Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net

   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1] 2 Next   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: DXers K3  (Read 3861 times)
EI2GLB
Member

Posts: 498




Ignore
« on: March 19, 2013, 07:13:04 PM »

Hi All

Not strictly a DX topic but I will chance it,

I hope to buy a K3 in the Autumn, I have some stuff in the shack not being used that If I sell and put some cash to it I should be ok to get a decent spec K3.

I know that the are popular with DXers so can you tell me what would be a good spec'd K3 for a DXer I do all modes,

I can't Afford a fully loaded K3 so I will not be considering the P3 at this time, but every other option is open to me,

I have a HEX beam at 70ft and a 40/30m Rotary Dipole at 60ft, So I am happy with my Antennas for the time being.

I will keep my PRO2 for RTTY Contesting.

Thanks
Trevor
EI2GLB
Logged
W6UX
Member

Posts: 97


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2013, 08:45:53 PM »

My initial build had these options:

2.7 kHz 5-pole, 1.8 kHz 8-pole, 400 Hz 8-pole filters
DVR for voice macros (great for saving the throat)
100w amp
Interal tuner
The I/O board (a must for a good digital setup)
0.5ppm TXCO

That setup got me from 0 to DXCC with a multiband dipole.

I just added the following (3 years later):

Sub receiver with matching filters
General coverage module
6 kHz AM filter
P3 Panadapter

For digital modes I'd recommend a Signalink or Microkeyer II (great for FSK RTTY).

If you buy used, try to get a late model (2010 or later) as Elecraft made some board revisions that incorporate needed hardware mods for certain modules such as the sub receiver.  I got mine in March 2010 and haven't had to do any mods.
Logged
K2MK
Member

Posts: 396




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2013, 04:06:54 AM »

Hi Trevor,

The K3 is a great RTTY rig. You will be able to sell your PRO2. Some people use external digital interfaces for RTTY but it is NOT required with the K3. The K3 can interface directly with your PC sound card with just 2 audio cables to produce AFSK RTTY.

73,
Mike K2MK
Logged
AD9DX
Member

Posts: 1484




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2013, 05:00:09 AM »

Trevor, I just bought a K3 last Saturday.  I have one of the older ones with the old DSP boards.  I will upgrade that and the other items eventually.  But I want to familiarize my self with the radio first.  I haven't had time to figure out the digi interface yet. I was hoping to do it last night but ended up working 18 hours yesterday. 


My rig had the 2.7 and the 400hz filters.  While honestly they are probably sufficient, I wouldn't mind getting the 1.8khz and the 250hz filters for contesting. 

If you are on the fence about Elecraft, I would say pull the trigger, while they are a bit intimidating at first they are really amazing to operate.   
Logged

EX, KC9TRM, KB9IRZ
KE8G
Member

Posts: 151




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2013, 05:06:25 AM »

Hi Trevor,
You will really enjoy the K3, it is a fantastic radio!

I am sure you will get 100 different answers from as many people.  It's all personal taste in operating habits. The great thing about a K3 is that it is modular, so you can add things to it as you get used to the radio.  It all doesn't have to be purchased right at the beginning.

My suggestion would be for you to join the Elecraft reflector and take a look through the archives.  Any question you can come up with has probably already been addressed there by folks who have operated K3s for years.  The added benefit of the reflector is that Wayne & Eric, owners/developers of the K3, join in and you get the answers "straight from the horses mouth!"

Take your time, research and you will be a very happy radio operator with a new K3!

73 de Jim - KE8G
Logged
VK3HJ
Member

Posts: 618




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2013, 05:36:42 AM »

The first time I touched a K3, it bit me!
This was in Vanuatu the year before last, and the owner was using an adaptor on his power supply plug that did not connect the earth pin through. As a consequence, there was around 80 vac on the case, and paddle. I don't think I actually made any Q's that time!
The receiver is superb, and easy on the ears.
I was visiting friends in Brisbane last year, and again sat in front of a K3. This one was properly grounded and I very quickly found my way around the controls and started making contacts.
I've never used a K3 on SSB, but it seems the transmit audio needs some setting up. I've heard some awful sounding SSB transmissions from recent DXpeditions. I'm sure they would sound very nice when set up properly.
K3 operators rave about their rigs, so that is probably the best recommendation.
A 100 W PA and narrow CW filter would be a must have for a DX rig.
Don't sell your existing rig. If for some reason you are not able to use your sole transceiver, you are off the air.
73,
Luke VK3HJ
Logged
N3QE
Member

Posts: 2220




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2013, 06:13:39 AM »

I will keep my PRO2 for RTTY Contesting.

I know of at least two major multi-multi RTTY contest stations that have converted entirely to K3's at all positions. Is it the panadaptor display that you would keep it, or computer interface details (FSK keyline?) , or Huh
Logged
IK0OZD
Member

Posts: 127




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2013, 07:00:24 AM »

    
I had a 4 year, K3
placed near many large caliber radio
5000 FT, IC 7800, ORION etc etc etc etc eyc,
the most comprehensive radio that you can ever have,
in ssb orion was better in selectivity,
is the radio that has it all!
serves 8 cw filter poles, for dx serves second receiver,
for rtty serves nothing
with the p3 + svga is a fantastic weapon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueom6SiGs48
After 4 years I sold for ts 990

73
Tony IK0OZD
Logged
KY6R
Member

Posts: 3191


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2013, 08:19:44 AM »

I have the full K-Line and its the best setup I've ever had. I've had the K-3 for 3 years, and P3, KPA-500 and KAT-500 for just months.

Everyone has their list of priorities, feature wise - read on what everyone says and choose what suits you. I concentrated on a narrow filter for CW and SSB and the Aux RX port for my K9AY loops.

Photo on my QRZ.COM page.

I use the Kenwood TS-590s as a backup rig - and for the money its a darn good radio, but I hardly ever use it - because the K3 fits like a glove for my DX-ing "style". I am mostly CW, but think the K3 is fine on SSB.
Logged
WX2S
Member

Posts: 735




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2013, 10:03:51 AM »

My initial build had these options:

2.7 kHz 5-pole, 1.8 kHz 8-pole, 400 Hz 8-pole filters
DVR for voice macros (great for saving the throat)
100w amp
Interal tuner
The I/O board (a must for a good digital setup)
0.5ppm TXCO

That setup got me from 0 to DXCC with a multiband dipole.
My $0.02:

Unless you want to use digital modes, you could skip the TCXO.

The DVR is only useful if you're working a lot of SSB or contesting on SSB.

If you're working a lot of CW, I'd add the 250-Hz filter.

The subreceiver is great for pileups, especially if you don't have a panadapter.

73,
- WX2S.
Logged

73, - Steve WX2S.
I subscribe to the DX Code of Conduct. http://dx-code.org/
IK0OZD
Member

Posts: 127




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: March 20, 2013, 11:21:15 AM »

   
I had a 4 year, K3
placed near many large caliber radio
5000 FT, IC 7800, ORION etc etc etc etc eyc,
the most comprehensive radio that you can ever have,
in ssb orion was better in selectivity,
is the radio that has it all!
need  8 pole cw filter , 500 Hz is ok , for dx second receiver is much better ,
 the 2nd receiver is the best second receiver much much much better respect orion ,for rtty is fantastic need only k3 utility software ,
with the p3 + svga is a fantastic weapon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueom6SiGs48
After 4 years I sold for ts 990

73
Tony IK0OZD
,.
Logged
EI2GLB
Member

Posts: 498




Ignore
« Reply #11 on: March 29, 2013, 01:16:11 PM »

Thanks for all the replies,

I have a few months to get the perfect configuration to suit my needs

Trevor
EI2GLB
Logged
EI2GLB
Member

Posts: 498




Ignore
« Reply #12 on: April 27, 2013, 10:01:21 PM »

Hi All

Sorry to keep digging up this thread,

Here is my current plan for my K3

Anyone have any ideas on how I might improve it.

I don't want to go over $4k if possible,

I can't see the need for the general coverage board as I don't do much SWL'ing anymore.

I also only went with one filter for the sub RX as I think that should be ok with the stock 2,7K SSB Filter.

K3 spec               
               
K3/100   K3 100W Xcvr. (Modular Kit)   $2099.95   ea.   1   $2,099.95
KAT3   K3 ATU (Modular Kit)   $299.95   ea.   1   $299.95
KDVR3   K3 Dig. Voice Recorder   $139.95   ea.   1   $139.95
KRX3   K3 2nd RX (Kit)   $599.95   ea.   1   $599.95
KXV3A   K3 RX Ant, IF Out & Xvrtr Intf.   $119.95   ea.   1   $119.95
                              
Filters               
               
KFL3A-2.1K   K3 2.1 kHz, 8 pole filter   $139.95   ea.   1   $139.95
KFL3A-250   K3 250 Hz, 8 pole filter   $139.95   ea.   1   $139.95
               
KFL3A-400   K3 400 Hz, 8 pole filter   $139.95   ea.   2   $279.90
                              
               
            Total   $3,819.55


Thanks
Trevor
EI2GLB
Logged
WX2S
Member

Posts: 735




Ignore
« Reply #13 on: April 28, 2013, 03:37:14 AM »

Consider swapping the DVR for another filter the Sub.

73,
Wx2s.
Logged

73, - Steve WX2S.
I subscribe to the DX Code of Conduct. http://dx-code.org/
NI0C
Member

Posts: 2406




Ignore
« Reply #14 on: April 28, 2013, 08:27:40 AM »

Trevor,
Although I have both the 400 Hz and 250 Hz 8-pole filters in my K3 (as well as the 700 Hz 8-pole and 200 Hz 5-pole), most people would advise against getting both of those. 

Here's why--
If you compare the filter response curves ( http://www.elecraft.com/K3/K3_filter_plots.htm  ) you will find that the actual bandwidth of the 250 Hz filter is 370 Hz, while the actual bandwidth of the 400 Hz filter is 435 Hz.  These are at the -6 dB points; the -60 dB bandwidths are 785 Hz and 935 Hz, respectively.  Thus, there is little difference between the two filters.

This seems to be one of the dirty little secrets about narrow CW crystal roofing filters-- the bandwidths aren't always what they claim to be.  I think it is difficult to manufacture such very high-Q multi-pole crystal filters. 

So, if you're getting only two CW filters, I'd recommend getting the "250" and something much wider (700 Hz or even 1KHz), or if you like very narrow filters, get the 400 Hz and 200 Hz.

73,
Chuck  NI0C
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Next   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!