Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13 Next
46  eHam Forums / Antenna Restrictions / The Perfect Antenna on: March 27, 2007, 10:52:21 AM
When you positively, absolutely have to have the best:

http://force12inc.com/F12-amateur-home-008.htm
47  eHam Forums / CW / Why are you so mad? on: March 27, 2007, 06:25:54 AM
>>>>> by AA4PB on March 27, 2007  
As new modes come along and become more popular they need spectrum in which to operate. That leaves you with two choices. Either you enlarge the ham bands or they share spectrum with existing modes like CW. I don't see the ham bands growing in size any time soon so I think we're going to have to learn to share.  <<<<<


Sure, which modes are we talking about?  Phone has gotten more space with recent FCC rules changes.  But digital modes like RTTY and PSK31 have gotten less band space.  The newest and fastest growing modes are getting less space.  The digital ops and CW ops are being squeezed into a smaller portion of the band.  But the phone portions of the bands are expanding as are the width of the phone signals.

48  eHam Forums / Contesting / Favorite State QSO Party? on: March 26, 2007, 01:58:26 PM
My favorite QSO party is the California QSO Party. But then again, I may be biased.

www.cqp.org

73, Jim
AD6WL
49  eHam Forums / Contesting / TX out of band? on: March 26, 2007, 01:56:07 PM
I have never heard anyone intentionally transmitting out of band during a contest.  I have heard hams xmit on the DX freq because they accidentally didn’t press or double pressed the “split” button.  These are honest mistakes and shouldn’t get other hams all upset.  Often times it’s the “Radio (keystone) Cops” who create more problems than the unsuspecting ham who made a mistake.
50  eHam Forums / Contesting / Can't the RST report be dropped for contests? on: March 26, 2007, 01:44:29 PM
5NN is an important part of the contest exchange.  It actaully means "OK, get ready here comes the important information."

Also, if you log it wrong then the contact doesn't count.



51  eHam Forums / CW / Why are you so mad? on: March 26, 2007, 01:40:07 PM
KD8ERE,

Congrats on passing your General and welcome to HF.  I hope you get on there and have some fun.  

I think many hams are mad or as others have put it, disappointed at the decision but not at the new hams.  I for one am disappointed because the FCC didn’t retain the morse code exam for the Extra class license.  That doesn’t mean that I am mad at you or any other ham who will be upgrading.  Outside of some internet hams, I haven’t seen any hostility at all toward newly upgraded hams.  Quit the opposite; I have only heard the OMs encouraging the Techs to upgrade and get on HF.  I haven’t heard any disparaging comments directed to newly upgraded hams on the air either.  

73, Jim
AD6WL
52  eHam Forums / Licensing / FCC releases "No Code" Press release on: December 21, 2006, 03:23:12 PM
"We lost the CW 'requirement' this month -- but gained bandspace."

What bandspace did we gain?
53  eHam Forums / Licensing / Thoughts about the FCC's decision... on: December 21, 2006, 03:16:53 PM
"This probably won't change the opinions of the most rabid CW fanatics"

Well, now that you put it that way...it probably won't!
54  eHam Forums / Elmers / 40 Meter Flat Top "V" In Attic on: December 21, 2006, 01:21:44 PM
I see now that you mean a horizontal V-Beam.
55  eHam Forums / Elmers / 40 Meter Flat Top "V" In Attic on: December 21, 2006, 09:31:06 AM
I’m thinking you want an inverted V since that is the shape of most attics ceilings.  You might be able to do it.  I would try using 50 ohm coax to a balun and then the dipole wires should be 33feet each for a total of 66 feet for the dipole.

I would run half of each 33ft leg along the ceiling line to the base in the attic and then run the second half along the floor of the attic at an angle along the wall.  Do the same for the other leg but in the opposite side.

To visualize it, think of it looking like a Z pattern with the feedpoint in the middle.

Disclaimer:  I am not into antenna modeling so someone else may model it and point out my mistakes.  I usually try to get the proper length wire up as high as possible and trim it to try and get as good an SWR reading as possible on an antenna analyzer.  Also, I would not run high power on this because the antenna is so close to house wiring, telephone lines, cable etc. that it could easily cause some RFI.
56  eHam Forums / Elmers / Best Band For Slow CW on: December 19, 2006, 03:02:23 PM
You can check out this article, it may give you some help:

http://www.eham.net/articles/13355

73, Jim
AD6WL
57  eHam Forums / Elmers / R&O that shook the hobby on: December 19, 2006, 01:22:53 PM
KC8VWM, tnx fer clearing that up.  You are correct.

This is from the ARRL website:

No Effective Date Yet

Today's R&O spells out the specific Part 97 changes going into place once the new rules go on the books and indicates that the effective date will be 30 days after the document appears in the Federal Register. Publication likely will occur in January, with the new rules going into effect in February.

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/12/19/101/?nc=1
58  eHam Forums / Elmers / R&O that shook the hobby on: December 19, 2006, 11:13:57 AM
It looks like it should take effect on 18 Jan 2007.  Techs will automatically get Tech + privilges.  

59  eHam Forums / Elmers / What does no Code really mean? on: December 19, 2006, 08:29:25 AM
This is from the ARRL website and should answer your questions:

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/12/15/104/?nc=1

REVISED Dec 18, 2006 15:50 ET

End of an Era: FCC to Drop Morse Testing for All Amateur License Classes
NEWINGTON, CT, Dec 15, 2006 -- In an historic move, the FCC has acted to drop the Morse code requirement for all Amateur Radio license classes. The Commission adopted, but hasn't yet released, the long-awaited Report and Order (R&O) in WT Docket 05-235, the "Morse code" proceeding. The FCC also has adopted an Order on Reconsideration in WT Docket 04-140 -- the "omnibus" proceeding -- modifying the Amateur Radio rules in response to an ARRL request to accommodate automatically controlled narrowband digital stations on 80 meters in the wake of rule changes that became effective December 15. The Commission designated the 3585 to 3600 kHz frequency segment for such operations, although the segment will remain available for CW, RTTY and data as it has been. So far, the FCC has only issued a public notice and not the actual orders detailing the rule changes. The effective date of both orders is not yet known, but it appears likely at this point that it will be sometime in February. Currently, Amateur Radio applicants must pass a 5 WPM Morse code test to operate on HF. The FCC's action will eliminate that requirement all around.

"This change eliminates an unnecessary regulatory burden that may discourage current Amateur Radio operators from advancing their skills and participating more fully in the benefits of Amateur Radio," the FCC said. The ARRL had asked the FCC to retain the 5 WPM for Amateur Extra class applicants only. The FCC proposed earlier to drop the requirement across the board, however, and it held to that decision.

A list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) on both orders is posted on the ARRL Web site.

The FCC's action in WT Docket 05-235 will grant limited HF privileges to all Technician licensees, whether or not they've passed a Morse code examination. Once the R&O goes into effect, all Technician class license holders will be able to enjoy current "Tech Plus" HF privileges in addition to their current VHF/UHF privileges. The FCC said the R&O in the Morse code docket would eliminate a disparity in the operating privileges for the Technician and Technician Plus class licensees -- something the ARRL also has asked the Commission to correct following the release of its July 2005 Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) in WT Docket 05-235.

"With today's elimination of the Morse code exam requirements, the FCC concluded that the disparity between the operating privileges of Technician class licensees and Technician Plus class licensees should not be retained," the FCC public notice said. "Therefore, the FCC, in today's action, afforded Technician and Technician Plus licensees identical operating privileges."

Technician licensees without Element 1 credit currently have operating privileges on all amateur frequencies above 30 MHz. Technicians with Element 1 credit (ie, "Tech Plus" licensees) have limited HF privileges on 80, 40, 15 and 10 meters. Under the Part 97 rules the Commission proposed last year in its NPRM in WT Docket 05-235, current Technicians lacking Morse credit after the new rules went into effect would have had to upgrade to General to earn any HF privileges.

Privileges will remain the same for Novice, General, Advanced and Amateur Extra class licensees.

Typically, the effective date of a FCC order comes 30 days after its publication in the Federal Register. If that's the case, the new exam requirement and the revised 80-meter segment for automatically controlled digital stations would likely not go into effect until sometime in February 2007. At the time the rule changes adopted in the R&O are published in the Federal Register, the effective date also will become known (it is included in the Federal Register summary). In any event, the new rules will not go into effect anytime before they show up in the Federal Register.

The FCC has clarified that there will be no changes in the administration of Amateur Radio examination elements and in granting a Certificate for Successful Completion of Examination (CSCE) for General and Extra class until the new rules go into effect. CSCEs are only valid for examination credit for 365 days from date of issuance; applicants cannot use CSCEs older than that to upgrade. Volunteer Examiner Coordinators (VECs) will handle all upgrades through volunteer examiner teams.

Candidates for General or Amateur Extra testing between now and the effective date of the new rules will still have to pass Element 1 (5 WPM Morse code) to obtain new privileges. Those earning Element 3 or Element 4 credit between now and the effective date of the new rules will receive a CSCE from the VE team. Once the new rules are in place, anyone holding a valid CSCE may apply for an upgrade at an exam session and pay the fee, if any.

The wholesale elimination of a Morse code requirement for all license classes ends a longstanding national and international regulatory tradition in the requirements to gain access to Amateur Radio frequencies below 30 MHz. The first no-code license in the US was the Technician ticket, instituted in 1991. The question of whether or not to drop the Morse requirement altogether has been the subject of often-heated debate over the past several years, but the handwriting has been on the wall -- especially since the FCC instituted an across-the-board 5 WPM Morse requirement effective April 15, 2000, in the most-recent major Amateur Radio licensing restructuring (WT Docket 98-143).

The FCC said the R&O in WT Docket 05-235 will comport with revisions to the international Radio Regulations resulting from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Radiocommunication Conference 2003 (WRC-03). At that gathering, delegates agreed to authorize each country to determine whether or not to require that applicants demonstrate Morse code proficiency in order to qualify for an Amateur Radio license with privileges on frequencies below 30 MHz.

The list of countries dropping the Morse requirement has been growing steadily since WRC-03. A number of countries, including Canada, the UK and several European nations, now no longer require applicants for an Amateur Radio license to pass a Morse code test to gain HF operating privileges. Following WRC-03, the FCC received several petitions for rule making asking it to eliminate the Morse requirement in the US.

The ARRL will provide any additional information on these important Part 97 rule revisions as it becomes available.

60  eHam Forums / Site Talk / Can/Do we have an ignore button in forums? on: December 14, 2006, 03:37:04 PM
( ) 75m wasteland rants
But it is.

( ) RTTY OPERATOR POSTINGS IN ALL CAPS
BUT NO MATTER HOW YOU TYPE IT IN, RTTY COMES OUT IN ALL CAPS

( ) - .... .. ... ... .... .. -
6isshu?

( ) posts from Region 6 operators
Awe shucks, now you done it. You made me mad.

( ) replies that don't understand sarcasm or humor.
I don’t get it.

( ) code/no-code rants
I’ll leave this one alone.
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13 Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!