Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net

donate to eham
   Home   Help Search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: KA4WJA/R, 146.97, Voted "Best" (non-linked) repeater in "4" Call Area...  (Read 108253 times)
KA4WJA
Member

Posts: 893




Ignore
« on: July 16, 2014, 09:54:12 AM »

Hello to all,
I returned from out-of-town last week, just in time for my scheduled semi-annual preventative maintenance on the repeaters at the tower site.
After finishing things up, and returning the repeaters to regular use, I was greeted with the usual thanks/appreciation, etc. and then something different....

A few of the guys on the 146.97 (KA4WJA/R) said that they weren't surprised that we were voted "the best repeater in the number 4 call area".....and as I inquired what this was all about, everyone said that there was a nation-wide vote, ranking repeaters in the 10 different call areas, in 5 different categories (apparently separate lists for "linked" systems and "un-linked repeaters")...

My first thought was "cool"....and then I thought maybe this was one of my friends playing a joke on me, but sitting across the dinner table from a few of them showed me that this was no joke...

It was explained to me that repeaters were ranked (from 0.0 thru 10.0) in five different categories, with a maximum score of 50.
The Categories:
A)  "Friendliest" to all (old-timers and novices)...
B)  "Most Reliable"....
C)  "Easiest" to use...
D)  "Coverage area"...
E)  "Technical Expertise" of the owners/clubs/licensees...

And, in the "unlinked repeater" list, we received a score of 50!!

This is not surprising to me....
a)  as I've always made it clear that although I don't use the repeater much, everyone is welcome (and actually had my syth. voice ID say "All are welcome" for many years!)
b)  high-quality components, regularly maintained, with both battery back-up and automatic generator power (as well as redundant / back-up equipment)...all of which is needed when on a tall tower in central Florida (aka "the lightning capital of the world"!)
c)  simple COR, open to all, no-CTCSS, long-time coordinated as a wide-area coverage repeater, no squelch-tail issues....upgraded a decade ago to voice-ID, time, etc...
d)  antennas at ~ 1100' AGL (above-ground-level), standing off > 10' from the tower, fed with 7/8", from 100+ watt PA's, and modern low-noise / limited-bandwidth receivers, thru precisely tuned BP/BR duplexers...
e)  owners' average number of years in RF engineering / RF systems : 35+ years each...

In addition to the many local users in our coverage area, with the tower a few miles from one of the only two Interstate Highways running N/S in the state, a few miles from other main highways, and only 60 miles from the other Interstate Highway, we get a LOT of travelers using the .97 machine, many of whom are heading to/from Disney World / Universal / Busch Gardens, etc. and/or to/from Cruise Ship docks, etc....
Late at night, truckers can use it for QSO's lasting two hours as they transit thru....and we even have a train engineer who calls in on many late nights as he drives a train "more than a mile long" at highway speeds...
And, with the "local" folks representing a wide cross-section of society / diversity...there is usually always someone to talk to to about something!!!


Now, I'm completely flattered and humbled by the ranking....but I cannot find the website that did this...
So, my question is:
Does anyone know the URL of the site, so I can pass on my thanks to all of them?


Thanks!

73,
John,  KA4WJA
Logged
K2LGO
Member

Posts: 165




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2014, 05:04:54 PM »

Well I don't know who nominated you, but I tip my hat to you and your operating ethics...I try to force myself to reply to any stranger who might wander to our very underused repeater...I hope a lot of old timers, and newbe's alike will take a lesson from you....BOB
Logged
KA4WJA
Member

Posts: 893




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2014, 01:24:39 PM »

Bob,
Well, I still don't know either....maybe we'll never know...
But, thanks for the kind words...
Well I don't know who nominated you, but I tip my hat to you and your operating ethics...I try to force myself to reply to any stranger who might wander to our very underused repeater...I hope a lot of old timers, and newbe's alike will take a lesson from you....BOB
And, thanks for doing what you do as well!!

When I remember back to my teenage years and even then, finding many of the oldtimers unable or unwilling to help, and now 35 - 40 years later realizing that I (and many of my ham friends) are now the "oldtimers", it makes me really try to be there to help novices along....
(just a hour or two ago, I explained on-the-air to a newer ham, how he needn't worry about his malfunctioning antenna analyzer, as he could still test his antenna with his rig and his swr meter, using low power on an empty/dead band he could test 10m and 15m late at night and maybe even find a time when 20m wasn't open...nobody ever explained that to him before, everyone else just told him he "had to buy this, or that...")


Again, Bob, thanks for all you do as well...

And, BTW, speaking of websites...here are two....the first one was put together by a friend of mine to help out the local ham community and the second one was a link e-mailed to me recently by someone that thought it might be the site I was looking for (but it wasn't)..

http://www.146970.com/

http://www.repeaterbook.com/repeaters/details.php?state_id=12&ID=9561#sthash.crnBvw2S.dpbs



73,
John,  KA4WJA
Logged
KA4WJA
Member

Posts: 893




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2015, 02:21:26 PM »

Okay, it's been a year, and I'm having dinner tonight with some friends....and one of them said he might have a line on that site!  Woo Hoo!!!
So, maybe by tomorrow I'll have the actual website to post the link for!

Also, planning on a upgrade to the Fusion DR-1x....but concerned it won't be as good as my current VRX-7000...
Anyone that's changed out a 7000 for a DR-1x, please post your comments/advice!
Thanks!


73,
John,  KA4WJA
Logged
W2NAP
Member

Posts: 279




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2015, 08:01:14 PM »

Also, planning on a upgrade to the Fusion DR-1x....but concerned it won't be as good as my current VRX-7000...
Anyone that's changed out a 7000 for a DR-1x, please post your comments/advice!
Thanks!


73,
John,  KA4WJA


blah go DMR mototrbo, or stay ani and upgrade the 7k for a quantar.

hell if you want 2 mobiles in a box to call a repeater get 2 GM300's it be a load cheaper
Logged

I AM THE VOICE OF THE VOICELESS!
KA4WJA
Member

Posts: 893




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2015, 09:55:32 AM »

Tony,
Thanks for the advice...but...

But, I'm an analog guy!  
My VRX-7000 has been working fine for years, as well as the Cat-300xl controller!
And, with my antennas at > 1000' AGL, with flat and slightly down-sloping terrain, I've got a great system that I don't want to screw with!
 

Recently many friends have asked me to upgrade to an analog/digital system, and with Yaesu offering the DR-1x for $500, I bought one...
But, with the reports of mediocre performance and it being just two mobiles in a rack cabinet, I've been dragging my feet on installing it!


Thanks again.

73,
John,  KA4WJA
Logged
KD0WZW
Member

Posts: 53




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2015, 10:55:03 AM »

sounds like you have a pretty rock-star setup there, antenna at 1000'?  wow!

almost all repeaters made today are two mobiles in a cabinet.  The DR1X is no different, although the mobiles are heavily modified, they aren't just FTM-400's.   Having access to both FM and Fusion is a lot of fun.
Logged
W2NAP
Member

Posts: 279




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2015, 07:50:56 PM »

sounds like you have a pretty rock-star setup there, antenna at 1000'?  wow!

almost all repeaters made today are two mobiles in a cabinet.  The DR1X is no different, although the mobiles are heavily modified, they aren't just FTM-400's.   Having access to both FM and Fusion is a lot of fun.

if it can't do 100 watts at true 100% duty cycle, then to me it ain't worth it.

and Fusion imo is a waste, DMR/Mototrbo is going to win out on the digital battle.
Logged

I AM THE VOICE OF THE VOICELESS!
NO2A
Member

Posts: 1198




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: January 07, 2016, 12:50:17 PM »

They've had problems with the Yaesu /Fusion repeater in our area. It was doing funny things, we couldn't bring it up a few times. It appears it can't handle the 100%duty cycle like the previous poster said. Maybe a heat issue. Especially during long winded qso's.
Logged
KA4WJA
Member

Posts: 893




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: January 07, 2016, 02:07:03 PM »

Thank You!

Thanks to all of you!

In 40 years in RF, I still think my old GE Master II's were bullet-proof...
But, my current VRX-7000 is still going strong, and I'm thinking I'll keep the VR-1x as "back-up".  (I know that some friends will be upset, but I'm paying the bills, so for now I'm staying analog!)

73,

John,  KA4WJA
Logged
W2NAP
Member

Posts: 279




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2016, 09:14:59 AM »

They've had problems with the Yaesu /Fusion repeater in our area. It was doing funny things, we couldn't bring it up a few times. It appears it can't handle the 100%duty cycle like the previous poster said. Maybe a heat issue. Especially during long winded qso's.

its 2 mobiles in a box. so at its rated tpo it wont do 100% duty, have to turn the tpo way down.
Logged

I AM THE VOICE OF THE VOICELESS!
KA4WJA
Member

Posts: 893




Ignore
« Reply #11 on: April 17, 2017, 02:28:29 PM »

Okay, after spending the $500 for that DR-1x (and never taking it out of the box)....and still having excellent coverage with the venerable VRX-7000....I should know better than to even think of changing out to something new....

But, I've gotten some repeater users who are asking about the Yaesu DR-2x repeater....
I'm not really looking to spend the $$$$ on it (even it is a good unit), as I like the analog world, and am happy with the repeater we got now, but wondering if anyone has any insight into the new DR-2x??

{BTW, anyone want to know the thankless (and expensive) task of owning a decent coverage repeater....well, just know I'd almost rather talk politics on 75m!  Smiley }



Thanks for any info/insight into the DR-2x.

73,
John,  KA4WJA
Logged
N1LO
Member

Posts: 1101


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #12 on: May 16, 2017, 02:50:29 PM »

And W4HZL 145.370 was voted the best repeater in eastern Virginia !  Wink
Logged
KA4WJA
Member

Posts: 893




Ignore
« Reply #13 on: May 16, 2017, 02:58:29 PM »

Mark,
FB!  (awesome!) Smiley

But, does anyone have any info / reports on the Yaesu DR-2x repeater?

73,
John,  KA4WJA
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!