eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

Utility Encounters Mixed Success in Avoiding Amateur Spectrum with BPL:

from The ARRL Letter, Vol 23, No 16 on April 16, 2004
Website: http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!

Utility Encounters Mixed Success in Avoiding Amateur Spectrum with BPL:

Amateurs in the Raleigh, North Carolina, area say electric utility Progress Energy and Broadband over Power Line (BPL) equipment provider Amperion have had "some success" in their efforts to avoid using Amateur Radio spectrum on overhead lines in their BPL field trial areas. But problems persist, and the process is far from quick and simple, says ARRL North Carolina PIO Gary Pearce, KN4AQ, who has been among local amateurs closely monitoring the Progress Energy/Amperion BPL trial. Their experiences could indicate what amateurs may face in areas where BPL is widely deployed.

"The mitigation process at this iteration of Amperion's hardware is neither simple nor precise," Pearce said earlier this month. Progress Energy/Amperion essentially are attempting to "notch out" or completely avoid ham radio frequencies, since hams have been the only HF users so far to file interference complaints. Complicating the effort, he says, is that the process is largely hit or miss, requiring field monitoring and feedback and sometimes another attempt to nail the target.

Pearce says he and Wake County ARES Emergency Coordinator Tom Brown, N4TAB--an engineer with extensive RF experience--met the week of April 5 with Progress Energy network engineer Bill Godwin at the so-called Phase II BPL trial areas to review the BPL spectrum in use. Amateurs also monitored the system using an Amateur Radio mobile station some 75 feet from the line.

"Bill Godwin had a chart showing where BPL could operate and avoid ham bands, and Amperion had adjusted its system to comply with that chart," Pearce said. Among other issues, Amperion missed the mark on 20 meters--starting a BPL signal block on 14.300 MHz instead of 14.350 MHz, he pointed out.

Pearce attributed the problem to a likely error in calculating the spectrum needed. BPL spectrum block edges "are not brick walls," he said, but taper off, with progressively weaker carriers remaining audible up to 100 kHz away, depending on the noise floor. "The remaining signals are very weak but would bother a home station within a city block or two of the power line." The goal is to be able to place BPL on a line in the immediate vicinity of a ham.

Unclear at this stage is whether the "notching" scheme will work in a more-dense BPL environment. "More spectrum can be used below 7 and above 30 MHz, but Amperion prefers to remain between 7 and 30 MHz," Pearce said. "If this spectrum can be rotated between line segments, and the notches can be deepened some, they may satisfy the concerns of hams for the Amateur Radio spectrum." But, he adds, no efforts are under way to avoid other shortwave frequencies.

"We appreciate this proactive attempt," Pearce said. "We will point out again that there are other public uses and users of the spectrum in between the ham bands." Amateur Radio operators "cannot sit back and say, 'Well, our problem's solved. Good luck with yours!'" Pearce says.

He says that for this reason alone, the North Carolina amateurs still consider BPL a flawed concept. And, while he credits Progress Energy and Amperion with cooperating to resolve amateur interference issues piecemeal, "we just want to make sure that everyone understands where the goal line stands."

Source:

The ARRL Letter Vol. 23, No. 16 April 16, 2004

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
Utility Encounters Mixed Success in Avoiding Amate  
by KD5IR on April 19, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
.........looking ahead just alittle you can SEE where this issue of close Proximity is going to become a test area for Hams. Lets suppose that BPL has been established in an unincorporated area Close to a Rural town and NO hams were in Residence , i.e....NO complaints. SO, Joe (Rag Chew, K5ASS) Smith moves in and immediately detects Noise from BPL. He files a complaint with the Utility and their response is.....Well , sorry, you're just one Ham and you got here after the fact and it's just TOO expensive to try and MitigateEliminate the Minimal level of interference you MIGHT be receiving from OUR equipment. SO, old JOE, starts Transmitting with a 1.5kw signal legally, and the BPL folks start getting all kinds of complaints that there is interference from Joe's legal signal. The Utility immediately notifies the FCC and the Do Do hits the Fan folks. Who, Praytell, will the FCC, give Precedence TOO , in this Scenerio??? My prediction is that ....Joe, is going to Loose. We, shall See...s.kuteman , Kd5ir
 
RE: Utility Encounters Mixed Success in Avoiding A  
by KE1MB on April 19, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
Not if Joe goes mobile with his 1.5kw...

 
RE: Utility Encounters Mixed Success in Avoiding A  
by W2IRT on April 19, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
So long as Part 15 still protects licensed services, Joe will do just fine. I'm just wondering how long the Amateur Service will be protected by Part 15 once this gets rolled out on a wide-scale basis.

What's even more disturbing is that the art of shortwave broadcast and utility listening will die completely once BPL starts nation-wide. This has to be stopped dead in its tracks, period.

73,
Peter, W2IRT
 
RE: Utility Encounters Mixed Success in Avoiding A  
by KD5IR on April 19, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
..............I, HAVE AN APOLOGY TO MAKE ....To K5ASS. I didn't think that this was AN Active Call. It, Is an active Call and I meant NO disrepect. I , just pulled it out of the AIR, without checking First. Stupid old ME.......sanford kuteman , kd5ir
 
Utility Encounters Mixed Success in Avoiding Amate  
by KT5X on April 20, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
Among the complaints one should be lodging ought to be the complaint that "I can not copy licensed short wave broadcast on such a such a frequency because of interference from unlicensed BPL operation." The more complaints of all sorts the better.
 
RE: Utility Encounters Mixed Success in Avoiding A  
by W1RFI on April 21, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
> So long as Part 15 still protects licensed services, > Joe will do just fine. I'm just wondering how long
> the Amateur Service will be protected by Part 15
> once this gets rolled out on a wide-scale basis.

How long has Part 15 protected amateur radio from interference to DSL, wired telephones, etc? What is the FCC position wrt fundamental overload of all sorts of consumer equipment? What does the FCC say about interference to cable TV due to ingress?

> What's even more disturbing is that the art of
> shortwave broadcast and utility listening will die
> completely once BPL starts nation-wide. This has to > be stopped dead in its tracks, period.

Interference to international shortwave broadcast is protected and if people experience such interference, they should report it. Unfortunately, most SWLs won't be able to identify BPL or know who to report it to.

Ed Hare, W1RFI
 
RE: Utility Calls ARRL bluff  
by KF7CG on April 23, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
MY turn to get political Bill,

"I never had sex with that woman." Clinton

"BPL doesn't cause harmful interference to mobile operation." PECO

Same quality of statement. Not content with just matching a former world class prevaricator, PECO continues that their remaining emissions in the Amateur bands also do constitute harmful interference.

Bill if they are paying you to comment here, "The check is in the mail."
 
RE: Utility Calls ARRL bluff  
by KF7CG on April 23, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
MY turn to get political Bill,

"I never had sex with that woman." Clinton

"BPL doesn't cause harmful interference to mobile operation." PECO

Same quality of statement. Not content with just matching a former world class prevaricator, PECO continues that their remaining emissions in the Amateur bands also do constitute harmful interference.

Bill if they are paying you to comment here, "The check is in the mail."
 
Utility Encounters Mixed Success in Avoiding Amate  
by K8SWL on April 24, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
They always mention people in close proximity to the power line in question. Have they ever considered how propagation may enter into it. I've worked 600 miles into a crappy loaded dipole with 150 milliwats on 40 meters. I guess the BPL signal won't propagate.

More ot come
Mike K8SWL
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Other News Articles
Indonesia To Launch Orari Satellite Next Year:
Radio Enthusiasts Help Red Cross During Games:
Smugglers Had Illegal Ham Radio:
ARNewsline # 1682 -- November 6 2009:
Propagation Forecast Bulletin #45 de K7RA: