FCC Issues $7,000 NAL for CB Amplifiers:
from
The FCC
on
June 11, 2004
Website:
http://www.fcc.gov
View comments about this article!
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554
In the Matter of )
) File No. EB-03-DT-120
Paladen Communications, Inc. )
a/k/a CB Shop ) NAL/Acct. No.
200432360003
)
North Jackson, Ohio ) FRN: 0010 6809 40
)
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE
Released: May 27, 2004
By the District Director, Detroit Office, Northeast Region,
Enforcement Bureau:
I. INTRODUCTION
·
1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
("NAL"), we find that Paladen Communications, Inc. a/k/a CB Shop
(``Paladen''), has apparently violated Section 302(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended1 (``the Act''), and
Sections 2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Commission's Rules
(``Rules'')2 by offering for sale Citizens Band (``CB'') external
radio frequency power amplifiers (``linears''). We conclude that
Paladen is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of
seven thousand dollars ($7,000).
II. BACKGROUND
2. On July 24, 2003, agents from the Detroit Office
visited Paladen at 12274 Mahoning Avenue, Suite 14, North
Jackson, Ohio. During this visit, the agents observed a Palomar
Deluxe Modulator DX-55V CB linear on sale for $250. The agents
informed Arthur Dundorf and Preston Dundorf of Paladen, that CB
linears could not be legally sold. As a result of their
findings, the Detroit Office issued them a Citation on October
31, 2003. The Citation informed Paladen of the violations and
penalties that could be imposed for selling linears. The Detroit
Office received a reply from Paladen, signed by Preston L.
Dundorf, proprietor. He wrote that they were unaware that they
were violating marketing rules and that they would not violate
the rules in the future.
3. On January 9, 2004, the Detroit Office received a
complaint that Paladen was continuing to violate the Commission's
marketing rules by selling CB linear amplifiers. As a result of
this new report, an agent traveled to North Jackson, Ohio to
determine if Paladen was continuing to sell CB linears. On
February 24, 2004, a sales person for Paladen offered to sell the
agent a Palomar 100 watt linear amplifier for $124.00.
III. DISCUSSION
4. Section 302 of the Act authorizes the Commission to
regulate equipment capable of emitting radio frequency energy
that may cause interference to radio communications. The Act
further states that ``[n]o person shall manufacture, import,
sell, offer for sale, or ship devices or home electronic
equipment and systems, or use devices, which fail to comply with
regulations promulgated pursuant to this section. Section
2.815(b) of the Rules states that ``...no person shall
manufacture, sell or lease, offer for sale or lease (including
advertising for sale or lease), or import, ship, or distribute
for the purpose of selling or leasing or offering for sale or
lease, any external radio frequency power amplifier or amplifier
kit capable of operation on any frequency or frequencies between
24 and 35 MHZ.''3 Section 2.815(c) of the rules states ``No
person shall manufacture, sell or lease (including advertising
for sale or lease) or import, ship or distribute for the purpose
of selling or leasing or offering for sale or lease, any external
radio frequency power amplifier or amplifier kit capable of
operation on any frequency or frequencies below 144 MHz unless
the amplifier has received a grant of type acceptance...''
Paladen was repeatedly warned, verbally and in writing, about the
penalties for selling CB linear amplifiers, yet, they continued
to sell them in violation of Section 302 of the Act4 and Sections
2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Rules.
5. Based on the evidence before us, we find that Paladen
willfully5 and repeatedly6 violated Section 302 of the Act and
Sections 2.815(b) and 2.815(c) of the Rules by offering for sale
CB linear amplifiers on February 24, 2004. The Commission's
Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the
Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, 12 FCC Rcd 17087,
17113 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303(1999) (``Forfeiture
Policy Statement'')7, sets the base forfeiture amount for
importation or marketing of unauthorized equipment at seven
thousand dollars ($7,000). In assessing the monetary forfeiture
amount, we must take into account the statutory factors set forth
in Section 503(b)(2)(D) of the Act.8 These factors include the
nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation, and
with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any
history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters
as justice may require. Applying the Forfeiture Policy
Statement, statutory factors and the inflation adjustments to the
base amount of Paladen's violation of $7,000 for marketing
unauthorized equipment, we find no compelling evidence to support
any adjustments to the base forfeiture amount. Thus, we believe
that a forfeiture amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) is
warranted.
IV. ORDERING CLAUSES
6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section
503(b)9 of the Act and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the
Rules10, Paladen Communications a/k/a CB Shop, is hereby
NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the
amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for willful and
repeated violation of Section 302(b) of the Act and Sections
2.815(b) and 2,815(c) of the Rules.
7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 1.80 of
the Rules, within thirty (30) days of the release date of this
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY, Paladen, SHALL PAY the full amount
of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement
seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture.
8. Payment of the forfeiture may be made by mailing a
check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal
Communications Commission, to the Forfeiture Collection Section,
Finance Branch, Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box
73482, Chicago, Illinois 60673-7482. The payment should note the
NAL/Acct. No. 200432360003, FRN: 0010 6809 40.
9. The response, if any, must be mailed to Federal
Communications Commission, Detroit Office, 24897 Hathaway Street,
Farmington Hills, MI 48335-1552, and MUST INCLUDE THE NAL/Acct.
No. 200432360003.
10. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling
a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless
the petitioner submits: (1) federal tax returns for the most
recent three-year period; (2) financial statements prepared
according to generally accepted accounting practices (``GAAP'');
or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation that
accurately reflects the petitioner's current financial status.
Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the
basis for the claim by reference to the financial documentation
submitted.
11. Requests for payment of the full amount of this Notice
of Apparent Liability under an installment plan should be sent
to: Chief, Revenue and Receivables Operations Group, 445 12th
Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.11
12. Under the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Pub L. No. 107-198, 116 Stat. 729 (June 28, 2002), the FCC is
engaged in a two-year tracking process regarding the size of
entities involved in forfeitures. If you qualify as a small
entity and if you wish to be treated as a small entity for
tracking purposes, please so certify to us within thirty (30)
days of this NAL, either in your response to the NAL or in a
separate filing to be sent to the Federal Communications
Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division,
445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Your
certification should indicate whether you, including your parent
entity and its subsidiaries, meet one of the definitions set
forth in the list provided by the FCC's Office of Communications
Business Opportunities (OCBO) set forth in Attachment A of this
Notice of Apparent Liability. This information will be used for
tracking purposes only. Your response or failure to respond to
this question will have no effect on your rights and
responsibilities pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications
Act. If you have questions regarding any of the information
contained in Attachment A, please contact OCBO at (202) 418-0990.
13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this NOTICE OF APPARENT
LIABILITY shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt
Requested, to Paladen Communications a/k/a CB Shop, 12274
Mahoning Avenue, Suite 14, North Jackson, Ohio 44451.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
James A. Bridgewater
District Director
Detroit Office
Attachment A - FCC List of Small Entities, October 2002.
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
|
FCC Issues $7,000 NAL for CB Amplifiers:
|
|
|
by N6KEK on June 11, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Please Paladin don't make us cry crocdile tears " We didn't know we we're violating rules and won't do it again"...
When you operate a business you better know what your limitations are in that regard. What if Paladin had dumped a highly dangerous carcinagen like PCB containing parts by the side of the raod because they didn't want to pay the cost of proper disposal and 100's of people came down with cancer. Would the just shrug their shoulders and say they same thing.
Paladin and all of the others selling these known illegal amps in this way is not legal and they just don't give a crap. Hurray for me and to hell with everbody else in their mantra.
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Issues $7,000 NAL for CB Amplifiers:
|
|
|
by AB5XZ on June 11, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
There are still a few CB amplifiers for sale on eBay. I counted 5 of them last night - one was a non-working tube-type for parts.
The rules are a-changing, though.
It will still be illegal for a CBer to use an amplifier in the US, but it won't be illegal for a manufacturer to import a ham amplifier that goes to full output with 5 watts drive.
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Issues $7,000 NAL for CB Amplifiers:
|
|
|
by WR8D on June 12, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I'd love to hear what kind of lie copper comes up with when they knock on their door. Way to go FCC! Just keep the ball rolling!
73
John, WR8D
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Issues $7,000 NAL for CB Amplifiers:
|
|
|
by KB3LFC on June 13, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Not only are illegal CB amps a problem but so are radios that operate outside of authorized frequency limits. Many CB shops either sell radios that will operate (transmit) on unauthorized frequencies or will modifiy existing radios to do so.
Years ago I worked in a CB shop and recall several humorous indicents involving (very good hearted but misled)truckers who wanted to "talk ham." One poor fellow brought in a Yeasu HF rig and swore up and down that Yeasu Radios were "no good." I asked him why he thought so and he replied, "...they all keep blowing the #@&*! finals!"
As it turned out this chap bought an HF rig so he could "talk ham." Of course he didn't have an amateur license, but that didn't seenm to matter. I asked what kind of antenna he was using and he replied that he was using a "Penetrator." I tried to explain that his problem was not the radio but most likely an out of sight SWR.
"No sir," he shot back. Pointing to the SWR meter he said, "See that? I got it turned clear down to zero. So don't tell me its the SWRs."
Well...OK! :)
KB3LFC
Tom Mitchell
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Issues $7,000 NAL for CB Amplifiers:
|
|
|
by WR8D on June 13, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Hi Hi Hi, you're killing me Tom. Just about the same exact thing has happened to me. From your wording i kind of figure you found out fast that you can't explain not one thing to any of them either. They already know it all.
Thanks for the laugh! 73
John
|
|   |
|
RE: FCC Issues $7,000 NAL for CB Amplifiers:
|
|
|
by KR4WM on June 17, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I began my electronics hobby at a very young age, around 6 years old (1964). I graduated to shortwave eventually, and began listening worldwide. That sure was a lot of fun, and quite a novelty to someone who had only watched an old black and white TV or listened to "newfangled" FM radio! When I was about 14, I bought a Radio Shack Mini-23 CB and a gutter mount antenna. I had absolutely no concept of a tuned antenna! I raised someone who was a couple of blocks away who told me I needed a better antenna. I went out and bought a Radio Shack 3-element beam, and laid it carefully on the metal roof of the mobile home I was living in at the time. The guy then told me to put it up on a pole and it would work much better.... DUH! The next thing he told me was to put the mast in a bucket of water, and that would make it work even better! Naive young me- yes, I did it all! Eventually I found knowledgable help and was on the air "proper". I learned as much as I could by reading, and what I couldn't find printed information on, I sought help from people who seemed nice and had great signals. Eventually I studied electronics after high school and got a degree, and whaddaya know, now I'm one of those who helps others learn the material right the first time! (But I never make 'em jump through the hoops I had to!). Just hook the newbies onto a short leash and show them the right way to do things. Hopefully they'll come around...
I can just see that guy Tom mentioned "adjusting his SWR's down to zero"!!! <GRIN>
Last Field Day I worked 5 stations QRP/Solar power at 1-1/2 watts to get the QRP endorsement for my club. Best contact was Canada (from South Carolina). You don't need an amp to make fun contacts, just perseverance and a good antenna (I made the last contact just as everyone was folding up to leave the site!).
73 all,-KR4WM
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Other News Articles
Antenna Rules on Dixon Agenda:
The New Frontier for School Radio:
New Vice Directors in Central, Roanoke Divisions:
New Amateur Radio Web Site Launches:
Announcing Railroad Depots on the Air:
|