Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 Next
1  eHam Forums / CW / RE: Looking for 25wpm character/12wpm morse mp3 files on: May 01, 2013, 04:36:01 PM
You can generate audio files with Just Learn Morse Code.

73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
2  eHam Forums / CW / RE: is this right on: April 08, 2013, 02:25:18 AM
You may want to send your callsign correctly, too.
3  eHam Forums / CW / RE: Zen and the Art of Radiotelegraphy on: April 02, 2013, 06:46:47 PM
Don't worry, I'm not offended.  I am pointing out that Just Learn Morse Code offers a lot more than random letter groups and a lot more than a static file library, in response to messages that imply the opposite.


I agree that copying real QSOs is a good way to get used to copying real QSOs, and it gives you real experience with real conditions.


73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
4  eHam Forums / CW / RE: Zen and the Art of Radiotelegraphy on: April 02, 2013, 01:38:38 AM
Hello All,

As one in the later stages of the learning process ( painful QSOs) I wanted mention one thing that made a difference for me.
I used the Koch trainer and also "Just learn morse code" programs. Both do what they are supposed to do; teach the letters and numbers at a reasonab;e medium wpm rate.
However I feel that I lost some ground trying to master coping using these.
If I had to do it over again I would have went to W1AW code practice and listening to live QSOs as soon as I could do a reasonable job of recognizing the "sounds" as letters.
Listening to actual content is more fun and challenging than random letters. Once i made the transition, i was attempting my own QSOs a month later. The ability to copy seemed to improve dramatically for me.

That was my experience, you mileage may vary...

Once again, you imply that Just Learn Morse Code only offers random letter groups.  This is what I responded with the last time I noticed such a claim from you:

I'm not following you.  Just Learn Morse Code has many options for generating random words, abbreviations and also anything you could manage to put on a separate line in a text file.

There are options for having it send random lines of text, or a whole book if you want to.

You can paste text copied from any other program and have Morse code generated for it without having it in a file.

There are options for "recording" any and all of this to audio files, and you can have a transcript generated as a text file if you want to.

This is a lot more versatile than anything you can get from somebody else's static file collection.  You can adjust any of a number of settings to suit your preferences.


There is also a help file included, that briefly explains how to use most of the options.  Select Contents in the Help menu to see it.


73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
5  eHam Forums / CW / RE: Koch morse training method on: March 12, 2013, 02:47:49 PM
I am a recent convert to cw and I have used both "Just Learn morse code" and the G4FON.
Those are great tools to learn the letters and numbers, but once that is accomplished move onto listening to the W1AW MP3 recordings or their broadcasts.
Random letter groups are meaningless and boring. I got to feeling that if I missed a letter or two, it didn't matter that much, so i fell into a pattern of no progress.
However, when I tried the recordings and broadcasts, I found that I tried harder to get it right because there was an actual message to decode.

I'm not following you.  Just Learn Morse Code has many options for generating random words, abbreviations and also anything you could manage to put on a separate line in a text file.

There are options for having it send random lines of text, or a whole book if you want to.

You can paste text copied from any other program and have Morse code generated for it without having it in a file.

There are options for "recording" any and all of this to audio files, and you can have a transcript generated as a text file if you want to.

This is a lot more versatile than anything you can get from somebody else's static file collection.  You can adjust any of a number of settings to suit your preferences.


There is also a help file included, that briefly explains how to use most of the options.  Select Contents in the Help menu to see it.


73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
6  eHam Forums / CW / RE: How to practically copy CW in your head - for beginners on: January 14, 2013, 03:29:26 AM
Good point Sig. Probably not a fair comparison, but I do believe the act of sending has a huge impact on imprinting the sounds in your brain. Don't you believe sending helps in learning the characters faster? Tom, ab9nz
You have to learn the characters before you can send them.  Once you know the characters, both sending and receiving will reinforce your skills.  And practicing sending is a must.  Too many of us went on the air with great receiving skills and messed up utterly because we didn't know how to properly send at speed.

73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
7  eHam Forums / CW / RE: How to practically copy CW in your head - for beginners on: January 13, 2013, 05:42:22 AM
I've been listening to music on the radio most of my life, using the logic of the Koch method, I should be a rock star now.
That's just stupid, Tom.

If you applied Koch to playing the guitar, you would learn one note or chord at a time at the speed you want to play it at.  Whenever you could hit that one note or chord most of the time, you would add another one.

While that may not make you a rock star, it sure would make you a better guitarist than just sitting around bitching about it.


LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
8  eHam Forums / CW / RE: JustLearnMorseCode on: September 06, 2012, 01:48:18 PM
100 wpm, why did you implement it, it is purposely made for 100 wpm max speed.

That is correct, it is intentionally done that way.  You have to draw the line somewhere, so why not at 100 ?
The target audience is highly unlikely to ever want to copy more than 8 characters per second.


Quote
It is not that ridiculously high, as you say, DJ1YFK listens to e-books converted to that speed in an MP3 file.

I'm quite sure that if DJ1YFK wants me to improve Just Learn Morse Code for his use, he will send me an email.


Quote
Better you also implement MP3 recordings, instead of WAV files, that are uncompressed and huge in size, special with 22050 16 bit samples/s, as you implemented,  when 8000 samples/s 8 bit per sample are for Morse code recordings perfect.

Creation of MP3 files is patented.  I do not steal other people's intellectual property.
At $5 or more per user, paying for it is not an option for software that is given away for free, either.

There is plenty of software that will convert your audio files between various formats with minimal user effort.  Surely a smart guy like you can manage to do that ?


Quote
G4FON produces also MP3.

Maybe he's rich.


Quote
You can use the open source LAME encoder.

The LAME encoder is there to shift the responsibility for stealing to the end users.  I think facilitating theft is wrong.


Quote
My comment about the leading and trailing edges is the detection of a BUG

Nope.  The sound generation is a result of research and conscious choice.  The waveform looks exactly like intended.


Quote
It is not to justify to mention anybody in this forum an anonymous coward

When somebody acts like you do in here, without revealing who he is, he is a coward and he is anonymous.
9  eHam Forums / CW / RE: JustLearnMorseCode on: September 06, 2012, 02:37:27 AM
I am well aware of how the audio generation works in Just Learn Morse Code, at any speed.

If your concern is how it works with unrealisticly high pitched audio generated at 100 WPM played back at 35 WPM then perhaps you should have said so at the start, rather than going on this wild goose chase.

I do listen to feedback and I do modify the program according to that feedback.  That doesn't mean I incorporate every suggestion I come across, but I have implemented quite a few of them.  It could also be that I would modify the behavior of the software for that tiny group of users that are interested in using it at ridiculous speeds, but I would only consider that after hearing from some of them.

In general, that does not include what anonymous cowards artificially construct and throw out in public on the Internet, though.
10  eHam Forums / CW / RE: JustLearnMorseCode on: September 05, 2012, 04:58:59 AM
Who in their right mind would want to see Morse code ?

Once again - What do your ears tell you ?


73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
11  eHam Forums / CW / RE: JustLearnMorseCode on: September 05, 2012, 04:42:59 AM
What do your ears tell you ?


73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
12  eHam Forums / CW / RE: JustLearnMorseCode on: September 05, 2012, 03:39:48 AM
Your thinking is too complicated.

Did you ever look at what your transmitter's keyer does ?


73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
13  eHam Forums / CW / RE: Android: learn fast CW with Koch method on: September 04, 2012, 06:01:24 PM
when I failed with Koch I bought the Code Quick course and very easily learned the characters, then built speed with on air listening and operating, and your wonderful program.

That's very interesting, Tom.  There is merit to that system after all, then. ;o)

One interpretation would be that Koch as well as the traditional systems are not for everybody.  Maybe a small percentage of people actually do better with soundalikes etc.

I don't think it's fair to blame your initial failure on Koch, though.  It seems likely that you would have had an even harder time using the traditional visual methods.

Struggling with sending after learning to receive seems to be universal - it takes practice to get good at it and most people only practice sending on the air.  It goes without saying that it feels worse messing up sending if you're on the air.


I'm glad you found a system that worked for you.  Persistence pays off, and so does flexibility.  Congratulations!


73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
14  eHam Forums / CW / RE: Android: learn fast CW with Koch method on: September 04, 2012, 05:17:10 PM
The starters will learn Morse, but they want to get if for free

The same would apply to any method for learning Morse code, and thus it has nothing to do with the quality of Koch's method.


73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
15  eHam Forums / CW / RE: Android: learn fast CW with Koch method on: September 04, 2012, 05:02:45 PM
Koch? Farnsworth?
try something else.
Like what ?

I'm not saying other methods don't work, in fact Just Learn Morse Code supports many other methods.  I'm just curious as to what methods actually work for somebody who failed with Koch's method.


73
LB3KB Sigurd
justlearnmorsecode.com
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!