Call Search
     

New to Ham Radio?
My Profile

Community
Articles
Forums
News
Reviews
Friends Remembered
Strays
Survey Question

Operating
Contesting
DX Cluster Spots
Propagation

Resources
Calendar
Classifieds
Ham Exams
Ham Links
List Archives
News Articles
Product Reviews
QSL Managers

Site Info
eHam Help (FAQ)
Support the site
The eHam Team
Advertising Info
Vision Statement
About eHam.net



QSL Managers
     

Ham Links
     


  Home Help Search  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 Next
1  eHam Forums / Company Reviews / RE: R&L ELECTRONICS "RIP OFF" on: May 14, 2013, 03:43:26 PM
No way of knowing but my wager would be that R&L probably sells more over the phone than walk in traffic. Just something to consider. I have always been pleased with the service I've received from them.
2  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Which Icom 756 Series to Choose ? on: August 19, 2012, 01:02:06 PM
I think you may have it wrong. It was not the color screen models with display issues! I believe it was the original 756 (not a pro) with the monochrome display that was the problem. It would start with lines in the display and then ultimately go out. I believe that all of the pro series (pro, pro II and pro III) were safe from any display issues. Great rigs.

The PRO or PROII would be a big improvement, if you look at Rob Sherwood's receiver tests (www.sherweng.com).  The band scope is also much more sensitive on the PRO models, and you get a built in voice keyer as well, not the mention all of the filter options. If you look around, you should be able to find a PRO for $900 or so, or a PROII for $1200. THose are both great deals.

John AF5CC

One of the color pro models was notorious for losing the color display, and the only replacement was a European company's that was like $300. If you do not need the band scope, Sherwood just tested the Yaesu FT-950, and it appears to be better than either the pro II or pro III.

The advantage is you can get a new radio for $1,400. The disadvantage is that you have to learn a new radio.

I h
3  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Building a 10m Quad - which wire is best? on: October 15, 2011, 06:26:04 AM
I have a 6 band (6 thru 20 meters) Lightning Bolt 2 element Quad.
It uses as I recall electric fence wire. It has been up for about 7 or so years now. It is still shiny.
It may be a particular kind. It is a single strand.
It is a bit stiff and does not like being bent back and forth much as it can break. You don't want to
put a kink in it as then it can break easier after straightening it out.
None the less, it works just fine and I have never had any problems with it.
I suspect it is fairly inexpensive.

I agree with this post. I also use electric fence wire for my quad. I recall about 14.00 for 1/4 mile spool. 1300 feet of wire for 14.00. Can't be beat. Purists will have a coronary but it works well. I have a tilt over antenna so if I should run into a problem, it's easy to restring. So far it's been up for 4 years with no broken wire. Now the ice storm last year broke a spreader but the wire held it all!!!! Cheap is for me (and if it works good, so much better).....
4  eHam Forums / Company Reviews / RE: Ham Store Websites are Terrible on: September 02, 2011, 10:58:35 AM
For what most of the online retailers charge for shipping, you would think they could hire better web designers!!!!

I.E. check out shipping costs for a "sma adapter" from HamCity......
5  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Icom 718 tuner function on: April 07, 2011, 01:41:05 PM
Sure it works. Add on on the ten-a-tuner or like circuits to the rear plug and it will make your rig think any autotuner is connected and put out approx a 10 watt signal. Just like you want.
6  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: What radio to buy....what to buy at Dayton on: April 06, 2011, 01:55:01 PM
The limitation you have in your current set up isn't the transceiver, it is the antenna. While you might not have as much room as you would like, replacing the antenna with a 6BTV, and a few radials, would be like adding an amplifier. And, you'd get an equivalent increase in receive too.

I agree with this post. Your limitations won't be the radio. Any of the ones mentioned will work just fine. I would be more concerned with antenna improvement. That would make a huge difference in your enjoyment.
7  eHam Forums / Company Reviews / RE: Radio Mart (EBay) on: January 18, 2011, 05:54:01 PM
So are you guys saying this is how the deal would go:

Here is the one you bid on:

http://cgi.ebay.com/Icom-IC-R71A-Receiver-EXCEPTIONAL-Working-Condition-/230574020986?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item35af48597a


Here Is the one you receive:

http://cgi.ebay.com/Icom-IC-R71A-Communications-Receiver-parts-/180611841276?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2a0d4dfcfc

Ouch.......
8  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Internal vs external antenna tuner on: January 04, 2011, 07:37:44 AM
The following is quoted from this website: 

http://www.skysdaughter.com/icom746-faq/

Quote:

Q:3.2.6   Can I use the internal ATU along with an external ATU?

   Maybe.   Theory says yes, but Icom says no.  The results
   are mixed.  Use at your own risk.

   Many people use an external ATU along with their IC-746.
   Usually, they leave the external ATU switched to "bypass"
   and let the internal ATU do its thing.   For troublesome
   bands/antennas, they turn off the internal ATU and
   engage the external one.

   Others use an external ATU to match their antenna to
   the middle of the desired band and let the internal ATU
   handle the rest.  In theory, the ATU doesn't know or
   care what's hooked up to it; it simply tries to match
   up to the impedance it sees.

   In most cases, either of the above approaches work fine.
   Many hams have been applying both for years with no
   problems.

   However, some IC-746's have had their ATUs go out from
   fried detector diodes and driver transistors.  On many
   repairs, Icom has blamed the failure upon external
   tuners.  One ham was told that external tuners can
   cause problems even when they are switched to "bypass".

   Nobody has been able to adequately explain why an
   external tuner would cause such damage, particularly
   when bypassed.  Some speculate that tuning with low
   power is safer than tuning with high power (if nothing
   else, its at least more polite).

   We need more information on this, but at least you've
   been warned.

   The best procedure we can suggest at this point is:

   *  Turn off the internal ATU.

   *  Reduce power to about 1/4 (25w).

   *  Adjust the external ATU using the rig's SWR meter.
      (The two meters usually disagree.  It is what the
      rig sees that is important.)

   *  Restore full power.

   *  Turn on the internal ATU.

   Do not adjust the external ATU at full power.

   Do not adjust the external ATU while the ATU is on.

   Do not change frequency while the ATU is searching for
   a match.

------------------------------

Unquote

Now some agree with this and some do not. In laymans term, the interaction between the components with high voltages present could possible damage the smaller/lesser components of the internal tuner. It's up to you to make your own decision.

I do not think it's worth taking the chance.....I have seen too many fried internal tuners.
9  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Echo Link on: January 03, 2011, 09:21:12 AM
Well Layne, do you have a ham license?Huh
If so, all you really need is a computer to get on E/L.
10  eHam Forums / QRP / RE: What is real "QRP"? on: December 31, 2010, 06:51:55 AM
Quote from: WX7G
The term QRP is defined where it counts and that is contests and awards.

Not everyone shares your limited view of ham radio.

/quote]

Most would!  Grin
11  eHam Forums / Company Reviews / RE: Radio Mart (EBay) on: December 29, 2010, 12:17:14 PM
Personally I've never purchased anything from Radio Mart. After reading thru the few years I've been a ham, I was always afraid too.....Just too many stories for their not to be any truth to any of it. Never saw any rebuttal from him until on here recently. He certainly put up a good case and as he stated: threw down the gauntlet. Well I would say a couple of gents have kicked it right back into his driveway..........

Sure looks incriminating...... Smiley
12  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Any common problems with the Ic 718? on: December 28, 2010, 07:07:29 PM
Any chance that rig ever had the golden screwdriver inside?Huh
13  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Explain the "de" prefix please. on: December 03, 2010, 07:06:54 PM
Not sure if they still use it but the military did use the prosign "de" in message formatting. Just like everone said, it means "from" or "this is" In telecom messages the message line would have the prosign "de" and then the routing indicator of the sender.

It also was used on rtty circuits once again indicating "this is" or "from"

Right out of ACP127........
14  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: banned radios? on: November 18, 2010, 06:15:59 AM
I mean no offense to the poster but what I find sad is that here is an individual who has been licensed for at least five years but yet has to ask such questions on a website. Where are his elmers or other local hams. I know it's easy to just ask online, but someone with a license for five years sure should be able to do a little research; either on his/her own or with other hams. Anyone should be able to look at the band plan and figure out what is allowed.
15  eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: usb to serial problem on: October 07, 2010, 08:06:33 PM
You're experiencing a common issue. I would suggest you try some different usb/serial converters. They are not all the same.

Precisely the reason I keep an old computer around with serial port. I wish computers would either have a serial port or more rigs should have usb.

Good luck.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11 Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!