eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

NTIA Spectrum Management Inquiry Poses No Danger to Ham Radio:

from The ARRL Letter, Vol 23, No 10
Website: http://www.arrl.org/ on March 5, 2004
View comments about this article!

NTIA Spectrum Management Inquiry Poses No Danger to Ham Radio:

Apparently not to be outdone by the FCC's Spectrum Policy Task Force (SPTF) and resulting proceedings, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has initiated its own spectrum management Notice of Inquiry http://spectrumreform.ntia.doc.gov/notice.htm. The NTIA administers spectrum used by the federal government and advises the White House in telecommunications matters. Comments on the NOI--which carries the somewhat unwieldy Docket No 040127027-4027-01--are due by March 18. Some in the amateur community believe the NOI represents a threat to Amateur Radio. ARRL Chief Technology Officer Paul Rinaldo, W4RI, says the League is taking a hard look at the NTIA NOI and its potential impact on the Amateur Radio Service and will comment formally by the filing deadline.

"In a nutshell, there is no specific threat to the Amateur Radio Service in this proceeding," Rinaldo said, "unless one considers opening spectrum management to scrutiny as the US government does every so often."

As it did with the FCC's SPTF, the League's Washington office is participating in meetings related to the NOI. On February 12 Rinaldo delivered a presentation on Amateur Radio spectrum management at an NTIA Forum on Spectrum Management Policy Reform, sponsored by the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board of The National Academies.

Among other things, Rinaldo noted that amateurs are concerned about potential interference from unlicensed Part 15 devices, "particularly those that are broadband and distributed throughout residential areas." Such devices, he asserted, should have "globally harmonized bands and standards" designed to preserve a low-noise environment needed for scientific uses and to avoid power escalation in radio services as the noise level rises.

The NTIA released the NOI February 2 in response to a May 29, 2003, executive memorandum from President George W. Bush called "United States Spectrum Policy for the 21st Century." The NTIA NOI now is being viewed as a counterweight to the FCC's SPTF.

The NTIA proceeding is broader than the FCC's SPTF initiative, however, and it poses some fundamental questions--including whether the FCC and NTIA spectrum management functions should be combined in a single entity.

"The League sees this NOI as a healthy opportunity for the airing of views on spectrum management and not a threat aimed at the Amateur Radio Service," Rinaldo concluded. "We appreciate an opportunity to hear members' views."

FCC Chairman Michael Powell and Acting NTIA head Michael Gallagher met February 27 to plan and coordinate the efforts of the FCC and the NTIA on spectrum policy. The meeting included senior spectrum policy teams from both government agencies.

Source:

The ARRL Letter Vol. 23, No. 10 March 5, 2004

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
NTIA Spectrum Management Inquiry Poses No Danger t  
by NE1Z on March 5, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
"there is no specific threat to the Amateur Radio Service in this proceeding"

Since when does the Federal Government have to make everything specific? The basic functions have clear parallels that could be combined with ease. The NTIA has far more resources than the FCC. Many forget that Homeland Security is making sweeping changes possible & if not, they are simply mandated.

Support the NTIA absorbing the FCC if part of it is actual enforcement of infractions like freebanding. If they intend to scoop up more radio thugs than current level of 3/year, I am all for it. Put the bands back in order.

The NTIA is far less a political body than the FCC 'Commission' concept. It appears to be a decisive management body who responded to reject 2 comment extension requests in just 24 hours.

They mean business & I can't wait to see the comments. A real test, 35 questions, no multiple choice!

Bill

 
RE: NTIA Spectrum Management Inquiry Poses No Dang  
by N7UQA on March 6, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
I would tend to agree, the FCC has over the years gone from technical to political. This path has no business deciding the future of the radio spectrum. Even though there has been some improvements in the enforcement arena, some scofflaws still receive nothing more than a mere slap on the wrist. I have more respect for the NTIA in “getting results” than I have for the FCC who lately, seem to cater to the politicians “damn the technical problems, full speed ahead!” approach (i.e. BPL).


Craig - N7UQA
 
RE: NTIA Spectrum Management Inquiry Poses No Dang  
by KC8VWM on March 6, 2004 Mail this to a friend!

>>>he asserted, should have "globally harmonized bands and standards" designed to preserve a low-noise environment needed for scientific uses and to AVOID POWER ESCALATION in radio services as the noise level rises.<<<<

Good, now maybe they will get the message about the hams capability to increase power output levels to maintain communications in noise like conditions.

Of course the side effects of increasing output power levels to communicate to other hams may of more consequence to Part 15 users, than the actual hams who are trying to legally communicate over these noise levels.

So they think a few thousand hams complaining about radio spectrum noise levels is a problem?

I can't wait for the millions of home consumers using Part 15 devices to start filing complaints with the FCC after the implementation of technologies like BPL.

One ham operator can literally and quite "unintentionally" interfere with with an entire neighborhood of Part 15 devices.

So who's REALLY causing these interference issues to all these Part 15 devices? Ham Operators? or is the REAL cause because of the "trickle down effect" from the implementation of BPL or other sources of spectrum noise?

After all, we are Part 97 licensed stations and are permitted to operate our power levels within the letter of the law to maintain radio communications...

We are Part 97 users and Part 15 users must accept this interference right?

Personally, I have no special desire to operate more than 100 watts from my station at any given time. This is mostly due to RF related safety purposes for myself and my family. However, I can't speak for everyone who owns a 1500 watt power amplifier in this particular circumstance.

I cannot say at this time if I would be forced into a position in the future to purchase a 1500 watt amplifier.

Obviously, my station would have to be capable and able to "get through" to others, otherwise my station would not be usable.
 
RE: NTIA Spectrum Management Inquiry Poses No Dang  
by NE1Z on March 7, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
"Even though there has been some improvements in the enforcement arena, some scofflaws still receive nothing more than a mere slap on the wrist."

So please explain to me just how that is some improvement?

What good is reading about warnings but never an actual bust in over 5 years?

Bill



 
FCC versus NTIA  
by CALLSIGNPENDING on March 7, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
BACKGROUND READING ON THE NTIA DOCKET


http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/06/20030605-4.html

Text of June 5, 2003 Presidential Memorandum on the Presidential Spectrum Policy Initiative (PSPI)


www.amherstalliance.org

Text of June 11, 2003 AMHERST ALLIANCE Letter To President Bush
(Click on "FCC Filings" ... THEN click on "Filings In Defense Of The Spectrum" ... THEN click on the letter to President Bush)


*****************************************************


Despite the news story, I believe it remains POSSIBLE that NTIA's NOI on spectrum management is a "stalking horse" for a shift of some current regulatory authority -- including, at least potentially, the regulation of hams -- from the FCC to the NTIA.

While the NTIA's NOI itself may not openly contemplate such a shift, we must remember that the NTIA Docket IMPLEMENTS a Presidential Spectrum Policy Initiative (PSPI), which is in turn rooted in a Presidential Memorandum of June 5, 2003. This Presidential Memorandum implies a strong interest in expanding the Commerce Department's regulatory authority, with the explicit intent of encouraging new COMMERCIAL uses of the spectrum -- while also establishing new user fees for "unauctioned" (non-commercial) uses of the spectrum.


See for yourself.

Read the June 5, 2003 Presidential Memorandum and the June 11, 2003 letter that THE AMHERST ALLIANCE wrote in response. The respective URLs are listed above.


****


As for the argument that the NTIA would be "less political" than the FCC: Think again.

The NTIA reports to the Secretary of Commerce, who reports to the President AND remains in office only so long as the President is pleased with what he or she is doing. Thus, as a matter of practical politics, regulation of hams by the NTIA would be regulation of hams by the White House. Alone.

Today, the FCC is much more "political" than it should be, AND than it used to be. Still, regulation at the hands of ONE person from ONE political party -- that is, the President -- would be even worse. With a COMMISSION composed of FIVE people instead of ONE, with more than one party represented, and with no legal obligation to please the President, there is a mixture of views and at least a chance for balance in decision-making.

With White House control, ONE person will have ALL the power -- ALL the power!! -- without having to answer to a minority party or to independent-minded Commissioners from his or her own party.


****


Again:

I'm not sure that the NTIA is really trying to change the regulatory status quo. However -- in light of the June 5, 2003 Presidential Memorandum -- I'm also not sure that it ISN'T.

Until the NTIA makes it clearer that they are ONLY concerned with managing FEDERAL GOVERNMENT use of the spectrum, and not the rest of the spectrum, prudence compels potentially affected parties to assume the worst.


Therefore, I urge all concerned parties to file Written Comments with the NTIA which:


(1) Urge the NTIA to stay within the statutory limits of its regulatory authority;
AND
(2) Remind the NTIA, and through it the President, that any changes in current regulatory authority may only be made by proposing new legislation to Congress -- NOT by issuing an illegal Executive Order.

73,



CALLSIGNPENDING aka Don Schellhardt
 
RE: FCC versus NTIA  
by NE1Z on March 8, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
Hey Shellgame,

When does the endless infomercials end & your "CALLSIGNPENDING" expire?

You are annoying, like flies at a picnic!

Bill

 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
What Happened to 60 Meters -- 5.2 MHz?
NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:
Spectrum Protection Act Cosponsor List Tops 100:
Holders of Expired Novice, Tech Licenses Eligible
FCC Continues South Carolina Exam Audit


Other News Articles
DX News -- ARRL DX Bulletin #36:
Learn CW Online!
60 Years of ATV -- a New Video On the BATC TV Website:
Radio Club Seeks Information, Picture Of Former Member:
Fire and Rescue Honors 'Hams':