Title: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: KB3FFH on October 11, 2012, 11:26:39 AM Is it worth it to spend the extra money to purchase a 200 watt radio instead of a 100 watt radio? I think a 200 watt radio I saw was $600 more than the 100 watt version. Thanks Bill
Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: KE4YOG on October 11, 2012, 05:41:37 PM I use the TS480HX. I really enjoy the rig. I feel the extra 100 watts helps at times but I am not sure it is 600 dollars worth. I started with a Kenwood TS2000. I worked plenty of DX with it but the receive is so much on the 480. I would say spend the extra on antenna. I just looked at the 480 at AES. The difference for a new radio is 150.00 dollars. That would put 450.00 into antenna upgrade. Just my opinion.
Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: KH6AQ on October 11, 2012, 07:48:02 PM $600 will almost buy you a brand new Ameritron AL811 ($709 at DX Engineering), 600 watt amplifier.
Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: W8JX on October 11, 2012, 08:11:24 PM Is it worth it to spend the extra money to purchase a 200 watt radio instead of a 100 watt radio? I think a 200 watt radio I saw was $600 more than the 100 watt version. Thanks Bill What rigs you talking about? Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: W4DBV on October 13, 2012, 11:30:17 AM That depends upon whether half an "S" unit is worth the difference in price to you.
Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: VE3FMC on October 13, 2012, 12:09:06 PM $600 difference, what rig are you looking at?
In Canada I can buy the 200 watt version of the TS480 for $100 more than the 100 watt version. But as noted if the difference is $600 then buy a 100 watt radio and put that $600 into an amp and you will gain 500 + watts. Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: AG6WT on October 13, 2012, 01:22:52 PM $600 difference, what rig are you looking at? My guess is that Bill is looking at the FT2000 vs FT2000/D. The D model is the 200 watt model and costs about $600 USD more. Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: W6UV on October 15, 2012, 12:38:23 PM If you're into high duty cycle modes like RTTY, then a 200 watt rig will probably let you run at 100 watts all day long, while running a 100 watt rig at 100 watts may quickly overheat.
Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: KH6AQ on October 15, 2012, 12:59:45 PM If you're into high duty cycle modes like RTTY, then a 200 watt rig will probably let you run at 100 watts all day long, while running a 100 watt rig at 100 watts may quickly overheat. Cranking a 200 watt transmitter down to 100 watts does not decrease the power dissipated. It does cut the DCRF efficiency. The final amp might have a DC input power of 400 watts for 200 watts RF output and a DC input power of 300 watts for 100 watts RF output. In both cases the amplifier dissipates 200 watts. It's easy to test this by recording the DC input power to a transceiver as the RF output power is reduced. Subtract the receive current to obtain more realistic transmit current. Then calculate the DCRF efficiency and power dissipated. Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: WB8UHZ on October 15, 2012, 03:53:16 PM No you are only talking about 3db more in signal which is a half Sunit, the lowest amount noticeable at the receiving end to tell any difference. Save the money.
Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: W8JI on October 15, 2012, 08:21:53 PM I like 200W radios with AL1200 amplifiers, or 3500Z amplifiers. 100W radios are plenty for 8877 amplifiers.
In a linear amplifier when quiescent current is small compared to operating current, efficiency decreases by the square root of power change. Half the power is sqrt .5 = .707 of original efficiency. 1/4 the power is sqrt .25 = .5 of original eff. Let's say the input power is 400 watts for 200 watts out, 50% eff, linear stage, and negligible quiescent current. 400 input 200 output = 200W heat =50% eff 346.4 input 150 output =196.4 w heat = 43.3% 282.9 input 100 output =182.9W heat = 35.35% eff 200 input 50 output = 150W heat =25% eff Heat does not drop much in the PA with power reduction, but it does in the power supply! 1/4 the power is half the supply heat. Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: K3CXG on October 19, 2012, 11:49:55 AM If I were in your shoes, I'd get the 100 watt version, and spend the extra money on a good antenna. 200 vs. 100 isn't as important as how you launch your signal. If you're on some acreage out in Howard County, you might want to put up at least a small tower. I'm in a subdivision in Frederick County, with restrictions, so it's stealth all the way.
73, Mike K3CXG Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: KH6AQ on October 19, 2012, 01:39:04 PM KB3FFH, you must ask yourself these two questions:
If I buy the 100 watt radio will I regret not going for the 200 watt version? If I buy the 200 watt radio will I regret not going for the 100 watt version? Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: W6UV on October 19, 2012, 11:05:49 PM If you're into high duty cycle modes like RTTY, then a 200 watt rig will probably let you run at 100 watts all day long, while running a 100 watt rig at 100 watts may quickly overheat. Cranking a 200 watt transmitter down to 100 watts does not decrease the power dissipated. It does cut the DCRF efficiency. The final amp might have a DC input power of 400 watts for 200 watts RF output and a DC input power of 300 watts for 100 watts RF output. In both cases the amplifier dissipates 200 watts. Sure, power dissipated as heat isn't a linear function, so reducing power output from 200 watts to 100 watts won't cut dissipated power in half, but it's not going to dissipate the same amount of power as heat as at 200 watts out either. I know someone who ran a test with a 200 watt rig (an Icom IC7700). He ran it at 200 watts in RTTY into a dummy load and the the rig started cutting back power at 8 minutes into the test. When he reduced output to 100 watts, it never cut back the output power. So in this particular case, running at 100 watts output was enough of a reduction that the rig never needed to cut back power. Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: KH6AQ on October 20, 2012, 05:40:46 PM Can you test this with your radio? From the TX current at full and 1/2 power subtract the RX current. Calculate PA dissipation and post your results for another data point.
Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: WD4ELG on October 20, 2012, 10:18:35 PM I agree with K3CXG. See if you can improve the antenna first. Then, look for an amp...but one that takes you from 100 watts to something higher like 500 (Elecraft) or 750 (Tokyo High Power). These are more expensive than MFJ, but they are idiot proof (trust me on this, I have VERIFIED that the THP 1.2KfX is 100% idiot proof in my shack, and it is worth EVERY penny).
But I did not buy the amp until I had gotten the best antenna setup possible that my QTH would allow: Hex beam for HF OCF dipole 132 foot inverted L with remote tuner Receiving stealth beverages on the ground Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: KH6AQ on October 31, 2012, 05:57:37 AM The only 200 radios I am aware of are the FT2000D and the TS480HX.
The FT2000D, 200 watt radio at Ham Radio Outlet is $350 more than the 100 watt version. The TS480HX, 200 watt radio at Ham Radio Outlet is $130 more than the 100 watt version. How does this new information change the many answers given? Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: AI4HO on November 08, 2012, 06:39:32 PM I will side with the TS480HX side, I have had 2 of them..one as a base, worked lots of DX, my friend bugged me and in a weak moment sold it to him, was so disgusted with myself at being so weak, but a deal is a deal, and I let him have the radio. Had a Kenwood TS570D/G..100 watt rig, nice rig but it wasn't the 480HX. Sold the 570D/G, bought myself another TS480HX, used it as a secondary/backup rig for a while, then mounted it in my Ford Ranger, traded the Ranger off last year and got a 2011 Toyota Tundra double cab, my TS480HX is now in my Tundra..this is a great rig, has the Kenwood audio, receive is also excellent, installed a 1.8KHz SSB filter about a month ago, for even better receive. True..you are only going up half an S unit, but sometimes that half an S unit makes the difference. Base or mobile, ya can't beat Kenwoods TS480HX..just my observations, been a proud owner of the TS480HX for a total of6 years now, my current one I've had for 4 years, the savings as others have stated..put it into the best antenna you can at your QTH.
73 de Mark AI4HO Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: KH6AQ on November 09, 2012, 05:24:14 AM I bought a TS480HX for the car to replace the FT857. The TS480HX is much nicer and easier to use and the 200 watts does help. If I needed a new radio for the house I would seriously consider the TS480.
Title: RE: 100 or 200 watt radio Post by: W8JX on November 09, 2012, 06:46:35 AM The 480 a very fine rig in either version. Very user friendly too.
