ARRL Asks FCC To Rethink Parts Of PRB-1 Petition D
from
The ARRL Letter/ARRL
on
January 19, 2000
Website:
http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!
The ARRL wants the FCC to declare that its limited federal preemption policy known as PRB-1 applies to amateurs who live in areas governed by deed restrictions, covenants, CC&Rs, or condominium regulations just as it does to hams regulated solely by local zoning laws. In a Petition for Reconsideration, the League has formally asked the FCC to rethink its November dismissal of a 1996 ARRL Petition for Rule Making. That petition called on the Commission to expand and clarify PRB-1.
In November, the FCC said PRB-1 excludes restrictive covenants in private contracts as "outside the reach of our limited preemption," although it strongly encouraged associations of homeowners and private contracting parties to "follow the principle of reasonable accommodation" with respect to Amateur Radio. But the FCC drew the line at proposing specific rule changes to bring private restrictive covenants under the umbrella of PRB-1.
In asking the FCC to rethink its November Order, the League said the FCC's disclaimer "is no longer a valid premise" and no longer accurately reflects FCC jurisdiction over private land use regulations. Since the advent of PRB-1 in 1985, the ARRL pointed out, the FCC has made it clear that it has Congressional authority to prohibit restrictive covenants that could keep property owners and even renters from installing antennas to receive TV, satellite and similar signals. The League asserts the same principle applies to Amateur Radio, in which the FCC has said it has a "strong federal interest."
The League called on the FCC to clarify
that PRB-1 applies to private land use regulations, leaving hams free to negotiate resonable accommodation provisions with local homeowners' associations just as they do now with governmental land use regulations.
The League also asked the FCC to provide some relief from "prohibitive and excessive fees" that localities might impose on amateurs for permits and fees. The ARRL said that such costs can be "the functional equivalent of a prohibition of amateur communications" and asked the FCC to state that "excessive costs associated with land use approvals fail the 'reasonable accommodation' and 'minimum practicable restriction' tests of PRB-1."
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
ARRL Asks FCC To Rethink Parts Of PRB-1 Petition D
|
|
|
by N6TGK on January 19, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I wish the FCC would clarify PRB-1... as far as I'm concerned, if the FCC can say that no association can prevent someone from putting up a TV antenna or satellite dish then the same should hold true for amateur radio antennas. Local government acknowledges that amateur radio operators provide a valuable service in times of need but where I live just about EVERY community has got CC&Rs restricting antennas... and you can forget about buying a new house because ALL of the new developments prohibit antennas. CC&Rs are a great concept in regards to ensuring that the neighborhood looks good (i.e. the yard is neat and trim and no used car lot out front) but the rest has gone too far.
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Other News Articles
Student Sends MIT Letter to Space:
Amateur Radio Club Talks to Hams Worldwide on Centennial:
New Communication Exhibit Helps Kids Get the Message:
Transmission of Images - No Internet, Satellite, Cable, or Cells Needed!
Deltona Youth Loves to Ham It Up on the Radio:
|