|
|
|
2
|
eHam Forums / Emergency Communications / What are the required FEMA courses for emergency workers?
|
on: February 01, 2013, 11:52:52 PM
|
|
It's been a while since I was involved with radio. In the few years which I was, there were required FEMA courses for emergency response personnel. They were ICS 100, 200 and NIMS 700, 800. I have ICS-100 and I believe 200 but they've changed the lettering. Each of the courses have letters appended to the end of the course identifier. Which are the required courses as of current and are my previous course credits compatible with current standards?
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: New Ham Radio Book
|
on: November 28, 2012, 08:10:32 AM
|
The English grammar rules are there to be used by those that desire their works to be admired and given credit. After perusing over the first two paragraphs of his work, I too wondered how much credit could be attributed to the technical portion of his writings after noticing his terrible attempt at the use of English Grammar.
As he did, I too graduate from High School and after attending schools of higher learning for 9.5 years, I attained a Terminal Degree in Mathematics, which required writing a dissertation and defending it before a Major Professor and three of his collages. At one time, I did possess the skills to correctly write the English Language; but over the years of hearing the English Language “butchered” by the so-called educated, I too have become lax in my writings habits. However, I haven’t deteriorated so far in my old age so as to try to begin to understand your misuse of the rules of English grammar.
Just because you don’t ascribe to the current rules in writing the English language and follow the established rules of grammar that I will change enough to accept your kludge of words and their meaning.
Think about this, what would our "written word" look like today if everyone that were to write an article decided to use sentence structure that “Sounds Good to Him”, in the article he wrote. That is one of the main reasons that people don’t speak and write the English Language correctly is because they have heard it “butchered” to death by those that don’t know how to correctly use it.
I bid you the best of luck in your writings and that you attain whatever it is that you aspire to be.
http://captain.park.edu/jglauner/EN-ED325%20Online/Research%20Paper%20Sample/evolution_of_english_grammar.htm
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: New Ham Radio Book
|
on: November 17, 2012, 03:06:35 AM
|
A newspaper editor once said, "Apostrophes are like power tools; if you don't know how to properly use them, it's best to leave them alone."
Some quick rules: Apostrophes are not be used to warn readers that the next letter is going to be an "s." Too many times, even here on eHam, I've seen references to radio's, antenna's, power supply's, battery's, etc. The rule-of-thumb is that plurals don't need apostrophes, but they may sometimes need a different ending (e.g. power supplies, batteries).
Apostrophes are not used to designate possession for the words he, her, or it. It is his radio, her QTH, and its frequency range is ....
Apostrophes are frequently used to denote contractions, such as isn't (is not), can't (cannot), he's (he is or he was), we're (we are), you're (you are), and so forth.
Apostrophes are also used to denote possession by proper nouns (John's radio was a ---, Carla's call sign is...," "The FCC's stand on this is...."
So here's my suggestion; once you've written your article, have a proofreader or two check its grammar, and have an elmer or two verify its radio accuracy. Although you may be a klutz at wordsmanship, your proofreaders can make you look like a pro. GL
GL with the book.
Although I do believe there are too many situations in which I used apostrophes in this book, I stand by the legality of them all (excluding it <possessive>). I just used the find feature in my word processor to go through the entire document and find all apostrophes. All of them are used to represent either a possessive form of a word or a contraction. As far as it, he, and she. I've always hated that rule as far as it is concerned. He, she, and it are conjugated to form the possessive form of his, hers, and its. As with most other languages he, she, and it are conjugated together. At least in German, Esperanto, and Spanish. Though I could part with leaving his and hers in it's true conjugated form, I hate leaving its in that form. I don't know what it is about that word but I hate conjugating it to it's possessive. Though i understand the rule, I don't agree with it. One simple rule for a contraction and a possessive makes life o so much simpler. He's and she's doesn't sound right to me though so that is why I do conjugate them correctly. Other than it's, all the apostrophes appear to be legally correct in their parts of sentence, at least from where I'm standing. Who's talking about "legal"? We're trying to make some grammar corrections to make it look as if you care about what you write. As you stated in the very front of the manuscript, you've been away from school for a while. I'm almost 70 years old but I volunteer at a nearby elementary school three days a week and I make corrections and suggestions in cases such as this quite often. Just because the book is about "amateur" radio doesn't mean it can't look and sound "professional". I appreciate that and thank you for your suggestions. I will be taking them into consideration while I continue to write the book. I do acknowledge that I may use too many instances where apostrophes are needed. I look forward to other additions your keen eyes, and seasoned wisdom may offer in this piece of literature. However, you gave me a list of rules (which defines the legal use of apostrophes in the English language.) I was trying to tell you that I've only violated one of those rules and that it wasn't out of a mistake but out of personal preference. That is the conjugation of "it" to its possessive form. It drives me insane not to include an apostrophe in "its." Though "he", "she", and "it" follow the same grammar patterns in many languages, in English while "he" and "she" are changed to "his" and "her" to indicate possession, "it" retains its original spelling. This is why I cannot stand leaving out the apostrophe, as adding just an "s" to the end of any other word makes it plural and not possessive.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: New Ham Radio Book
|
on: November 16, 2012, 01:29:48 PM
|
What's the point of reading book if the author takes no responsibility for the content?
It's a concept from the software world. It's actually a fairly common concept in software development. Read up on the GNU GPL. Basically, I give you a knowledge of theory. What you do with that theory should not reflect upon me. I shouldn't get into trouble if you choose to misuse that knowledge. So to get around that, I deny everything. In the software world this is fair b/c you get to see the source code of the program you're about to run (under the GPL). So you agree that you know what the software does and upon running it you take full responsibility for it. In this instance, you see the text of the book. Therefore you can verify it with other sources. Also, being as I didn't charge anyone for the book this is the best way to nullify ALL lawsuits against it.
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: New Ham Radio Book
|
on: November 16, 2012, 07:23:11 AM
|
A newspaper editor once said, "Apostrophes are like power tools; if you don't know how to properly use them, it's best to leave them alone."
Some quick rules: Apostrophes are not be used to warn readers that the next letter is going to be an "s." Too many times, even here on eHam, I've seen references to radio's, antenna's, power supply's, battery's, etc. The rule-of-thumb is that plurals don't need apostrophes, but they may sometimes need a different ending (e.g. power supplies, batteries).
Apostrophes are not used to designate possession for the words he, her, or it. It is his radio, her QTH, and its frequency range is ....
Apostrophes are frequently used to denote contractions, such as isn't (is not), can't (cannot), he's (he is or he was), we're (we are), you're (you are), and so forth.
Apostrophes are also used to denote possession by proper nouns (John's radio was a ---, Carla's call sign is...," "The FCC's stand on this is...."
So here's my suggestion; once you've written your article, have a proofreader or two check its grammar, and have an elmer or two verify its radio accuracy. Although you may be a klutz at wordsmanship, your proofreaders can make you look like a pro. GL
GL with the book.
Although I do believe there are too many situations in which I used apostrophes in this book, I stand by the legality of them all (excluding it <possessive>). I just used the find feature in my word processor to go through the entire document and find all apostrophes. All of them are used to represent either a possessive form of a word or a contraction. As far as it, he, and she. I've always hated that rule as far as it is concerned. He, she, and it are conjugated to form the possessive form of his, hers, and its. As with most other languages he, she, and it are conjugated together. At least in German, Esperanto, and Spanish. Though I could part with leaving his and hers in it's true conjugated form, I hate leaving its in that form. I don't know what it is about that word but I hate conjugating it to it's possessive. Though i understand the rule, I don't agree with it. One simple rule for a contraction and a possessive makes life o so much simpler. He's and she's doesn't sound right to me though so that is why I do conjugate them correctly. Other than it's, all the apostrophes appear to be legally correct in their parts of sentence, at least from where I'm standing.
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / RE: Biking the USA
|
on: November 30, 2011, 12:51:13 PM
|
I do remember a fellow here in California a couple of years ago who did the bike ride across the USA, and he had a small trailer he pulled behind the bike. he did have ham radio along, and If I remember he has a solar panel on the trailer to give him power ( charged a battery) but I remember he also had to coordinate with local law enforcement, as you can't bike down the freeway. It is a doable task. but you need to try some "local" trips to get through then problems. He did take pictures and would usually get on every evening on hf to update the web page. I think he also found sponsors, but any how. good luck
Thank you soo much. I was hoping to get something attached to my wheel to generate power. I don't know if I could pull a trailor or not LOL. Anyone know a radio dealer who might lend me a 2M radio and means of power for the trip? I'm not going to be asking my sponsors to chip in until I actually plan the trip (which will be in the Summer) I just want to be prepared.
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / Biking the USA
|
on: November 30, 2011, 08:54:45 AM
|
|
Hey guys, In order to bring a spark to my boring life, I'm wanting to bike across the USA (from Kentucky to California and several stops in between; Niagra falls, Mount Rushmore, Twin Towers Memorial, Grand Canyon, Beverly Hills, White House) I'm looking for sponsors/employers who would hire me to take photos on my journey. I'm wanting to upload them to a blog so readers may enjoy a weekly update.
Here's what I'm planning to take with me: (Haven't bought it yet) Bicycle (obviously) Archos 43 tablet (it has wifi and a camera and it runs on Android) 2M Radio (I don't know what mounting supplies I'll need) $500 (probably on a paypal account card for safety reasons) Bluetooth GPS device for the Archos 43 (So I know where I am)
I'm planning on practicing in the country (steep hills and curvy roads) all Winter and then to take off on the first day of Spring. If you guys know of anything else I would need to add to this list or anything else I would need to take into consideration, please let me know. I also need some places to stay or crash while doing this if anyone is up for it or knows of anywhere. This would be my first time doing something like this (I bike all the time) so some advice on mounting my radio and some general dos and don'ts would very much be appreciated. Thanks for the support. 73 DE KI4JGT
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
eHam Forums / Emergency Communications / 11/9 National Emergency Response Test
|
on: October 27, 2011, 04:12:12 AM
|
|
I just casually glanced over the forums (haven't been here in a while) but I'm surprised that I didn't see this in any of the forums main categories. FEMA has declared a test of the president's ability to declare national emergency (as delegated to the director of FEMA) for 11/9 at 2PM EST. As a result, I know that all commercial broadcast stations are required to cease transmission. Are hams included in this? What about ARES, RACES, and MARS?
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
eHam Forums / HomeBrew / RE: Anyone want to develop a secured comms device?
|
on: September 14, 2011, 12:13:41 PM
|
|
Were the European embassy guys using exit nodes? If so, I've eliminated them. Take a look at Tor Hidden Services. It's how Wikileaks was first hosted. It keeps all the traffic in the Tor network, which has full gpg/pgp encryption until it reaches an exit node (websites can't use gpg/pgp, so the exit node must decrypt the connection and translate it to the site. This is where all the trouble is. Some exit nodes can not be trusted. The implant information, they steal information, they keep information from getting to it's destination. To avoid this, I'm keeping all connections within the network with hidden services. There will be no need for an exit node to decrypt the information, so there will be no way of the information getting out. Each hidden service gets it's own URL. This is how you can keep up with the IP of the users. Many Tor chat programs already use this technology. Then you move on to several other security risks associated with using this technology. . . impersonation for one. Sending IP for two. My application which has been placed over Tor, allows you take care of both of these problems and a few more.
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
eHam Forums / HomeBrew / RE: Anyone want to develop a secured comms device?
|
on: September 14, 2011, 05:23:24 AM
|
|
I already have a distributor who may be interested. Off the shelf will have to be postponed. I do have plans to port it to PC, Mac, Linux, Android and iOS later, but not right now. I want to make sure that it isn't able to interact with 3rd party apps. Meaning I would have to write my own keyboard for the program so a thirdparty app couldn't tap into the OS's main keyboard (hoping that's how it works anyway. Knowing Apple and Android, it'll probably be more complex). I'm going to allow Tor protocol to handle the crypto part. Lastly, I'm not using exit nodes. The entire system will be inside the network. Exit nodes present a very BIG vulnerability to the end user. For this reason they've been eliminated altogether.
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
eHam Forums / HomeBrew / RE: Anyone want to develop a secured comms device?
|
on: September 13, 2011, 09:13:08 PM
|
|
Thanks for the advice W5FYI. In some countries running the Tor client is illegal. China for example. They block EVERYTHING. Tor has been able to bypass this block for a long time. They hate it, so they fine ANYONE caught running it. My service is run on the Tor protocol (with some MAJOR changes to make it texting friendly.). As far as I'm aware, Tor is perfectly legal in the states though. It was developed by the U.S. military and the more people who use it, the more secure and unblockable it becomes. They need a lot of people to use it, so that it remains secure for them to operate. Like I said earlier, even hard core criminals use it.
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|