Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 52 Next
1  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: San Felix Is. on: Yesterday at 10:14:59 AM
I think the clear path South has more to do with it.

This one will be a challenge for me though, due to time constraints. I hope he comes on at night at least, otherwise I will be taking a day or two off.
2  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: San Felix Is. on: Yesterday at 09:59:28 AM
I don't disagree. Bouvet wasn't all that weak to me when I worked Petrus--certainly not as weak as ZS8M. That one was ESP for all three of my contacts. Weak clearly has its advantages. My path to CE0X is still not great (if it were 20 degrees further west I'd be in the clear) but for this distance, a higher angle shouldn't be a problem, plus TEP on the higher bands ought to help if he's on in the late afternoon. Let's just say I'll be ready to pounce every day except Thursday, when I've gotta be in NYC for a dental appointment.

Bouvet was weak most of the time until the one or two days we had propagation which is when you worked them.

I had worked them a full month before that, as did Annita, when nobody I had talked to in NJDXA was even hearing them.

ZS8M wasn't ESP here. He was about S5. But that was on 40m at night.
3  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: San Felix Is. on: Yesterday at 07:34:48 AM
This may sound selfish but if they are weak like 3Y0E I wouldn't mind. It would keep the pileups thin, and only guys like me with serious metal in the air and a clear path South would be successful.

But even if they have strong signals and huge pileups I'll still be able to work them, I am optimistic.
4  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: Most Ridiculous DXCC Entity on: June 17, 2013, 05:55:01 AM
It really doesn't matter in the end. DXCC is a game, so the country rules could be pretty much anything.

Common sense would dictate that physical separation and political entities should be separate from their mainland counterparts.

Rarely activated entities should stay for the challenge factor. Top of the honor roll shouldn't be easy.

So I agree with DXCC rules for the most part.
5  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: Could Aves Island be on the way back? on: June 14, 2013, 07:22:37 AM
That's nice! I am glad it's being activated because the storm really took its toll.
6  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: How come there has never been a DXpedition to Mount Athos? on: June 13, 2013, 10:49:27 AM
Who operated from there on 7 bands!  Huh Shocked
7  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: SX5KL on: June 13, 2013, 06:24:40 AM
Congratulations Ryan. Just think, you are young enough and have capable enough of an antenna system that when you are 60 you could be on top of the DXCC challenge. Now get cracking and bring the Desoto Cup back to the US!   Grin

lmao yes, and the kids will be out of the house by then too. Cheesy

Only wildcard is I don't know how long I will stay at this house and location.
8  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: SX5KL on: June 12, 2013, 01:45:56 PM
Awesome bandfills. They pushed me over the top for Challenge! Now just need to submit my app, but I'm waiting for cards #299 and 300 to come in.
9  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: Most Ridiculous DXCC Entity on: June 12, 2013, 10:34:51 AM
Both of those, plus 4U1UN, 4U1ITU and 1A. Office buildings should not be counted as separate DXCC entities, regardless of their significance.

Well they aren't on US soil and in fact don't even follow US law in there. They also have a seprate prefix block. People used to even smoke in their offices up until recently. They still allow smoking in the cafe and delegates lounge. Last I was there it reminded me of an airport in the 1980s.

I think that the policy should be uniform though. 4U1WB and others should also be an entity.
10  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: Most Ridiculous DXCC Entity on: June 12, 2013, 10:33:31 AM
BS7 without a doubt. Had to be specially voted in by ARRL BoD and was added strictly to keep things "interesting."
11  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: How come there has never been a DXpedition to Mount Athos? on: June 11, 2013, 06:53:11 AM
Yeah and he was subsequently arrested, not for the same thing though:

http://hamgallery.com/gallery/D/dj6si.htm
12  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: Doldurm Filler - 5T0SP LotW QSLs, YV1 6M on LotW on: June 11, 2013, 06:50:31 AM
Just 2 more confirmations needed for challenge! Hope I get it SOON.

Cheesy
13  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: T43S QSL route on: June 10, 2013, 12:35:58 PM
In keeping with the embarge, I do not believe it is either legal or possible to send mail to Cuber from the US, or if you can send, you certainly cannot receive. I tried having a friend in Canada send to a Cuban manager a few years back and nothing ever came back to either him or me.

No, that is incorrect. Mail can be sent to Cuba and received from Cuba. I think it goes through a third country though.

The problem is getting return postage. Not sure if IRCs can be exchanged there. US$ may be stolen from the mail as I'd imagine mail is watched by big brother or stolen by postal workers.

You CAN get Cuban stamps from Bill Plum, plumdx@msn.com. Those may work.
14  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: Brainstorming: is there a better way for the DX to avoid QRM? on: June 10, 2013, 08:05:45 AM
I prefer numbers.  Why not give the weak ones a chance?   Why not break it into groups - either with numbers or locations?

With the above it goes from everyone jumping on each other to a much quieter pile...

I remember a VK6 working a pretty big group and someone keep saying "split.. split"..  he came back.. "I'm not going to run split.. if you would shut up follow what I tell you, we'll all be happy.."  or something like that...   he was able to pull them out quickly right on frequency.

No one said it was CW only.   Who said the DX was going to stick around for a few days?   I didn't read that.


By the numbers just plain SUCKS. Instead of spending 5 minutes in a pileup I have to spend 30 and if I don't get through when they are done with my number I have to wait a whole cycle again.

The best DXpeditions I have heard and worked did not go by the numbers at all. Even the huge pileups at 7O6T didn't require going by the numbers, yet they worked a lot of people, a lot of whom didn't have big beams.

If you are a weak station, you have several options. One of which is to wait a few days. After a few days most DXpeditions are begging because all the big guns have them in the log. People like W2IRT will have them on every band, every mode by then and won't need to crowd you out of the pileup. So you get your chance for a contact.

Another is to learn a technique that gets you noticed. I did a lot of mobile operating. Not exactly a big gun. So I learned to call near the end of when people were calling. Delayed my DVK or CW keyer until the last.

Another is to have a long callsign. My XYL with her call KC2OYY always gets through on CW even with 100w. (try that in your head dahdidah dahdidahdit dididahdahdah dahdahdah dahdidahdah dahdidahdah).

Another is to shape your audio to get noticed.

And don't really expect that an indoor antenna with 5w is going to get you to the top of the heap. It will take patience and more patience.
15  eHam Forums / DXing / RE: VU7KV on: June 06, 2013, 07:32:54 AM
It has been approved for DXCC by the DXCC desk.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 52 Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!