Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14 Next
61  eHam Forums / Contesting / RE: LOOKING FOR CONTESTS OPERATORS on: October 27, 2010, 11:57:26 AM
Now we have reached the cloud with ham radio. They talk about cloud computing, this is cloud contesting..

WTG
62  eHam Forums / Digital / RE: West Mountain Radio - New Owners on: October 27, 2010, 11:04:07 AM
Dave sold about a month ago.... new company seems to be keeping quiet about the sale but continuing to produce products.
63  eHam Forums / Computers And Software / RE: DXbase on: October 18, 2010, 06:11:33 AM
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase

New owner on the list there
64  eHam Forums / Digital / RE: PK-232 MBX Terminal Program? on: October 13, 2010, 08:00:15 AM




Built in logbook: DD: Yes
                      WW:yes

WinWarbler also logs directly to the free DXKeeper, which provides award tracking, QSL printing, and LotW/eQSL synchronization as well as powerful QSO capture and log maintenance capabilities. Would you like to compare your application's logging capabilities with DXKeeper's one-on-one?

Radio Control    DD: Yes
                     WW: Requires another program

Yes, WinWarbler automatically interoperates with the free Commander; would you like to compare your application's transceiver control capabilities with Commander's one-on-one?



I've always promoted that the logbook and radio control in Digital Desktop was basic.  The design of DD is to be Host Mode terminal program for digital communciations, not a full blown logbook or full blow radio control. It's a full blown digital control program. Smiley
65  eHam Forums / Digital / RE: PK-232 MBX Terminal Program? on: October 12, 2010, 08:32:15 AM
Im the only one doing TNC software anymore and mine is the only one that works with Windows 7 32/64.

Not true! WinWarbler supports the PK232, and runs on 32-bit and 64-bit flavors of XP, Vista, and Windows 7. .

You can get the cross upgrade for $79.95 for Digital Desktop.

WinWarbler is free.

   73,

        Dave, AA6YQ

Dave,

Yours is a terminal mode app, mine is a host mode app.  Lets do some one on one comparisions. 

Modes: DD: CW, packet, RTTY, SSTV, ASCII, FEC, SIAM, ARQ and FEC Pactor and Amtor, MT63, PSK-31/63/125.
           WW: CW, Phone, RTTY, PSK-31/63/125

Host mode: DD: Yes
                WW: NO

Access to CMD: Prompt when xmitting:  DD:Yes
                                                      WW:NO

Can do soundcard RTTY and PK-232 RTTY at the same time: DD: NO
                                                                                  WW: Yes

Can run one TNC for Packet and another for digital modes at the same time: DD: Yes
                                                                                                       WW: No

Has waterfall for RTTY and others modes: DD: Yes
                                                        WW:Yes

Built in logbook: DD: Yes
                      WW:yes

Radio Control    DD: Yes
                     WW: Requires another program

Cost: DD: $99.95 new, $79.95 competitive upgrade, $49.95 upgrade
        WW: Free

Support:  DD: Phone, web, email
              WW: Web, email


As we've discussed before, you have a nice retirement from your days at Rose and IBM.  I'm 50 and have 17 more years to retire. Smiley


66  eHam Forums / Digital / RE: Kantronics KPC-3 on: October 01, 2010, 07:53:13 AM
Many EOC's are setting up packet networks in their area for EmComm as a backup to normal communication.  You also have APRS on 144.39 and you can do Packet to the ISS, as they have a BBS and digipeater on the space station.

EmComm Ops for Kantronics is a $29.95 piece of software for your TNC, and will work with Packet TNCs with version 5.0 or greater.

http://www.w4pcsoftware.com/Emcomm_Ops.html

Rick - W4PC
67  eHam Forums / Digital / RE: PK-232 MBX Terminal Program? on: September 29, 2010, 06:11:08 PM
Gary's XPWIN should still be available for download free from his webpage. I think I paid $75 for it when he was still supporting it. I never had a problem with the program running the PK-232 or the KAM thru WIN 98, ME,& XP. Airmail/Sailmail will also support the PK-232 and most likely will work with WIN7 as Jim keeps it current.

No DOS or 16 bit program will run under the 64 bit version of Windows 7, only 32 and 64 bit programs will run.
68  eHam Forums / Digital / RE: Kenwood ts-480 sat to my kantronics kam 98. on: September 24, 2010, 09:00:10 PM
Hello group!
I am wanting to hook up my Kenwood ts-480 sat to my kantronics kam 98. i cannot find any of the cables to the kam98. i think i cam figure out the power to it,but am not sure what i need. Is there a site where i can buy the all the cables? and i need help on how to connect it all and run in on my computer. i do understand computers.. haha
thanks for any help.
 Huh
73,
Danny
KB8VFA

Dan at Associated Radio
http://www.associatedradio.com

Rick - W4PC

http://www.cssincorp.com/ROC_Digital_Desktop.html
69  eHam Forums / Digital / RE: two sound cards with Windows XP SP3? on: September 24, 2010, 08:57:49 PM
alright cool.. My motherboard has a built-in sound card, with FRONT-Facing mic and speaker jacks which will be nice for ham stuff Smiley

then I can leave my good SB Audigy 3d sound card alone for the rest of multi-media stuff :>


Which radio do you have?
70  eHam Forums / Digital / RE: PK-232 MBX Terminal Program? on: September 24, 2010, 06:58:07 PM
Don,

Im the only one doing TNC software anymore and mine is the only one that works with Windows 7 32/64.  I also own the rights to Pakratt (which is on the 25th anniversary CD) and Im disappointed you took a pirated copy, since I do have it available again. (And to Mel, who gave it to you Sad  ). It is not pubic domain or freeware.

Im not a big company, just 3 of us, me myself and I. Smiley

Let me know what I can do for you.  You can get the cross upgrade for $79.95 for Digital Desktop. It's at http://www.cssincorp.com/cgi-bin/store/commerce.cgi?pid=36. As long as you have 12/93 firmware, you're good to go.  If you need upgrade firmware and hardware (soundcard interface, DSP, USB, etc), check with Timewave at http://www.timewave.com

Best

Rick - W4PC
71  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: What has happened to the 20 meter DX Window? on: September 21, 2010, 12:29:40 AM

A "few years ago"Huh??   How about 40 years ago....

We did not confuse it with the 75M DX window..

14.195 was the DX operating freq and occasionally   "Blackie's" listening freq.

If you don't know Blackie,  then you truly are a newbie to 20 SSB...

W6HLH, 10 KC wide signal on top of DX....

SK in 2005, got a warning in Jan 2005 before his death.
72  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: Bouvet Isle - 3Y on: August 30, 2010, 04:55:27 AM
Exactly Bob.  That story is pretty sobering.

Folks who complain should also read up on the exploits of Danny Weil, VP2VB as well as Dick McKercher, W0MLY, Gus Brwoning, W4BPD and all the DXpeditioners who risked life and limb in the post-war years (and beyond) put rare (and some not-so-rare, but difficult to get to) entities on the air.

Frank, W1NK

Has anyone written a book on these?  Seems that would be very interesting reading...
73  eHam Forums / Digital / RE: Any USA Telnet Packet BBS's ? on: August 26, 2010, 08:03:25 AM
which bulletins are you looking for?

oh and a google search turned up this.

http://db0lj.prgm.org/db0lj-tn_g.htm

and this

http://www.dmnet.ca/ve/hamtelnet.shtml

and this..

http://ve9dx.weblink.nbtel.net/telnet/sites.html

and so on......
74  eHam Forums / Misc / RE: QRZ.com site no longer on the internet on: August 25, 2010, 04:48:13 PM
QRZ is Fred LLoyd, one man, one administrator. He and his wife keep the site going, almost at a loss.

Met him in person the first time in Hunstville this year, but have spoke with him by phone and email many times.

Bought banner ads from him too (as well as eHam from a great SK guy, Bill Fisher, W4AN).

I keep saying hams expect the same level out of one person as they expect out of a Microsoft or Yahoo.  The market is tiny.  When I worked for MSN we had almost 1,000,000 in the first few months and the data center has LOTS of outages (continues to this day, almost 15 years later).

So if Microsoft can't keep their servers up as much as QRZ does, your expectations are too high.
75  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: "I got into a recent pissing contest over on EHAM" on: August 25, 2010, 12:02:04 PM
All of the recent effort has been towards the 1500 which has many bugs. The 5000a still has many bugs also but 5000a owners are not complaining like the newer 1500 owners. The old squeaking wheel gets the grease mentality....

So what else is new?

This is standard practice in the software industry. Very few development organizations have the discipline needed to wring all of the serious bugs out of their products before releasing them. There's just too much emphasis on features, features, features, and quality suffers as a result.

Another common practice, that also seems to have been adopted by Flex, is to use the user base as a QA organization through the release of thinly disguised alpha software that should never see the light of day outside of the development lab.

So you expect a company of 15 people to be able to have bug free software?  Even Microsoft with it's 32,000 people.. many of those are development and QA, can't even do that.  IBM can't do that. No company can do that, not even hardware companies.

Look at Yaesu, Kenwood, Icom, they all have issues and problems in hardware, as well as design flaws in the hardware.

Back in the early '90s, IBM had OEMed processor chips from Cyrix (now defunt), we couldnt figure out why PC-Mos was failing on only that processor until we put an ICE on it and found out there was a masking but error in the MICROCODE of the processor.  Bad code from IBM.  The big boys. (this was before they and MSFT split).

Do hams really expect small ham companies to be able to do things even the BIG companies cant do, which is bug free software AND get great service and low prices? Take Ford, GM, Toyota for example for hardware.  Toyota had a 'little' design flaw in the defective accelerator pedals.   

So why dont you apply to be their QA person? Which methodolgy would you use to QA the software and hardware? Do you know which model they are using for the software development cycle? Seems you could help them if you have done it before.

Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14 Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!