Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / VHF in 2004 Deville on: October 01, 2004, 07:12:10 AM
My dealer would not install a radio and believed that it might interfere with the car's computer.
(1) Does anyone have any experience with late model Devilles and VHF? Any issues?
(2) Does anyone know if there is power available in the trunk or would I need to run a power cord back to the battery. I understand that going directly to the battery is the preferred method, but if it works well, good. If not, I can always run a power cable.
2  eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / Mike display/control dual bander? on: September 19, 2004, 02:18:04 PM
Does anyone know of a 2/440 dual band fm rig for vehicle with a mike display of frequency/channel ? Yhis would really simplify installation.
3  eHam Forums / Digital / Efffective PSK31 Power Calculation on: April 22, 2002, 01:47:14 PM
The relationship between bandwidth and power, for fixed S/N, is fairly straightforward and is easy to derive from Shannon's work. That relationship is:

PWR ratio in dB = 10*log(B2/B1)
---where log is log base 10, B2, is the bandwidth of channel 2 [ssb ~2500] and B1 is the bandwidth of channel 1 [say, psk31~31.25].

3.125 Hz is interesting as many waterfalls I see show distinct 3rd IMD and even higher. I am assuming the transmitter is properly adjusted and linear.

To get the power invert the dB back to Power:

P2 = P1 * 10^(dB/10)

---where P2 will be the equivalent power to achieve the same S/N on channel 2 as P1 achieved on channel 1. dB is the dB you calculated in the first formula.

You do get figures similar to what are discussed in this email thread. In fairness to ssb, there is the potential for a lot more information in its bandwidth and there is also a relationship between signal levels and required bandwidth. It is these relationships and their consequences that were the core of Shannon's work.

It is important to remember that what Shannon was driving at was channel capacity in relationship to noise and your results may vary based upon band conditions. He assumed white [random] noise and that 1.5 KW station next door 3 Hz away produces different issues.

Hope this helps.

Rob WW6G
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!