Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
from
The ARRL Letter/ARRL
on
January 19, 2000
Website:
http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!
As the latest batch of FCC correspondence reveals, malicious interference cases continue to comprise the bulk of amateur enforcement cases facing FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Riley Hollingsworth. Recent allegations of deliberate and malicious interference have involved both HF and VHF/UHF operation. Here's a sampling.
On December 30, 1999, the FCC wrote Amateur Extra Licensee Frederick J. Roll, NU5M, enclosing a tape recording it said was of a November 13, 1999, QSO between NU5M and KC1ZQ on 14.313 MHz that allegedly included harassing behavior. Hollingsworth said the tape was made by the FCC's High-Frequency Direction Finding Center in Columbia, MD. The FCC requested that Roll provide a full explanation of the transmissions and said his response would be used to determine what action the FCC would take in the matter. The FCC also set aside a recent vanity call sign grant to Roll, pending the outcome of the case.
The FCC put Amateur Extra licensee Arthur Visser, W9ART, on notice December 30 that it intends to designate his license for revocation if it learns of additional allegations of malicious interference by the licensee. The FCC says it's received "numerous complaints regarding malicious interference and jamming" apparently originating from Visser's station on 3.950 MHz, most recently on Christmas Eve. The FCC had issued Visser a Warning Notice January 8, 1999, regarding similar allegations. Hollingsworth told the ARRL January 6, 2000, that he and Visser had been in touch by telephone "in an effort to resolve the issues" that led to the FCC letter.
Meanwhile, the FCC wrote General licensee Jeffrey J. Pipenur, WA8IKW, in late December, setting side his license renewal, granted last October 19. Hollinsworth told Pipenur that the FCC had monitoring evidence indicating that the licensee has "deliberately and maliciously interfered with radio operations of other amateur licensees on 3.865 MHz" last April 13 and 14 and last November 21. The FCC also sent Pipenur tape recordings of his April 1999 transmissions and requested a response. "This matter will have to be resolved before we can make a decision on your renewal application," Hollingsworth told the licensee.
Hollingsworth told the ARRL that the FCC has received renewed allegations of VHF repeater interference in connection with Anthony J. Barben, Jr., N2WNF, of Brooklyn, NY. In June 1997, Barben consented to a 15-month license suspension as part of an FCC effort to resolve a rash of interference cases in the New York City-Long Island area. The suspension followed accusations of will ful and malicious interference, using obscene or indecent language and failure to identify. On December 28, 1999, the FCC requested that Barben retake his Technician class Amateur Radio examination under the supervision of FCC personnel by January 30, 2000.
Other repeater interference cases involved two stations in CA. The FCC sent Advanced licensee Jensen W. Woods, AH6MX, a Warning Notice for alleged interference with the KC6OKA repeater system in the LA area. Another Warning Notice went out to Technician licensee Gary R. Dent, KE6JUV, for alleged interference to an ATV repeater.
Hollingsworth has said he plans to make more use of the FCC's High-Frequency Direction Finding Center to track down rulesbreakers in the coming year. In addition, Hollingsworth now has enhanced monitoring tools at his Gettysburg office.
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by KD7CO on February 18, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
My comments are right on what they are doing My opinion is that Mr Hollingsworth is doing a suppior job of cleaning up the airways for us ligitamous users. My hats off to Mr. Hollingsworth. From an amature of 44 years. Wally kd7co
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by K4OKA on January 30, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Mr Hollingsworth is very inconsistent in his enforcement practices.
Look at captain truth nightly on 3894.5 and occasionally 20 and 40.
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by N7DC on January 27, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
It is going to take a long time to clean up the bands, partly due to the inexcuseable absence of FCC actions for some years, but secondly due to the general behavior patterns of today. Its not just the new generation, but some of the older ones as well, but we get what we deserve. We need to get back to the old adage "Do unto others" (Thats not just the the Christian Bible- its in every major (and minor) faiths' writings.
We need more "Do as I do" Not "Do as I say"
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by KE4WKK on January 26, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Go get them Riley! It doesn't surprise me that most of them was extra's. After listening to the crap on 14.313 he ought to crack down there more offen.
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by KH0CE on January 21, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Mr. Hollingsworth must be commended for his work. But he must not stop there, he must also look into malicous interference caused by CB stations not only in the U.S. Mainland but in U.S. possession too, like Northern Mariana Islands. There are lot of these cases here in Saipan.
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by WV2B on January 21, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Its interesting that this report is being construed to imply that all major interference problems are from extras. The report mentioned two extras, two techs, one advanced, and one general. Extras comprised 2/5 of those mentioned. That means 3/5 were classes other than extra!
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by N2MG on January 21, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Hey, enough Extra bashing. There are Advanced, General and Technician class licensees mentioned in this news blurb, too.
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by W0PEA on January 20, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Riley Hollingsworth should be commended for his accomplishments in enforcement on the amateur bands. It is interesting that the major interference does not come from the No Code Technicians on the VHF frequencies, but instead from Extra Class License amateurs, most of which have many years of experience. Most of the people who complain about the "Dumbing Down" by reducing the code speed for all licenses are also mostly Extra Class. Perhaps there is a hidden message here. Higher Code Speed obviously does not keep the "Riff Raff" out. If it did, why are most of the people who cause the malicious interference are the higher classes of license? Another prime cause of malicious interference are the numerous so called "Nets" that are only group social get together meetings that think that they "Own the Frequency" and will cooperatively work, scheme and cajole in concert to QRM anyone on "Their Frequency" to move. These "Nets think that cooperation is a one sided achievement of making another QSO that was already on the frequency before the "Net" move. The "Nets" could not consider moving because they will tell you that they have been using this frequency since 1932, and that there are members in the "Net" that are crystal controlled and cannot move. More hams need to realize that frequencies are like park benches, whoever occupies the frequency first has the primary right to use that frequency. Others who come later will have to wait their turn or move elsewhere. It is time to wake up and smell the roses. If ham radio continues in its path of self destruction, its days and years are numbered!
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by N5HG on January 20, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
To be sure, Ham Radio is a microcosism of society-at-large. Our population is and always has been reflective of "all" that society has to offer (good and bad). To think differently is just not consistent with the facts. On a positive note, to date, I've had no problem in finding a stimulating, thought provoking, and enjoyable conversation on the air. Lucky? I don't think so. As the old adage goes, "you usually find that which you seek". Just my two cents worth. Regards.
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by K6DHM on January 20, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
With all of the negative reteric on the restructure from Amateur Extras, it seems a real shame that so much Enforcement action is aimed at the higher class licensees for interference and illegal operations. It almost seems that "dumbing down" starts at the "top" and flows downward.
I support vigerous enforcement and quick and decisive actions against ALL Hams (and non-hams) that don't follow the rules.
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by N5XM on January 20, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I sure hate to see my fellow Extras involved in this kind of stuff, but if they are in fact maliciously interfering with other stations repeatedly, they are only getting what they deserve. The same is true for any other class of licensee who exibits this kind of behaviour. With all the talk about dumbing down in Ham Radio, we seem to be the worst off in how we treat one another. Sure, society has evolved that way, but the great history of our hobby is one of kind, genteel individuals who are generous to a fault, always helpful, and above all, respectful of one another. What happened? I guess it's human nature, but it's still sad. Maybe if enforcement is heightened, some of this will stop. We can only hope.
|
|   |
|
RE: Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by AB7NC on May 1, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I have heard a lot of bashing going on .Most of it has came from the tech+ bashing the extras . It is to bad there is any bashing at all in our hobby.
|
|   |
|
FCC is joke
|
|
|
by W6CZH on June 17, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Riley and his merry band of enforcers are a joke. Tune across ten meters CW sometime. To little to long and now it's out of control with CB'ers and freebanders everywhere.
While Riley is snapping his suspenders and thumping his chest the world of illegal operation continues to expand.
He can slap someones hand for not identifying on a repeater somewhere, that's about all. Spare us all the grandstanding please, it's a sad old tune you sing FCC.
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by K6WLT on May 12, 2003
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
The FCC is doing a good job. If they didn't enforce the laws, we'd have a mess on our hands. Keep up the good work!
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by KE4ZHN on June 25, 2003
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
This is great news for amateur radio. Im glad to see Riley cleaning house and doing away with some of these jammers and idiots who feed on hate and destroying the bands. 14.313 has been a cesspool for too long. A feeding ground for jammers and assorted nut cases who do nothing but render the frequency useless by transmitting profanity, playing tapes, and just being a general nuisance. Its also interesting to point out, that one poster on here was himself a known jammer who got busted playing tapes in fits of drunken stupidity and now seems to be sporting sour grapes towards the enforcement! Hes lucky to even be still on the air! Amazing how the qrm`ers themselves will complain when they are being jammed!
|
|   |
|
Malicious Interference Cases Top FCC List
|
|
|
by WA2JJH on August 18, 2003
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
What is up with EXTRA bashing. Just like any other license class, there a good ops and lids.
It could be a target message to the rest of the amatuers. The FCC does not have enough staff.
So they will stick to the advanced and extra frequencies because a)There is less space to cover
b)Try sifting out a sea of calls in the general portion
of 20 meters.
By going after the Extra's with petty stuff(like hi-fi ssb)shockwaves will go down to THE OTHER CLASS HAMS.(this is a business tactic that was taught at some business schools)
Someone pointed out how CW speed of an EXTRA is not a riff-raff filter.
Look at stats....As soon as 20WPM was replaced by 5WPM, the amount of EXTRAS more than doubled!
So many of these "BAD EXTRA'S" really would still be GENERALS.
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Related News & Articles
Question Pool Committee Eyes February 1 Release Da
KV4FZ Files Yet Another Appeal
ARRL-VEC Picks up Personnel
FCC Denies Request for SSB in VHF CW SubBands
ULS to Cores Transition Smooth: FCC
Other News Articles
Middle School Looks to Start Ham Radio Club:
Mile High Radio Club Connects the Mountain:
DX News -- ARRL DX Bulletin #47:
This Week on the Radio:
FCC Looks to Revise, Clarify Vanity Call Sign Rules:
|