eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 434.5 MHz:

from W1AW Bulletin via the ARRL on April 17, 2004
Website: http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!

FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 434.5 MHz :

ZCZC AG13
QST de W1AW
ARRL Bulletin 13 ARLB013
>From ARRL Headquarters
Newington CT April 16, 2004
To all radio amateurs

SB QST ARL ARLB013
ARLB013 FCC okays RF identification tags at 433.5 to 434.5 MHz

The FCC has adopted a somewhat limited proposal to permit deployment of RF Identification (RFID) tags on the 70-cm band at much greater duty cycles than current Part 15 rules permit for such devices.

Among other applications, RFID tags are used to track shipments and packing containers. A Third Report and Order (R & O) in ET Docket 01-278--approved April 15 but not yet released--follows a 2000 petition by SAVI Technology to revise FCC Part 15 rules to accommodate such devices in the vicinity of 433 MHz. The ARRL has consistently opposed the proposal, but the FCC just as unfailingly has gone along with it. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Chief Ed Thomas said RFIDs provide important public benefits.

"This device is designed to increase homeland security at ports, rail yards and warehouses," Thomas told the FCC open meeting. "It will foster the development of more powerful and advanced RFID systems that can identify the contents of shipping containers and determine whether tampering has occurred during shipment." Thomas said the devices also would increase efficiency in shipping operations and inventory control.

In requesting Commission adoption, OET's Hugh van Tuyl provided the broad strokes of the Part 15 rule changes, which, he said, would apply specifically to shipping containers "in commercial and industrial areas." In certain cases, he asserted, current Part 15 requirements aimed at preventing interference to licensed services "may unnecessarily constrain the operational range of RFID systems as well as the speed and quantity of data that can be transmitted."

The Third R & O would increase the maximum radiated field strength permitted for such devices as well as the maximum permissible duty cycle--from one second to one minute. The longer duty cycle would allow an RFID to transmit the contents of an entire shipping container, van Tuyl said. "We therefore believe there will be no significant increase in the potential for interference to authorized services," he concluded.

The Third R & O reflects certain accommodations to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), which expressed "grave concerns" about the proposal in 2002. The R & O limits the operating band for such RFID tags to 433.5 to 434.5 MHz, instead of the 425 to 435 MHz SAVI originally asked for. It further prohibits operation of RFID tag systems within 40 km (about 25 miles) of five government radar sites. Manufacturers of 433 MHz RFID systems would have to register the locations of their system base stations to aid in interference resolution.

Since SAVI first approached the FCC in 2000, ARRL has maintained that the RFID tags the company proposed would represent a significant source of potential interference to sensitive receivers and be incompatible with ongoing requirements of incumbent services.

More than 130 amateurs filed comments in opposition to SAVI Technology's RFID tags proposal, and most supported the ARRL's position that the proposed rules were flawed and should not be adopted.
NNNN
/EX

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 434.5  
by KC6MMI on April 17, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
yep. and more good news on this can be found at www.infowars.com
TNX
Rich
 
FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 434.5  
by W4VR on April 17, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
The FCC continues to make spectrum management decisions based on something other than Physics.
 
RE: FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 4  
by NE1Z on April 17, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
It isn't going to hurt anything except the ARRL Obstructionist agenda:

FCC ADOPTS RULE CHANGES FOR IMPROVED RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION
SYSTEMS TO FACILITATE HOMELAND SECURITY EFFORTS. The FCC adopted a
Third Report and Order that allows for the operation of improved radio
frequency identification (RFID) systems. News Release. (Dkt No 01-278).
Adopted: 04/15/2004. News Media Contact: Lauren Van Wazer at (202)
418-0030 OET. Contact Hugh Van Tuyl at (202) 418-7506, email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246145A1.doc>
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246145A2.doc>
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246145A1.pdf>
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246145A2.pdf>
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246145A1.txt>
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246145A2.txt>
 
FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 434.5  
by W5GNB on April 19, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
If the equipment is built to specifications outlined in the part-15 rulings, there should be no interferrence to anyone unless you are within a few feet of the device. I found a site that was quite interesting, it is RF-ID.COM

The question here is will the equipment be built to just satisfy the requirement for this "New Technology" or will they begin running several watts in the future to expand the range of these devices?

Maybe the ARRL can take advantage of this and create a NEW CONTEST, we can call it Worked All ID TAGS. You could get a prize at Wally-World if you can gather enough points!!
 
RE: FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 4  
by W4CRT on April 20, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
Use it or lose it. 2 meters and 440 are both dead as a hammer in this area.
 
RE: FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 4  
by W1RFI on April 21, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
> If the equipment is built to specifications outlined
> in the part-15 rulings, there should be no
> interferrence to anyone unless you are within a few
> feet of the device.

The testing ARRL did showed that the interference 0.l km from a simulated RFID device operating under the proposed rules was loud and clear.
See:

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6513192655

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6513295351

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6513083022

http://www.arrl.org/~ehare/rfid/ARRLExParteRev.doc

You may be thinking of some of the short-range RFID devices that operate on other spectrum, but this is designed to operate over the range of a very large warehouse or from inside cargo containers or truck trailer enclosures.

Ed Hare, W1RFI







 
FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 434.5  
by KC8WCW on April 22, 2004 Mail this to a friend!

Only in Amateur radio is a giant leap backwards into the old HF Spectrum considered to be an upgrade. The rest of the modern world will tell you to keep your HF, and give them everything from 6 meters and up. Those of us who know better, realize that we already had the upgrade with a Technician license. By the time anyone gets a clue, the spectrum worth having will be nothing but a dream.

 
RE: FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 4  
by KT0DD on April 24, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
It seems real stupid to take the spectrum out of FM simplex allocations, instead of lower in the Fast Scan TV allocations. I think there would be a greater need for interference free FM simplex, especially in emergencies, than Fast Scan TV, I don't know of anyone doing fast scan TV. 73.
 
FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 434.5  
by KT6KT on April 24, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
It's not going to hurt anything, eh?

Lets see. With my tv set tuned to 434 MHz, and in conjunction with a spectrum analyzer, I presently see the following transmitters:

Pool alarms from 433.5 to 434 MHz.
Weather stations around 434.8 MHz (sold by ham outlets).
TV surveillance at 434.9 MHz (sold by ham outlets).
Burglar alarms at 434.79 MHz.
Businesses on 440.00 FM.

ATVer living close to industrial areas will never be able to do any more weak signal work.
 
FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 434.5  
by KC8WCW on April 25, 2004 Mail this to a friend!

Frankly, I wouldn't be as concerned with the threat to Amateur Radio, as I would the other way around. It'll be interesting to see the outcome when a case like this actually occurs.

What happens when you're in or near an airport with a perfectly legal Amateur radio, with license in hand, only to wreak havoc on normal airport security equipment. Assuming that were possible, are Hams then held accountable for malicious interference with another licensed entity? Considering the fact that the other entity happens to include agents of the federal government, who in the real world do you think would win that discussion?
 
FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 434.5  
by K6AER on April 25, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
KC8WCW, how did you get so very knowledgeable?
Most of your posting are Bullsh..
Listen and maybe you can learn or at least find a good Elemer.
 
RE: FCC Okays RF Identification Tags at 433.5 to 4  
by KC8WCW on April 26, 2004 Mail this to a friend!

Oh, quite the contrary. I've worked with commercial two way gear for the past 23 years of my professional life. It took a ten minute exposure to Amateur Radio, for me to realize that it was a total waste of time, energy, and money. At this point, my only participation is in forums like this. Don't worry, I'm not involved in it anyway.

I do indeed have a clue. That's precisely why I have nothing to do with it.

 
RE: FCC Okays RF ID Tags at 433.5 to 434.5  
by NE1Z on April 29, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
I have to laugh at the "giant leap" theory, it is so true. Celebrate living in the past!!

Bill
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Other News Articles
The New Frontier for School Radio:
New Vice Directors in Central, Roanoke Divisions:
New Amateur Radio Web Site Launches:
Announcing Railroad Depots on the Air:
Rowley Shears, G8KW (SK):