|
|
|
46
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Good first paddle?
|
on: July 05, 2011, 07:23:19 AM
|
I highly recommend the Black Widow paddle. It has the feel of a much more expensive paddle and it comes as an easy-to-finish kit. Everything is predrilled you just have to do a bit of sanding, finishing (i.e clear coat) and assembly. At $67 delivered to your door it is a very good deal. I borrowed a friend's and it compares very well against my much more expensive Bencher Hex key. The URL : http://www.w5jh.net/Black_Widow.htmMichael VE3WMB
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
eHam Forums / Antennas and Towers and more / RE: delta loop for 40m
|
on: June 26, 2011, 07:47:16 AM
|
|
Antennas do interact with their environment so it is not always possible to accurately predict / model what the real impedance and resonance point will be. I think that the advice of making the base wider to raise it is worth a try. You can even slope the antenna a bit if that helps to get the bottom corners a bit higher off the ground (note that this will raise the radiation angle slightly). With your feed-point positioning you are getting vertical polarization with low angle radiation, which is what I hope that you want.
If this antenna is to be used for portable operation at different locations then perhaps the most simple solution is to feed it with parallel line (ie Twin-lead, Ladderline or open-wire line) and use a balanced tuner. That would allow you to account for impedance and resonance variations from location to location. This should also allow you to use this antenna multi-band. Note that to use it on 80m would require you to open the loop, opposite the feedpoint.
I have a sloping 30m delta loop in my backyard (apex at about 20+ feet, base at about 7 feet) and it is fed about 1/4 wavelength (on 30m) from the apex with about 8 feet of HB open-wire to a 4:1 balun connected to an LDG tuner housed in a waterproof box attached to my side fence. This antenna works quite well on 40m and 30m and will match from 40m through 10m. Because of the extreme slope, my antenna, at least theoretically, has a somewhat higher takeoff angle than your vertical loop but in practice it still works quite well and gives me a 2-S unit S/N advantage over my vertical.
best of luck
Michael VE3WMB
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
eHam Forums / Antennas and Towers and more / RE: Will a spring serve as a decent stress relief?
|
on: June 11, 2011, 04:29:19 PM
|
|
Another option to consider is rubber truck tie-down straps. These work pretty well and I think are more durable than regular "bungee" cords but I have found over the years that the UV stability varies from brand to brand. I use these at the center and ends of a 204 ft doublet that I have up at 50 ft at my cottage. I have learned that it is best to replace them yearly to avoid failure. What I have also started doing is to bridge the tie-downs with a rope loop. That way if the tie-down breaks the antenna stays up but goes slack.
Michael VE3WMB
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Mode B - result of a logic error?
|
on: May 07, 2011, 06:08:48 PM
|
My best guess is that it was the WB4VVF Accu-keyer as I believe that this was the original Iambic Mode-B keyer. BTW it is horrific trying to switch between the two. I have been an Iambic-B user for 30+ years and when I built my Elecraft K1 I didn't realize at first that it defaulted to mode-A keying ... I really thought that I was losing it for a while ... couldn't send an "R" if my life depended on it :-) then I realized that the rig was set to mode-A .... Michael VE3WMB / VA2NB I've read on Wikipedia that "Mode B is the second mode, which devolved from a logic error in an early iambic keyer". This statement appears to have been cut and pasted verbatim onto several other sites too.
Is there anyone here who has been around longer than I have, who knows which early keyer was the culprit? Just curious, because my able search assistant, Mr Google, has not been able to verify the statement.
73
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: running a Vibroplex Bug and Paddle at will ????
|
on: May 02, 2011, 06:24:44 AM
|
I use a paddle and straight key with my left hand and a bug with my right and my brain seems to be able to keep it all straight. I was a dual paddle user for about 20 years (left handed) and after much off-air practice with a CPO I was able to develop sufficient proficiency with my right hand to use a bug on the air. I have found that using a bug requires a lot less fine motor skills than a dual paddle so using my "wrong" hand to send with a bug wasn't too bad. Michael VE3WMB / VA2NB ...I run a Vibroplex Bug exclusively...at times I would like to operate my Bencher paddle/keyer...I have never been able to mix and shift between the bug and the paddle at will...seems I always start "speaking in tongues" if I try to mix the two...does anyone have success with using both bug and paddles, and if so (besides being a super-hero) what is the formula for success   thanx Ron K0XY
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Coffin Key
|
on: April 19, 2011, 07:38:00 PM
|
|
Yes I have one that I picked up on eBay a few years ago. The lid was yellowed and cracked (often the case) but I managed to get a replacement cover from Morse Express. These bugs have a pretty decent feel, somewhat crisp, but a bit clacky with the lid in place. Mine gets used on occasion (too many keys ;-) ). BTW the square weights from the Vibroplex Lightning / Champion / Zephyr will fit if you need to add more weight, you just may need to temporarily remove the pendulum to get the Vibroplex weights on.
Michael VE3WMB / VA2NB
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Building skill question about kits
|
on: April 05, 2011, 04:51:15 PM
|
|
I think that the SW20+ is a good first radio kit. I have built both an SW40+ and an SW80+ and they are excellent little radios for $55.
The instruction manual has some good reminders of how to properly solder, including pictures and if you have built a few kits before you should be fine. The key to building any kit is to be well organized and to take your time and ensure that you have the right component in the right hole before you solder it in.
I wouldn't hesitate to recommend the SW+ series and Dave is a great guy to deal with.
Cheers,
Michael VE3WMB / VA2NB
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: LINUX FOR HAMS
|
on: April 05, 2011, 04:39:15 PM
|
I use fldigi on a Acer Aspire One netbook running Ubuntu Netbook Remix and it works well for digimodes. I also use WINE to run the N3FJP Windows Logging programs and they run fine. Actually I have even run Digipan V2.0 on this machine under WINE and it works fine with the exception of setting the audio levels (no windows mixer on Linux ;-) but I was using a SignalLink USB with physical TX and RX gain controls so it didn't matter. Michael VE3WMB HELLO FELLOW HAMS I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SOME POINTERS ON HAM SOFTWARE FOR LINUX ANY LUCK WITH WINE HQ OR HOW DO YOU DO IT I DO MOSTLY DIGITAL BUT WILL LIKE TO EXPAND TO SSB THANKS
pRESTON
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Standard Iambic Convention
|
on: April 05, 2011, 04:05:08 PM
|
The convention is "thumb" is DIT and finger is DAH, regardless of which hand you send with. So for a right-handed person the left paddle is DIT and the right paddle DAH. This is reversed for a lefty but many left-handed people just learn to send with a right-handed paddle. Fortunately these days most keyers allow you to switch the paddle sense via a command. When wiring the paddle using a stereo plug, the DIT paddle is connected to the TIP, the DAH paddle is connected to the RING and the ground is connected to the shield of the plug. Michael VE3WMB / VA2NB Hi all: I am building an iambic paddle and want to make it standard as I haven't operated with an iambic paddle before.
Which side is the dot and which is the dash? (i.e. left paddle, right paddle)
Thanks in advance.
73 de W2DAB - David in NYC
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Copy CW in your head
|
on: April 02, 2011, 08:09:02 PM
|
When I started to head copy what worked to help me visualize was to close my eyes and print the character on the palm of my other hand using my finger. It didn't take me too long to make the transition from that to just visualizing in my head. The hardest part about developing the ability to head copy is to "let go" when you hear something that just doesn't register. Once it starts to "click" it is an interesting feeling .. a bit like reading a good book, where you can get so into the story that you are not even consciously aware of reading the words, the ideas just sort of appear in your head. Also I suggest slowing down a bit so that you are in your comfort zone at first, but just like learning to hand-copy code you want to push the speed beyond your comfort zone to improve. Best of luck ... Michael VE3WMB What is the easiest way to learn to copy CW in your head? I've have always copied by writing every thing down. I progressed to the point where I could copy 20 wpm 100% and get one minute solid copy at 25 wpm. I can recognize "the" "ing" and "ion" as sounds instead of individual character.
Most of my code practice has been copying W1AW so "the" "ing" and "ion" do not happen in QSOs. (I'll never mispell amateur. It is a real common word in practice texts. )
I've tried shutting my eyes and attempt to visualize the characters like a scrolling Broadway sign but it didn't work for me.
Can anyone offer advice on how to copy in your head? 73 de Lynn WB0U
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
eHam Forums / CW / RE: Best CW Filter for FT897D?
|
on: March 19, 2011, 07:34:29 AM
|
I agree with STAYVERTICAL. The 500 hz mechanical filter is the best place to start (either the Yaesu (Collins) or INRAD). If you go with the 300hz filter you will likely find that it is a bit too narrow to have engaged while tuning around. You can always add the 300 hz filter as the second filter later on if you feel that you really need it. Likely part of your dissatisfaction with just the audio DSP filtering in the FT897D is that even though the DSP audio filtering may filter out the audio of of interfering stations, those stations are still within the passband of your 2.8 KHZ IF filter and thus they will have an impact on the AGC, causing it to pump. No doubt you have experienced this. Usually you will hear a bit of a thump and the station you are trying to copy drops out because the rig is responding to the overload caused by the stronger interfering signal, thus drastically reducing the receiver gain. Personally I find that the FT897D with the 500hz Collins filter + the DBF feature of the built-in DSP audio filter works pretty well for CW operation. If you find that the DSP filtering is too narrow for your liking I believe that the bandwidth can be varied by one of the internal menu settings so you might want to experiment with this once you have a narrower IF filter installed. Best of luck Michael VE3WMB / VA2NB I have an FT897D and fitted the 500hz Yaesu filter (which is actually a Collins mechanical filter). I chose the 500hz filter over the 300hz because 500hz is a commonly used digital modes bandwidth and it is not far from 300hz in any case. Very easy to install (just take off the top cover and plug in the filter onto pins already fitted - no soldering required). The FT897D has two places for optional filters, so if you really want, you could fit both a 300hz and 500hz filter if desired. I have the second slot populated with a 2.3khz Yaesu mechanical filter, but would not say it is really worth fitting. A second filter of 300hz would be my choice if I had to do it over.
I use the DSP setting "DBF" which gives a CW peaking filter and personally find it very useful and easy on the ears, but that may just be my preference. Using the 500hz filter and the DBF DSP setting makes for a pretty good CW environment.
73s
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
eHam Forums / Antenna Restrictions / RE: Antenna for portable work (near sea coastline)
|
on: March 10, 2011, 08:05:39 AM
|
It is hard to beat an 88 ft doublet, center-fed with open-wire line, ladderline or even TV Twin lead to an autotuner. This is an Extended Double Zepp for 20m and will yield gain of about 9 dBi broadside on 20m. You mention that the QTH is rocky so you want to stay away from vertical polarization. You will want to put the antenna up as a flattop at least 1/2 wavelength (on 20m) if you want the gain and a low radiation angle. Using an inverted vee will make the pattern more omni-directional and will kill the added gain. This antenna should match from 80m through to 10m with a decent auto-tuner. http://www.tomochka.com/na7u/doublet/w4rnlbackup.htmlIf you can take advantage of sloping terrain and a clear shot at the ocean, putting the antenna part-way down the hill (as opposed to at the top) will further enhance the signals in the direction opposite to the hillside. Michael VE3WMB P.S. If you do manage to operate from the beach near the waterline then be sure to use a vertical.
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
eHam Forums / Antenna Restrictions / RE: Hustler 4-BTV versus Inverted V
|
on: March 10, 2011, 07:29:46 AM
|
|
The 4BTV is extremely good value for the money. It is well made antenna constructed with good materials and will stand up to a lot of abuse. There are also a couple of very simple mods to add 12m and 17m coverage (small gauge wires running more or less parallel to the vertical and connected to the base .. virtually invisible). Put down as many radials as you can, as long as practical. You can always experiment with small gauge wire antennas if in the future you want to get on 30m or 80m. There are lots of options for HOA-friendly attic loops, dipoles etc that can give you coverage of the "missing bands".
Good luck
Michael VE3WMB - A happy 4BTV owner !
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
eHam Forums / QRP / RE: SW40+
|
on: March 08, 2011, 08:10:19 PM
|
|
I think that the SW+-series is still one of the best values in Ham Radio today. For $55 you get a real radio!
I added both a Freq-Mite and a K1EL K12 keyer to my SW-40+ and it makes an excellent little mono-band portable rig. At ~2W out on CW a lot of contacts can be had with a simple low dipole on 40m.
I wish you many hours of enjoyment with your SW40+.
Cheers,
Michael VE3WMB
P.S. BTW there is a yahoo group dedicated to these rigs ( SWkits) and I believe that Ten Tec used to supply the custom enclosures for SWL. According to someone in the SWkits group it is the Ten Tec TG-24 (or alternately TPB-19) that SWL used. You can purchase these directly from Ten Tec, but you will have to drill the holes and supply your own labelling.
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
eHam Forums / QRP / RE: Need Help: Adjusting OHR Explorer II (40 mtrs) Frequency Range
|
on: March 07, 2011, 08:17:12 AM
|
I forgot to note that you should also be able to shift the 70 Khz "tuning window" by adding the appropriate amount of offset to the frequencies used during the alignment. For instance if you wanted to cover the SKCC and Fists frequencies and still keep coverage from 7.100 MHZ to 7.120 Mhz (slower code window) you could use 2135 KHZ (2085 + 50 Khz) to start tuning at 7.050 MHZ and 2205 Khz (2135 + 70 KHZ) to end tuning at 7.120 MHZ (I hope I did the math right ! ). You would need to do some mental math to figure out what your frequency is based on the dial pointer location but installing a Small Wonder Labs Freq-Mite to give you an audible frequency readout could also be an option. Michael VE3WMB P.S. I have both the 30m and 40m Explorer IIs and they are nice little rigs .. simple but very fun to operate and the RX on both is surprisingly good. I am assuming that you don't have the manual, as the procedure is documented on P14 (Alignment) in last step on the page? The assumption in the manual is that you will either setup the rig so that when the tuning dial is at the "0" position, the rig is either on 7.000 MHZ or 7.100 MHZ. Note that you only get 70 Khz of band coverage with this rig.
In a nutshell the procedure is :
Attach a 10:1 frequency counter probe to the bare lead of R42. Connect and turn on the rig and the frequency counter, wait 30 minutes for everything to warm up.
1) Set the main tuning dial to "0". Adjust L9 for a frequency of 2085 Khz (if you want the rig to start tuning at 7.000 MHZ). Set the tuning dial to 70 and adjust C62 for a frequency of 2155 Khz (i.e. 2085 + 70 Khz).
2) Keep repeating step 1 (i.e. going back and forth between "0" and "70" on the dial and adjusting L9 and C62, until you have exactly 70 Khz of coverage.
If you need the two pages from the manual on Alignment I can probably scan them and send you a .PDF.
Michael VE3WMB
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|