eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

Amateur Radio Politics

from Jacob Lauser on May 8, 2000
View comments about this article!

While recently dealing with a major hubub at a club I used to preside over, I was reminded just how dirty politics can get, especially Amateur Radio politics.

We like to thing that we're a world-wide fraternity of like-minded experimenters, but more often than not, we get set in our ways over something or another and we end up fighting among ourselves over ridiculous things.

In Arizona, for instance, there are two rival repeater coordination groups that have arisen in the last two decades who constantly war over frequencies and mountain-top transmitter sites. And I do mean war.

I had to accompany a friend on a repeater purchasing trip a couple years back and was forced to attend a secret meeting of one group. Throughout the luncheon, the entire converstation was nothing but hateful and derogatory comments about the other group and plans to get back at them. I kid you not when I say that I even heard one cliche planning a midnight raid on a rival repeater to cut the coax leads to their antennas!

Is this Ham Radio?

Or how about division within a club?

That's even more exciting because you get to see the soap-opera-like inter-relationships between supposed members and who knows best on how to run a club, or how to spend the money, etc. The club I used to chair is having a problem with who controls the webpage, who has access to the rooftop antennas, and exactly who gets to call themselves president. After I left, they had no fewer than 2 shotgun elections that changed the entire leadership. Talk about revolution! And the worst part is that it's a University-affiliated club.

I worry sometimes that our internal bickering will become so bad that the University will simply tell us to get lost. NO MORE HAM RADIO CLUB HERE! You're too much trouble for us to deal with...

The parallels to the hobby in general are uncanny. Even I, a die-hard DXer and avid QRP addict, have come close to abandoning this lifestyle we call Amateur Radio.

In all fairness, people, it is supposed to be a HOBBY. Something we do for fun? Not something that sends us to an early grave because we worry too much about what Barney, down the road is saying about your repeater signals' interference. And you wonder why hams are dying off at an alarming rate and why the kids don't want anything to do with the hobby?

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
 
by N0RKX on May 16, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
Sorry to say, "been there, done that".
We recently had a situation where we decided to put up another 2 meter repeater. We already had a 146.28/88 machine up and it provided excellent local coverage. The second machine is on 147.135/735 and provides a large coverage area, about 70 miles radius. We intended to use the 135 for skywarn activities and provide coverage for the interstates running through central Iowa. Because of it's wide coverage we had to put a PL tone on it. We were getting interference from users of other machines as much as 90 miles away. You should have heard the screaming from the local Ham community. "My radio doesn't have PL", "Is this a private repeater?" etc.... The PL tone is widely published, it's an open repeater. I'm sorry if this sounds mean spirited, but if your radio doesn't have PL capability you need to get a new radio. One of the local groups not far from here has gone so far as to not announce our functions or net times on their regular sunday net.The NCS has his undies in a bundle about the PL tone. We've still got 28/88 up, it's good for 25-30 miles and even has autopatch capability. 135 fills a need we had in this community when it comes to storm spotting and emergency communications. We filled a serious gap between Des Moines and Waterloo, the NWS loves it. So why do we get the animosity?


 
RE:  
by K0RS on June 18, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
Is this what 2m guys do for fun? Who said code wasn't a filter?
 
Amateur Radio Politics  
by N0XMZ on October 18, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Ah yes, what would a topic about ham radio politics be without the baiting of the almightly morse code?

I really look forward to the the FCC acting and finally putting that dead dog to rest. The bickering will probably carry on for another 5-10 years or so. But even still, some day it will FINALLY be "SK".

The carriers I hear on HF deliberately interfering with voice communications.....

Foul language on 80m.....

Riley recently saaying that the majority of offenders he has to deal with are advanced & extra class licensees......

Yep, that's one heckuva "filter" y'all have there.
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
We Need a PAC!
Looking for Help with Club Meetings
Linking Repeaters???
Riley: ID With Your Call; Fines Upheld
Recruit the BIG Guns!


Other Opinion Articles
How Social Networking Can Help Ham Radio
Don't Knock It!
Knobs and SDRs (Software Defined Radios)
EMP a Real Threat to Hams and the USA
High Speed Packet?