Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 64 Next
1  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: Lower Your Power and Improve Your Pileup Skill on: May 17, 2013, 09:15:59 AM
"The Beacon":  I heard this guy last week; I was driving home listening to 17m phone, and there was a fair-sized simplex pileup going on.  "Mister Beacon" YELLED his call about every 7-8 seconds.  It didn't matter if the DX station was working someone else, or calling "who is the Nancy Whiskey station?" or anything else; Mr. Beacon keyed up every 7-8 seconds, no matter what, and shouted his callsign, as loudly and automatically as a foghorn.  :-(
2  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Current propagation? on: May 14, 2013, 04:13:34 AM
Sam, this is just my own opinion and millions of people would disagree.  But I'd suggest turning to the higher bands and listening carefully, no matter WHAT the SFI or K-index is.  Last week the propagation summary said 15m was "poor" for night, but I listened and found a JA calling CQ all alone.  Weak signal, but I worked him ... and then realized JD1 isn't a JA after all.  :-)  Lately on 15m/12/10m (from here on the east coast) I've been having fun working into the Pacific plus VK/ZL/JA after local sunset, even with so-called "poor" propagation.  It's been great!  Weak signals, yes, but very few American hams are up there trying, so the competition is scarce!  :-)  I've worked more FO's in the last month than in several years put together.  And a bunch of ATNOs, too: P2, FK, KH0 ...

So my own suggestion is not to worry much about what the propagation numbers say, and just LISTEN to the bands!  There's fun to be had!   73!  ken
3  eHam Forums / Misc / RE: Ohm's Law on: May 13, 2013, 09:16:06 AM
Everyone knows what a "cycle" is.  What the hell is a hertz?   Roll Eyes

It's the same thing as a henway.   Wink

4  eHam Forums / Misc / RE: Ohm's Law on: May 13, 2013, 04:15:27 AM
Having E change to V is a vowel movement.
5  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: FT-817 on: May 13, 2013, 04:13:35 AM
Wes KC9TNH has a good idea there, about the hidden menus.  And it reminds me of how I solved my own 817 problem.  I'm no guru, but I bought an old 817 last year and the thing just didn't seem to work on HF at all.  I fiddled with it for a day or two before I had the idea of doing a full reset on the 817.  Google "full factory reset FT-817" and you'll find instructions.   I also had to replace the third-party internal battery pack, which had some problem I never did understand.  Once I did both of those, the 817 sprang to life and works normally.  Fun little radio!  73 GL  --ken
6  eHam Forums / Computers And Software / RE: cw decoder on: May 11, 2013, 04:40:51 AM
I recommend that you try FLDIGI. It is free software and has very active and great support forum  ...

Mauri, you're right!  And another great thing about FLDIGI is that it is available for both Windows and Linux.  With both types of machines around the shack, it's nice to have software that will run on either.

I've been using FLDIGI for a year or so, for RTTY and PSK.  I've been very pleased with it--lots of useful options, easy to set up and use, and it does everything I want.   A while back I noticed I could use the waterfall as a sort of spectrum scope--very handy for CW DXpeditions, since you can see (up to 1.5khz or so) what station the DX is answering and drop your own next call near to that one.  And it's handy for zero-beating CW if you have lousy ears, too.  :-)

Since doing that, I've also been using FLDIGI while operating CW, and I've been impressed at how well it follows most CW.  I mostly use my ears, but FLDIGI regularly catches details that I miss, when I am working at near my maximum speed.  I might miss a guy's name or the other guy's serial number in a contest, but FLDIGI often catches it when I didn't.  That's nice!

So another "thumbs up" for FLDIGI.  :-)  73!   -ken
7  eHam Forums / Misc / RE: heil icm mich on: May 09, 2013, 09:21:23 AM
"heil icm mich"

Isn't that what Kennedy said at the wall in Berlin?

 Smiley   He could have saved time by saying "/DL"    Wink
8  eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / RE: Ham stick 2 mtr colinear on: May 05, 2013, 05:15:12 AM
...  Then you can work on ordering a replacement whip.

It isn't much help now, but I've bought a BUNCH of old Hustler resonator/whip combinations, and a bunch of hamstick and even old CB antennas, used at hamfests.  If I can get them cheap enough, they supply lots of extra whips at low price--very handy to have!

As long as I'm rambling, most of those whips are stainless, and it isn't easy to shorten them cleanly without bending the cut end.  The way I do it is to mark the place where I want to cut the whip, then use my bench grinder to deeply score around the whip.  Then the end can be snapped off pretty easily.  FWIW!
9  eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / RE: To modify or not to modify my existing antenna system That is the question! on: May 05, 2013, 05:07:42 AM
W5WSS--OK, sorry, I wasn't following your question at first.  I'm using the cap hats as KB4QAA says, to increase the efficiency of a mobile HF antenna for a given length.  And I really never worry about SWR as long as it's below 3:1.  I get the antenna resonant at the desired frequency, and the SWR usually isn't any worse than 2:1, more or less.

I haven't used the step-up transformer you mention; as long as my SWR is low enough that the transmitter isn't folding back the power, I don't worry about it.  I have experimentally tested the cap hats change in a given antenna's resonance. Now, I've never actually tested this, but it appears to me from my fiddling around, that getting an antenna resonant at a given frequency is more important to performance than getting the SWR to exactly 1:1.  I have no data to support it, but that's what it feels like to me.

I am, as you say, doing the bit where I have a pre-tuned resonator/whip/hat for each band, each on a quick-disconnect.  To change bands: I pop off one resonator and pop on the one for the band I want.  In the past I've had separate ones: one for the phone portion and one for the CW portion of the band.  And special long ones for trips, where I didn't need to worry about fitting into my parking garage.

Anyway, sorry my rambling replies didn't really help.  Maybe you could use antenna modeling software to try to give you some answers.  Either way, good luck with it, and we'd be glad if you tell us what you wound up doing and how it worked for you!  GL 73!  --ken
10  eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / RE: Hatchback Antenna Mount on: May 03, 2013, 04:11:40 AM
AC4RD, did you obtain a compatible chunk of stainless and have a bracket custom welded so you could mount an antenna mount onto it?

No, Jordan, that would have been a better way to do it, I imagine.  :-)  What I did was to pop out the little plastic cover and screw the towing eye into the socket in the chassis.  Then I used a standard aluminum bracket meant to take a 3/8x24 antenna mount on one end, about 6" long, and stuck it on the towing eye with U-bolts.  The antenna connector was in the middle of the eye itself.  :-)  If your browser lets you zoom in on the photo of the little red car, you can see what I'm talking about.

My current car didn't have a towing eye that screws in--it has a loop coming off the chassis, under the body.  The loop is vertical (the old setup was horizontal) and I've got a piece of aluminum bolted to the towing loop, and the antenna mount bolted to the other end of the aluminum.  I'll take a photo if you want.   Strictly improvised, but it seems to work well.

Hope this helps!  Mobile HF is a lot of fun!  73!  --ken
11  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Need help to identify a radio seen on The Andy Griffith Show on: May 03, 2013, 04:01:49 AM
Giant mutant bugs or something. The small town Sheriff's
Office had a TS-940 for a scanner by the dispatcher's
desk. I assume they were using it as a scanner, no mic attached.

Deputy:  "Sheriff!  Come quick!  Huge bugs are attacking the town!"

Sheriff:  "You'll have to handle it yourself, Barney.  Monk Apollo is on 17m RTTY and the pileup isn't very big right now!"

12  eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / RE: To modify or not to modify my existing antenna system That is the question! on: May 02, 2013, 03:05:57 PM
First off, this is the second time I've posted this link recently, and I apologize for doing it so often.  :-/

I've been using modified Hustler antennas with various homebrewed elements for a few years now--to me, they're a great way to get more performance than a hamstick while still keeping the antennas fairly cheap and small.

Here's the link: 
  http://people.duke.edu/~kuzen001/ac4rdmobile.htm

As I say on that page, capacity hats clearly DO help performance.  But I build my own, with brass rod from the local hardware store.  They're cheap to make and easy to fiddle with, to get a particular resonator/whip combination just where you want it.

I sometimes use either a capacitor or an inductor at the base of the antenna for matching, but it's rarely actually necessary.  What I do is get that antenna resonant (X=0) at the desired point in the band it's for, and the SWR is usually good enough that it doesn't need any further fussing.

Hope this helps; feel free to email if you want to discuss it further.  73!  -ken
13  eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / RE: Hatchback Antenna Mount on: May 02, 2013, 04:25:30 AM
...and I was considering using the factory tow hook location on the rear of the vehicle to have something custom fabbed to hold a screwdriver antenna off the

Jordan, I've been using a tow-hook mount for several years now.  Seems to work pretty well for me.  I found I still needed braided straps from the antenna mount to the car's chassis; the tow-hook to chassis alone wasn't a good enough RF connection to let the antenna work well.  There are some photos:

  http://people.duke.edu/~kuzen001/ac4rdmobile.htm

 ... that same antenna is on a different car now, on an aluminum bracket bolted to the towing eye beneath the rear bumper.  The shot showing the tow-hook mount on the little red car is higher resolution than you see on the web, so you can zoom in.   Feel free to email me if you want to discuss further.  GL 73!  --ken
14  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Fun in the sun on: April 29, 2013, 09:13:23 AM
JKA, I think you got MY share of good luck for the weekend.  On Saturday it was a pretty morning and the weather has turned fairly warm here in NC.  So I hauled the 817 and a gel-cell out, hooked them up, had trouble with the antenna I wanted to use and spent a half-hour fiddling with that, and finally got ready to have a little QRP fun in the back yard.

I heard a CQ from WT0S on 17m and answered him ... or TRIED to.  Turned out my homebrew paddles apparently got bent out of alignment in storage over the winter.  And I didn't bother to CHECK them before I answered Don's CQ.  :-(  I kept trying to make a basic exchange but the dot paddle either didn't work at all, or it sent lots of extra dots.  I couldn't even get a clean "SRI" out.  :-(  I finally finished the QSO, embarrassed about how bad my code was ... and just then the rain started and I had to start hauling stuff back into the house.

Yep.  JKA, I do believe you got your own share of good luck for the weekend, and MY share too.  :-/
15  eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / RE: Opek HVT-600 Mobile Antenna on: April 29, 2013, 04:19:58 AM
I guess I wanted my cake and eat it too when it comes to being picky with this whole idea of mobile operating. I wanted to do hf in the car but didn't want to go crazy with huge antennas, spending a ton of money ...

We're all in that boat, really.  We all decide how much expense and bother we are willing to go to, for mobile HF.  I used hamsticks for years, then switched to a Hustler system for a bit better performance.  But I'll probably NEVER bother with any sort of screwdriver antenna--too big, too much money, don't want all the bother of running control wires and choking them, etc.  I'm perfectly happy with my current setup--and it allows a bit of fun experimentation, besides.  The screwdriver owners made their own decisions, too, just as we did.  "Having fun" is the goal--I know I'm having fun with it! Smiley   73!  -ken
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 64 Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!