|
|
|
241
|
eHam Forums / Antennas and Towers and more / RE: Bent antenna
|
on: January 22, 2012, 03:43:34 PM
|
|
If the antenna is 5" shorter than it originally was, you will have high SWR problems. It may seem to transmit and receive OK, but, it won't be. And eventually, you will have problems with the finals in your radio. If you have an SWR meter for VHF, you should check your antenna. The best bet is to replace it if you can. james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
eHam Forums / Amplifiers / RE: RM Italy has competition!
|
on: January 08, 2012, 05:44:05 PM
|
|
And it looks like they have a distributor in Dallas, Tx too. Maybe they'll be at HAMCOM this year. I'm betting those amps will be pretty expensive. Maybe not as expensive as some, but, from the specs, along with a built-in autotuner, they certainly won't be cheap. james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / RE: 706 vs 480
|
on: January 08, 2012, 05:33:52 PM
|
Wow--thank you, Alan and James! That's the sort of hands-on insight that makes eham so helpful! It doesn't make it that much easier to decide. :-) But it's very helpful to know what you two think. :-)
The new battery may be next weekend ... and the guys who install them often seem puzzled by the 8-ga red/black pair running from the battery through the firewall. :-) I often find it helpful to tell the installer just to leave the radio wires hanging. So I'll think more about it this week, and by Saturday I'll know what to do.
The TS-480 seems nice, but I'm VERY used to the 706 in the car. I'll decide RSN. :-) One thing I did this afternoon was to set up a resonator/whip for 40 meters from the car. I've never worked 40 mobile, and I've never used 40 much, either, but since 20-15 often aren't open when I'm headed to work in the morning, I thought I might give 40 a shot this week :-)
Thanks! --ken ac4rd
40 meters mobile can be lots of fun day or night. I've worked DX at night on 40 while mobile and regional during the day. There is a bunch of guys (some are truckers or retired truckers) that show up on 7.195 during the day that are very laid back and enjoyable to talk to. One guy runs a Flex 3000 from home. If you get a chance to talk to him(W5QI), ask him to give you a signal report. He'll record your audio with the Flex and play it back to you. That really gives you some idea of what others hear. I listen to 40 meters during the day (mostly 7.195) and occasionally go up to 17 meters as well. Sitting in line at a rock crusher waiting to get loaded can be boring. Talking to friends on 40 or working DX on 17 makes the time go by much better! Hope to talk to you on 40 meters sometime! james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
244
|
eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / RE: 706 vs 480
|
on: January 08, 2012, 11:11:08 AM
|
|
I have both the 706 (MKIIG) and the TS-480SAT. The 706 lives in my Dodge pickup. And the 480SAT is in a 2007 Kenworth (day cab) diesel rig. Both are fine radios and I would be hard pressed if I had to decide on taking the 706 out of my pickup. I will say this, the 706's Noise Blanker is not as good as the one in the 480SAT. Since my pickup is an older diesel model with the mechanical fuel injector system,that is not an issue. Of course, if someone drives by me with a noisy ignition system, I can hear it. Even with the noise blanker on. But, everyone I talk to with the 706 comments on the voice quality from the transmitted audio. (using the stock mic) And it is an easy radio to use. The 480SAT in the Kenworth is a great radio too. I like it's filtering and Noise Blanker as well. The fuel injection system in the truck (Caterpillar engine) is electronic and VERY noisy. The Noise Blanker works pretty good compared to the one in the 706. (I have an ICOM 7000 as well, that is better than both radios as far as handling noise issues, just cannot bring myself to put it in a rock truck!!!) The main thing I like about the 480SAT other than the noise handling & filtering, is the HUGE display!! I can see it clearly in any lighting situation. The 706 and the 7000 cannot top it. (well, I guess, I could put a remote video display in the truck for the 7000 but, that would be too much of a distraction) And the most used functions while mobile are easy to use (buttons) without having to look at the display and away from driving. (I try not to make changes while driving anyway......too dangerous) The only real downside for the 480SAT, is the fact that the microphone can only be connected to the body of the radio and not the remote head. Depending on where you mount the body, that may or may not be an issue. If you can easily switch out radios, I'd give the 480 a run in the mobile. It is a fun radio and it too has great audio. And you can adjust the output audio quite a bit too. Either way, you cannot go wrong with either rig. Since you have both, I'd say give it a try! james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: Is 14.313 the proverbial diaper of ham radio? LOL
|
on: December 30, 2011, 08:52:48 PM
|
My point is that I am happy with my current hf/vhf/uhf privileges were I know people and they are SANE. Why bother to upgrade when all that BS is going on. If I want to hear that I can always tune to 11 meters (which doesn't seem quite as bad to me). And theres always the FREEBAND!, where the operators are polite and friendly. Makes sense to me...
I can understand being happy with your current privileges and if that is enough for you then that is great. But, again, you are letting a "minority" of troublemakers, keep you from enjoying more privileges and chances to meet new and interesting people, simply because of a few misguided individuals. The so-called BS that is going on, is not as widespread and you make it sound. Far from it. As for the 11 meter comment, if you think what goes on there is not as bad as 14.313, then you must have antenna problems. And are not hearing anything. I can guarantee you that there is no difference between the two. And in fact, at least two of the people on 14.313 are also troublemakers on 36LSB on CB. And FREEBAND being nice and polite? I've listened in on a few of those conversations and it's not much different than CB. (or some ham op's as well) There are good and bad individuals in both, Amateur Radio and CB. That's just a fact of life. But, to let any of it keep you from upgrading in order to gain more operating privileges, makes no sense at all. You are missing out on so much more than you can imagine. But, again, if you are happy where you are at, then stay at that point. james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: Is 14.313 the proverbial diaper of ham radio? LOL
|
on: December 26, 2011, 09:38:48 AM
|
I've listened to this frequency occasionally over the last year, as my licence class does not permit me to transmit. Not very appealing to me. No urgency in upgrading at this point.
Why would something that goes on , on 14.313 (or several other well know frequencies) prevent you from wanting to upgrade?? There are idiots in every group and Amateur Radio is no exception. Why keep yourself from enjoying more privileges on HF because of a few bad apples? That makes no sense at all. There is a ton of other frequencies and modes that you can have available to you with an upgrade. Don't let what you hear a FEW people doing, cause you not to take advantage of what can be available to you with a simple written test and upgrade in license. Amateur Radio is FUN, just pass over the idiots and have some fun of your own. james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
247
|
eHam Forums / Mobile Ham / RE: What's your longest mobile contact?
|
on: December 25, 2011, 05:02:09 PM
|
A few days ago I had a good QSO with KP4BI (Puerto Rico) which is 10,000 miles+ from my location in Thailand. This was with my MFJ 20 meter band rig and about 100 watts output from my linear into a Hustler resonator on my car roof. This was working the grey line. But perhaps the fact that I had parked my car only 5 meters from the Indian Ocean would certainly have helped  Simon Now, that's a good one! Puerto Rico is fairly easy for me. But, I have not worked Thailand yet. Maybe one of these days!! james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
eHam Forums / Misc / RE: Flex 1500
|
on: December 22, 2011, 04:21:10 PM
|
|
Don't forget the computer! Well, being an over the road driver and a ham etc. I'm betting you already have a laptop! The Flex 1500 is a good 5 watt qrp rig. I use one here at home and it is fun. It's not a pileup buster, but, does surprisingly well. I drive a rock truck locally and use a Kenwood TS-480SAT for HF. Of course, I have it hooked up to the battery. (my boss is fairly lenient when it comes to radios. (CB and Ham gear) If you are limited to qrp, there are other choices that don't require a computer to use them. Elecraft, ICOM both offer rigs that run 5 watts or less and put no strain on the battery system. If you haven't experienced qrp, it may or may not, be fun. There WILL be times that you can hear a station just fine that cannot quite hear you. Maybe, you can talk your boss into letting you run a rig with a bit more power. Good luck. james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Brand New Shack Setup: please advice.
|
on: December 20, 2011, 05:43:15 PM
|
|
Don't know why people think the 7000 runs hot. The entire case is a heatsink and having used mine for extended periods of time, it never gets so hot I cannot touch it. And the Temp display on screen never gets into the red. It might get that hot if used for extended periods in digital modes. Overall, the 7000 is a great rig for the price and for the features it has. Most of the things you need to operate the rig have buttons on the front and are easy to use. The rest are mostly set & forget. james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: No dealers prices on top transceivers?
|
on: December 16, 2011, 01:51:31 PM
|
|
Probably because their ads are submitted sometimes months in advance. And if they want to run a sale, they don't want their competition to have a leg up on them. Of course, their competition can just call and find out current prices as easy as anyone else. But, My guess is that is one of the major reasons. And it gets you to call them and listen to a salesman. It kind of bugs me too, but, I can see their point in a way. james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
252
|
eHam Forums / Company Reviews / RE: N2VZ of Turbo Tuner Rip Off
|
on: December 06, 2011, 03:06:45 PM
|
|
Not making excuses, but I believe something has happened to Bill. I have two of his turbo tuners and one works and another does not. He helped me (by phone on his dime) to try and get the non-working Turbo Tuner working. It never quite made it. But, I did not buy them from him (bought used from other hams) and did not, and do not expect him to do any kind of warranty work. I think the best thing to do is, if your Turbo Tuner is out of warranty, is to try to find someone who can fix it. Or go to another solution. If it still is in warranty, contacting the Better Business Bureau and filing a complaint with the state attorney general is about your only recourse. Sad that it has come to this, as it leaves only one manufacturer out there that offers these type of controllers. And they are limited to the ICOM 7000 as far as complete control. Maybe, they will offer controllers for other brands of radios in the future. james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
253
|
eHam Forums / Boat Anchors / RE: Value of restored antique equipment
|
on: December 06, 2011, 02:56:06 PM
|
|
I have an SX-100 that looks better than new and works great. The person that restored did a magnificent job of restoration. Including recapping and a paint job, while the right colors, it looks better than the first SX-100 I owned some 40 years ago. And the inside is polished to a shine that is probably nothing like what came off the factory assembly line. Is it original? I doubt it, from what I have seen growing up and years later. But, I will say this, I wouldn't sell it for 10X what I paid for it. ($250) james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
eHam Forums / Elmers / RE: Inheriting some radios. What should I expect?
|
on: November 27, 2011, 04:03:17 PM
|
|
I believe that I would put that code practice oscillator in a special place just to remember your grandfather. The radios, while out of date, can be fun, if working. If you know which one might have been his favorite, keep it and enjoy it. None of them have any great monetary value, but, as a way to remember your grandfather and all he taught you, some could be priceless. Sorry for your loss, hope you have plenty of good memories of your grandfather. (I know I have many of mine) james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
255
|
eHam Forums / SWL (Shortwave Listening) / RE: What was your first shortwave radio?
|
on: November 16, 2011, 07:27:02 PM
|
|
My first "real" shortwave radio was a Hallicrafters SX-96 that I paid $25 for from a TV shop that I worked part time in. The radio had to be repaired, and I also had to clean out the storeroom in the back of the shop as part of the deal. In this part of Texas we have a monthly flea market called "First Monday". When I cleaned out the storeroom, I got to haul off all the old tv's, radios and small appliances. I repaired as many of those as I could and sold them at First Monday and more than made back what I paid for the SX-96. This was in 1966. If I could go back and get some of the old tv's and radios that I sold or ended up dumping, I could have a LOT of money now. Several I remember are collector items now. At some point in time the SX-96 got traded or sold, don't remember which(getting old is a PIA sometimes). And eventually, after my first son was born, I got another Hallicrafters receiver, an SX-100. Also, got a Heathkit DX-60 transmitter and some other gear for RTTY reception. I got my Novice License then too. But, at some point (probably to raise money for bills) the SX-100 went away. Recently, I was at the Belton Texas Hamfest (is held twice a year) and found an SX-100b, that had been fully restored and looks better than new! And works great. That one, is not getting away from me. (might even be buried with me when the time comes.) james WD5GWY
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|