Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next
1  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: shure sm-57 sm-58 mic for kenwood radio? on: April 12, 2013, 06:18:15 AM
You can make just about any mic work if you match levels and impedances.  But do remember the "push-to-talk" switch with your design.  sometimes this is forgotten in the zeal to try a mic, making the operation "less than practical"!
Just a reminder.
73s.

-Mike.
I know this is an old thread, but wanted to add that "necessity is the mama of invention" sometimes. I run a Heil GM5 mic which has the built-in TX/RX stitch in it, but found it to be unusable because the mic is mounted in a shock mount which makes getting at that little switch a real pain.
So I wired-in a small SPST toggle switch on 3ft of shielded wire to the mic connector and mounted it in a pill bottle. Works great! And with the mic on a boom, it's "hands-free" during keydowns.
Also, you only need to compare frequency response and impedance to any proposed application here. I run a "work" DM-45 (an SM58 clone) in the garage and it sounds better on that radio than the heil does on that radio (FT-840), given no external EQ changes. My point being, you wont know for certain until you try.

2  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Tuning up on: February 11, 2013, 10:46:04 AM
Why do so many people think they need to tune up their radios on top of people having a QSO. I see this all too often, even on the maritime net. I was monitoring 14,300 yesterday and in just one hour I heard six differant people tuning up their systems, another repeating "audio" and one person whistling. Band conditions are bad enough as it is so why are we making things more difficult??? I thought we were supposed to be professional amateurs...
I don't get it either. My best friend does this and he is far from alone. I've made him aware of my disapproval, but he is a headstrong dude. He just keys-up whenever, wherever, and even belts-out his call on top of a QSO -- very rude. I've heard more courtesy on channel six during a 'shootout'!
3  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Isn't this illegal??? on: February 11, 2013, 10:40:38 AM
At the point that it would be actually TRANSMITTED, yes. Until then, the FCC you,me the pope can do nothing to prevent them.
At the point that they would use this "code", the point of legality becomes moot because anarchy would be the government du jour, or a government which would go against the constitutional and God-given freedoms to do intervene. And yes, I realize we are already there with the current regime. But that wasn't the question. You could try to get your operatives on the inside to learn the code first anyhow. Is it against the law to formulate a code? No. It's against the law to use it in communications.
I think I'm going to check into this further. I might want to learn it now while I have the chance.
4  eHam Forums / Mods And Repairs / RE: Sick FT-840 -- blink, blink, blink display? on: November 26, 2012, 10:19:32 AM
I know this thread is ancient, but because this is a common fault with the 840, I thought I would add my two cents, Just in case anyone else has had this problem;
The blinking display would indicate it has no data supply to the VCO or DDS circuits. These radios have two voltage regulator IC's mounted on a small PC board, which plugs into the local board near the audio output ic. They are Q2901 (a 5V regulator ic ) and Q2902, (a 9volt regulator ic).

The 9Volt ic can outright FAIL, but this board is 'free-floating' -- simply "plugged-into" the local pcb much like the option boards are, pin-n-socket style while the IC's themselves are heat-sunk to the base of the chassis. Vibration can provide a lot of "fun" little quirks here. The main problem is that the soldered pads on the PC are subject to break if the rig was banged-around a lot, or causing this sub-board's pins to lose contact... And to think, they actually made (and sold a boat load of) mobile mounting kits for the 840.. LOL.
IC replacement tip: Mount the new ic's WITHOUT soldering them to the pc board. Mount the ic board into the local board, then mount the IC's to the chassis using heatsink compound -- THEN solder the ic legs to their board. This way, no "pre-stress" is placed on the connections when it is buttoned-down....... Found this out the hard way.

Happy hunting.
 
5  eHam Forums / Mods And Repairs / RE: Yaesu FT757GXii, issue, NO TX, any mode. on: September 17, 2012, 04:31:34 AM
Problem solved: I appreciate all the responses.
I told the guy that I probably wouldn't be able to crack the cover on the radio until sometime late in October or November, to which, he replied, "that's fine. It isn't werking now,so take as long as you need."
He called me this weekend to ask if it was ready yet and that he needed it soon. I told him no, it isn't done -- Then I told him to give me two hours to put it back together, then come get it out of my sight.
He really tweaked me with this one.

6  eHam Forums / Mods And Repairs / RE: Yaesu FT757GXii, issue, NO TX, any mode. on: September 04, 2012, 05:58:08 AM
Hmmm.. You're right! I have been attaching ground to a nice, "safe" chassis ground. I'll backtrack my measurements asap. Thanks.
7  eHam Forums / Mods And Repairs / RE: Yaesu FT757GXii, issue, NO TX, any mode. on: September 03, 2012, 08:36:39 AM
Sorry for getting back so late. I didn't give up yet.
Do you measure the correct voltages for the final transistors? My feeling is still this must be a supply problem, i.e. the voltage getting through.
No need to apologize, just know I appreciate your efforts any time that you are able, but even I haven't had much time to address this one much further anyhow myself. I won't give up on it,but I'm in the middle of remodeling the house and have had some hectic hours at my job lately, too... I have a feeling this rig is going to be on the bench a lonnng time Smiley
But that's the way the fortune cookie crumbles..
I agree it is a supply issue, but not likely to be the PA stages, because the supply disappears before it gets there. No juice to kick the relays,at least, but I haven't ruled-out anything but the 78xx's so far. Even though they have been checked and have proper output, it could be a blown zener, one of those funky,obsolete chips,or an open coil someplace, I guess. I did  get time to lift the main PCB -- No easy feat (took me all last Saturday). All traces look 'factory-fresh'.I haven't nailed it back down yet, as I will probably need access to that side to do any further component checking or replacement under there. All I can add is WoW, was this old rig well-made!

8  eHam Forums / Mods And Repairs / RE: Yaesu FT757GXii, issue, NO TX, any mode. on: August 26, 2012, 03:17:51 PM
With the storm churning out there, I had a chance to tear-into this thing a bit more. All the regulator IC's check good. Additionally, I also checked and can rule-out Q-56, Q72.
9  eHam Forums / Mods And Repairs / RE: Yaesu FT757GXii, issue, NO TX, any mode. on: August 20, 2012, 05:10:09 AM
There is of course a wide variety of possible failures. It seems someone already has tampered with the rig. I'd try to gently tighten the screws holding the boards for improving ground connection. It also might be helpful to carefully disconnect and reseat connectors. I assume the supply voltage is good.
Definitely molested, with half the original case screws missing, the other half with stripped heads... But the price was right. It was GIVEN to him. Cheesy It is complete, but all else appears in order, and the 'thump-test' turned-up no anomalies.
I would attempt to key it in CW jack and mode, see if you get anything that way...


Tried that, same result. the RX switches-out, the indicatator goes out, but no indication of TX in any mode. That does narrow it down to after the key, but before the driver.... But that is a lot of real estate. I appreciate the input so far, gents. I am lost without a readable schematic. For instance -- I want to check a component that appears in the block diagram labled the "PTT CNTL", but I can't make-out the part number, or location in the radio, or schematic. It's a 2SC458B (i think, as it is hard to make out also).It's Q20-something.  Also, a 7805 regulator delivers 5V in TX, but i again, can't find it.



10  eHam Forums / Mods And Repairs / Yaesu FT757GXii, issue, NO TX, any mode. on: August 19, 2012, 07:11:50 AM
This rig is not mine, but a brand new ham's first HF rig, brought to me (of all people) to see if I could get some life out it. It wasn't receiving Either, but it truned out to be an unplugged "CAR IN" coax connection and badda-bing, got great ears.
HOWEVER, I cannot get TX, or any indication of TX from PTT from mike, or when switching the MOX, and no TX led indicator.
It does cancel RX when attempting TX, but nodda other than that.
I have the schematics available online, but those of you who have seen them, know I might as well toss some tea leaves into the air and read them when they hit the floor. Tongue
Any direction given would be greatly appreciated.
11  eHam Forums / Antennas and Towers and more / RE: Ununs - Why use them with non-resonant verticals? on: January 30, 2012, 02:45:00 PM
So much "food for thought", I had to copy/paste it to a notebook file! Thanks. I might try that when I get my towers back up (lost them to a storm in June). 160 was useless in the summer months with my previous setup. 80 wasn't much better, but it sure sounds great in RX lately -- wish I could TX, but my makeshift dipole wont even tune. I cut them way long for future clipping, but they are touching the roof,10 ft off the ground right now.






12  eHam Forums / Antennas and Towers and more / RE: Ununs - Why use them with non-resonant verticals? on: January 29, 2012, 05:00:37 PM
Nah, I have had my resonance killer thing removed for years - no issue at all.
LOL. I hear the doc may let me return to werk the next day.
13  eHam Forums / Antennas and Towers and more / RE: Ununs - Why use them with non-resonant verticals? on: January 29, 2012, 01:16:57 PM
Quote
BTW, when is MFJ going to use decent turns counters on their variable inductor tuners?  I have several of their tuners (both high and low powered) and the turns counter loses calibration very quickly on all of them.  The tuners work fairly well but are useless for quick band changes since the settings are always getting messed up.

I don't have an issue on my Differential T tuner.  After a few months of daily use, it might be off by a half a digit.  I did remove that resonance killer thing on the inductor though since I always seemed to bump into it when switching to 80m.  Maybe you are turning to fast?  Though I turn mine pretty fast, too...
Man am I glad I ran into THIS topic! I just purchased a nice (looking) MFJ-962D from a local hamfest, only to find the "resonance killer" burnt up. The little epoxy pc board "pawls" were charcoal, as was a portion of the center PVC frame. I cleaned it up as best I could, removing every trace of carbon (remembering lessons learned in the HV stages of TV sets), but those pawls are toast -- nuthin left. I was going to call MFJ tomorrow morning to see if I could purchase just the pawls. But if there is no harm done in totally eliminating this mouse trap assembly in it's entirety. it is HISTORY.
14  eHam Forums / Mods And Repairs / RE: Air VVarible caps. Which is more stable? on: August 18, 2011, 04:48:14 AM
Thanks, Tisha. It is a 'lousy design' ,for sure. When it comes to RF sig generators, it would appear that 'you get what you pay for' , for sure. I'm more or less stuck with my poor choice now, but if I had it all to do over, I would've saved my cabbage until I have enough to buy a REAL SG..  The only thing worse than the poor design and construction practices found in this device, is the schematic -- because one cannot be found. It's hard trying to figure out 'what is what' without a road map, but I did find a 5K Ohm, fixed resistor in series with all of the band tuning coils. I took it out and tacked-in a 5K pot and bingo! 'fine' tuning! I ordered a 10-turn pot for a permanent install, but the steady drift-down seams uncontrollable. I would steer everybody I could away from paying more than $20 for one of these train - "REKs".

I cut out a slot in the front panel and installed one of those freq counter modules found on ebay for $34 (including S&H) in this poc.
It gives me something pretty to look at, as it "counts-down" like a NASA clock.... "T-minus 10:240:121 and counting." After about an hour or so powered-up, the 'countdown' ACTUALLY DOES slow down to something I can work with, but it never totally quits.  

73
15  eHam Forums / Mods And Repairs / RE: Air VVarible caps. Which is more stable? on: August 14, 2011, 11:44:16 AM
Thanks, y'all, for your input. The main board looks like it was properly assembled, but the assembly of the  peripheral components looks HORRIBLE! My grandson could do better and I'm not exaggerating.
I've noticed that when I just get close to it, the frequency shifts worse! And very very coarse! I have a DDS-60 that is much more accurate, but it's not very convenient. I may just end-up installing an adjustable attenuator and audio generator to it, but I've been having too much fun using for a SD VFO. But if I could get this thing to not drift so drastically, I'd use it instead.
I'll go-over all the solder joints to see if I can clean it up some. Any ideas on how to install a fine-tuning capability to this thing?
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!