ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
from
The ARRL Letter/ARRL
on
February 4, 2000
View comments about this article!
The ARRL Board of Directors has approved the development and implementation
of an initiative to promote self-education by radio amateurs. The new ARRL
Certification Program will aim to inspire amateurs to continue acquiring
technical knowledge and operating expertise beyond that required to become
licensed and give them a chance to test their own limits. Following up on the
"2010 Vision" discussions at last July's Board meeting, ARRL Executive
Vice President David Sumner, K1ZZ, presented the broad strokes of the
Certification Program during the Board's January 21-22 meeting in Memphis.
At this point, the Certification Program only exists as a concept, with the
details to be worked out, but plans call for having the program in place by
later this year. The first step in putting the program in place will be to
solicit the ideas of ARRL members, via a Web-based message board, on appropriate
topics to be included in the initial rollout. "The idea is to make this
program what members want it to be, and not something imposed from 'on
high,'" Sumner said.
"Many ARRL members believe there is a widening gap between what the FCC
requires amateur licensees to know and what it takes to be truly knowledgeable
about Amateur Radio," he continued. "Whether or not you agree, it's
certainly true that those of us who took our FCC exams years ago have never had
to demonstrate an understanding of current technology. We could use a new
challenge."
The new Certification Program will offer participants an opportunity to earn
credentials at various levels of depth and difficulty in different courses of
study--perhaps in such areas as ionospheric propagation, receiver design, and
Morse code proficiency. Sumner said the ARRL should and will continue to
encourage the development of Morse code proficiency beyond the basic HF
licensing requirements. He observed that the standards for ARRL certification
could be more stringent and more uniform than those used for FCC exams.
Sumner said he sees the certification program not only as a welcome
opportunity for individual self-development but a response to the perceived
"dumbing down" of Amateur Radio qualifications--especially in the
aftermath of the FCC's recently announced license restructuring plan. While the
plan was not developed directly in response to restructuring, its timing could
not be better, Sumner said, conceding that the restructuring debate "has
moved it up the agenda."
As envisioned, the program would be largely self-supporting, but startup
costs would be funded from the Exceptional Merit Stipend established by the late
Ethel Smith, K4LMB. The Certification Program will be dedicated to her memory.
Smith--who helped found the Young Ladies Radio League and served as its first
president--died in 1997, leaving the bulk of her estate to the ARRL.
Sumner says a Web-based message board will be set up in a few weeks to gather
input from members in terms of specific programs and areas of study or skills
development they would like to see become part of the voluntary certification
program. The League plans to seek outside expert input to assist in setting the
knowledge or performance threshold at the optimal level.
The program likely will include some professional development aspects and
could include the granting of Continuing Education Units--CEUs. The League also
is seeking cooperative arrangements with related professional organizations. It
already has a memorandum of understanding with the National Association of
Radio-Television Engineers and has approached the Society of Broadcast Engineers
for a similar agreement.
The voluntary certification program dovetails neatly with goals expressed by
the League's new President Jim Haynie, W5JBP. Following his election January 21
in Memphis, Haynie said he favors even greater promotion of Amateur Radio,
especially among youth and in schools, as well as programs to rekindle interest
and activity among current licensees.
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by N4KIM on February 25, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
AIN'T GONNA WORK FOLKS!!!!
Take a look at the comments.
The new(er) HAMs are the laxiest yo-yos around. IF they don't want to take the time necessary to learn the morse code and think it is SUCH a brain buster, what makes you think they are willing to learn anything else??? Especially on a VOLUNTARY basis!!!!
|
|   |
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by K2PI on February 10, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
The jury is still out on this one, as far as I am concerned. Certification programs that lead nowhere except "feel good" land are fine for the New Agers, but they do nothing for me. I've gone through several commercial certifications (CET, MSCE, etc) and they were always to satisfy a requirement, and I don't recall gaining much except a recognition for knowledge I already had. I agree with N1KGH on the reason this probably came about. However, the ARRL has pretty much lost it's mandate as a promoter of enhanced technical skills when they hopped on incentive licensing and dumbed down or eliminated many of the license exams. I don't think a piece of paper from the ARRL would be worth more than the cost of the paper and laser toner it's printed with.
|
|   |
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by N7LT on February 9, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
N3NL and KE6TKO have got the idea! Seems N1KGH and AN0N feel threatened though? You guys need to lighten up! I didn't see anywhere in the article that you HAD to take any of these proposed certification programs.... Quit making it harder than it is! If you want to improve your education in radio electronics, the ARRL is providing another way to do it. Nowhere in the article did it say anything about you HAD to! If you don't want to take the ARRL certification programs, NOBODY IS TWISTING YOUR ARM FORCING YOU!!! Boy, anytime someone mentions tests, half the amateur radio community gets all worked up into a frenzy as if they're worried they will fail :)
I look forward to seeing what they will have! At least I'm willing to look over the material first before condeming them.
Re-educating myself in electronics is something I've been planning to do for a few years now and this is just the kick in the butt I've been looking for so like Nick and David, I look forward to seeing what the ARRL can provide as learning tools in Radio Electronics.
Get use to the changes guys. The only thing that remains the same is everything changes.
73
Lyndel
P.S. Not having a college degree, I can thank my Amateur radio experience for helping land those jobs that I would not of qualified for.
|
|   |
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by W5HTW on February 7, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I think the last paragraph addresses some concerns. It is a "voluntary" program. I see it, and I hope this is the case, as similar to the code proficiency runs by W1AW. Fine, if you want to put a CP certificate on your wall, but it isn't going to get you a job with General Electric. This is a hobby, and I believe the days of a ham license qualifying a person for a career are long gone (although I was one of the fortunate ones for whom holding a ham license was sufficient direct qualification for a career, that was long ago.) That these certifications are voluntary should eliminate any controversy about them. Want to take a "personal safisfaction" test on ionospheric propagation? Fine. But remember - the ARRL is not a licensing authority, and such certifications appare to be personal gratification only. Like DXCC, WAS, etc. As they should be. 73, Ed
|
|   |
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by AN0N on February 7, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Certification Program? CEUs? Huh?
Hey folks, this is a HOBBY! It's not like being a registered professional engineer or school teacher or even a realtor, where you have to regularly take courses to keep your job.
I think it's an ego thing for the advocates ("so what if you got your Extra, I'm certified in narrow-band communication modes, rig control programming, and surface mount soldering techniques, nyaa, nyaa"). But the ARRL will be very happy to endorse such a program because it represents a revenue opportunity (study guides and course material, VE fees, certificate issuance).
It will be interesting to see how it all plays out (just follow the money).
|
|   |
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by AN0N on February 7, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Certification Program? CEUs? Huh?
Hey folks, this is a HOBBY! It's not like being a registered professional engineer or school teacher or even a realtor, where you have to regularly take courses to keep your job.
I think it's an ego thing for the advocates ("so what if you got your Extra, I'm certified in narrow-band communication modes, rig control programming, and surface mount soldering techniques, nyaa, nyaa"). But the ARRL will be very happy to endorse such a program because it represents a revenue opportunity (study guides and course material, VE fees, certificate issuance).
It will be interesting to see how it all plays out (just follow the money).
|
|   |
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by AN0N on February 7, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Certification Program? CEUs? Huh?
Hey folks, this is a HOBBY! It's not like being a registered professional engineer or school teacher or even a realtor, where you have to regularly take courses to keep your job.
I think it's an ego thing for the advocates ("so what if you got your Extra, I'm certified in narrow-band communication modes, rig control programming, and surface mount soldering techniques, nyaa, nyaa"). But the ARRL will be very happy to endorse such a program because it represents a revenue opportunity (study guides and course material, VE fees, certificate issuance).
It will be interesting to see how it all plays out (just follow the money).
|
|   |
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by AN0N on February 7, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Certification Program? CEUs? Huh?
Hey folks, this is a HOBBY! It's not like being a registered professional engineer or school teacher or even a realtor, where you have to regularly take courses to keep your job.
I think it's an ego thing for the advocates ("so what if you got your Extra, I'm certified in narrow-band communication modes, rig control programming, and surface mount soldering techniques, nyaa, nyaa"). But the ARRL will be very happy to endorse such a program because it represents a revenue opportunity (study guides and course material, VE fees, certificate issuance).
It will be interesting to see how it all plays out (just follow the money).
|
|   |
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by N1KGH on February 5, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
It's an interesting idea. I have some questions, though: The ARRL is doing this on the urging of their members who want "something" to replace the FCC exams as a proof of intelligence or "toughness". But what does the ARRL think it's getting? Do they want certificates just to add wallpaper? Or will they be "marketable" skills? Their talks with NARTE and SBE suggest the latter. I want to--and *do*--learn new things all the time. But I don't want to spend the rest of my life chasing down wallpaper merely for peer respect. The one thing I prize most about my license is that I can partake in many different activities without needing to prove my competence in each one; I can let the end result be my "final exam." Credentalism has its downside when one is made to spend large sums of money on a moving target. But if it's a fixed target (50 WPM CW, say) then it's worthless except as wallpaper. Certification has the best chance of acceptance if it is integrated with existing training. SKYWARN and ARES/RACES is perfect for such certification since the requirements are fairly concrete and definable and people readily accept the idea of retraining (time for *my* SKYWARN retraining...)
Summary: Certification to competence in a field: No problem;
Certification to micromanage requirements: Problem;
Certification to someone else's ego: BIG problem.
73's, Dave
|
|   |
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by N3NL on February 5, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Hello, This is a wonderful idea! I would like to earn ARRL certifications in the areas of circuit analysis and design, antenna design, homebrew building techniques, high speed morse code operating, and building your own circuit components. Will the ARRL VECs be offering these certification exams?
Nick Leggett N3NL
|
|   |
|
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program
|
|
|
by KE6TKO on February 5, 2000
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
I have looked for training in the area I live and all electronic and communications training is in computers. I welcome any opertunity to for training in my hobby.
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Other News Articles
VK5RJ Still Gracing the Airwaves at Age 101:
rec.radio.amateur.moderated -- 5 Yrs. Old:
Tune-In To The World -- Amateur Radio Gets People Talking:
Student Sends MIT Letter to Space:
Amateur Radio Club Talks to Hams Worldwide on Centennial:
|