Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: Prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 40 Next
16  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: FU728F & 4CX1500B Question on: April 13, 2013, 08:30:07 PM
 FU728 has lousy IMD performance when compared to the 4cx1500B. The 4cx1500B was designed for linear SSB service and there is no Chinese or Russian tube that can beat the IMD performance of the 4cx1500.

Power for the sake  of powers sake without considering the IMD performance is best left to the CB band.

Driving a pair FU7828's to  the 5kw PEP output level is not acceptable practice since the IMD performance is so poor.

If you need 5kw PEP output for your VK license use a 3cx3000A7 which a linear tube designed for SSB linear service. The IMD performance is -44dbc more that 50% better than a pair of FU728's

When running output powers  of 5kw you certainly do want to make sure your tube and transmitter meets ITU standards. Unfortunately most ham equipment splatters as bad  as most CB equipment. Using ham transmitters
with poor IMD performance tubes like the FU728 is would be disaster for the ham bands. Very few hams own a spectrum analyzer  or SDR receiver that can monitor the IMD performance of their transmissions.

Practices such as ESSB and not using RF speech processing  with ham transceivers and when used with transceivers that have ALC design issues can make a mess of the ham bands.

To run the high 5kw power that you mention unfortunately most hams dont have the technical skills or ability to do so in a manner that is considered professional and considerate of other users of the ham bands.



About the FU-728F tetrode, the tube is bigger in height than the 4cx1500b and has far better cooling and this also allows for a higher PEP rating than the older Eimac 4cx1500B, and has also been tried and tested in these Emtron Amplifiers as the bases are the "4CX1500B bases", so no need to change the bases if you want to use 4CX1500B tubes but you will notice the PEP rating will drop quite dramatically.

Please note:  Yes these are the "4CX1500B Bases" not the FU-728F type so no need to change if using either.

Power using the Eimac 4cx1500B will be very noticeable as it is not in 10's of watts that it drops, it is in 100's of watts using the older Eimac 4CX1500B.

The FU-728F is far superior and a higher output than the older Eimac 4cx1500B and is more readily available but don't buy on eBay.

Emtron purchase from the factory direct re the FU-728F and will supply all Emtron owners if needed in the future.

If you check the all new Emtron Website and read up on the ranges and read about the FU-728F and the equivalent 4CX-1500B you will see that it plainly tells you that these tubes are interchangeable and what changes needed.

Here is an example from the DX-3SP range and take note on the FU-728F and 4CX1500B: 

The "Big Gun" is getting even bigger, with the new DX-3SP! With over 4000 Watts CW and more then 4500 Watts SSB, this QRO muscle amp is not a joke! It is an amplifier with gravitas capable of satisfying the serious and most fastidious station operator. All specifications and features, except output power, are the same all throughout the Emtron amplifier product range, and the DX-3SP comes complete with QSK module as standard. The design deploys two durable FU-728F tubes (improved Chinese mil-version of the 4CX1500B) in parallel, with a total plate dissipation of 3000 Watts, comfortably delivering the expected output power and durability. These robust FU728F tubes are manufactured in present production and are available directly from the manufacturer, or from Emtron, exclusively for Emtron amplifier owners. We believe that this new DX-3SP is physically the smallest 4000 Watt desktop RF amplifier on the market today, and the most popular as well.

Please note: This new DX-3SP comes with two FU-728B tubes, which are directly interchangeable with Eimac 4CX1500B tubes! Only the filament tap on the transformer must be changed from 9 volt to 6 volt, if Eimac tubes are used!


The above PEP rating is very conservative as tested into a Dummy Load of 50ohms and showing 5000watts yes 5000watts PEP.

So this Emtron DX-3SP is no slouch comparing to other brands that are much dearer and not as sophisticated nor with the same Engineering and Safety features as the emtron range of amplifiers.

Even the DX-2SP tested into a Dummy load of 50ohms gives a whopping 3000watts PEP.

I have been building my own 50ohm Dummy Loads for quite some time using Carborundum Resistors. The later one using 3 of 150ohm x 3000watts each with 450cub Mt's of forced air cooling, with a total of handling 9000watts of power. I have tested the above to the maximum into these loads.

Others using these High Power Emtron Amplifiers can agree with me on what you can use and do with these Superb Amplifiers that nobody and that is nobody has been able to match in Quality / Engineering / Safety Features along with Support for these highly sought after amplifiers.

I hope this sorts out the issue that some have about the different basses for the FU-728F and the Eimac 4CX1500B.

Check the all new Emtron Website for the latest information and all the new features:
http://www.emtron.com.au/

I welcome others inputs confirming what I have just written.

73's Chris
17  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Suggestions for a 100 Watt Class amplifier for a FLEX-1500? on: April 13, 2013, 08:19:18 PM
We should really be optimizing amplifiers for  optimum occupied bandwidth rather than  best 2 tone numbers.  A spectrum mask should be used under voice or white noise loading for minimizing higher order IMD products.
This is essentially what the ITU and FCC uses for their type acceptance standards.

There are  a number of ham transceivers with excellent 2 tone 3rd figure yet they could not even pass the FCC part80 marine standards because they have such lousy high order IMD suppression. The suppression of high
order IMD and problems like  ALC induced splatter overshoot is the issue that needs to be addressed in  ham transceiver design.  Even if we did have the perfect transceiver what point  would it be having such ideal equipment when we have hams who have every intention of using their CB equipment on the ham bands.

We have these idiotic practices now creeping into the ham service that causes massive amounts of interference. Badly adjusted  ESSB equipment and  the use of CB amplifiers  is a malaise  that is causing a lot of interference.
Its just unfortunate that these two bad operating practices seem to appeal to many new hams and CB'ers. ESSB as practiced today is the CB equivalent of running excessive microphone gain. CB'ers were at least smart enough to do it with equipment that was worth 50 dollars. ESSB users cause the same amount of splatter and do it with  equipment  worth 1000's of dollars.


I've done a lot of experimentation with homebrew HF amplifiers and, across all of the designs, one thing stands out. The higher the source drain voltage (or emitter collector) the cleaner the amplifier. I don't know the theory behind this but empirical results have shown that a 48V amplifier is a much better beast than a 12V one.

One other thing helps. About half of the amplifiers have a center tap on the output transformer and use this to feed the DC into the amp, this increases IMD by a small amount but reduces costs and PCB board space. A separate DC feed through a bifilar transformer is the only way to do it.

Tanakasan
18  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Suggestions for a 100 Watt Class amplifier for a FLEX-1500? on: April 13, 2013, 08:06:57 PM
Nah, I dont run away and hide and report deceptive 2 tone figures and tell people that the RM Italy Amps are fine.   Nor do i introduce  the amp has filters and its clean argument. Nobody is concerned about  harmonics because
all radios and amplifiers designed for the ham service have proper levels of harmonic suppression because they do have to pass FCC type acceptance. Amplifiers do not have to pass FCC type acceptance for IMD or splatter in the ham service. My view is that IMD type acceptance for the ham service is a must and should be made the same as that for all commercial HF radios. If these rules were adopted no ham would be using  this CB crap on any ham band.

All I am concerned about is the occupied bandwidth produced when using these amps. The argument that hams drive these amps at half power is a ridiculous  way of suggesting that a piece of equipment that is unacceptable performs in an acceptable manner when a smart CB LID with no test equipment is going to drive it to the highest standard. Many Hams cant even adjust mic gain and ALC properly for a clean signal how the hell are they going to monitor their signals for driving a CB amp cleanly. They cant and there all hams should not use piece of equipment not meant for linear SSB service.

Every ham that I have heard on the air with one of these  RM Italy amps drives them to the maximum. The subsequent mess on the bands is evident on any SDR  receiver which measures dynamic IMD  of a transmission better than largely irrelevant and inaccurate 2 tone IMD measurement data.

When i  measured the HLA300 not  with 2 tones using white noise loading using a IC706 and  HLA300 the IMD was disaster at fully output. The IC706 was putting out between 20 and 25 watts for about 300 to 400 watts across all the bands. Thats  about the manufacturers ratings and where most hams would be running them not at 200 watts. Why would spend money on a 400 watt amplifier and run it at 200 watts?  No normal ham would do this. Its a nice feel good argument for hams who buy this CB splatter garbage  and then run the amp at full power. Everyday on the ham bands we hear these crap boxes spewing out splatter and  occupying 20 khz of bandwidth with splatter  when they drive to the full rated output.

So the end conclusion is that this is CB junk that causes a lot of splatter nothing will change any time soon thats going to make this RM Italy equipment clean.  Reading all the ham forums I wonder if some hams dont have a pecuniary
interest in promoting this CB junk on so many ham forums.

My dynamic IMD measurements of this combination of the IC706 and HL3000 were terrible.

 5 khz 20 db down from PEP
10 khz 27 db down from PEP
15 kHz 35 db down from PEP
20 khz 40 db down from PEP

The results were identical for white noise or voice. On many occasions using  voice these figures were worst because of the crap ALC in the IC706 which cause overshoot. This combination is a disaster for the ham bands
If this amp was to be called clean the 20khz figure would be where the 5 khz  is IE 40db down at 5  khz not at  20KHZ! If you do a 2 tone test on these amps you will have your answer why the IMD performance stinks under voice.
The IMD products after the 7th order plateau   right out past the 17th order. There is no drop in the IMD products  because this amp generates so much distortion. Any hint of over drive generates the worst possible signal.  In anybodies  language this RM Italy amp is a crap box that does not belong on the ham bands because most of the hams that this product appeals to will drive it to the max causing problems for others.


19  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Is the KX3 all it's cracked up to be or fake? on: April 05, 2013, 01:11:14 AM
Every HF radio on the market that has 2 meters built in has lousy HF receiver performance, this is before we start talking about the lousy VHF/UHF performance.

I just read the  RSGB report of the KX3 and the radio got a glowing review. However as expected the transmitter IMD on the higher bands was a lousy -22Dbc.  And as expected most stations
will be feeding this radio into a CB amplifier or some other crummy splatter box which makes the excellent receiver performance a moot point when users of this radio will be polluting  some other hams receiver
causing misery. This is the stupidity of the current receiver performance craze, chasing numbers that have no meaning in the real world. Until we can  make transmitters as good as the receiver performance we wasting out money.


I will be complaining about splattering KX3 users just like I complain about these lousy FT817 and all the operators who use CB amplifiers with this radio. All these stations are inconsiderate LIDS who should
use proper equipment that does not splatter. The KX3 will be in same dirty league as all these other crap transmitter which is a shame since its receiver performance seems to be so good.




To W7ASA --

     Ray,
       I never thought about it in that way...but I must conclude you are indeed correct...plus at the extremely low prices you can buy a 2 meter hand-held in today's market...well.....it sure makes sense to me.
        Nice posting Ray.
         Best regards with many 72...73.
            Don sr. --WA2TPU --
20  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Suggestions for a 100 Watt Class amplifier for a FLEX-1500? on: April 05, 2013, 12:58:23 AM
I use a Rohde  FSU. But I did not question the accuracy of your test equipment. I questioned your credibility  by proclaiming that this CB amplifier is clean by only reporting 3rd order IMD figures.
If you do want to make a claim that any amplifier is clean based on 2 tone measurements, you could do your credibility some good by publishing all the levels of all the measured IMD products on different frequencies.
Anyone can cherry picky the best IMD results and make wild claims about the performance.

 There seems to be a growing trend from CB hams wanting too promote these rubbish amplifiers for ham radio use and I see that you are very active in promoting this brand on various forums and reviews.
When I see data that  is lacking is details and claims made that the amp is clean with no data to support this claim I have a right to question your assertion that this amp is clean.
 
I know that you have a RF Engineering  background Mike, so the last thing that I want to do is give you lectures on your  profession. However I dont agree that this amplifier is clean because even
at the low power  that you measured  the amp at, the higher products above the 9th order are from  acceptable. These are the products that cause  other operators on the band more grief than the 3rd
order products that are close to the nominal occupied bandwidth.  Look at the FCC  Part 80 Rules for the maritime HF service. The IMD mask  places more emphasis on the higher order product suppression than
the  the 3rd order products. The Part 80 rules for maritime HF service would be a good test of amplifier linearity  for the ham radio service. Most transceivers would fail purely because their high order suppression products are so poor.

I wont change my views because I have measured the HLA300 using  a R&S real time spectrum analyzer when used with a  Icom 706 MK2g, anybody using this combination will be splattering  because of poor IMD  suppression
and ALC overshoot. Everyone of these amplifiers that I have heard on the ham bands causes excessive amount of splatter that makes operating  anywhere less that 10khz away very difficult. If you have to operate this far away from any SSB station that  stations signal is filthy, and in the case of RM Italy amplifiers on the ham bands this is norm.




Zenki,

My three main spactrum analyzers are:

HP 8593C
Agilent ESM-4402B
Agilent 89441B

What are you using?
21  eHam Forums / CW / RE: Does anybody zero beat a QSO anymore? on: March 31, 2013, 04:04:19 PM
Yeah I just dont get it either. I hear people call who can be us much as 800hz off zerobeat. When I hear their equipment they using modernn radios with the ability to easy zerobeat or automatically zerobeat.
There must be some misunderstanding of how to zerobeat a signal and have a CW QSO. Sometimes I suspect its someone using digital programs that are using audio generated CW and they working CW on SSB.

The best CW operators for zerobeat are homebrew QRP radio types, they know how to do it and are always spot on.  Why guys with modern radios cant do this is also beyond belief.
A lot of JA stations on 7mhz also seems to be off zerobeat, I dont know if they doing this because of QRM and birdies or what.
22  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Solid State vs Tubes - Any Thoughts? on: March 31, 2013, 03:58:43 PM
Tube amplifiers are cleaner and have better IMD performance under all load conditions.

Solid state amplifier makers dont even publish  IMD data, most use industrial not RF fets and the IMD performance.

You cant beat a clean tube amplifier that runs 3-500s, 3cx800's or a 8877.

If you short on cash a any amplifier with a pair of 3-500's. Actually if you invest  the money you spend on a solid state amplifier, you could buy a tube amplifier for every band.
Now if you come up with a switching system for the key line and the input relays can handle high power you can string all the amplifiers in series. Now you have a pretuned amplifier on every
band thats as fast as any solid state amp. A do this with modified SB220's and Drake L4BS.

23  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Suggestions for a 100 Watt Class amplifier for a FLEX-1500? on: March 31, 2013, 03:52:23 PM
It might be a good well built amplifier but what is its IMD performance like. Hams are quick to say this or that KIT amplifier works well, how many hams actually ask the question  is the  amplifier that I am buying clean.

All the kit amps  on the ham market are just copies of databook designs  whose sole objective is to make the sellers money. Not one ham kit HF amplifier kit on the market is designed to be a clean band friendly amp.
Hams are starting to behave like CB'ers with no regard for other users of the band when buying or selecting equipment which is very disappointing.

We will be making progress when some amplifier manufacturer actually  displays IMD data and boasts how clean their amplifiers are and not how cheap they are.


I just built a Juma pa100 for a ham that wanted to use it with his flex 1500 and he is very happy with its performance. 100 watts output, auto band selection. Just a very nice amp.
24  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Suggestions for a 100 Watt Class amplifier for a FLEX-1500? on: March 31, 2013, 03:46:13 PM
Reporting IMD figures and proclaiming that a amp is clean is misleading.  You really need  to include all the data and that includes all the higher order products. The higher order products are more of a worry
than the 3rd order products which are  very close to the nominal occupied bandwidth. As everyone knows 2 tone figures have no relation to how any amplifier is going to work in the real world with a real human voice. This is
especially so when the amplifier has marginal amplifier like this one.

The real problem is that when amplifiers like these  are used with ham transceivers with known ALC or power overshoot design issues.  This combination of marginal CB 12 volt amplifiers and poor transceiver design makes
a mess of the band. This is especially so under voice conditions, we dont talk or modulate in 2 tones, so a dynamic IMD test under real voice conditions would be preferable before calling any amplifier and transceiver
combination clean. These RM amplifiers are CB junk and everyone that I have heard on the air causes splatter. Hams need to remember most high performance receivers today have better dynamic ranges than most spectrum analyzers and when combined withe SDR receiver gives you a clear picture of the REAL IMD performance of any station. Old clunky sweeping spectrum analyzers  are not fast enough nor have enough dynamic range to give you
a true picture of how any amplifier is working in the real world.

The ARRL needs to change its IMD testing regime from 2 tones towards real dynamic IMD testing. Even a white noise loaded notch test would be a better test than the almost useless 2 tone test.

These RM Italy amplifiers are still CB garbage amplifiers and when used with such a poor transmitter like the Flex1500 that has poor IMD performance its a disaster for other users of the band.


I measured the IMD on my HLA-300V and with ten watts drive through a 90 degree hybrid combiner, 6 dB pads in the input to the hybrid for 30 dB port to port isolation.  The HLA-300V second to third IMD was 32 dB. That is about 6 dB better than the exciter with a two tone audio measurement. Power out was 261 watts with 14.4 VDC. At three hundred watts out the two tone the IMD dropped to 28 dB second to third.  Measurements were made on 20 and 40 meters. An Agilent ESM-4402B spectrum analyzer was used. Exciters were a pair of IC-706 MK-IIG's in CW.

Mind you when the ARRL measures an amplifier the dB dynamic range is measured from a single tone which inflates the third order IMD numbers 6 dB.

The amplifier is plenty clean enough if not overdriven. More splatter is created in HF transceiver with compression and mic gain than in most amplifiers.

On another note: If your watt meter shows 250 watts PEP out of a HLA-150 that has two 80 watt devices the power meter needs calibration.
25  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Apache Labs on: March 08, 2013, 12:25:07 PM
Do they take Paypal now?  I  wanted to order a Hermes but they did not take Paypal. They wanted me to use some Indian transaction processing system that I did not really trust.
Apache did indicate that they will be using Paypal in the future but I guess that has not worked out for them.

They have good products its a shame that they have used lousy 12 volt devices with poor IMD in their PA's The Hermes is capable of -50Dbc  3rd order IMD and they feed such a clean signal into
a useless 12  volt PA with poor IMD. What were they thinking ?

 The only thing pan adapter radios will be good for soon is watching all the splatter on the ham bands. It wont be good for much
else because so many companies and hams have such a low level of technical understanding and reasoning. Actually its worst than that, they just dont even get it why TX IMD is such an important.

 A group such as HPSDR should get it but all the folks on their groups make the same design mistake. They promote and use terrible  amplifier designs that have poor IMD performance. So whats the point of
having such good receivers when you cant use them  because of all the splatter? I think I will need to ask Batman that question.



Not much discussion here on the new Apache Labs transceivers. It is worth following the Yahoo Group as there are some good discussions and new software announcements that are IMHO ground-breaking.

See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apache-labs/messages
26  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Suggestions for a 100 Watt Class amplifier for a FLEX-1500? on: March 08, 2013, 12:12:48 PM
This is the real problem with all this QRP brainwashing. Work the world on 5 watts its easy  as using a telephone NOT!

All the QRP radios like the FT817, Flex, IC703 and other  that are sold end up with  some sort of amplifier down the track. 9 times out of 10 its a crap CB amp  or some cheap  CB copy kit amp.
These AMPS have horrendous IMD performance because of low battery voltage and uncompensated bias systems. The result on the air is disaster. I have heard all these crummy signals from these stations on the air
and the resulting signal is terrible.

Why anyone would want to put up with a tiny radio, external amp and all the wiring mess when you can buy a decent radio like FT857, TS50 or IC706 is  hard to understand.  Even in the Flexradios case buying a Flex3000 would have made more sense if the SDR platform is your preferred choice. I guess some people just like doing things the hard way.

From a technical perspective adding using a transceiver with a marginal amp and the resultant IMD is always worst than the  radios IMD by itself. Nobody figures this fact into  their buy a cheap amp for my QRP radio act.

At the end of the day using these QRP radios has no real power consumption benefits because all these radios are current hogs on receive.  You might as well just use a 100 watt normal radio.

I dont know why Flexradio cant design a clean decent amplifier for their products. I see active promotion of RM Italy CB class C products on the Flexradio reflector, just another reflection of their poor technical knowledge.
Now I read  another post on the Elecraft reflector. Another joker promoting his poor IMD Flex1500  and using it with a trashy splattering RM CB amplifier. I guess the moderators on Elecraft are going easy on all the new KX3 owners who
will be doing the same.  The worlds best QRP radio will be used with the worlds worst CB amps and the who cares if the crud kills your new 10,000 dollar  receiver.  Ignorance is bliss!


sell the 1500 and get a 100 watt radio.  for about the same price, you can get one of the origonal sdr rigs , a ten tec pegasus
27  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: RM Italy BLA 350 -- Overpriced???? on: March 08, 2013, 11:55:41 AM
And as a result innocent hams have to put up with the IMD and trash from this CB junk.  It also seems that seeming intelligent hams have started the promotion of CB brand amps for use on the ham bands.

We need mandated IMD standards for all ham HF amps and transceivers. Just as their are standards for harmonic levels we need standards for IMD.

The ham bands are awash with idiots using these  CB amps  using industrial FETS not meant for  linear SSB use. Just because this amp uses 50 volt devices and has low pass filters still does not make
using it acceptable. The IMD performance stinks because they using industrial ISM fets not linear amplifier FETS. I wonder when all these genius hams are going  to start promoting using class C bias amps on the ham bands for better efficiency and dollar per watt ratio on SSB. I see the argument heading in this direction. Not one poster has even mentioned the subject of IMD, and this is from supposedly smart hams.

Now we have to tolerate hams splattering because they have no skills to build a decent amplifier now we have to condone their idiotic use of CB amplifiers because they cant afford to buy a decent ham amplifier.
Another win  for low technical standards accommodating non technical people in a technical hobby. Hams defending and promoting CB garbage WOW.

Eham should really ban any discussion or promotion  on  any amplifier thats  not  FCC type accepted, that would be an acceptable standard. Since this is a education forum condoning  commercial products that are illegal
is not really ethical especially when promoting these devices will do more harm than good to the ham service. RM Italy and its friends seem to be very active lately promoting their products on discussion forums, is this their
back door brain washing and marketing program to capture the  CB'er in new hams before its lost?


If there's no CE mark, sale in the EU is illegal. Trouble is, enforcement in the EU is about at the same level as in the US - except in Germany.
28  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Flex 1500 Amplifier Recommendations ? on: February 19, 2013, 12:50:37 AM
Some hams discuss this CB equipment as if  the only thing that comes out of these CB amplifiers are harmonics. Just because a CB junk amplifier has filters in it and meets harmonic specifications does not mean automatically
that it becomes a "linear amplifier" It could have harmonic filters and still generate crud and IMD why aint we concerned about that.  This is typically the CB attitude if we dont know about it its not a problem. Promoting this CB junk for use
on the ham bands  is really the wrong thing too do,  If there was a decent CB linear amplifier that was cleaned and properly designed I would use it as well, the problem is that all of them are really poor designs. Again it does not help when you have a equally poor radio like the Flex1500 driving a CB amplifier, the end result is a disaster for other users of the HF bands. How can you morally and technically find this acceptable. Splatter is not acceptable and neither is using equipment that contributes to making the problem worst.

29  eHam Forums / Software Defined Radio / RE: Flex 1500 Amplifier Recommendations ? on: February 19, 2013, 12:44:39 AM
Its still CB junk that does not deserve a place on the ham bands. The IMD performance is horrendous and any ham who buys this kind of amp will drive it to the limit. This will happen because of these products appeal
to people with poor technical sensibilities.  Why would you buy a 300 watt amp and run it 100 watts of output when you could just use any normal decent ham radio amplifier or radio?. Its just plain dumb and just plays into the hands of these  marketers whose only objective is too pollute the ham bands with crud.

Besides what kind of ham are you when you use such a poor performing piece of equipment when there is just so much good equipment available?

The link below is worth reading so that one has a more balanced view of RM's amplifiers.

http://www.w8ji.com/rm_hla-150_test.htm


30  eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: Suggestions for a 100 Watt Class amplifier for a FLEX-1500? on: February 19, 2013, 12:36:17 AM
Contact 4z4RB Baruch. He sells decent LINEAR  FET amps not CB Junk. I know many hams who have used his amps with external filters on their SDR projects.

http://www.ebay.com/sch/4z4rb/m.html?item=150943164487&pt=US_Ham_Radio_Amplifiers&hash=item2324e9e847&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562

These amps will  have decent IMD performance, much better than the CB junk recommended by others.  Baruch has also sorted out all the design problems on the  Motorola designs that CCI and others sell with bugs!

Pages: Prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 40 Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!