eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

NTIA Study Documents Radio Interference from BPL:

from The ARRL Letter, Vol 23, No 18 on May 1, 2004
Website: http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!

NTIA Study Documents Radio Interference from BPL:

The first phase of a long-awaited broadband over power line (BPL) study the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) released this week suggests it's possible to accommodate BPL technology while managing the interference risk. In a cover letter to FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell, Acting NTIA Administrator Michael D. Gallagher pledged that the NTIA would "work with the Commission to establish a firm technical foundation for responsible deployment of BPL to protect critical federal communications systems." But, Gallagher added, "technical rules governing their deployment must address potential harmful interference to critical systems." Released April 27, NTIA Report 04-413 http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fccfilings/2004/bpl/index.html analyzes 10 million BPL system measurements.

"Most studies have been oriented to determine whether interference will occur at the variously proposed limits," NTIA says in describing its study's approach. "In contrast, NTIA has oriented its study to find a solution that accommodates BPL systems while appropriately managing the risk of interference to radio systems." The NTIA acknowledges that BPL signals "unintentionally radiate" from power lines. But, the agency said, "there is substantial disagreement as to the strength of the emissions and their potential for causing interference to licensed radio systems." The NTIA also said current FCC Part 15 measurement techniques may "significantly underestimate" peak BPL field strength.

The hefty, two-volume NTIA Phase 1 study looks at BPL systems using the HF and low-VHF spectrum from 1.7 to 80 MHz and "defines risks of interference from BPL systems to local radio reception" while assuming the systems comply with existing Part 15 rules. That spectrum, NTIA said, is home to some 59,000 federal frequency assignments. The study proposes protecting 41 frequencies of the "most sensitive and likely most severely affected federal systems."

ARRL CEO David Sumner, K1ZZ, said the NTIA study clearly demonstrates that BPL systems pollute the radio spectrum. "How can any responsible public official encourage the deployment of such systems," he asked, "and how can any investor seriously consider pouring money into such an obviously flawed technology?"

Among interference mitigation techniques, the NTIA study recommends reducing BPL device output power--which it called "the single most effective method" of reducing interference potential--and "shifting or notching" BPL frequencies. Others included differential-mode signal injection, absorbing filters, adopting a "one active device per frequency and area" rule and using a single point of control for each BPL service area.

Interference calculations by the NTIA engineers indicated that a BPL transmitter operating within Part 15 limits would significantly increase the noise floor for land-mobile receivers on frequencies below 30 MHz. The agency said it could be inferred from its calculations that "a vehicle-mounted HF receiver" operating in a residential neighborhood next to a BPL-energized line "may experience harmful interference" depending on the frequency, distance along the line from the BPL transmitter, the BPL transmitter's duty cycle and the number of BPL devices on the power line.

The NTIA study calculated that interference "is likely" to mobile stations in areas extending to 30 meters and to fixed stations in areas extending to 55 meters from a single BPL device and the power lines to which it's connected. With "low to moderate desired signal levels," the NTIA study continued, interference is likely at these receivers within areas extending to 75 meters for mobiles and 460 meters for fixed stations.

The NTIA says its Phase 2 study will "evaluate the effectiveness" of its Phase 1 recommendations and address potential interference via ionospheric propagation of BPL "from mature, large-scale" deployed BPL networks.

Source:

The ARRL Letter Vol. 23, No. 18 April 30, 2004

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
NTIA Study Documents Radio Interference from BPL:  
by K1CJS on May 2, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
On reflection, maybe those of us who are comparing the issue in Japan to here (the US) are taking things a little far. True, Japan has stopped the BPL technology (!) from being used there, but Japan has a much more dense population throughout than the majority of the United States. The comparison (with apologies to the Japanese people) is like packed sardines in a tin as compared to fish in a lake!

It is true that BPL is not without interference, that much is painfully obvious. BPL should not be promoted as the 'last mile' solution to getting high speed internet to rural areas--it certainly isn't, at least not in its present form. What is most obvious is this: BPL is cost effective only in high population urban areas. In rural areas, the cost factor of the installation of BPL would make the cost per individual installation too high to compete with DSL or cable (if cable was even available). Whether the cost is lower than comparable cable or DSL service is secondary--to the HF radio bands--to the noise factor, which is much higher than the other two offerings.

Maybe what is needed is a back door approach to the whole problem: Spread the word to everyone you know that is considering subscribing to a BPL service that for that internet access, they'll be sacrificing their clear reception of radio and non-cable television. Spread the word. Maybe we should spread a little misinformation of our own, just like the BPL purveyors are doing.
 
RE: NTIA Study Documents Radio Interference from B  
by KF7CG on May 3, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
Broadcast radio and TV are on the way out. So interference to them is becoming less of a problem every day. New cars now even come with satellite radio installed, there goes FM and AM radio broadcasts - digital satellite stuff there to.

The free for listening to the ads model is going away for a pay for listening to the stupid ads model. Many local TV stations now have cable stations as well and depend upon being carried by the cable. HDTV will increase this trend. Shortwave Broadcasters are dying out. The big power house networks and stations are pulling out with speed. No BBC International Service, none of the US Networks has an overseas service anymore, everything is satellite.

I am waiting for the first really good solar flare to hit the satellite patch. The satellite people lucked out this cycle, the really big flares missed. A direct hit from an X20+ solar flare and its accompanying coronal mass ejection can kill satellites or seriously perturb their orbits. This would put a glitch in the satellite stuff for a week or two at least. That would be INTERESTING.
 
RE: NTIA Study Documents Radio Interference from B  
by NE1Z on May 3, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
"Broadcast radio and TV are on the way out."

Where do you get this crap from, invent it?

If it were dying, do you think the 100's of TV stations would be spending millions on HDTV transmission upgrades? AM talk radio is alive & lucritive.

You should really educate yourself in the Radio & TV business world before making such boldly incorrect assumptions.



 
RE: NTIA Study Documents Radio Interference from B  
by KF7CG on May 4, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
Talk radio it is so profitable that one company has been able to slowly pickup a tremendous string of stations. I said broadcast not cable or satellite, the upgrades are necessary every where but the transmitter itself no matter which way it goes. When broadband gets cheap, AM talk radio will go broadband too. Some of the bigger names are there already.

Besides that the ugly police will get them. TV and radio towers are just plain ugly. So the have to go away. Buried cable works but not for broadcast.

Dying is a prediction, the death isn't immenent yet, but as satellite radio gains a foot hold AM and FM car radio will go the way of the 8 inch and 5.25 inch floppies.
 
RE: NTIA Study Documents Radio Interference from B  
by WA3KYY on May 4, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
Broadcast radio will die only if people are willing to pay for the alternative. Many are neither willing nor able to pay. Even at $10/month, I have no interest in satellite radio nor do I bother with streaming video or audio over my DSL connection, it slows up the rest of what I want to do on the Internet.
 
NTIA Study Documents Radio Interference from BPL:  
by W3DCG on May 9, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
" The hefty, two-volume NTIA Phase 1 study looks at BPL systems using the HF and low-VHF spectrum from 1.7 to 80 MHz and..."

...and, what happened to those supposedly non-interfering BPL systems in the Ghz spectrum? Was/is it real, or was it just a dream, some people's idea of some quick mega bucks and a sick joke?

Where IS Corridor while all this HF/VHF/UHF polluting nonsense is trying to take root?
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
RFI from Alarm System
Automotive Noise -- What Can We All Do?
Kiss 33cm (900 MHz) Goodbye?
NTIA Spectrum Management Inquiry Poses No Danger to Ham Radio:
EchoLink


Other News Articles
Amateur Radio Group Puts Focus On Emergency Communication:
Lester, Daniel C. 'Danny' KE9SE, (SK):
World War II-Era Navigation System Shut Down:
CU Space Project to Study How a Violent Sun Can Affect Earth:
ARNewsline #1695 -- February 5 2010: