eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

ARRL Seeks Partial Reconsideraton of Restructuring

from W1AW Bulletin/ARRL on January 31, 2000
Website: http://www.arrl.org
View comments about this article!

The ARRL will seek partial reconsideration on two points in the Amateur Radio license restructuring plan announced by the FCC on December 30. Both points involve the way the plan deals with Technician-class licensees. The new FCC rules go into effect April 15. The League will ask the FCC to continue to maintain records that indicate whether a Technician licensee has passed a Morse code exam to earn Novice/Tech Plus HF privileges. Under the current system, the license class of Technicians is designated by a "T" in the FCC's amateur database, and of Tech Plus licensees by a "P". Under FCC's restructuring plan, Technician and Tech Plus licensees will all be known simply as "Technician". The ARRL asserts the change will eliminate any easy way to tell which licensees have passed the Morse code exam and which have not. "We're going to try to persuade the FCC that it made a drastic error in deciding to change all those P's back to T's in the database," said ARRL Executive Vice President David Sumner, K1ZZ. The FCC has said that it would be up to Technician licensees, if asked, to prove that they have successfully passed the 5 WPM cod test. The ARRL plans to ask the FCC to stipulate that any amateur who provides proof of having passed an FCC-recognized Morse code exam prior to April 15 would be entitled to receive credit for the Morse code exam element when applying to future upgrades. The FCC has indicated to the ARRL that after April 15, code credit for technician applicants passing the 5 WPM test would not survive beyond the 365-day term of a Certificate of Successful Completion of Examination - or CSCE. Under both the present and new rules, anyone who held a technician license before February 14, 1991, has permanent credit for the Morse code element, but others do not. The ARRL Board of Directors approved a motion to file the Petition for Partial reconsideration at its January 22 meeting in Memphis, TN.

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
ARRL Seeks Partial Reconsideraton of Restructuring  
by N7KH on February 7, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
For jason Williams... I also worked hard... for my Extra... and I also feel it should be noted in the data base that I passed my 20 WPM... but it will not, The data base makes no differentiation between an Extra that passed 20 WPM, and an extra that passed only 5WPM...
 
ARRL Seeks Partial Reconsideraton of Restructuring  
by N0AH on February 6, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
With the power of the ARRL lobby- it won't be long before it's just a ham ticket- the days of tiered licensing are just about over- why sweat the small stuff-
 
ARRL Seeks Partial Reconsideraton of Restructuring  
by KC4WWL on February 4, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
I worked hard for my tech plus ,and i feel it should be noted in the data base that i passed my 5 wpm
 
ARRL Seeks Partial Reconsideraton of Restructuring  
by WO6T on February 2, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
If I am on 10 meters ssb talking to a technician, how would I know if he was a technician, that has past code and was properly licensed.? WHEN I am at home I can check my cd rom. database, or the fcc data base, but if no T or P, I would not know. I want a T OR P ON THE FCC DATA, AND ON THE LICENSE, MICKEY WO6T
 
ARRL Seeks Partial Reconsideraton of Restructuring  
by RADIOWIENER on June 30, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
The FCC has said that it is up to the Technician licensee to "prove that he has successfully passed the code test"-- by means of a CSCE, no doubt. Unless I am mistaken, the obverse is true: It is up to the FCC to prove that the Technician under suspicion HAS NOT "...passed the code test" if they are to make a case against the ham that has any legal standing. 'Innocent until proven guilty' is the American way. Please correct me if I am wrong about this.
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
eHam.net at Dayton 2000 (Update)
The ARRL Needs More Members!
An Ally's Presentation to the ARRL Board:
ARRL President Urges Orderly Amateur Radio Response to Katrina:


Other News Articles
Amateur Radio Grants Help Bob Jones Set Up Station:
11-Meter Radio Mast Gets Thumbs Up from Planners:
Attorney: City Plan Violates Law:
Middle School Looks to Start Ham Radio Club:
Mile High Radio Club Connects the Mountain: