eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Speak Out
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:

from The ARRL Letter, Vol 23, No 22 on May 29, 2004
Website: http://www.arrl.org/
View comments about this article!

NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:

National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Acting Administrator Michael Gallagher says his agency's complete Phase 2 broadband over power line (BPL) study is targeted for release later this year. In remarks May 17 at the United Telecom Council's "Telecom 2004," Gallagher hinted at some findings in the Phase 2 study, which NTIA says will provide "additional guidance" on contending with BPL interference. The NTIA advised against putting the present FCC rule making proceeding on hold until release of its full Phase 2 report, however.

"Key Phase 2 technical analyses have been completed," Gallagher told the UTC gathering, "and the findings are appended to NTIA's comments on proposed rules." The NTIA has posted its Phase 1 BPL study on the proceeding, ET Docket 04-37, and has indicated to the FCC that it will file its comments on or about May 28.

Responsible for developing telecommunications policy for a White House that's promoting BPL, as well as for administering federal government radio spectrum that could be affected by the technology, the NTIA finds itself with a stake in both sides of the BPL controversy.

The principal concern, Gallagher acknowledged, is that BPL systems might interfere with federal government and other radio services. The NTIA's Phase 1 study showed that interference risks already are high under existing Part 15 rules. Among its recommendations for reducing interference were frequency shifting and notching as well as "refined compliance measurement procedures."

Gallagher says the NTIA's Phase 2 study has determined that BPL aggregation (ie, total emissions from multiple BPL systems) and ionospheric propagation "is not a potential near-term problem." The agency predicts that millions of BPL devices can be deployed under the rules the FCC is expected to adopt--probably later this year--before ionospheric propagation and aggregate BPL emissions become an interference issue.

ARRL CEO David Sumner, K1ZZ, says he's curious to hear the NTIA rationalize its "near-term" assertion. "Does this mean it's okay to go ahead with a bad idea if the problems it causes are sufficiently far in the future?" he asked.

The Phase 2 study also will evaluate the effectiveness of proposed Part 15 measurement techniques and recommend a "height-correction factor" of 5 dB to BPL measurements made at a height of 1 meter, Gallagher said. The NTIA acknowledges that peak field strength is as much as 20 dB higher--a factor of 100--than the peak measured at a height of 1 meter under current Part 15 rules. Because the peak does not occur consistently at a particular distance from a BPL device along the power line, the NTIA will advise requiring a peak field strength measurement search along the entire power line at a distance of 10 meters and at a height of 1 meter.

The agency has determined that a moderate-to-high probability of interference exists to a fixed station from BPL power lines at a distance of 450 meters--approximately 1480 feet--and to a mobile station at a distance of 55 meters--approximately 180 feet.

To "fulfill special protection requirements," Gallagher said, the NTIA will suggest "minimal" coordination areas--where a specified authority would coordinate all planned BPL deployment--plus excluded bands and exclusion zones. The NTIA recommends "voluntary coordination" with respect to other radio operations plus "mandatory Access BPL power control, frequency agility and shut-off capabilities" to reduce interference risks and to expedite interference mitigation.

The NTIA further proposes that BPL rules provide for "prompt response to complaints of suspected interference," recasting the FCC's Part 15 shutdown requirement as "a last resort."

"Our BPL study of more than 10 million signal samples shows that solutions exist to all identified BPL technical issues," Gallagher concluded.

That's true, Sumner said, "but only if you include shutting a BPL system off and keeping it off as a 'solution.'"

During a White House meeting May 20, ARRL officials asked the Bush administration to heed its own NTIA experts and back away from its support of BPL. The League also has called on the FCC to put its BPL proceeding on hold to allow more thorough research of its interference potential.

For additional information, visit the "Broadband Over Power Line (BPL) and Amateur Radio" http://www.arrl.org/bpl page on the ARRL Web site.

Source:

The ARRL Letter Vol. 23, No. 22 May 28, 2004

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:  
by WA4ET on May 29, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
More Double speak on BPL. Sounds like more slight of hang by the administration to back their political agenda, to give free internet to the disenfranchized poor, at the expense of many other radio services.

DAvid
 
RE: NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:  
by KG5JJ on May 29, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
A bit myopic in the NTIA's assessment. No avenue for the "long-term" RFI problem during the next solar max and its enhanced world-wide propagation?

Brilliant. It's not a problem until it becomes a problem. Nice forward thinking modus operandi.

BPL proponents will likely consider the "no near-term" propagation problem scenario as "happy, happy talk".

Frankly, I wonder how long it will take before the heavy-hitters against BPL will fall like bowling-pins when confronted with the power of political money.

Just a skeptic's observations...

...73 KG5JJ (Mike)
 
RE: NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:  
by N3HKN on May 31, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
You can make money from BLP now! Get a group togther that assembles some facts to oppose BPL and create a web site. Some mailing to Congress and BPL lobbyists (bag-men) will be at your door with cash to shut you up.

I would be willing to wager that one of the early draft reports shows that BPL is a menance. However, key managers were probably bribed to water it down. Watch how many of these crooked slime pick up jobs in the industry when they leave government - with a fat pension.
Dick N3HKN
 
RE: NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:  
by W1RFI on June 2, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
> You can make money from BLP now! Get a group togther
> that assembles some facts to oppose BPL and create a
> web site. Some mailing to Congress and BPL lobbyists
> (bag-men) will be at your door with cash to shut you
> up.

ARRL and www.gobpl.com both have web pages that oppose BPL. Neither has had any offers of big bucks to shut them up. Neither have any of the overseas anti-BPL sites, to my knowledge.

Can you provide any examples of your theory, or at least explain why it doesn't apply to the sites that are on the web right now?

Ed Hare, W1RFI


 
NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:  
by WB1FPA on June 2, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
____How interesting that BPL should jam over-the-air television on the very frequencies that propagate best (TV channels 2-6) in rural areas. I mean, BPL cannot compete with cable in already equipped high speed areas (unless of course the fees are offset with monies collected from power users???). So it is for rural areas right? Just where TV 2-6 would have been entertainment. Progress, right? It seems to me that its been a long time since spectrum use was truly doled out in the 'public interest'.
____Follow the money
 
RE: NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:  
by K0VJ on June 2, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
Dick, that sounds like a plan. It reminds me of a line from an old Dire Straits tune - Money for nothin' and your chicks for free. What's the URL for your website so that we can archive all the good info before the money men knock on your door and shut you down with a big, fat payment?

Rick KØVJ
 
NTIA Tips Hand on its Additional BPL Findings:  
by AE1X on June 10, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
Come now friends. What do you expect? The White House has publicly endorsed BPL and indicated that regulations must be changed accomodate it. How much clearer do you want it? BPL will become a reality. Regulations will be changed. I'm just surprised at this moment that the FCC has not decided to close this discussion early based on the President's statement alone and issued the needed changes on its own motion. Besides, the FCC OET has filed its comments and NTIA has filed their's. The record is now complete. What more needs to be said that has not been said already in the NOI and this NPRM? Be sure to file your comments, but remember this is not a democratic exercise nor a regulatory exercise. This, in fact, is a purely political exercise. The results have been pre-ordained by the Executive Branch and it is this branch of government that administers the budgets of both agencies.

Ken, AE1X
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
After The Dust Settles What's Left?
League Files Opposition to BPL Reconsideration Petitions:
Texas BPL Initiative Dead; Antenna Bill Exempts Amateur Radio:
IARU Eyes Global Coordination of Amateur Radio's BPL/EMC Response:
Public BPL Database Access Restrictions Removed:


Other News Articles
Amateur Radio Grants Help Bob Jones Set Up Station:
11-Meter Radio Mast Gets Thumbs Up from Planners:
Attorney: City Plan Violates Law:
Middle School Looks to Start Ham Radio Club:
Mile High Radio Club Connects the Mountain: