NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:
from
The ARRL Letter, Vol 23, No 22
on
May 29, 2004
Website:
http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!
NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Acting
Administrator Michael Gallagher says his agency's complete Phase 2
broadband over power line (BPL) study is targeted for release later this
year. In remarks May 17 at the United Telecom Council's "Telecom 2004,"
Gallagher hinted at some findings in the Phase 2 study, which NTIA says
will provide "additional guidance" on contending with BPL interference.
The NTIA advised against putting the present FCC rule making proceeding on
hold until release of its full Phase 2 report, however.
"Key Phase 2 technical analyses have been completed," Gallagher told the
UTC gathering, "and the findings are appended to NTIA's comments on
proposed rules." The NTIA has posted its Phase 1 BPL study on the
proceeding, ET Docket 04-37, and has indicated to the FCC that it will
file its comments on or about May 28.
Responsible for developing telecommunications policy for a White House
that's promoting BPL, as well as for administering federal government
radio spectrum that could be affected by the technology, the NTIA finds
itself with a stake in both sides of the BPL controversy.
The principal concern, Gallagher acknowledged, is that BPL systems might
interfere with federal government and other radio services. The NTIA's
Phase 1 study showed that interference risks already are high under
existing Part 15 rules. Among its recommendations for reducing
interference were frequency shifting and notching as well as "refined
compliance measurement procedures."
Gallagher says the NTIA's Phase 2 study has determined that BPL
aggregation (ie, total emissions from multiple BPL systems) and
ionospheric propagation "is not a potential near-term problem." The agency
predicts that millions of BPL devices can be deployed under the rules the
FCC is expected to adopt--probably later this year--before ionospheric
propagation and aggregate BPL emissions become an interference issue.
ARRL CEO David Sumner, K1ZZ, says he's curious to hear the NTIA
rationalize its "near-term" assertion. "Does this mean it's okay to go
ahead with a bad idea if the problems it causes are sufficiently far in
the future?" he asked.
The Phase 2 study also will evaluate the effectiveness of proposed Part 15
measurement techniques and recommend a "height-correction factor" of 5 dB
to BPL measurements made at a height of 1 meter, Gallagher said. The NTIA
acknowledges that peak field strength is as much as 20 dB higher--a factor
of 100--than the peak measured at a height of 1 meter under current Part
15 rules. Because the peak does not occur consistently at a particular
distance from a BPL device along the power line, the NTIA will advise
requiring a peak field strength measurement search along the entire power
line at a distance of 10 meters and at a height of 1 meter.
The agency has determined that a moderate-to-high probability of
interference exists to a fixed station from BPL power lines at a distance
of 450 meters--approximately 1480 feet--and to a mobile station at a
distance of 55 meters--approximately 180 feet.
To "fulfill special protection requirements," Gallagher said, the NTIA
will suggest "minimal" coordination areas--where a specified authority
would coordinate all planned BPL deployment--plus excluded bands and
exclusion zones. The NTIA recommends "voluntary coordination" with respect
to other radio operations plus "mandatory Access BPL power control,
frequency agility and shut-off capabilities" to reduce interference risks
and to expedite interference mitigation.
The NTIA further proposes that BPL rules provide for "prompt response to
complaints of suspected interference," recasting the FCC's Part 15
shutdown requirement as "a last resort."
"Our BPL study of more than 10 million signal samples shows that solutions
exist to all identified BPL technical issues," Gallagher concluded.
That's true, Sumner said, "but only if you include shutting a BPL system
off and keeping it off as a 'solution.'"
During a White House meeting May 20, ARRL officials asked the Bush
administration to heed its own NTIA experts and back away from its support
of BPL. The League also has called on the FCC to put its BPL proceeding on
hold to allow more thorough research of its interference potential.
For additional information, visit the "Broadband Over Power Line (BPL) and
Amateur Radio"
http://www.arrl.org/bpl page on the ARRL Web site.
Source:
The ARRL Letter
Vol. 23, No. 22
May 28, 2004
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:
|
|
|
by WA4ET on May 29, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
More Double speak on BPL. Sounds like more slight of hang by the administration to back their political agenda, to give free internet to the disenfranchized poor, at the expense of many other radio services.
DAvid
|
|   |
|
RE: NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:
|
|
|
by KG5JJ on May 29, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
A bit myopic in the NTIA's assessment. No avenue for the "long-term" RFI problem during the next solar max and its enhanced world-wide propagation?
Brilliant. It's not a problem until it becomes a problem. Nice forward thinking modus operandi.
BPL proponents will likely consider the "no near-term" propagation problem scenario as "happy, happy talk".
Frankly, I wonder how long it will take before the heavy-hitters against BPL will fall like bowling-pins when confronted with the power of political money.
Just a skeptic's observations...
...73 KG5JJ (Mike)
|
|   |
|
RE: NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:
|
|
|
by N3HKN on May 31, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
You can make money from BLP now! Get a group togther that assembles some facts to oppose BPL and create a web site. Some mailing to Congress and BPL lobbyists (bag-men) will be at your door with cash to shut you up.
I would be willing to wager that one of the early draft reports shows that BPL is a menance. However, key managers were probably bribed to water it down. Watch how many of these crooked slime pick up jobs in the industry when they leave government - with a fat pension.
Dick N3HKN
|
|   |
|
RE: NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:
|
|
|
by W1RFI on June 2, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
> You can make money from BLP now! Get a group togther
> that assembles some facts to oppose BPL and create a
> web site. Some mailing to Congress and BPL lobbyists
> (bag-men) will be at your door with cash to shut you
> up.
ARRL and www.gobpl.com both have web pages that oppose BPL. Neither has had any offers of big bucks to shut them up. Neither have any of the overseas anti-BPL sites, to my knowledge.
Can you provide any examples of your theory, or at least explain why it doesn't apply to the sites that are on the web right now?
Ed Hare, W1RFI
|
|   |
|
NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:
|
|
|
by WB1FPA on June 2, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
____How interesting that BPL should jam over-the-air television on the very frequencies that propagate best (TV channels 2-6) in rural areas. I mean, BPL cannot compete with cable in already equipped high speed areas (unless of course the fees are offset with monies collected from power users???). So it is for rural areas right? Just where TV 2-6 would have been entertainment. Progress, right? It seems to me that its been a long time since spectrum use was truly doled out in the 'public interest'.
____Follow the money
|
|   |
|
RE: NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:
|
|
|
by K0VJ on June 2, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Dick, that sounds like a plan. It reminds me of a line from an old Dire Straits tune - Money for nothin' and your chicks for free. What's the URL for your website so that we can archive all the good info before the money men knock on your door and shut you down with a big, fat payment?
Rick KØVJ
|
|   |
|
NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:
|
|
|
by AE1X on June 10, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Come now friends. What do you expect? The White House has publicly endorsed BPL and indicated that regulations must be changed accomodate it. How much clearer do you want it? BPL will become a reality. Regulations will be changed. I'm just surprised at this moment that the FCC has not decided to close this discussion early based on the President's statement alone and issued the needed changes on its own motion. Besides, the FCC OET has filed its comments and NTIA has filed their's. The record is now complete. What more needs to be said that has not been said already in the NOI and this NPRM? Be sure to file your comments, but remember this is not a democratic exercise nor a regulatory exercise. This, in fact, is a purely political exercise. The results have been pre-ordained by the Executive Branch and it is this branch of government that administers the budgets of both agencies.
Ken, AE1X
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Related News & Articles
After The Dust Settles What's Left?
League Files Opposition to BPL Reconsideration Petitions:
Texas BPL Initiative Dead; Antenna Bill Exempts Amateur Radio:
IARU Eyes Global Coordination of Amateur Radio's BPL/EMC Response:
Public BPL Database Access Restrictions Removed:
Other News Articles
Amateur Radio Grants Help Bob Jones Set Up Station:
11-Meter Radio Mast Gets Thumbs Up from Planners:
Attorney: City Plan Violates Law:
Middle School Looks to Start Ham Radio Club:
Mile High Radio Club Connects the Mountain:
|