Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net

   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1] 2 Next   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Mobile seperation kits?  (Read 3259 times)
W4KVW
Member

Posts: 508




Ignore
« on: January 01, 2008, 03:05:31 PM »

Was wondering if others would be interested in buying MONO BAND FM mobile rigs with removable face plates & seperation cables if they were offered for sale?The MONO BAND FM rigs that you can purchase today do NOT have this feature stock or as an option.You must spend the EXTRA money for a DUAL,TRI,or QUAD band FM rig if you want a removable faceplate,even if you have NO NEED for the other bands.With todays smaller vehicles it would make for much simpler mounting just as with the multi band FM & the mini HF mobile rigs on the market today.The last MONO BAND rig I remember with a seperation kit was made in the late 1970's or early 1980's.I have a full size pickup but would love to have the option of simpler mouting options.Tell me what you think & we will see if others feel the way I do.MAYBE someone(Icom,Kenwood,Yaesu,ect.)will give it a try for TODAY's ham market if it appears it would be a BIG seller!

Clayton
W4KVW  
Logged
K0BG
Member

Posts: 9899


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2008, 04:47:56 PM »

Forget it!

If you had spent the amount of money the big three have, on market research and planning, you'd know there isn't a market for the proposed radio. If there was, you'd still see them on the market.

One question you might ask yourself is this; why is the largest selling mobile radio of all time, the Icom IC-706 (some 70,000 plus in its various iterations)? It is not a single band radio, and it costs much more than any single band radio. The answer should be obvious.

Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
Logged

N8EMR
Member

Posts: 235




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2008, 05:07:48 PM »

While a remote head mobile would be nice and I am betting pretty easy to adapt most current units. I would much prefer a "convertacom" type system. Take a small handheld and now put a docking station with it. Once docked  you get a mobile like remote head and high power RF dock. I dont just want amp I want a FUll blown mobile radio but use the computer guts and the low power RF front end from a handheld. Drop the HT in and your now a full function mobile
Logged
W4KVW
Member

Posts: 508




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2008, 07:49:04 PM »

Alan,just a couple of years ago I remember several times hearing it said that an HF rig with 6 meters is just NOT wanted nor would they sell since 6 meters is a DEAD band & a waste of time & money for modern gear!Guess those folks were WRONG since ONLY Kenwood was making such rigs for years(680/690 series).It's ONLY a "FORUM" of opinions of potential users & NOT an OFFICIAL survey! }:>)

Clayton
W4KVW
Logged
K0BG
Member

Posts: 9899


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2008, 06:35:56 AM »

Let's don't be naive here; everything, including amateur radio products, are market driven. Yes, I agree there are nitch markets, but when it comes to mass production, supply will always meet demand. No demand, no market!

For example, Gary's suggestion sounds like a good one on the surface, but based on personal experience with American Radio, it won't sell in enough numbers to make it profitable. At least in the mass market.
This fact is one reason there are so many amateur-related, small companies making nitch market products.

Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
Logged

N8EMR
Member

Posts: 235




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2008, 10:32:19 AM »

Alan,
I think my design would be a big hit if  if you could get a standard interface between vendors. I still not convinced a single vendor product wouldnt work. I think it would need to created for multi generation handhelds and have a universal interface for talking between the handheld and the rf dock. Most ham have handhelds, many have mobiles/base. Why do I need to program 3 different radio channels and tones. Program a base RF unit and then plug it into the mobile or base docking station for the power and easy to use dials.
Logged
KA1MDA
Member

Posts: 543




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2008, 03:08:26 PM »

"everything, including amateur radio products, are market driven"

If that's the case, it's only a matter of time until the 2 meter / 11 meter dual band rigs show up.

KA1MDA
www.ka1mda.org
Logged
N6JRZ
Member

Posts: 26




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2008, 08:37:51 PM »

Wheather there is a demand or not, I think a mono band w/separation kit rig is a great idear. Perhaps one of the big wigs from one of the big radio producers, Icom, Kenwood, etc etc read these forums and think about it!!!!! Apparently it would make some amatuers happy,me included!!!!
Logged
K4NFG
Member

Posts: 45




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2008, 09:01:28 PM »

Excellent idea, I definitely would have bought one.
Logged
W3LK
Member

Posts: 5639




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: January 02, 2008, 09:01:31 PM »

<< Wheather there is a demand or not, I think a mono band w/separation kit rig is a great idear. >>

Whether it is a good "idear" or not is immaterial. The cost to bring it to market is probably prohibitive.

I am amazed how many hams have so little knowledge of what is necessary to bring a product to market, especially such a small market as ours. Sad

73,

Lon - W3LK
Naugatuck, Connecticut
Logged

A smoking section in a restaurant makes as much sense as a peeing section in a swimming pool.
K0BG
Member

Posts: 9899


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2008, 06:16:38 AM »

Gary, from late 1979 through Spring 1981, I worked for American Radio Corp., based in Aurora, CO. I designed the exact device you're asking for. It was built to interface with the then, very popular Kenwood TR-2200 handheld. You might not be familiar with the unit, but the interface connections were on the side, not the bottom like the similar Motorola unit aimed at the public service market.

The tray the radio laid on had a special 3M tape developed for the purpose. The power amp was based around a CRC VHF FET (Please note, this was (1979), and put out 25 watts. The audio amp was a full 5 watts RMS. It was called the ARC220.

The first production run was 25 units. I still have one production unit, and the original prototype in my possession.

Kenwood had sold nearly 10,000 of them, and you'd think you could sell a few of the units. All told, HRO sold 18, and the rest were almost given away. The investment was nearly $20,000 in 1979 dollars, and with an MSRP of $129, it would have taken hundreds to recoup the investment.

At about the same time, Icom introduced their new handheld. It was half the size, half the weight, put out nearly twice the power, and cost less. In order to adapt the unit would have cost another $8,000 or so.

The only amateur product ARC built that went anywhere was the deviation meter. We sold about 100 of those at $49 each MSRP. I don't remember how much the design cost was, but I'm sure it was never recouped.

There are companies making money on the amateur nitch market (actually amateur radio is already a nitch market). MFJ is a very good example. However, in order to compete, the quality has to be on the dull edge (certainly not cutting edge). Or, the selling price has to be very high.

As for a universal interface; Motorola tried to do just that. At about the same time, Icom, Midland, Uniden, and a few others started after the public service market. After Harris bought GE two-way radio division, they closed it. They weren't about to buy the market like had been GE doing.

As Lon alluded to, there is much more to bringing a product to the mass market than meets the common eye. Part of the misconception comes from applying an MFJ-style nitch marketing technique, to mass marketing. With some apologies to Samuel Clemens, "The twain shall never meet".

Alan, KØBG
www.k0bg.com
Logged

W3LK
Member

Posts: 5639




Ignore
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2008, 11:35:04 AM »

<< With some apologies to Samuel Clemens, "The twain shall never meet". >>

You owe him a BIG apology for that one!!! Smiley

73,

Lon - W3LK
Naugatuck, Connecticut
Logged

A smoking section in a restaurant makes as much sense as a peeing section in a swimming pool.
N5EAT
Member

Posts: 175




Ignore
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2008, 03:38:11 PM »

The cost to bring a single band rig with control head would be negligible.  The technology is over 15 years old and could be fitted easily into single band radios.

Logged
W3LK
Member

Posts: 5639




Ignore
« Reply #13 on: January 03, 2008, 04:10:12 PM »

Are you going to pay the setup and tooling cost for an assembly line?

Have an idea how many would have to be sold to get a return on the investment?

It's not that simple.

73,

Lon - W3LK
Naugatuck, Connecticut
Logged

A smoking section in a restaurant makes as much sense as a peeing section in a swimming pool.
KE5OFO
Member

Posts: 75




Ignore
« Reply #14 on: January 14, 2008, 08:23:10 AM »

I agree with N8EMR on the convertacom idea.  I would love that myslef  I have a couple of Moto HT's that I wouldn't mind picking up a conbertacom for.  I am also working on just buiding a sort of docking unit for my FT-470 with a custom drop in bay and a dual band brick amp.  The only thing is that you have to conntect cables for the antenna and the mic/speaker.  

Kerry
KE5OFO
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Next   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!