eHam.net - Amateur Radio (Ham Radio) Community

Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net


QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     



[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

FCC Denies Request for SSB in VHF CW SubBands

from W1AW Bulletin / ARRL on July 6, 2000
Website: http://www.arrl.org
View comments about this article!

QST de W1AW 
ARRL Bulletin 28  ARLB028
From ARRL Headquarters 
Newington CT  July 6, 2000
To all radio amateurs

FCC says ''no'' to SSB, digital modes in VHF CW subbands

The FCC has turned down a request asking it to permit SSB and
digital modes in the 6 and 2-meter CW-only subbands. The petition,
filed last August by the California Six Meter Club, was assigned
rulemaking number RM-9806 by the FCC.

The CSMC said it requested the additional emission types because its
survey of weak-signal operations indicated that the segments were
hardly used. The club said most DX and weak signal work took place
on frequencies above the CW subbands.

In denying the request, the FCC said it did not believe the
requested revisions were necessary or had support of the amateur
community. The FCC concluded that authorizing additional emission
types in the 6-meter and 2-meter CW subbands ''could have an adverse
impact on the operating activities of other licensees.''
Additionally, the FCC said, CSMC did not show that any improvement
in communications capabilities would result if the 100 kHz of
spectrum was opened up for other emission types, which the FCC said
were ''adequately accommodated'' under present rules.

The FCC said it was ''not persuaded that there is a lack of spectrum
in the 6 and 2-meter amateur service bands for transmission of data
and phone emission types'' and concluded that any changes to the
rules were unnecessary.

The FCC action was released June 28.

Member Comments:
This article has expired. No more comments may be added.
 
Other Modes in CW Band ?  
by N5NJ on July 7, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
It sounds like this "California Six Meter Club" is a local chapter of the "No Code International" group. Their request has absolutely no basis in fact. The CW band from 50.0 to 50.1 is full of beacon stations that operate around the clock. The other night when 6 was wide open, this portion of 6 meters was so packed, the beacons were QRMing each other. What's wrong with using the other 3.9 MHz of 6M ?
 
FCC Denies Request for SSB in VHF CW SubBands  
by KA9FLX on June 27, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
Referencing N5NJ's comments - AMEN!!!

 
FCC Denies Request for SSB in VHF CW SubBands  
by KG4RUL on August 4, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
When the code requirement is inevitably dropped, I believe that the existing CW allocations in the band plan should be retained. However, if these bands are not regularly utilized (i.e. used other than contest periods), adjustments could be made in the future.

Now is the time for CW operators to speak out (key out is more accurate)!

Dennis
 
RE: FCC Denies Request for SSB in VHF CW SubBands  
by KG6JEV on August 18, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
And you'll get a resounding AMEN! from me, too!

73,

Steven/KG6JEV/4
 
RE: FCC Denies Request for SSB in VHF CW SubBands  
by N8ZUX on September 18, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
What do you expect from those in SIX Land ? trying to get a jump on things that probably will not change until the year 2525, probably by then but now that the RM has failed they are plain outta luck someone playing with the Band plan!!!
 
FCC Denies Request for SSB in VHF CW SubBands  
by WR8Y on December 19, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
N5NJ really said it all.

But just to re-inforce what's already been said: It's good to have a reasonably clear place to go for beacons.
 
RE: FCC Denies Request for SSB in VHF CW SubBands  
by KB2VXA on May 5, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
Hi all,

Since you need a space ship to get to 6 Land and a universal translator or babelfish once you do it's no wonder why such a proposal would come from there. Since the translator isn't programmed and the fish can't understand the La La Land (Valley) dielect we just put a sign along the Interstellar warning of a black hole.

Well, I'm off to visit my cousin on Alpha Prime so I'll see you again before you read this message.

73 de KB2VXA
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Other News Articles
Student Sends MIT Letter to Space:
Amateur Radio Club Talks to Hams Worldwide on Centennial:
New Communication Exhibit Helps Kids Get the Message:
Transmission of Images - No Internet, Satellite, Cable, or Cells Needed!
Deltona Youth Loves to Ham It Up on the Radio: