|
|
|
106
|
eHam Forums / DXing / RE: What is the Best Place in the world to have a Ham Station?
|
on: April 26, 2012, 12:56:58 AM
|
I am not sure if this has been discussed before but I am looking at a Map trying to figure out what would be the ultimate location for a QTH (I am Not planning to move just wondering) I guess one would have to set some basic Criteria. 1) A location that is easy to work the Big three (Japan, USA and Europe) IMO it makes no sense to be based on a remote location that cannot access a wide range of Hams on a daily basis year round. DXing is fun to a point but a good location also needs good Rag chewing capabilities. 2) The ability to access just about any location on the planet even with average solar numbers. 3) Factors like politics, wars, lack of water etc. don't matter it's just down to a location. OK maybe some factors should be considered since without food and water whats the point  Maybe two answers are needed, the best for propagation and the best with minimum living standards factored in. Obviously no place is perfect but whats your opinion of the best location on the planet for a ham operator. Robert A yacht! 
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: RMS Titanic
|
on: April 16, 2012, 07:33:46 PM
|
|
Let's never forget the role that a device called radio played in saving the lives of those Titanic survivors, and in saving the lives of so many others throughout history.
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
eHam Forums / Antennas and Towers and more / RE: Homebrew vertical
|
on: March 24, 2012, 02:49:13 PM
|
I'm considering building a "hidden" vertical antenna, using a store-bought "umbrella" clothesline (presumably constructed out of aluminum supports with some sort of insulated wire). My thought is to connect the center of the coax to the clothesline at the base, then ground the shield. I assume I would need to find a way to insulate the part I'm loading up from ground as well as ensure that the "clothesline" wires are electrically connected to the mast. The clotheslines I've seen around here in the stores run about 6 ft x 6 ft x 6 ft
I'm assuming the more wires from the clothesline, the better, and I would need to have some ground radials as well. I'm also considering a remote antenna tuner at the base, if the price is right.
Due to the metal construction, and need to have it blend in, I don't think trying to design it as a loop would work.
Any thoughts or suggestions on my idea?
Thanks!
N0UJT
Could work if you set it up right. I heard of a ham who used an artificial Christmas tree with a wire running through it and some buried radials, with good results! Ever think of putting up a flagpole? 
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
eHam Forums / Antennas and Towers and more / RE: Can't hear me on 10m
|
on: March 24, 2012, 02:44:06 PM
|
So I built a 10m dipole with insulated speaker wire (first build), strung from eve (20') down to fence, sloping about 45 degrees, connected to HTX-100. Middle of band SWR is 1.3. Last few afternoons I've heard lots of ops mostly grouped in Great Lakes area, deep South, Alaska and South America. I did hear two Australia ops, which is kewl considering that's a long way around. I'm northern California.
Haven't been able to make a single QSO either responding to CQ's or calling. Conditions haven't been great, so I'm I just hearing the high power beam stations and just too weak to get above the noise floor to be heard with 25W? Have a Moxon on list of to-do's but anxious to make first HF contact.
I did recently purchase a IC-718, though haven't taken receipt yet.
Thanks, Jon - KJ6TJX
I have used an HTX-100 with a dipole and also with an A-99, and have worked the world! I agree to first check with a local ham and see how the radio is working.
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Moving radio next to Imac
|
on: March 19, 2012, 06:55:40 PM
|
|
My Imac seems to slightly reduce the sensitivity of my 2 meter rig when it is on. The rig is about 4 feet from the computer. It also seems to knock down the receive signal on one of my TVs, which is hooked to an indoor DTV antenna. Not really sure why this happens.
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
eHam Forums / VHF / UHF / RE: What Should I Get For My Yaesu FT-60R?
|
on: March 14, 2012, 07:57:00 PM
|
When I got my first HT, the thing that made the biggest improvement in performance was an external antenna. I bought some coax cable with connectors, and an SO-239. I put together a home brew 2 meter ground plane, stuck it on a broomstick, and taped it to a vent pipe on my roof. I was amazed that even with my 5 watt HTX-202, I was able to hit repeaters some 40 miles away! 
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
eHam Forums / Repeaters / RE: Early days of repeater use
|
on: March 14, 2012, 07:10:11 PM
|
I remember when the MTARA repeaters, especially the one on Mt. Tom, in Holyoke MA, were active 24 hours a day. There was always someone on the machine. Today, you'd be lucky to find activity during the commuting hours. Where the activity went is a mystery. Many of the most active users retired, moved away, or passed away. Repeaters don't have the draw they did back in the 70s. For one thing, modern technology, such as cell phones has made many aspects of FM repeaters obsolete. How many machines still bother offering autopatches?
Pete
It could have a lot to do with the rise in cell phone use. What happened to 2 meters is similar to what happened on the 11 meter band. When I was a kid, the CB band in my area was just jammed with locals. I could talk day and night to different people, most of whom were within only a few miles of me! There was so much activity, the FCC actually had to expand the band from 23 to 40 channels. Today, the activity level on both bands has significantly diminished.
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
eHam Forums / Repeaters / RE: Early days of repeater use
|
on: March 14, 2012, 06:43:06 PM
|
|
It was kind of crazy in the beginning. Lots of people using a relatively small number of repeaters. People with Yagis trying to hit repeaters long distances away. Many conversations happening day and night, and almost always people on the air to chat with! Where did all those operators go? Those certainly were the days.
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|