eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program

from The ARRL Letter/ARRL on February 4, 2000
View comments about this article!

The ARRL Board of Directors has approved the development and implementation of an initiative to promote self-education by radio amateurs. The new ARRL Certification Program will aim to inspire amateurs to continue acquiring technical knowledge and operating expertise beyond that required to become licensed and give them a chance to test their own limits. Following up on the "2010 Vision" discussions at last July's Board meeting, ARRL Executive Vice President David Sumner, K1ZZ, presented the broad strokes of the Certification Program during the Board's January 21-22 meeting in Memphis.

At this point, the Certification Program only exists as a concept, with the details to be worked out, but plans call for having the program in place by later this year. The first step in putting the program in place will be to solicit the ideas of ARRL members, via a Web-based message board, on appropriate topics to be included in the initial rollout. "The idea is to make this program what members want it to be, and not something imposed from 'on high,'" Sumner said.

"Many ARRL members believe there is a widening gap between what the FCC requires amateur licensees to know and what it takes to be truly knowledgeable about Amateur Radio," he continued. "Whether or not you agree, it's certainly true that those of us who took our FCC exams years ago have never had to demonstrate an understanding of current technology. We could use a new challenge."

The new Certification Program will offer participants an opportunity to earn credentials at various levels of depth and difficulty in different courses of study--perhaps in such areas as ionospheric propagation, receiver design, and Morse code proficiency. Sumner said the ARRL should and will continue to encourage the development of Morse code proficiency beyond the basic HF licensing requirements. He observed that the standards for ARRL certification could be more stringent and more uniform than those used for FCC exams.

Sumner said he sees the certification program not only as a welcome opportunity for individual self-development but a response to the perceived "dumbing down" of Amateur Radio qualifications--especially in the aftermath of the FCC's recently announced license restructuring plan. While the plan was not developed directly in response to restructuring, its timing could not be better, Sumner said, conceding that the restructuring debate "has moved it up the agenda."

As envisioned, the program would be largely self-supporting, but startup costs would be funded from the Exceptional Merit Stipend established by the late Ethel Smith, K4LMB. The Certification Program will be dedicated to her memory. Smith--who helped found the Young Ladies Radio League and served as its first president--died in 1997, leaving the bulk of her estate to the ARRL.

Sumner says a Web-based message board will be set up in a few weeks to gather input from members in terms of specific programs and areas of study or skills development they would like to see become part of the voluntary certification program. The League plans to seek outside expert input to assist in setting the knowledge or performance threshold at the optimal level.

The program likely will include some professional development aspects and could include the granting of Continuing Education Units--CEUs. The League also is seeking cooperative arrangements with related professional organizations. It already has a memorandum of understanding with the National Association of Radio-Television Engineers and has approached the Society of Broadcast Engineers for a similar agreement.

The voluntary certification program dovetails neatly with goals expressed by the League's new President Jim Haynie, W5JBP. Following his election January 21 in Memphis, Haynie said he favors even greater promotion of Amateur Radio, especially among youth and in schools, as well as programs to rekindle interest and activity among current licensees.

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by N4KIM on February 25, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
AIN'T GONNA WORK FOLKS!!!!
Take a look at the comments.
The new(er) HAMs are the laxiest yo-yos around. IF they don't want to take the time necessary to learn the morse code and think it is SUCH a brain buster, what makes you think they are willing to learn anything else??? Especially on a VOLUNTARY basis!!!!
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by K2PI on February 10, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
The jury is still out on this one, as far as I am concerned. Certification programs that lead nowhere except "feel good" land are fine for the New Agers, but they do nothing for me. I've gone through several commercial certifications (CET, MSCE, etc) and they were always to satisfy a requirement, and I don't recall gaining much except a recognition for knowledge I already had. I agree with N1KGH on the reason this probably came about. However, the ARRL has pretty much lost it's mandate as a promoter of enhanced technical skills when they hopped on incentive licensing and dumbed down or eliminated many of the license exams. I don't think a piece of paper from the ARRL would be worth more than the cost of the paper and laser toner it's printed with.
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by N7LT on February 9, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
N3NL and KE6TKO have got the idea! Seems N1KGH and AN0N feel threatened though? You guys need to lighten up! I didn't see anywhere in the article that you HAD to take any of these proposed certification programs.... Quit making it harder than it is! If you want to improve your education in radio electronics, the ARRL is providing another way to do it. Nowhere in the article did it say anything about you HAD to! If you don't want to take the ARRL certification programs, NOBODY IS TWISTING YOUR ARM FORCING YOU!!! Boy, anytime someone mentions tests, half the amateur radio community gets all worked up into a frenzy as if they're worried they will fail :)

I look forward to seeing what they will have! At least I'm willing to look over the material first before condeming them.

Re-educating myself in electronics is something I've been planning to do for a few years now and this is just the kick in the butt I've been looking for so like Nick and David, I look forward to seeing what the ARRL can provide as learning tools in Radio Electronics.

Get use to the changes guys. The only thing that remains the same is everything changes.

73

Lyndel

P.S. Not having a college degree, I can thank my Amateur radio experience for helping land those jobs that I would not of qualified for.
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by W5HTW on February 7, 2000 Mail this to a friend!

I think the last paragraph addresses some concerns. It is a "voluntary" program. I see it, and I hope this is the case, as similar to the code proficiency runs by W1AW. Fine, if you want to put a CP certificate on your wall, but it isn't going to get you a job with General Electric. This is a hobby, and I believe the days of a ham license qualifying a person for a career are long gone (although I was one of the fortunate ones for whom holding a ham license was sufficient direct qualification for a career, that was long ago.) That these certifications are voluntary should eliminate any controversy about them. Want to take a "personal safisfaction" test on ionospheric propagation? Fine. But remember - the ARRL is not a licensing authority, and such certifications appare to be personal gratification only. Like DXCC, WAS, etc. As they should be. 73, Ed
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by AN0N on February 7, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
Certification Program? CEUs? Huh?

Hey folks, this is a HOBBY! It's not like being a registered professional engineer or school teacher or even a realtor, where you have to regularly take courses to keep your job.

I think it's an ego thing for the advocates ("so what if you got your Extra, I'm certified in narrow-band communication modes, rig control programming, and surface mount soldering techniques, nyaa, nyaa"). But the ARRL will be very happy to endorse such a program because it represents a revenue opportunity (study guides and course material, VE fees, certificate issuance).

It will be interesting to see how it all plays out (just follow the money).
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by AN0N on February 7, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
Certification Program? CEUs? Huh?

Hey folks, this is a HOBBY! It's not like being a registered professional engineer or school teacher or even a realtor, where you have to regularly take courses to keep your job.

I think it's an ego thing for the advocates ("so what if you got your Extra, I'm certified in narrow-band communication modes, rig control programming, and surface mount soldering techniques, nyaa, nyaa"). But the ARRL will be very happy to endorse such a program because it represents a revenue opportunity (study guides and course material, VE fees, certificate issuance).

It will be interesting to see how it all plays out (just follow the money).
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by AN0N on February 7, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
Certification Program? CEUs? Huh?

Hey folks, this is a HOBBY! It's not like being a registered professional engineer or school teacher or even a realtor, where you have to regularly take courses to keep your job.

I think it's an ego thing for the advocates ("so what if you got your Extra, I'm certified in narrow-band communication modes, rig control programming, and surface mount soldering techniques, nyaa, nyaa"). But the ARRL will be very happy to endorse such a program because it represents a revenue opportunity (study guides and course material, VE fees, certificate issuance).

It will be interesting to see how it all plays out (just follow the money).
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by AN0N on February 7, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
Certification Program? CEUs? Huh?

Hey folks, this is a HOBBY! It's not like being a registered professional engineer or school teacher or even a realtor, where you have to regularly take courses to keep your job.

I think it's an ego thing for the advocates ("so what if you got your Extra, I'm certified in narrow-band communication modes, rig control programming, and surface mount soldering techniques, nyaa, nyaa"). But the ARRL will be very happy to endorse such a program because it represents a revenue opportunity (study guides and course material, VE fees, certificate issuance).

It will be interesting to see how it all plays out (just follow the money).
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by N1KGH on February 5, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
It's an interesting idea. I have some questions, though: The ARRL is doing this on the urging of their members who want "something" to replace the FCC exams as a proof of intelligence or "toughness". But what does the ARRL think it's getting? Do they want certificates just to add wallpaper? Or will they be "marketable" skills? Their talks with NARTE and SBE suggest the latter. I want to--and *do*--learn new things all the time. But I don't want to spend the rest of my life chasing down wallpaper merely for peer respect. The one thing I prize most about my license is that I can partake in many different activities without needing to prove my competence in each one; I can let the end result be my "final exam." Credentalism has its downside when one is made to spend large sums of money on a moving target. But if it's a fixed target (50 WPM CW, say) then it's worthless except as wallpaper. Certification has the best chance of acceptance if it is integrated with existing training. SKYWARN and ARES/RACES is perfect for such certification since the requirements are fairly concrete and definable and people readily accept the idea of retraining (time for *my* SKYWARN retraining...)

Summary: Certification to competence in a field: No problem;
Certification to micromanage requirements: Problem;
Certification to someone else's ego: BIG problem.

73's, Dave
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by N3NL on February 5, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
Hello, This is a wonderful idea! I would like to earn ARRL certifications in the areas of circuit analysis and design, antenna design, homebrew building techniques, high speed morse code operating, and building your own circuit components. Will the ARRL VECs be offering these certification exams?
Nick Leggett N3NL
 
ARRL Board Endorses Certification Program  
by KE6TKO on February 5, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
I have looked for training in the area I live and all electronic and communications training is in computers. I welcome any opertunity to for training in my hobby.
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Other News Articles
VK5RJ Still Gracing the Airwaves at Age 101:
rec.radio.amateur.moderated -- 5 Yrs. Old:
Tune-In To The World -- Amateur Radio Gets People Talking:
Student Sends MIT Letter to Space:
Amateur Radio Club Talks to Hams Worldwide on Centennial: