory
|
|   |
|
Times are changing.
|
|
|
by AI2IA on August 12, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
QSL's are as much a part of ham radio as the straight key, but like the straight key, and to use a pun, they are becoming more and more "collectible."
It is getting painfully expensive now to send out even ten cards a month, more so when sent to DX stations. Yet, how can you not send one out to that rare station, that old buddy from long ago, that new ham who is eager to have yours, or that mostly overlooked or forgotten ham out here somewhere?
We still need to do it, to send them out, but now not so much or not so often. If requesting one, the SASE is just about essential and/or the green stamps. No shack, howsoever digital, can be complete without a few QSL cards on the wall.
Ham radio and QSL cards - you can't have one without the other.
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by M3FLP on August 13, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Isn't it easy to before you finish your chat, give your email address (most people have one nowadays) to the person you're talking to, ask them to email you their address and then just pop one in the post to them?
I do and it's very quick and easy. It doesn't cost any more posting a QSL Card here in the UK to any other Country, than sending a normal letter to somebody up the road!
You might not get one back, even if you email them your address but most of the time, I have one within a week, even from the US etc!
Don't be lazy, be polite, we're all on the same side and Radio is our hobby!
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by N3AIU on August 16, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Bad day at work and no QSL waiting for me in mail when I get home = bad day
Bad day at work and QSL waiting for me in mail when I get home = good day
Good day at work and no QSL waiting for me in mail when I get home = mediocre day
Good day at work and QSL waiting for me in mail when I get home = great day
When someone asks for my QSL, it makes me happy that I will be helping someone document their on-air activities and earn awards.
73, Nick N3AIU
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by WR3Y on August 19, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Reg a wonderful article. Thank you! I love QSL cards and hope the traditional card does not disappear. I QSL with printed cards, LOTW and eQSL.com. I enjoy getting them all.
73
Rob
WR3Y
|
|   |
|
RE: QSLing
|
|
|
by KJ4FUU on August 30, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I like getting and sending QSL cards. I don't particularly care for e-QSLs, since I work on a computer all day and don't want to overdo using computers in my leisure time.
I recently contacted Bermuda on 20 meters USB using 5 watts, and was disappointed when I looked on qrz.com that the station I contacted only QSLed via LOTW. However, I realized that contesting was his main activity, and to QSL via the mail would have cost him a bunch in postage. I am getting my LOTW account set up, but it just doesn't have the enjoyment of having cards in your hand that you can take places and show your friends and fellow club members.
I learned from another club member some tips on QSLing that they don't teach in the manual, such as remember to keep the UTC date in mind, and not just the time, and *never* correct a QSL card, because then it will be rejected if you try to use it as proof for an award.
Nice article.
-- Tom
|
|   |
|
QSLing
|
|
|
by K6RAH on August 30, 2010
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I love QSLs too! I managed to keep my old Novice QSLs and most of those I received as a General back in the late 50s. Now that I'm back on the air, I enjoy receiving QSLs again, especially those confirming a new state or country.
In the past year, I have worked 49 of the 50 states (still missing Alaska) and have QSLs from all but three. I will continue to pester those three while trying to get back up QSOs.
Although postage is sky high these days, I still QSL 100% without SASE or other niceties. I agree with the final courtesy ethic, yet I do understand that some hams are strapped for extra funds (like our young hams still on an allowance), so I don't ignore those cards. Conversely, I send SASE for domestic cards and green stamps for DX QSOs when I confirm.
I think that I'll go through my Novice cards from 1956 and check QRZ.com to see if some of them are still active. Scanning their cards and sending to them would be another fun way to enjoy ham radio.
Long live QSLs!
73's,
Dick Morgan K6RAH
Dallas, TX
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Other Editorial Articles
Project 'Take Back 146.52'
|