100 wpm, why did you implement it, it is purposely made for 100 wpm max speed.
That is correct, it is intentionally done that way. You have to draw the line somewhere, so why not at 100 ?
The target audience is highly unlikely to ever want to copy more than 8 characters per second.
It is not that ridiculously high, as you say, DJ1YFK listens to e-books converted to that speed in an MP3 file.
I'm quite sure that if DJ1YFK wants me to improve Just Learn Morse Code for his use, he will send me an email.
Better you also implement MP3 recordings, instead of WAV files, that are uncompressed and huge in size, special with 22050 16 bit samples/s, as you implemented, when 8000 samples/s 8 bit per sample are for Morse code recordings perfect.
Creation of MP3 files is patented. I do not steal other people's intellectual property.
At $5 or more per user, paying for it is not an option for software that is given away for free, either.
There is plenty of software that will convert your audio files between various formats with minimal user effort. Surely a smart guy like you can manage to do that ?
G4FON produces also MP3.
Maybe he's rich.
You can use the open source LAME encoder.
The LAME encoder is there to shift the responsibility for stealing to the end users. I think facilitating theft is wrong.
My comment about the leading and trailing edges is the detection of a BUG
Nope. The sound generation is a result of research and conscious choice. The waveform looks exactly like intended.
It is not to justify to mention anybody in this forum an anonymous coward
When somebody acts like you do in here, without revealing who he is, he is a coward and he is anonymous.