Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
Charlie Taylor Jr. (K5USS)
on
May 25, 2004
View comments about this article!
What do you do when your Elmer hands you a box full of "old" equipment that is not in working order? YOU FIX IT! Now why would ANYONE want to fix "old stuff"? Well, the first reason would be KNOWLEDGE! The second would be to show that you are interested in more than the local repeaters and you want to better yourself in the amateur radio hobby/service!
My Elmer recently handed me a box of items, some of it worked and some of it did not. ALL of the items that needed to be worked on were pointed out as they went into the box. For example, one of the three HTs that went into the box was labeled as "bad receive", the other was marked "Does not transmit". What do you do when your mentor looks at you and says, "When you figure out why it has bad receive let me know"? How do you go about finding the problems? You OPEN it UP and LOOK at it!
Two of the three HTs that were in that box are now working. Would they have been repaired if I had gotten them at a hamfest? Probably not! I would have put them into the junk drawer and forgotten them until I needed something from them, perhaps a crystal, or a speaker. These items are working now because they were given to me with the belief that I want to know more about how I can talk around the world or across town, and how RF works!
Prior to getting into the amateur radio hobby/service I had not had any experience with electronics. After I got into this I decided that since I did not know electronics, but I did know math and engineering, I would concentrate on antennas…A little math and some measurements will get you through on antennas, or so I thought! You do need to know a bit more than that, but I digress….
I was handed a box of "stuff", each item that went into the box had some history to it, I was told that these items were being given to me because I was trusted to work on them, and learn from them, and would not place them on a table at the next hamfest. The man I call Elmer, whom I will leave nameless and call-less until told otherwise, entrusted me with his "treasures", things he had collected over the years. It makes no difference where they came from, or why they are broken, they are his. His to do with as he pleases! He decided to pass them along to me, he trusted me with his "stuff". He decided to pass them along, and to further facilitate the knowledge base of the service we call amateur radio by doing so.
The first things I took out of the box were two Regency receivers. Both of them were in good working order, as I was told they were, they received the frequencies that were marked on them and they are now sitting on the bench in the shack "listening" for the next burst of RF. Next I took the HTs from their resting place in the bottom of the cardboard box. I wished they could speak to me, I am sure they would have stories to tell. But, they did not say anything to me at that time, I have to "resurrect them" so to speak, make them have the capability to "talk" once again.
The first one I pulled out was large! This HT weighed almost as much as my mobile VHF/UHF rig does, but it does not work, it has "issues". I looked it over and wondered what to do next, should I try to put power into the external power jack? What if I wire the jack wrong? Is it center pin positive or negative? I told myself I had a 50/50 chance of being correct, and I went with center pin positive, most everything else I own is. I was right, the next thing I heard was static, always a good sign! I pressed the PTT button and my frequency counter told me it was transmitting on 151.250 MHz, and then I heard a voice! SUCCESS!!!
I did not smoke the first project. Granted it is not within the amateur bands but I was able to find the place to power up, add an antenna and learn. While pondering my next project I heard a voice on the HT I had just powered up, it was not anything of importance, someone was calling in that a door was secure, but it made my night! The "old and heavy" HT was working once again!
The next project was a bit more of a challenge, the battery compartment of the Yaesu FT-202R was COMPLETLEY eroded away from corrosion. What should I do now I asked myself, I decided that I needed to find where the power was fed into the radio from and add power to it! How did I do this? The wires were eaten away. I looked on the Internet and found the schematic to this particular radio. I looked it over, decoded where to place my alligator clips, I lowered the voltage on my power supply to 8vdc, and turned it on. It lit up! The schematic stated that it was rated for up to 12vdc and I moved my supply to 10.5vdc and called a friend of mine on 146.52. Miles, W5RMH, replied that I was weak but he could hear me. I could not say the same for him at all. This radio had been marked as bad receive, and it was true! What now? Open it up and see WHY it has a bad receive is all I could come up with. I got lucky, the speaker was torn ¾ of the way around, and I replaced the speaker with one I had in the junk drawer and WOW, what a difference! I carried on a QSO with W5RMH for a few minutes and shut it down so I could make the solder joints permanent.
Since I have gained these items in the box I have PROVEN to myself that I CAN sort of read a schematic, I can use a soldering iron without damage, and I can make modifications without "breaking" anything. The worst thing I could do to these pieces of amateur radio equipment was to fix them, THEY WERE ALREADY BROKEN!
Why am I writing this, some will ask… What I have accomplished is not a great feat to some in the amateur radio world at all. But, it was a MAJOR accomplishment to me! I proved to myself that I could diagnose a problem, granted small ones, and I could fix them! -- To me that is one of the many things that this is all about, learning and experimentation. I did not invent a new mode, nor did I accomplish something that had not been done before, but I did gain knowledge and confidence, and an interest in the inner-works of the devices that we take for granted. To me that is a great accomplishment!
I am not a repairman for amateur radio equipment, I have NOT fully gained the knowledge to read a schematic, but I have learned that if you apply yourself, and you want to learn, you CAN do so, if you TRY!
I call to ALL amateurs that are new to the airwaves, find on Old Timer to mentor you, get your hands on a radio device that does not work and diagnose it, and the FIX it! The feeling you get from talking on a piece of equipment that did not work minutes ago, and is now providing you with a communication medium, cannot be described! The knowledge you gain from such an experience will be PRICELESS!
I have MANY more challenges in the box that was provided to me! I will tackle them one at a time…You never know, one of these days you may make contact with K5USS and hear that I am working you off of a rig that was given to me broken, and forgotten, but is now on the air once again!
Elmer, you know who you are, thank you very much!
Vy vy 73,
Charlie
K5USS
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by N5GLR on May 25, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Your Elmer does indeed have the best plan. Hands-on practice cements the "book" knowledge you gained studying for your test(s). Unfortunately, there aren't many Hams left with the knowledge and experience to provide this kind of training and help. Your are very fortunate to have found one.
73,
Garry
N5GLR
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by K0BG on May 25, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
The ARRL's internet question of the week, last week, ask what you'd do if your radio broke. Over 27% of the respondents said they'd ship it back to the factory for repair. The largest portion said they'd try to fix it. That's great! But...most of todays miniture radios use surface-mounted technology, and few amateur radio shacks have the necessry equipment to work on this technology. And this doesn't address diagnosing the LSI chips they all contain either. It is indeed a conundrum.
Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
|
|   |
|
Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by N3NL on May 25, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I proposed a requirement that ham radio gear be
field-repairable. This idea was shot down by the ham
community and then shot down by the FCC. So the
alternative step is repairing old gear as suggested
here or building your own new gear. Your homebrew
gear can include experimental components such as
the salt water capacitor invented by a ham.
Whatever you do, hands-on work is indeed the best way
to learn electronics or any other technology.
73 and best DX. Nickolaus E. Leggett, N3NL
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by K6BBC on May 25, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
WHY ELMER??? IT'S NOT CHARMING. IT MAKES HAM RADIO SOUND LIKE A HOBBY FOR HICKS!!!
k6bbc
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by AE1X on May 25, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Where have you been? Elmer has been a term used for the kindly experience amateur in you neighborhood that you relied on for assistance with becoming a HAM forever and I hope regains its meaning. We, the experienced, need to help others. That's what made this hobby what is and could be again.
There is a place for all in this hobby. I could name a lot of skills that could be useful to this community. Look around, a plumber could help you build a plumbing pipe special or assist you with water cooling your 1kW final. A machinist sure would come in handy with those special parts needed for VHF/UHF work. These are all Elmers when they help you resolve a thorny problem with a project.
Ken, AE1X
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by KG5JJ on May 25, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Wow...this one hit home, has for years. The best teacher is LBD (Learn By Doing). Give the newbies the guidance they need, then challenge them! They will learn by doing.
The "Elmer" comment above has just reinforced the fact that we have done a poor job of "Elmering" our new operators. Traditions and modus operandi we take for granted, and have been in place for years, must seem stupid or foreign to the X and Y generations. Take the time to explain it, and if it is ridiculed or pooh-poohed, at least now they know what it is they are ridiculing...their loss.
Elmer means helper, Amateur Radio Guru (or not), who wants to help newbies (or old timers) to excel in this hobby. People who want to help people are Elmers.
Perhaps someone may give the exact time or place the term "Elmer" was born. I'm sure it must be steeped in ancient Amateur Radio folklore...any takers?
Anyway, appreciate those who want to learn and respect what you've got to say, and the others...well...they may LBD (Learn By Doing).
73 KG5JJ (Mike)
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by K6BBC on May 25, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I was lisenced in 68 and I never heard of the term Elmer or Elmering back then. It's a terrible image for us.
K6BBC
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by KA5N on May 26, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
The term (as I understand it) came from the name of a ham who was a great helper and instructor. His name was Elmer. Frankly I prefer the term "mentor" which is self-explanatory to those not hep (or is it hip) on ham terms. It always makes me think of Elmer Fudd. The term I really hate is "newbie". I thought at first someone was describing a "nubile ham" and cocked my ear. Novice is the correct term but its usage is clouded by a license class.
Drat
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by W5HTW on May 26, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
<<by K6BBC on May 25, 2004 I was lisenced in 68 and I never heard of the term Elmer or Elmering back then. It's a terrible image for us.
K6BBC>>
I heard the term before that, well before that, probably at least five or six years before that.
Those of us who used to read Popular Mechanics became familiar with Gus, the fictional (I think!) mechanic who had a short story about him in each issue, resolving some problem with a vehicle. Popular Electronics had a similar story each month, involving a young boy or maybe two boys, who resolved problems in electronics. "Elmer" appeared in various short stories as a fictional older ham who assisted younger, newer hams, but I don't recall it being a regular thing, but more sporadic.
I fail to see how it is a negative image for ham radio unless to some specific individual who has in his/her past someone really named Elmer who was not a pleasant person. In that case, it could certainly be a painful reminder of some days from one's youth. Of course, it ISN'T a negative image for the majority of hams, so it's probably a moot point anyway.
"Elmer" was a complimentary term regarding the more experienced ham who helped those with less experience. I don't recall the name, though, being used in conjunction with my own "Elmer" until a few years after he had helped me and many others get into this hobby. Now, in retrospect, I speak of him as my Elmer.
The origin of the term has never particularly bothered me or been important to me. Too many guesses on the web (which is full of everyone's garbage) that contradict each other make it really difficult to figure out the truth, so I don't bother. Nor do I care. Still, I wonder if it could actually be from the word "Elder" as a term of respect? For me, I have been a mentor, an "Elmer", an instructor, a teacher, a guide, and perhaps other mentoring definitions as well.
All of it was good.
Ed
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by LA4RT on May 27, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I was licensed in 1974, dropped out of ham radio in the early eighties. Living in Norway, I didn't speak regularly with U.S. hams, but I did read QST, CQ, 73 and Ham Radio magazine when I came across them. I can't remember the term 'Elmer'. So if it existed back then,
it probably wasn't the "can't miss it", "all over the place" term it is now.
73
Jon Kåre
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by KC8VWM on May 28, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
>>> I was lisenced in 68 and I never heard of the term Elmer or Elmering back then. <<<
K6BBC,
Rod Newkirk, W9BRD (also licensed as VA3ZBB) is credited with being the first to use the term "Elmer". He was the DX editor of QST magazine from 1948 to 1978.
The term "Elmer" first appeared in QST in a March 1971 "How's DX" column.
More information about the term "Elmer" can be found at:
http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2000/05/05/1/
73
Charles - KC8VWM
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by KC8VWM on May 28, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
It is VERY, VERY interesting to note that when I was a child attending school in Ontario, Canada during the 1970's, I clearly remember the term "Elmer" was used as a public relations effort by several law enforcement agencies.
In Canada, "Elmer" was depicted as a "friendly" mascot that regularly informed and "guided" children about the "do's & dont's" to keep children safe in thier communities. "Elmer" was primarily used as "teaching symbol" for Children like myself back in the early 1970's.
"Elmer" was often shown on local public service TV spots, and posters of "Elmer" graced the walls in public schools I attended.
I find it rather interesting that the Amateur Radio editor of QST magazine also holds a "Canadian" issued callsign from the same province of Ontario where "Elmer" happened to have started at the same time he wrote the DX spot articles for the magazine.
I feel STRONGLY that perhaps there is a correlation here as the magazine columnist may have at one time attended a Canadian school and carried the "teaching elmer" over into the Amateur Radio community.
See what Canada's Children's "Training Elmer" of the 1970's looked like for yourself and YOU decide!
http://www.safety-council.org/info/child/elmer/elstory.htm
73
Charles - KC8VWM
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by KC9FQM on May 30, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I am reading about the bad light that the term "Elmer" puts us in, and about the inappropriate use of the term "newbie". I am constrained to say, "lighten up, already" If my name were Elmer, I would be offended by some of the comments denigrating the use of that term to refer to a mentor or helper. I had a great uncle by marriage whose name was Elmer and I always thought as much of him as of my other similar relatives.
I am also of a very different opinion about the use of the term "newbie". The call sign KC9FQM was awarded to me about 1961 or 1962. It showed that I had passed the qualifying exams for a eneral Class license before an FCC examiner. This was in Anchorage, Alaska while I was stationed as a fully qualified Communications Officer with the US Air Force at Elmendorf AFB. Unfortunately I did not have any idea what I wanted to do in amateur radio, and I did not have an Elmer and had never heard the name used as mentor. My license (as well as my First Phone with ship radar endorsement) lapsed and eventually it was too late to renew them.
About the first of this year I decided to see if I still "had it". In February I passed elements 1, 2, and 3 and received the call sign KC9FQM as a General Class operator again! That lasted a bit over a month when I passed element 4 and received the call sign AB9IW. Now I am an Amateur Extra class operator. It took another month before I obtained any equipment, but I bought from a fellow ham a used Yaesu VX5R, and have used it most days since. That man was to a degree and Elmer, and I certainly am a Newbie. I really am not a novice. I was a novice in communications when I started, and even when I completed the Air Force Ground Communications Officer School at Scott AFB (class 22064). But after competing a career in the Air Force with the majrity of it in some form of communicatios, I am not a novice communicator. I was a both a novice and a newbie in missile operatios when I started in the Minuteman System in 1963 or 1964, but after that tour of duty I word a Senior Missileman badge. No longer a novice or a newbie. When I returned to Amateur Radio this year, I was in no way a novice, at least in my lexicon, but I am certainly a newbie to amateur operating.
Yes, words have meanings, and dictionaries are generally desctiptive, but different disciplines have their own specific language or jargon.
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by KC9FQM on May 30, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Oops! I said I was awarded KC9FQM in 1961 or 1962. That is in error. I was awarded WA9CMI at that time.
Gene
|
|   |
|
RE: Your Elmer May Have the Best Plan!
|
|
|
by K6BZ on May 20, 2006
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
>and few amateur radio shacks have the necessry equipment to work on this technology.
I guess you're not referring to our eyesight :(
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Other Editorial Articles
Project 'Take Back 146.52'
|